Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Where are the inventors in the courts. When is there case to be heard?
Just what happened today? All I see is the word “Judgment “ in the last court posting its not saying for whom. Have read today’s postings and couldn’t see why pps dropped as it did. Again all the courts posting said was “judgement “ for whom? Data is saying keep tuned in.
Chen will give consideration to how the patient was written and the laws in place at that time…. This is where he has power/justification to take that into consideration…. After all that’s why he is given the power to make a ruling.
it's been so long since I've added to the Long term library. Was going to add todays hearing. Anyone?
pennystock_es Tuesday, 03/08/22 10:00:25 AM
Re: None 0
Post #
43954
of 43996
FOLLOW THE TRIAL OF $WDDD vs $ATVI LIVE HERE
$WDDD. v. $ATVI Activision Blizzard Inc U.S. $MSFT Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Live Stream Courtroom 201 https://t.co/TOJNo0BRf1 a través de @YouTube
— PennyStock.es (@PennyStock_es) March 8, 2022
Thinks someone asked for this?
The Federal Circuit scorecard shows that Judge Moore has tied Judge Hughes with most Section 101 decisions (27). However, Judge Moore has found patent eligible subject matter in three cases (Thales, Enfish, CellzDirect), whereas Judge Hughes hasn’t seen an eligible patent since Enfish (which he authored). As the scorecard reflects, judges Dyk and Lourie, with 18 opportunities each, have not seen eligible subject either. Such bad luck! The Federal Circui
?
t scorecard reflects the behavior of individual judges on the Federal Circuit. But what about pairs of judges? How do the various pairs of judges vote when they appear on a panel together? Are there pairs of judges who always go one way or the other? Does any judge appear to “influence” the others? To answer this question, I looked at every pair of judges in every Federal Circuit 101 decision: a panel with three judges has three pairs. I tabulated the occurrences of eligible and ineligible outcomes for all pairs. Here’s what I found:
[color=red]Theres a chart that will not copy & paste here[color=red]
Each cell corresponds to a pair of Federal Circuit judges, identified by the row and column names. Each cell shows a ratio “X / Y,” where X is the number of eligible decisions made by the pair, and Y is the number ineligible decisions. A blank space means that the two judges have not appeared together on a panel for a § 101 decision. The color coding shows the direction of the pair: green is a significant ratio of the number of eligible outcomes to ineligible outcomes (X>Y), and red is a significant ratio of the number ineligible outcomes to eligible ones (X<Y) ). We see that judges Wallach and Hughes have been on nine panels together (more than any other pair of judges) and in every case have found the patents ineligible. Similarly, judges Prost and Wallach have shared a panel seven times and again have never found patent eligible subject matter. What makes this interesting is that Wallach has voted for eligible subject three times, including in a business methods case, Trading Technologies. Is there something that happens when Wallach joins up with Prost or Hughes that the panel turns decidedly ineligible? Some may suggest that if you show up to your Federal Circuit oral argument and one of these pairs is on the bench, you could very well decide to waive the argument and ask the panel to issue a decision on the briefs; if they agree, you’ll get an early lunch and save your client some money. Consider that a “win.” On the other side of the spectrum, we have judges Newman and O’Malley, with two out of three decisions (Trading Technologies, BASCOM) finding eligible subject matter—the most of any pair of judges. Definitely stay for oral argument. Who is the judge who appears—at least in the data—to most “influence” her or his peers toward an eligible outcome? The cells on the diagonal show the ratio of eligible to ineligible pair outcomes. Judge Newman has the highest score here (0.1852), followed by Judge Stoll (0.1765). From a first glance at the table it would seem that Judge Stoll has the most impact: looking across her row, we see a series of eligible outcomes with judges Moore, Taranto, Reyna, Wallach and Prost. So numerically she appears in more eligible pairs (6) than Judge Newman (5). But Judge Stoll also appears in more ineligible pairs (28) than Judge Newman (22), and so Judge Newman’s overall percentage of eligible pairs is higher. Either way, for patentees, it’s a good sign if you have Judge Newman or Stoll on your panel. TC Heartland and Patent Eligibility: Be Careful What You Wish For… The most important patent decision of late is TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands, where the Supreme Court continues its streak of decisions reversing a patent law doctrine that it previously left to the lower courts to develop. The decision has been greeted with cheers from the patent defense bar, as it likely means the end of the Eastern District of Texas as the forum of choice for some patentees. But perhaps this is not such a bad thing when it comes to patent eligibility. In TC Heartland, the Supreme Court ruled that “residence” in venue statute 28 U.S.C. 1400(b) means, with respect to corporations, the place of incorporation. For most corporate patent defendants, that means Delaware. The upshot is that many commentators expect a shift in patent litigation filings from E.D. Texas to Delaware. But rather than bemoan this outcome, patentees may find it to their overall advantage in surviving a Section 101 motion. While E.D. Texas has a reputation of being pro-patent owner, its record on Section 101 motions reveals a trend to the contrary, one that I noted in my last blog. There I showed that E.D. Texas had the largest increase in the percentage of Section 101 motions granted over the last two quarters relative to the period since Alice:
Correct! Chen has language morphing over 27 years to justify a favorable decision. After all it’s been the courts that have dragged this out for the most part.
Hugh’s will be able to convince Chen. Chen is one of the more knowledgeable tech judges. If he can Be convinced that technological language and expression have morfted since 1995 I think he’ll come around & include same in his writing.
Specificity has not been an issue. What was said about #4 ( clarity) need not to have been repeated as it was stated in #1. Chen will pick up on that.
Wrong….a sell off after this hearing is directly proportional to the lack of understanding of all the moving parts of this case and the participants…. Let it sell off a bit more and get a better bargain. This is the opportunity.
I think we have a win.
She is a piece of work
That’s the dream team.
Cherry. As a fistie 20 year old I told an uncle of mine I was going to make a million by the time I was 30. Well that didn’t happen. Perhaps that has been achieved over my life time but like most that went into the cost of just living. Would like to see it happen just to be half correct. .50 cents won’t make that happen but I would not reject it. He was a good guy and would have loved to have seen that. Pctl has a product that is very valuable in many areas. Perhaps if pctl was bought it could be framed so that oil/gas would be a separate sale and pctl could continue in th other areas of application ( agg, medical, schools,hospitality ect. Now, that would be a win win. Pctl could continue ( with funding) to make inroads in the other verticals w/o infringing. A buyout by an o/g company would provide $$$$ for development in the other verticals which in turn could be developed at a faster pace.
The more I read in the The Journal of Petroleum Technology, the Society of Petroleum Engineers’ flagship Publication the more I become convinced there will be a buyout of the price is right. That or a hostile takeover.
https://jpt.spe.org/patent-pending-rigless-chemical-process-enhances-oil-and-gas-production-in-eagle-ford
Must weed through that site. Maybe google jot.spe.org to see what they do.
Buyout pps I think at least $1.00/share however don’t think we will get that as another company I’ve reviewed has a much higher valuation. Perhaps our methods will prove to be more advantageous/ profitable but we need much documentation to prove so.
Not Sims as CEO. He is a motivator, a marketer (is pres. of a multi level marketing/ investing (?) or promotion firm. His value to pctl is putting a group of heavy hitters together to make investments as he did when pctl received the 2.250m. He needs to concentrate on promotion. I think the mention of being a co ceo was hype nothing more.
That should be stickied.
Tatiana has hired WhyMedia ,a marketing firm who also serves an oil & gas company. Take a look at the company’s they serve. A no joke marketing firm. Reassuring. Plus one of their clients is a oil & gas company. We should be able to get them to check out our products.
http://www.uogplc.com/
Suggest when reading articles, keep a record & contact the author and provide information that would entice to check out what pctl has to offer . This will assist the company greatly.
Thanks for the link…I’ll be reading it
Link to that independent lab ? Would like to see that report and see what the basis of their report.
Pctl,s products are the compromise between jo manchon’s point of view and the no drill at all .
We will still need oil for the next 15 year’s…. Will reduce the cost to produce ( better price at the gas pumps). Rely less on imported oil.
Here’s where we all can help the company… contact congress
Way to go Mugs……. Folks,I don’t think understand there are many things we, the 600 +- who follow & are invested in pctl can have a significant impact on the company. Just by doing what you are doing can do much research in areas where it would save the company much time. We do this type of research it provides the company with a great deal of information allowing pctl personal to concentrate on what they do best, tasks we can’t do. What can we do?
1.public private grant research
2.lobby… congressional awareness in our districts benefits pctl process/ products
3.Contact oil drillers/ large-small by bringing them awareness… giving pctl exposure saving pctl time and money
4. Any hospital contacts one may have give those contacts basic information and how to get more
information , all pertinent contact information. Like Ace or specific hospital’s using pctl products.
5. Local schools…. Give them the information and pctl website… present as a effective cost efficient decontamiator.
Again, good post. If more of us did what we’re doing ( even just one contact per day)
Me 4…..but I’ll have to file….not:)
Have not heard from quilt….
The PR could have been much better….. good news is the full paper on the tests will still come out. So it’s best to just wait for it.
Tigard needs to be contacted and informed about pctl. That’s how the word will get out.
Excellent post. Hope DE can figure out how each method would cost per barrel & compare to our method.
Check out
https://netl.doe.gov/business/solicitations
https://eere-exchange.energy.gov/Manuals.aspx
This is where pctl come in such demand.
https://www.denverpost.com/2022/02/07/pfas-forever-chemicals-fracking-oil-gas-colorado/
Anyone know if ACE has an exclusive territory?
Here is another cleaning company in NYC
https://4starcleaning.com/
This is a place that pctl might beable to get funding..
https://netl.doe.gov/oil-gas/oil-recovery
TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIPS
As much as two-thirds of conventional crude oil in domestic
fields remains unproduced, left behind due to the physics of
fluid flow that results in oil adhering to matrices in underground
formations. CO2
EOR enhances sweep efficiency, or the ability
to flush the oil droplets off the formation matrices, thereby
enhancing production. The technology is also applicable to
hydrocarbons in unconventional rocks or in formations that
have unconventional characteristics (such as oil in fractured
shales, kerogen in oil shale, or bitumen in tar sands) which
constitute a significant potential domestic supply of energy.
The re-injection of natural gas associated with oil production
is also being investigated as a mechanism for EOR. The use
of associated natural gas as an injectate for EOR not only
improves incremental recovery. It also reduces further flaring
of natural gas, thus mitigating greenhouse gas emissions.
NETL is sponsoring field-based research to accelerate the
development and application of technologies for enhancing
the recovery of petroleum from both conventional and
unconventional reservoirs in fields across the nation.
Drivers that provide a clear focus for research, development,
and demonstration in this area include:
Next generation CO2
EOR technologies that can increase
recovery from existing CO2
EOR projects and accelerate
application of the process to other mature oil fields around
the country.
Methods to improve performance and lower costs of CO2
and other gas floods, as well as ways to accelerate their
application by independent producers.
Targeting hydrocarbons locked in unconventional reservoir
rocks like the Bakken shale or in reservoirs which have
characteristics that make their production difficult (such as
heavy oil in arctic reservoirs).
NETL maintains research partnerships with industry and
academia for field laboratories to catalyze development and
demonstration of emerging technologies and methodologies
to facilitate widespread application of EOR.
For more information, see:
https://netl.doe.gov/oil-gas/oil-recovery
Might want to also send info to the US Dept of Energy...National Energy Technology Laboratory....might be some reaserch $$$$ avalable for pctl
I’m thinking it might be wize for pctl to set up teams that would work in the field testing various locations/ customers thus speed up sales
Great post…. However most won’t take the deep dive to understand the contents of that study. The value to the common investor it’s to demonstrate the reasons testing has to be done at each site due to the many variables that come into play at each site & extraction methods to be applied.
If the new ag division head can arrange testing with a company like Dole foods, Archer Daniels Middlen or the like that could be a home run. Then go after in field/ farms.
Ag will be the last to get contacts. Fortunately, pctl is on the right track…. Hiring a vp to head the ag division. When the candidate is selected it will take time to be in place and become familiar with pctl. Full time testing on ag production also will take time. O&g contacts will find these efforts. I would guess acceleration in ag sales are at least a year out. As are sales of crystals.
One could guess…. Ace was buying cleaning solutions to use in their work now Ace is selling cleaning solutions to the hospital ( probably at a lower price per gallon)
Thanks. That comes to 270,000/ 3yr lease or 90,000/yr.
Would it be reasonable to assume the cost/ unit is about 30,000 including delivery,replacement parts ect. that’s an income of 6,000/mo
Ace do u know?
generators have a flat rate for the lease =____?/mo
additional spray cart =____?/mo
spray gun adds to the lease cost=____?/mo
"Update 4/5/2021: The Rocks and Reservoirs Phase 2 Pilot program has concluded and EORI is no longer accepting proposals."
Unless pctl put in a proposal & was accepted....we would have heard something about that.