Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yes they're already somewhere between EST and CST.
lol
Duh ;)
Congrats GG!
COMPX 12/19/2002~~~~~
Previous close-1361.51
1389 MM
1393 AKvetch
1398 reserved for you-know-who
COMPX 12/19/2002~~~~~
Previous close-1361.51
1388 MM
~~~~Year End COMPX WAG~~~~
1231 MB
1251 timhyma
1268 FritzV
1271 fung_derf
1300 Churak
1306 GGraessle
1361 JXM
1398 WTMHouston
1405 Carolyn
1425 Phil
1454 shao
1477 The Original dpb5!
1489 Muell
1498 AKvetch
1502 MM
1550 NoMoDo
1560 broderick_s
It was a good day.
You might try emailing myst@stockwerld.com
Thanks Softie.
Thanks, I'm downloading them now.
It's a .pdf file so you need to have Adobe Acrobat installed.
~~~~Year End COMPX WAG~~~~
1231 MB
1268 FritzV
1300 Churak
1306 GGraessle
1398 WTMHouston
1425.25 Phil
1454 shao
1477 The Original dpb5!
1498 AKvetch
1550 NoMoDo
1554 MM
COMPX 12/18/2002~~~~~
Previous close-1392.05
1365 GG
1377.16 SagDec15
1388 timhyma
1398 WTMHouston
1414 AKvetch
1420 MM
Have you looked at the comp lately? It's still settling.
[url name=test target=developer.netscape.com/docs/manuals/communicator/jsref/>
~~~COMPX 12/17/2002~~~~~
Previous close-1400.35
1428 MM
1433 timhyma
test
~~~COMPX 12/16/2002~~~~~
Previous close-1,362.42
1301 NoMoDo
1375 Phil
1385 AKvetch
1391 MM
1398 WTMHouston
<duplicate>
~~~COMPX 12/16/2002~~~~~
Previous close-1,362.42
1390 MM
Congratulations Troy! That's a record setting week.
test
Year End COMPX WAG
1398 WTMHouston
1454 shao
1540 MM
LG, just use the ignore feature over there. It isn't worth the time.
Regards, MM
Nice chart!
Btw it's not uncommon that when one of these studies comes together it turns out to be something like a McClellan Oscillator that already exists. Along the way there's always good things happening throughout the process. So if that happens it's not a failure it's just a result that lead somewhere someone else has already been.
Regards, MM
My earlier description neglected to consider unchanged vol. Here's an adjusted model.
up = 60
dn = 30
unchanged = 10
total vol = 100
That's actual raw volume rather than percentage volume. Although it totals 100 it's only by design to facillate finding logic errors.
PNPV = positive volume / (positive v + negative v + unchanged v)
PNPV = 60 / (60+30+10) = .6 or 60% so PNPV looks good to me. But I don't think it's Percentage "NET POSITIVE V". I thought NPV would be:
net / (positive v + negative v + unchanged v);
where net = positive v - negative v;
I might be misunderstanding the objective and thus there's a reason you're using positive v instead of net v. I don't know because I don't have a feel for where this is heading yet.
PVO = (13-day SMA - 21-day SMA)/ 13-day SMA)
That part is really cool because it begins with MACD of the signal and divides by the leading half of the signal. I'll have to pick this up at another time because it's too much to think about right now.
Thanks for the study. I'm anxious to see what develops out of it. A guy I really admire always says he didn't know enough to know that it couldn't be done so he just kept trying it a different way. He's quite successful. The other thing I've picked up from him is when he describes associates he's had that were extremely successful he always mentions how bent their thinking process was from the norm. just fwiw, it might not mean anything to anyone on this thread but it's my opinion from studying successful traders that scientific technique only goes so far and without the drive to create something unusual it doesn't matter how many stats classes one takes.
I subtracted the 26-DMA from the 5-DMA
That convergence divergence is the basis for MACD. But thinking along those lines is cool because it's out of the box, off the wall, and upside down. All of those qualities are necessary in my opinion in order to find the true nature of price dynamics.
Keep experimenting.
Up vol = 60
Dn vol = 40
Total vol = 100
up/total = .6
dn/total = .4
(up-dn)/total = .2
I haven't followed the conversation about volume closely and I'm not qualified to offer anything other than a wild guess about the relationship of volume to price. That being said, volume is something I gave up on long ago but would like to study again. I think it has a lot of potential to add value to a signal. I have to find some time to actually do the studies instead of just talking about them.
Meanwhile I'm impressed with your initiative and between you and Augie I know something good can come out of this.
Congratulations Phil! Nice wag.
nevermind
I've synced my clock to wag time.
#msg-620992
Aptus,
It's late and I'm not thinking clearly but I can add this. I actually stored the last 5 values rather than 4. But before selecting the maximum H I tossed out the highest value because I was seeking more of a normal maximum H. Thus out of the 5 values I discarded 1 outlier and picked the maximum from the remaining 4. To get the minimum H I also tossed the lowest value as an invalid outlier to get a more normal minimum expectation for the H.
Did the same for the lows.
The bands for min and max values were pretty tight because of the short lookback and tossing the outliers.
Also when populating the arrays I would switch based on the indicator trend. This meant that the uptrend array had values that were sequential until the trend turned down and then it's next value wouldn't occur until the trend turned up again. Just fwiw in case it helps you better understand the nature of the values I was working with.
Strategy is something I have to check my notes on. It's been a year since I've looked at this but strategy is always the cool part.
Thanks for the insight into your algorithm. I'll study it later and get back to you with some more after I've had a chance to catch up on things.
MM
Considering just the size of the downswing it's attached to I'd say yes. Proportionately it's a bear flag off that downswing.
COMPX range from L to H has been 38 over the last 3 days. About 2.7%.
It's not unusual to see it move 2% in 1 day, from close to close. Low to high range on those days often exceeds the total range of these past 3 days.
Monday was a huge bar and everything since then has been contained within it's range. Stalled. Accumulation or distribution?