Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Tiny volume run today, have a good weekend all. SFOR!
Anyone with a Gmail account can attest that if you forget your password, one way to reset it is through two factor authentication using your cell phone. Gmail has been using this patented technology for quite some time now because it's a great idea. Alphabet, parent co. of Google's Gmail, may not know it yet, but as customers of SFOR's property, eventually, through these lawsuits, they will be paying the rightful owners to continue to use it, namely: Strikeforce Technologies, Inc.
Anyone have an L2 they can put up today? I've been watching the bids and asks go up all morning.
Kind of agree, but imo when the IPR is terminated, SFOR could easily gap right past $.03 to $.05ish.
Of course. Everyone with any brains will want to own this stock when the lawsuits start settling. I'm hoping to see at least a nickel a share after the 1st one settles.
FMW Media Works Corp.’s “New To The Street” Business TV On October 26, 2017, Films Exciting New Line-up - PetVivo Holdings, Inc (PETV), Premier Biomedical, Inc. (BIEI) and Strikeforce Technologies, Inc.(SFOR)
BY GlobeNewswire
— 1:00 PM ET 10/03/2017
The patents make the business valuable, therefor SFOR stocks... like the business side of Strikeforce could be fixed by whoever buys them out. No matter who Kay sells the company to, they will have their own distribution and sales
Volume is ramping up in anticipation.
OMG dude can you believe the price of SFOR right now? I agree! This firecracker is lit man... LIT!
just sayin...
https://meddevgroup.site-ym.com/events/EventDetails.aspx?id=996391
Date: Wed. October 4 • Time: 5:30 to 8:30 PM
Location: Regis College Fine Arts Center, Weston, MA
Augmented Reality has great potential in the world of patient care, recovery and surgery. Its functionality has the potential to benefit a range of clinical, educational and training applications.
Augmented Reality (AR) is a powerful technology enabling digitally generated 3D/2D images to be overlaid onto real world environments. Think of movies like Minority Report which uses AR to control systems and display information, or Terminator which displays information in the eye of the main cyborg character.
These are examples of information display and systems control, but that is just half the story. Imagine the amputee that has phantom pain or poor limb control; or the stroke victim with paralysis or weakness, both caused by the damaged part of the brain.
By employing AR and visualizing the normal movements of the paralyzed, lost or disabled limb, the brain can be reactivated. This reactivation promotes re-learning of motor function and sensory processing, rewiring the brain when coupled to conventional rehabilitation therapies.
Imagine getting ready to perform surgery on a gall bladder. Technicians have loaded the patients 3D body scanned data into the system from CATScan and MRI sources; the Copy for Eblast #1 To Select of TBMG’s 10M List augmented information and displays have been registered to the real world through a navigation system. And the predetermined surgical plan has been loaded into the AR system. The surgeon puts on the head mounted display and now has a significantly expanded access to information, 3D anatomy display and guided tour of the operation.
Our panelists are leaders in medical innovation as well as industry.
Analyst Actions: Piper Jaffray Upgrades Zynerba Pharmaceuticals to Overweight from Neutral
BY MT Newswires
— 7:08 AM ET 09/29/2017
07:08 AM EDT, 09/29/2017 (MT Newswires) -- Zynerba Pharmaceuticals' ( ZYNE ) average rating among analysts is a hold, with an average price target of $11.
I think that it's likely folks at Microsoft footing this bill. Think about it, they certainly have deep enough pockets, and it would be in their interest to keep Strikeforce afloat as they are licensing this technology for Azure.
OMG dude can you believe the price of SFOR right now? WTF! I feel a cover coming, watch the volume. This firecracker is lit man... LIT!
just sayin...
OMG dude can you believe the price of SFOR right now? WTF! I feel a cover coming, watch the volume. This firecracker is lit man... LIT!
just sayin...
OMG dude can you believe the price of SFOR right now? WTF! I feel a cover coming, watch the volume. This firecracker is lit man... LIT!
just sayin...
This company is potentially worth $billions
SA article out touting this high yielder.
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4108632-6-reasons-15-percent-yielding-stock-strong-buy-largest-holding?page=1
Did anyone else notice the little 500 share trades last week? The last time I saw those was when this went up to almost 3 cents. Is a 500 share trade print on a <1 cent share some type of a MM signal to each other? 'Cause that's less than what the commission would cost no?
Right on, so they lost 76K through no fault of their own, but they got some advertising out of it. Not a total loss. Shouldn't affect SFOR much but expect longs to buy the dip!
Unlike OMVS, Sfor have been in an actual business for a long time. Robots are cool, and I hope this is not the scam it appears to be.
GLTA OMVS longs!
It's a damn good thing that someone of Kay's caliber, ex- JPMorgan exec no less, is involved. Otherwise, all those infringing could have gotten away with it.
Now, they won't. The law firms representing SFOR are pretty hard to ignore. The market seems to know that the IP is solid, and the technology is more and more prolific.
Just sayin...SFOR.
Whoever ponied up the 1.5+ million must agree with that. The 7.5 million+ will be a pittance compared to the 10% he gets later, judging from what the value of Strikeforce's IP will be after it survives this court process...
Look, if you're using their OOBA IP, you should be paying Strikeforce Technologies for it, not the guys who did not invent it and aren't paying for it
Even without triple damages, the amounts they've been gypped out of, and could sue for are pretty significant, judging from how prolific OOBA is.
Will it be just as ridiculous to trade SFOR at .9999 after Kay sells Strikeforce post settlement(s)? A buck a share will be cheap after that, even with this share structure
Then our anticipated international patents award should send this well over a nickel a share would you agree?
Can't believe I actually got some SFOR under seven, but it was fun adding to my SFOR horde with eights. I still look forward to the pennies I'll get for those eights. What the monkey say when they cut off his tail? "WON'T BE LONG NOW!" No wait that was the guy that ponied up a couple million.
Flippers be flippin this today!
All I can say is thanks Kay for supporting Ram's IP.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): September 6, 2017
STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Wyoming
000-55012
22-3827597
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
(Commission
File Number)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
1090 King Georges Post Road, Suite 603, Edison, NJ
08837
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (732) 661 9641
N/A
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):
o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12(b))
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
As used in this report, the terms “Company,” “our company,” “us,” “SFT,” “StrikeForce,” “we” and “our” refer to StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. unless the context requires otherwise.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Our disclosure and analysis in this Current Report on Form 8-K contains some forward-looking statements. Certain of the matters discussed concerning our operations, cash flows, financial position, economic performance and financial condition, and the effect of economic conditions include forward-looking statements. Statements that are predictive in nature, that depend upon or refer to future events or conditions or that include words such as "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "plans," "believes," "estimates" and similar expressions are forward-looking statements. Although we believe that these statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, including projections of orders, sales, operating margins, earnings, cash flow, research and development costs, working capital, capital expenditures and other projections, they are subject to several risks and uncertainties.
Investors are cautioned that our forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and the actual results or developments may differ materially from the expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements.
As for the forward-looking statements that relate to future financial results and other projections, actual results will be different due to the inherent uncertainty of estimates, forecasts and projections may be better or worse than projected. Given these uncertainties, you should not place any reliance on these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements also represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date that they were made. We expressly disclaim a duty to provide updates to these forward-looking statements, and the estimates and assumptions associated with them, after the date of this filing to reflect events or changes in circumstances or changes in expectations or the occurrence of anticipated events. You are advised, however, to consult any additional disclosures we make in our reports on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q, Form 8-K, or their successors.
2
ITEM 1.01 ENTRY INTO MATERIAL DEFINITIVE AGREEMENT
On September 6, 2017, the Company entered into a Litigation Funding Agreement with two parties (the “Funders”) for the purpose of funding the enforcement of certain patents relating to the process of providing dual channel authentication against several infringers (the “Litigation Enforcement of Patents”).
The Litigation Funding Agreement provides for the following:
1. Immediate funding of One Million, Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000) (“Initial Funding”).
2. The Funders shall receive from the proceeds of any litigation arising from the Litigation Enforcement of Patents (the “Claim Proceeds”), an amount equal to One Million, Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000) plus ten percent (10%) of any balance thereof until the Funders have received an aggregate of Seven Million, Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($7,500,000) and thereafter, in perpetuity, Two and One Half percent (2.5%) of any and all additional Claim Proceeds.
3. The Company can request subsequent funding, upon notice and request of the Company, of up to an additional One Million, Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000) payable in increments of $250,000 during the period of February 1, 2018 through January 31, 2019 (“Additional Funding”).
4. In the event the Company requests Additional Funding, for each $250,000 received, the Funders shall receive from the Claim Proceeds an additional Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000), plus, pursuant to the Additional Funding clause, one-sixth of Eight percent (8%) (1 and 1/3 percent) of all additional Claim Proceeds until the Funder has received an additional One Million, Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($1,250,000.00), and thereafter, in perpetuity, one-sixth of Two percent (2%) (1/3 of 1%) of all additional Claim Proceeds.
Management believes that this Litigation Funding Agreement will allow the Company to pursue litigation against any infringement on its patents. Previously, in an action commenced on March 28, 2013 (subsequently amended in April, 2014), and settled on January 15, 2016, the Company settled certain patent litigation through a Release and License Agreement in which certain patents were licensed to Microsoft Corporation, and the Company received a non-disclosable one time lump sum payment. No assurances can be provided that subsequent litigation, funded through the Litigation Funding Agreement, will have the same results.
3
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Registrant)
Dated: September 11, 2017
By:
/s/ Mark L. Kay
Mark L. Kay
Chief Executive Officer
4
Student debt.
How will the government find a way to reap rewards based on that? We'll soon find out I'm afraid. FNMA and FMCC is the perfect example of how the government can claim the sky is falling so they can put student loans into "conservatorship"
Is this MVIS projector technology being used by Sony?
https://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2017/1/4/14150010/sony-short-throw-4k-projector-vpl-vz1000es-ces-2017
Oh well, I got stopped out at .18. That's ok, I'll take a double and move on. Best of luck to rest of ya'll!
I just renewed mine last week. Thankfully!
I agree. $73,000,000.00 x 3 (treble damages) = a huge payday for SFOR stockholders. Duo will likely settle for something around $100,000,000.00, and a license fee to Strikeforce Tech. , just to keep their own doors open.
I just tried to log into a bank, got the password wrong, and then corrected it. I instantly got a message saying an authentication code had been sent to my phone, which then buzzed to tell me of a text. Until I entered the authentication code I wasn't able to get into my account.
That is Strikeforce
Whomever this bank got that software from, has infringed on Strikeforce's patent, unless they are paying Strikeforce or it's channel partners for it.
Its public record who is representing those patents
I have read the patents in the government patent database
Incidentally, there is a looming catalyst in the form of an international patent.
3 cents was and is still peanuts for SFOR
Patience is key to this one... buckle up.
Just sayin...
Most longs don't care where SFOR pps is this week or next month, other than accumulating, they are more interested in what's coming. Market already put this at nearly 3 cents with the existing conditions. Nothing has changed since then.
Just sayin...
Are they like a low quality competitor? I saw where one of their robots fell into a fountain, and not long ago ran over a 18month old kid at a mall.
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/07/knightscope-k5-security-bot-drowned/
Has anyone else noticed there was a Knightscope commercial on TV a couple days ago.
Organovo Sponsors Pioneering Research With Amgen and Medikine in Critical Areas of Liver and Kidney Disease
BY GlobeNewswire
— 8:05 AM ET 08/23/2017
“We are pleased to support innovative applications using our dynamic liver and kidney tissue systems,” noted Taylor J. Crouch, CEO, Organovo (ONVO). “Through our grant program, Organovo (ONVO) will work closely with partners to design 3D tissue solutions in vital areas of high-value drug profiling. These applications will support the increased demand for translational in vitro models and benefit a broader customer base.”
With enough shares of SFOR, you could rent girlfriends wink wink.
It's a pretty good benefit that they are keeping good books on SFOR. Even if they look like shit, at least when the suits do hit they hit a solid company. The stocks will react fast. What they do after that hardly matters.
What I'm wondering is how big the gap will be when the first one, or several, happens