Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Nano Tech West is the only distributor of programmable Nano Technology in the Western Hemisphere!!!
Per: http://nanotechwestinc.com/about-us/
CSCE's Acquisition Nano Tech West:
Per:http://nanotechwestinc.com/projects/
I can all but guarantee that IBC sold into the runs we saw in December/January. Not worried about that now.
Here's an even clearer Article on an actual IRS ruling involving a Chapter 11 reorganization with NOLS and common shareholders:
Per: http://ww2.cfo.com/tax/2011/01/irs-rules-on-postbankruptcy-nols-2/
If you read the article even further, and I suggest everybody does, it gets very specific about the NOLS:
Per: http://www.pepperlaw.com/publications_update.aspx?articlekey=1110
Yes and this is the single most important facet of this trade, going forward, no matter whom the winning bidder is. If a corporation is to be able to retain the NOLS, which in this case are worth quite a lot, they cannot just shaft us common shareholders from receiving some of the new shares, based on what I have read.
Bingo. Investors should keep in mind that Pepper Stebbins stated it was AZFL's goal to get the Pueblo Colorado grow deal inked before April 1st, so they can generate a revenue on the first crop this year and I believe they have been working very diligently to accomplish just that. April 1st is merely 3 weeks away, my friends.
IMO, we will be hearing something in the next couple of weeks and for those who have their sells @.0005, you may as sell into the bid, if you are willing to give up so close to the inflection point of this deal.
You Got that right, my friend SAPX goin Live
Funny thing is Buys are showing as sells on ETRADE Pro!!!!
GO SAPX .0005's almost gone!!
FORM 15 JUST FILED FOR SAPX .0005's almost gone, Low Floater!!!!!
SAPX FORM 15 JUST FILED!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1408276/000126246315000133/sevenartsform15.htm
SAPX FORM 15 JUST FILED!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1408276/000126246315000133/sevenartsform15.htm
SAPX FORM 15 JUST FILED!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1408276/000126246315000133/sevenartsform15.htm
Got that right Jack!!! And AZFL Acts before they speak. When they announced they were going into Hemp production stateside on January 21, 2015:http://www.eteligis.com/ViewSubmission.aspx?submissionRequest=27950
they had already incorporated their subsidiary Amazonas Hemp Ltd. with the Colorado SOS:
http://www.sos.state.co.us/biz/BusinessEntityDetail.do?quitButtonDestination=BusinessEntityResults&nameTyp=ENT&entityId2=20151039010&srchTyp=ENTITY&fileId=20151039010&masterFileId=20151039010
http://www.sos.state.co.us/biz/ViewImage.do?fileId=20151039010&masterFileId=20151039010
Amazonas is well aware of the impact and sustainability HEMP will have in the Building Industry here and abroad for decades to come, and if anyone is unsure of that here's a great site showing the abundance of Hemp building products already on the market
http://hempmaterials.com/hemp-building-materials/
Yeah and litigation is with Asher, a company not exactly known for being ethical. I think DBMMM learned their lesson with that one. Heck, Asher, IMO, is very much responsible for shorting this ticker to where it is now.
The notion that Asher can continue to exist escapes me...
To get a rather large taste of Ashers many scams: http://investorshub.advfn.com/~-ASHER-~-25451/
Yes indeed and they paid down some debt...Just waiting for the 10-Q.
DBMM 10-K Filed!!!!! Paid down Debt!!!!
Bingo Nailed it: Key Word being "SHORT" AZFL 7th most shorted ticker on the OTC: http://otcshortreport.com/index.php?index=AZFL#mostshorted
Be careful what you give away folks: February is always good with AZFL.... ;)
Touche my friend...$400 HIPPQ smackers in da profit pocket, here!!! not bad for 20 minutes of work...
And those sell side price points above a penny remain above a penny. Case in point. :)
Agreed BCN!!! If SITO Mobile were a private company, I would not have bought into HIPPQ this morning, however it is Public, fully reporting QB, with the likes of Amazon, Coca- Cola, Microsoft, Days Inn, Fox Searchlight, Mercedes Benz, and Volkswagen, as clients; just to name a few. Why would they come in a day after the Bankruptcy Filing and offer to buy up the assets and run the company, so it may continue trading during the Chapter 11 reorganization? This did not happen overnight; there is worth in HipCricket Inc. and I'm not the only one who thinks so; just look at the ASK on the L2:
Actually Gwyther owns 634,197,102 shares of DBMM which is more substantial in terms of his commitment to DBMM, IMO
215,299,806 were purchased on August 29th
Per:http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10180654
418,897,196 were purchased on September 9th
Per: http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10195698
We will soon see how this unfolds. Still waiting to hear on the big US Automaker contract that was expected in the last part of the year. ;)
I've read her Linked In when it was up and she is a consultant for Small Cap companies. I would imagine Rhonda is bound to a confidentiality agreement, like most people involved in Public companies..so I'm not really concerned with that.
Wise thinking on HMCP, Nadendla, in fact if one looks at the timing between filings in Rhonda's work with, RGMI; Rhonda filed the form 15 on November 24, 2014 Per: http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10325021
The next filings were not published until December 18 & December 19th. This is almost a full month:
Per: http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=RGMI&id=131015
Per:http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=RGMI&id=131052
Now I am not suggesting it will only take a month between filings for HMCP, as Rhonda filed the Form 15 on December 4th and the Holidays shortly followed that, however, one would think that the process is somewhat similar, IMO.
Setting the record straight with Regard to Wilfred Shaw and Financial Content Inc. (Formerly FCON).
While it is true Financial Content Inc. was revoked by the SEC for failure to file reports, due to it's inability to come up with the money to do so, it was never the intent of the company to leave shareholders hanging, as evidenced by the filings that were made.
First and Foremost, one must remember what happened to First Content was the result of the general market crash in 2008. Many Dot Coms went under due to their inability to secure financing and luckily, Wilfred Shaw and his colleagues were able to save the company and take it private via a stock transfer, in hopes to resurrect it. In the interim, they were left with a shell they tried to sell and like many at the time couldn't.
Wilfred Shaw made it very clear that they were trying to sell the Shell, to the SEC and stockholders and was always filing properly to convey that. In their last filing of March 2009
Per:Mar 31, 2009 Notification of inability to timely file Form 10Q or 10QSB: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1100360/000114036109012715/doc1.htm
Big Merger in the works with PRTT
Requested PRTT from Stockcharts...There pretty cool about adding new charts..
Lucky you got in on the round up.PRTT is looking great for 2015.
Lucky you got in on the round up.PRTT is looking great for 2015.
Looking Good PRTT...WHOA!!!
Yeah, TINO still showing today on ETRADE Pro L2 +186% change on close with last sale recorded at .056....go figure.
Yes when they decided to save the company, Financial Content (FCON), from completely dissolving, you can tell they looked at every option open to them. What stood out to me was the last line from a filing (Pre14-C) they filed back in May of 2008.
It was a stock transfer agreement. It's on page 5 and 6.
Per: http://www.barchart.com/plmodules/?module=secFilings&filingid=5943459&type=CONVPDF&popup=1&override=1&symbol=FCON
Yes SantaZar, what people need to understand here, is that Wilfred Shaw isn't just some newbie wanting to take a start-up company public. He has been involved with internet technology companies for quite some time, and while he is still young, 44; the experience he has gained with Financial Content as a public company during what has gone down in history as "The Dot Com Bust" of the 2007-2010 period, coupled with the fact that you pointed out, Mr. Shaw tried to get the company listed on the NASDAQ, is proof in point that Mr. Shaw has gained Wisdom!!! Wisdom is failure realized and my bet is that He is about to provide us with some exciting SANB NEWS.....Oh and one more thing...UM The Itsy Bitsy Float. ;) LOL GO SANB
You are entitled to your opinion, however, your opinion is not taking this into account:
SANB was just purchased by Wilfred Shaw and went from .007-.008 to .03 when people got wind of it, during the rather slow period of trading that is the Holidays.
Wilfred Shaw purposefully bought an OTCQB Shell; Not a pink.
Why is that important? THE NEW OTCQB REQUIREMENTS MADE EFFECTIVE THIS PAST MAY
Per:http://www.otcmarkets.com/learn/otcqb
Anytime will be the right time, because many eyes on this. Look where SANB went over the slow trading Holidays...Dimes plus is easy with a float this low. Remember, we have Wilfred Shaw at the Helm here:
His background is in growing Technology companies; This Shell is getting Warmed for something special, IMO. SANB soars in 2015!!!
Great DD SantaZar!! IMO, SANB is that kind of rare, low float, Buy and Hold for mid double digits kind of stock you don't commonly see on the OTC...These don't come around very often. I feel blessed to be holding here and still having the opportunity to purchase some more shares quite cheaply given the Holiday pullback. GO SANB!!
It is a newly purchased Shell and Wilfred Shaw has nothing to do with a prior owner. Facts are:
1. It's QB fully reporting
2. There is no business model as of now, meaning it is a vehicle for a R/M
3. Low Float
4. Wilfred Shaw already took Financial Content Public (FCOC) and due to the market conditions most IT/Software Start-ups were faced with starting in 2008, they transferred the ownership and took it private again.
5. Mr. Shaw purchased these shares @.00125.
With a share structure like SANB and a Wee little Float; dimes are likely, IMO. You don't come back to market with empty pockets; Wilfred Shaw is gonna have some News to share, IMO. Think if SPLI before it became VPOR last Feb. And SANB has a smaller float