Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
No. The SEC reacts to suspicious filings and movement in stocks, as well as, whistle blowers.
Company officers also have the luxury of identifying illegal activities that may be going on with their company's stock.
Let's see if Rufus can/will point out a defendent. LOL!
As far as Ourstreet calling the SEC, why would you worry about that if Rufus is on the up and up? All the man had to do was get an attorney with a tiny fraction of that 800 million he said he had in escrow and we wouldn't be here today, right? Before you say Rufus didn't want to waste money on an attorney because he wanted the SEC to find the fraud themselves, ask yourself this.
How much money has it cost Rufus in missed opportunity and business NOT to get an attorney OVER A YEAR AGO? LOL! Come on. Open your eyes.
LOL! You make it sound like a movie. In the message board world, I guess it kinda is with the wild speculation that goes on. However, as I'm sure the Judge "knows" about the message boards, I doubt he reads them and sees this as nothing more than a scam.
Now, folks keep mentioning the NSS and other crooks. It's not up to the SEC to go find unnamed crooks regarding this play. It's up to RUFUS to name the defendents. And that'd be a separate litigation anyway. So ask yourself. Why doesn't Rufus name the defendents in a court filing?
Specifically, who the NSS is.
You didn't ask me. You accused me of supporting a NSS scam.
Now that you actually asked, here you go:
No, I do NOT think it's OK to NSS a scam company and more than I think an Insurance scammer should scam a vulnerable senior citizen.
As far as focusing on Rufus... I didn't buy CSHD because I thought or didn't think NSS would infest the play. I bought based on Rufus's filings. And I don't believe NSS would be in play if Rufus was NOT a scammer. I'll worry about the NSS when the source scammer is taken out of the market.
Clear?
You got that from my post?
Another analogy: Some elderly are victims of insurance scammers. I believe insurance scammers target vulnerable senior citizens for scams.
You think I created a "two wrongs make a right" argument here as well? LOL!
Mastaflash, you're blinders are preventing you from successfully reading and understanding peoples' posts/opinions here. Read my signature and embrace it for your own sake.
I don't believe CSHD escaped NSS. I do believe that NSS'ers like to target POS companies though.
??? I used the term "usually" in the first sentence. My last sentence was "I wonder what it is this time."
You didn't get that it was my opinion from that? LOL!
I happen to know that's not the case.
Masta, does that make Roheex a liar?
LOL. Just playing, Ro.
BTW, what is ole Rufus up to? Since you seem to know and all.
So Mastaflash's new definition of a liar is someone who posts an opinion, unknowing if it's true or not even though said opinion is based on historical probability?
Masta, that's a deep hole you just dug. If that's your definition, MOST of the folks including yourself, were/are liars because the b.s. opinions you guys post almost always turn out to be wrong and don't even come close to supporting historical probability.
Liars. LOL!
You really meant to post to me that I'm a liar in your opinion?
Name ONE SINGLE instance of a post I made that was a lie.
Really? I'll remind you of New Year's of 07, DUI after that New Year's issue, and the horse debacle.
Usually, when Rufus disappears for a few days, it either means he was in Jail or having to move what is left of his horses around.
I wonder what it means this time? LOL!
What's the significance of a 13g filed by Knight?
You don't remember lying about the items I posted? If that's the case, you missed quite a bit.
Deano, Rufus has lied many times on multiple subjects such as having or not having an attorney. Lied about having 800 million in escrow to support 15 PPS. He lies daily about attacks on his message board servers that we already know are behind provider firewalls. Lied about the horses dying until we confirmed with local authorities. Lied about going to jail until we confirmed with local authorities.
What makes you think he isn't lying about the other stuff? LOL! Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, thrice, etc. call me Deano361.
FWIW, the chart is looking like the bottom was hit in the 1.60's.
Should be good for 2 bucks plus in the next few weeks, IMO. Not a 100% gainer but you could buy in now and sleep at night. LOL!
Good luck.
Agreed. I learned that lesson. I accepted unverified information as fact and lost a few bucks. I chose to listen to the wrong side. Bashing or Pumping? That is the question, isn't it? LOL. Both are just as dangerous.
Facts should prevail, and scam artists should be in jail.
LOL! You should get out of the stock market immediately if you are basing the strength of a stock on what message board posters are saying about it.
I learned never to buy a POS pinksheet after the run. LOL!
LOL! Good luck!
I understand that. However, I don't believe a word the man says.
My point was though that the SEC has a lot more than what Rufus is alluding to, IMO.
Rufus already said that his family may have sold some. That it was their perogative.
I think you'll find that that SEC has far more than what ch4 thinks. And I believe that Alana would be perplexed why many on ch4 would think the SEC would handle the information on this case the same way Rufus does.
That's not a fair statment, Masta.
You have to agree that HSM folks and iHub bashers have been more correct on predictions regarding Harris and CSHD than anyone holding onto hope on the other channels.
It sucks, I know. I'd love for everyone to make money. But the fact is, you won't if you hang your hat on Rufus's b.s. I noticed some on ch4 are starting to realize this.
LOL! You said:
"..your guessing, cause you don't know IMO."
When I posted the same thing. So you now know that I was right. LOL!
Now who are you going to listen to? Rufus or Samael? Hehehe
There's a lot of pinks that have no filings and plagued with corrupt CEO's or officers. They are marked as "stop", "Caveat Emptor", or as CSHD is listed, with a triangle and ! sign, GREY MARKET.
http://pinksheets.com/pink/quote/quote.jsp?symbol=cshd
I didn't do that and nor did it come from desperation. The only desperation I had was when I worked to sell out quick enough to get enough money out worth playing another POS penny stock. LOL!
LOL! Nice:
"Oh and bashers, your not missing anything either....its a dead company with no office and no business....remember?"
I guess Rufus forgot that the interest is not with the company any longer but a psyche study of what happens in a cult situation and how long said cults generally last when the leader has nothing but B.S. to peddle.
Not for the folks that didn't want the site shut down. LOL!
At least, that's what I heard. Hehehe
Fair enough.
Calling 2600 shareholders? 2600? All 2600 of us would be asking questions, etc. and that exercise would stop after call number 10, IMO. That ain't going to happen. No offense.
I've posted it several times. Rufus must LEAVE this shell. He needs to go away for the sake of shareholders. So that maybe someone else will buy it and bring value.
I'm no longer a shareholder. But like many other longs at the time, I was extremely pleased when Rufus was booted as the CEO.
If I were a shareholder today, I would still be bashing Rufus and hoping the scammer goes away. Give the shell a year to get rid of Rufus's stench, and someone else could run with it.
In fact, said year is up! If he'd have disappeared then, by now, someone may have bought this shell. You should never believe a single individual is your sole chance of making your money back.
Mastaflash, I was very specific before I asked the question of whether or not you believe Rufus is a liar. I was specific in that he is LYING to PRESENT SHAREHOLDERS about other people with deliberate intent just because we either ask "tuff" questions or simply call him out.
Do you or do you not believe that? Do you believe that I'm a crook?
Keep in mind, Mastaflash, Rufus is posting that some of us ARE the shorters.
That's why our (if I can speak for some others here) conviction that Rufus is a liar is so strong. He's making crap up about message board posters and spreading it as truth when it's easy for some of us to show that Rufus is FOS.
For example, Rufus accused me of shorting the stock (let alone, NSS). But I know and proved to the board that I was simply a disgruntled long. And proved it by posting my old blog about CSHD back when I actually thought it might be legit. Then I got banned. LOL!
So, in your opinion, do you believe Rufus is a liar or not?
I wonder how many NSS'ers short against stocks that actually bring in revenue.
Apparently, MM's will naked short sell a stock with full intentions to cover just to make a market.
My guess, NSS'ers usually target scams or general POS companies when using it as a tactic to bring the PPS to zero.
All those pesky dates just keep passing and passing with nothing good ever happening with CSHD.
No regulations were broken. Simply put, Rufus failed to file the proper forms for the merger. No 15c211 was filed either. Couple that with the SEC charges and it's moved to the gray sheets. That's all.
Who's going to allow Rufus to get them on the stand in his defense as a shareholder? Think about it a second. Let's say that one of the faithful are on the stand to testify in defense of Rufus. What are they going to say? And you know it will be AFTER the SEC points out all the red flags that an investor should have seen coming a mile away (yeah, I was duped as well!).
All that person will be there for is to help Rufus get a settlement of some kind by showing that they believe Rufus was duped and done wrong. There's no value to add to the stock after that. LOL! Not to mention, how embarassing would that be for the testifying shareholder on a stand and finally realizing that they had been had... in front of their peers.
Do these folks really believe the SEC has done no DD on the case? Do they really think that the SEC sees this the same way the faithful does and expects the SEC to advise of every piece of evidence as it comes in the same way Rufus posts B.S. at will?
Come on folks. That survey is another carrot.
Interesting. Rufus still thinks that trading CSHD stock is illegal. Specifically the "quoting" of it. LOL!
At least he knows about international bonds.
He's just getting shareholders to back him up in court so that his victim play is more believeable.