Tip Of The Week: When going through airport customs and you are asked "Do you have any firearms with you?" do not reply "What do you need?"
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
kind of. im not sure he even believes the crap he's been saying lately though.
yea, i'm torn. right after the silva/maia fight i really wanted sonnen to beat him down. sonnen's gone overboard lately though.
yea, once we close above $40 watch out.
Without bad news I highly doubt that. imo.
not a bad card and its not even complete.
Official Shark Fights 13 (Sept. 11) Line Up:
Main Card:
1. Keith Jardine vs. Trevor Prangley (205lbs)
2. Rameau Thierry Sokoudjou vs. Houston Alexander (205lbs)
3. Paul Daley vs. TBA (170lbs)
4. Joey Villasanor vs. Drew McFredries (185lbs)
5. Another high-profile fight to be announced next week!
watch the back flip at the end lol
james toney is too funny.
"Which is either going to take aquistition news or audited financials."
or share buyback announcement. everything is true though imo.
yea, it goes both ways. randy better not get submitted and toney better not get ko'd.
nice. got in at .006 last week.
He is ING analyst Jason Kenney.
what happened to the exemplary earnings?
Tuesday's second-quarter results are expected to be exemplary despite the effect of the cost of the spill, he said.
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=43732534&symbol=NY^BP
it did.
yea, thats a great card.
nice. i wouldn't bet against it.
"CYSG is getting a lot of attention for addressing the compliance mandates issued by these companies. imo."
what? LOL
No bad news and this will easily be back in the $40's again soon imo.
Tuesday's second-quarter results are expected to be exemplary despite the effect of the cost of the spill, he said.
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=43732534&symbol=NY^BP
chart's looking good here. might have to pick up a few shares tomorrow.
yea me too.
Carwin should get the loser of this fight.
yea, anyone who has in the past would have to be an idiot to upload anymore ufc events. at one point dana white said he was even going to come after all the people watching the illegally streamed events. he's definitely not playing around. if I don't buy the event me and a few buddies just go to hooters.
come on, you're wasting your time. i'm waiting to see what you find on cape.
was that part of what you found researching cape online?
definitely
could be, but it has looked bottomed out other times too. if dilution is occurring and continues the only true bottom will be .0001.
if what he was saying is true, the seller is not decimating the pps. the chart still looks good. we'll make a strong base around this level. unless they take it down to the low 30's, a couple dollars isn't going to hurt anybody. you're going to expect sellers regardless after a move from $27 to $39 in 2 1/2 weeks or whatever it was.
yea, ARTS is looking real good imo.
so that's good news. they're selling while not killing the pps. once they're done we resume the upward move then.
yes, i probably did misunderstand it. I took it like Wal-Mart collaborated with them in order to make them compliant. That would seem pretty good to me. I mean Wal-Mart wouldn't help 30 companies become compliant with what they want. It would seem like a waste of time to me. They would just make a deal with one and then make sure they are compliant. Unless that process is very simple. In that case that pr or whatever it was could be mean nothing at all, if they didn't get the contract.
"The SS changes were merely an action the "stock" itself HAD to have. These weren't changes to put money into Toms' pocket."
Yes, and a reverse split may be an action the "stock" itself HAS to do as well. And not to put money in Toms' pocket, either. I bet he didn't want to double the A/S but he had to. He never reverse split his other company(s) because he was never in the situation where he had to. This time may be different. He may have no choice.
there's nothing out there. i've called and texted toms in the past and gotten no response. does anyone really want more bull**** from toms anyway? the following link is the most telling sign that they never had some 100+ million dollar operation going on and were actually in extremely bad shape (which pretty much explains the need for large amounts of financing). and it is from the most reliable and credible DD source out there: Cape's own filing.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=50382439
In the meantime you keep digging around and see where any of it gets you or this stock's pps. it's all on toms' shoulders now.
i know all that. why did it need financing if it has deals with wal-mart? that is what i don't understand. Isn't that weird to anyone else?
and who is to say the A/S won't be 8 bil. soon or a r/s won't happen? maybe we just haven't gotten there yet.
"when you run a company things go wrong more often than not..."
well with his enormous experience and success in the past wouldn't you think he would know this and not open his mouth and give random dates out without being 1,000% sure they would be met?
ha. no, it definitely doesn't. I don't care what you believe though.
I cannot understand how this company (or stock) is in the position they are, if articles like these are/were true. How can they have been in so much debt? The story doesn't match up to me.