InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 22
Posts 2880
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/20/2009

Re: Rich post# 28899

Sunday, 07/25/2010 10:33:23 AM

Sunday, July 25, 2010 10:33:23 AM

Post# of 42706
"The SS changes were merely an action the "stock" itself HAD to have. These weren't changes to put money into Toms' pocket."

Yes, and a reverse split may be an action the "stock" itself HAS to do as well. And not to put money in Toms' pocket, either. I bet he didn't want to double the A/S but he had to. He never reverse split his other company(s) because he was never in the situation where he had to. This time may be different. He may have no choice.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.