actually conducting DD
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Chevyman, the judge simply did not comment or rule on the merits, but only on the fact that in his opinion, there was not the required detail in the complaint.
The court of appeals will address the same, limited issue.
Janes won this round, no doubt, but he was not vindicated.
I agree, however, that nothing ever is a slam dunk.
Not a Pumper, there is absolutely no guarantee that the stock will go up in Q1; there is however an absolute guarantee that the suit will not be dropped.
Years of half truths + misrepresentations + lies = Dean Janes
A year end resubmittal is only possible if the company has finished the acquisition of images as per the agreed upon imaging protocol negotiated with the FDA.
Does anyone have an update on this matter?
Has the company even begun such a task?
Has the company confirmed, in writing, with the FDA, the imaging protocol, or are they going to rely on notes they took during the meeting?
Whatever happened to the luminary site announced in February 2007 at OHSU??
Any one hear any more from Dr. Martin Fuss??
Janes did win.
Unless the court of appeals reverses the decision of the trial court and sends the case back, I have no right to pursue him anymore on the issues raised in my lawsuit.
I certainly believe that I have been specific enough, although the trial court disagreed. Lets se what the court of appeals says.
There will never, ever, be a counterclaim filed by Janes against me. Why would he voluntarily ask a court to look at the facts and determine whether he misrepresented the facts in the 2009 and 2010 conference calls??
In my opinion, Janes is a liar. If he wants to sue me for libel and slander, please, please do so. I beg you, do so. Truth is a defense to a libel/slander suit.
I suspect that in the long run, I will not have been the only one that will have sued over this.
But for now, yes, he won.
Happy to email it and you can figure out how to post it.
May I ask why you believe that FDA approval is coming soon when the new application has not yet been filed? Its now over one year since the NSE.
May I also ask why the volume is so anemic whith an alleged great showing at the trade show?
Even receiving FDA approval will not erase the misrepresentations Mr. Janes made regarding the FDA letters.
Even if my appeals fail, the road has now been paved by this judge's decision. He has made it clear exactly what is needed to survive a motion to dismiss.
I assume that I will not be the only one to ever sue this man on this issue.
We shall see what the 9th court of appeals has to say. One thing is for sure, there will be such a decision as I am moving forward with the appeal. The notice of appeal has already been filed and served.
I thought I was advertising my resolve to see this matter through to the end. The notice of appeal has been mailed in for filing and counsel for Janes already notified.
The most recent penny stock case from California made it all the way to the US Supreme Court before it was returned for trial.
Read the opinion, Janes was not vindicated.
Yes and Yes and Thanks.
Mr. Lobcrab, today I received news from the court that Mr. Janes' motion to dismuss has been granted and the case now goes to the 9th court of appeals. The notice of appeal is being mailed for filing this afternoon.
I wanted everyone to have this info before the market closed today.
Bogdan Rentea
Thank you.
Does anyone have contact information for this company, since there is no real contact info on the website.
The entire trading activity today was $10???????
On the website, at the bottom of the Help page is states "designed by 'free CSS templates".
What happened to Paddington media?
I am also having trouble with the site's functionality; am I alone in this??
As an investor I will start my own investigation.
The case is currently pending in front of the Honorable Judge Klausner, in the Central District.
I do not need to be licensed in California to proceed with the case.
The defendant's motion to dismiss is on the motion docket for October 31st. If the motion is denied, I will proceed with discovery. If the motion is granted, I will appeal to the 9th Circuit.
Tomorrow we celebrate the one year anniversary of the NSE letter.
Based on what Mr. Janes said on MoneyTV, this last Monday he became aware of its contents for the first time.
These types of appearances give me the motivation to continue with the litigation.
First, the case is against Janes Dean and not IMGG.
Second, I dont need to be licensed in California to appear pro se. (look it up)
Third, you are right, sorry for venturing back into the LOM.
Good night and good bye.
I guess the number really does not matter.
The list be will requested in discovery and depositions will be taken.
Enough said.
Are you being sarcastic?
If i was CEO of a company that had an OH a week ago and took down info on everyone that attended, I would not go on TV and take a guess like that.
So all I am looking for are actual numbers.
Question.
How many people attended the OH?
How many actually stayed for the demonstration?
In the MoneyTV interview Mr. Janes said that the count was between 70 and 100.
Thank you
Kichwa1, thanks.
I couldn't tell if he was talking about Mugs or Janes.
For the non lawyers here,
1. safe harbor statements do not apply to penny stocks
2. didnt hear any safe harbor statements on MoneyTV
Before you get everyone too excited, that was before I got suckered into buying in the $1+ range by the outright misrepresentations on MoneyTV by Mr. Janes about the tone and content of the October 2009 letter, that was supposed to be good news.
Ok, the facts
1. the Dean Janes litigation page was removed
2. the reson stated was violation of terms and conditions
3. I have appealed
4. I assume that it was the Facebook police and not because of a complaint by anyone
BTW, Dean Janes' Facebook page is alive and well, with a new picture to boot.
http://www.facebook.com/#!/dean.janes
I meant a competitor of Facebook
no, just moved on to a competitor
drPOLK, please understand that it was the federal government that send me the October 23, 2009 letter.
BTW, my name is Bogdan Rentea, what is yours?
You cannot find the facebook page because it was removed by Facebook.
I suppose that some roving Facebook team monitoring compliance with Facebook policies, on its own, decided that it violated some posting policy.
I am appealing. We shall see.
Just received from the FDA the letters of October 23, 2009 and January 5, 2010.
The October letter is outright shocking to me.
After I compare the public statements to the contents of the letters, I will make a posting on the "Janes Dean Litigation" facebook page.
Madtig6
just log into facebook and type in "dean janes litigation"
Generally, the safe harbor for Forward-Looking statements is not available to penny-stock companies. See Section 27A(b)(1)(C) of the Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
More at Dean Janes Litigation on Facebook
Federal rules require that before process is served, the defendant must be given a chance to waive service.
Such a request was sent to Mr. Janes. It gave him 30 days to make his decision.
Therefore, there will be no attempt to serve him until the middle of February.
Hindsight, happy to oblige, give me an email address.
Day Trader, my source of information about the suit against Dean Janes, is first hand, personal knowledge.
Everyone that wants a copy, just ask.
Lawsuit should be on PACER later today.
Lawsuit filed today against Dean Janes.
US District Court, Western District of Texas
No. A11CA 031LY