Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
BOD Thomas G. Plaskett, Chairman
Board of Directors member from the PLRO Website:
Thomas G. Plaskett, Chairman (Proposed), is a corporate director and executive with more than 25 years of executive management and senior level policy experience in the corporate areas of service, manufacturing and transportation.
Since 1991, Mr. Plaskett has served as chairman of Fox Run Capital Associates, a private consulting firm in Dallas, focusing on financial advisory and consulting services for emerging companies. Previously, he was chairman, president, and chief executive officer of Pan Am Corporation from 1988 to 1991, and president and chief executive officer of Continental Airlines from 1986 to 1987. Also, from 1974 to 1986, he held several senior management positions at American Airlines and AMR Corporation, including senior vice president of marketing, senior vice president of finance and chief financial officer. He also was vice-chairman of Legend Airlines in Dallas from 1996 to 2000. Mr. Plaskett was elected to the board of directors of Greyhound Lines, Inc., in May, 1994, and served as interim president and chief executive officer of the company for a period in late 1994. He was elected chairman of the board in 1995 and served in that role until the company was sold in March 1999.
Mr. Plaskett is the non-executive chairman of Novell Corporation and presiding director of RadioShack Corporation, headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas. He is also a director of Alcon, Incorporated, in Fort Worth. He serves as trustee and past chairman of the board of trustees for Kettering University (formerly GMI Engineering and Management Institute) in Flint, Michigan.
Mr. Plaskett holds an MBA from the Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration and a Bachelor of Industrial Engineering from Kettering University in Flint, Michigan.
.
PLRO-Platinum Research Organization,Inc.
TechroBond is positioned to disrupt large, status quo global markets, markets that are controlled by some of the world's largest corporations. Company has been researching and developing it's technology for 10 years. Just went public in November. Poised to enter the lucrative $56.8 Billion Lubrications Market.
3 PLRO Stock Reports
1.) PLRO 16 Page Stock Alert:
http://hubbertmarketdigest.com/media/Hubbert_PLRO.pdf
2.) PLRO Valuation Analysis by Strategis Report, December 12, 2006.
3.) PLRO 14 Page Fundamental Analysis by The Research Works LLC,
December 07, 2006.
http://www.hubbertmarketdigest.com/report.htm
PLRO Website:
http://www.platinumresearch.com
.
US must lead on global warming: Senators
Reuters
February 15, 2007 - 10:19PM
Corporate moguls, policy experts and US senators spoke with one voice about global warming Thursday, telling a world forum the United States must take a lead role in cutting greenhouse gases if it wants to encourage China and India to do the same.
At a Capitol Hill meeting that included representatives from the Group of Eight industrialised nations plus China, India, South Africa, Brazil and the European Union, Senator John McCain put the case for action on climate change bluntly.
"The debate is over, my friends," the Arizona Republican said. "Now the question is what do we do? Do we act, do we care enough about the young people of the next generation to act seriously and meaningfully, or are we going to just continue this debate and this discussion?"
McCain said the push to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that spur global climate change was a national security issue, and that voluntary efforts to limit those emissions from vehicles, power plants and other human sources "will not change the status quo".
McCain and Senator Joseph Lieberman, a Connecticut independent, have pushed legislation that would set limits on the emission of greenhouse gases including carbon dioxide, and allow those that exceed them to trade with others that are under the limit, a plan known as cap-and-trade.
Lieberman, who also addressed the group in the ornate Senate Caucus Room, noted growing momentum for US action "after many years of denial and inaction" on global warming.
"I want to make a prediction, which is that the Congress of the United States will enact a nationwide law mandating substantial reductions in greenhouse gases before the end of this Congress or early in the next," Lieberman said. This session of Congress ends in late 2008.
The Bush administration has rejected calls for mandatory limits on greenhouse gas emissions, maintaining that such caps would harm the US economy.
Jim Rogers, the chief of Duke Energy, applauded the mandatory cap-and-trade approach, and stressed that if the United States did not act soon to cut greenhouse emissions, fast-developing China and India probably would not participate in any global emissions-cutting program.
In one of his first speeches that addresses climate change, World Bank President Paul Wolfowitz called on countries to agree on a post-Kyoto global regulatory framework for reducing carbon emissions that does not punish the poor. The Kyoto Protocol on curbing greenhouse gas emissions expires in 2012.
He said the challenge was to cut greenhouse gases while meeting energy demands that can help people escape poverty.
"We cannot penalise countries escaping from poverty for what is the result of a fossil-dependent growth pattern in rich countries," he told delegates at a dinner hosted by the World Bank.
Richard Branson, chief of Virgin Airlines and other ventures, said leadership and sacrifice were required to tackle global warming, but credited the United States for growing markets for renewable energy and green technologies.
Branson announced last week in London a $US25 million ($A32 million) prize for the first person to find a way to scrub greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.
.
I Started This Board
I guess I kind of fell into being Board Monitor. Starting to regret it already, lol. Naw, not really, I am here for intelligent discussion on PLRO, and nobody will drive me away. We are lucky, for people to post here, IHUB requires them to be civil.
So come on people, speak up, whether positive or negative. Supporting your reasoning with links, research and logic, will give credibility to your posts.
.
It is a Simple Question All Right
I really doubt that anyone here really cares whether it is 2 reports or 3 reports. I looked at your link. It still looks like 3 to me. The Strategis report is a Valuation Report. IF you still want to waste your time on such a trivial matter go for it. First, i suggest you go to this link and read the WHOLE page.
http://www.hubbertmarketdigest.com/report.htm
At the top it says "one such report", then later it says "Another such report on PLRO I've taken the liberty of posting right here":
Strategis Report
Platinum Research Organization (PRO) edition - December 12, 2006
The following is a preliminary analysis to ascertain the potential value with respect to the proposed merger of NorthTech and Platinum Research Organization (“PRO”).
Such a trivial matter, unreal.
Also, for your benefit. I am the Board Monitor. If you want to continue posting such nonsense go for it. Eventually, people will just stop reading your posts. However, this Board will remain civil. You have already violated a rule that requires me to delete your post (#160). However, I will give you one more chance to be civil, before I do such.
FYI Here is the rule:
Personal Attack – when someone attacks a person, with name calling, or relating to the messenger and not the message.
.
Reverse Merger VS. IPO
When a new company decides to go public they can either go by a reverse merger or an Initial Public Offering (IPO). PLRO chose via reverse merger. The benefits of a reverse merger, as opposed to an IPO are:
* You may receive a higher valuation for your company
* The company does not require an underwriter
* The costs are significantly less
* The time required is considerably less
* IPO's require greater attention from top management
* Typically there is less dilution of ownership control
http://www.businessfinance.com/reverse-merger.htm
The main benefit of an IPO is publicity. The hoopla is all over Wall Street. Everybody knows about it. Of course the Underwtiters usually get millions of dollars to get the word out.
PLRO went the reverse merger route. They did not get any of the publicity that an IPO receives. PLRO did not want to remain unknown forever.
So in an IPO the Company ends up paying for publicity of their stock. In a reverse merger the Company or a non-controling stockholder may pay for the publicity. There is not much difference in either path.
Apparently, some here would rather PLRO stay an unknown Company, that is utterly ridiculous.
.
PLRO Stock Report Fees
The 16 page PLRO Stock Alert:
Paid for by Watermark Capital Ltd., by their own description a non-controling shareholder, to provide (GASP) public awareness for PLRO. Hubbert Market digest was paid $2,000 and expects to receive new subscriber revenue as a result of this advertising effort.
The PLRO Strategis Report:
It does not say.
I have never received any mailing at home, so I have no comment on that.
The PLRO 14 page Research Works Report:
For RW's equity research services related to this Company, including this report, to be performed through December 6, 2007, the Company agreed to pay RW a fee of $5,000, and a non-controlling shareholder has agreed to pay RW a fee of 50,000 warrants for the purchase of Company stock with a strike price of $0.26. This report is based on RW's independent analysis and judgement.
To get a more clear picture of the reports, read the disclaimers in their entirety. The reports give the phone number of PLRO Investor Relations.
These are paid for promotions that are openly displayed to the public. You never get to see the figures paid for in an IPO, you might be very surprised.
You watch hundreds of paid for promotions every time you watch TV, do you go running, screaming around the house "It's a scam, it's a scam"!! Well, a few here just might.
.
About My Posts
I will be posting here for quite a while, so I better explain myself. I do not and/or will not knowingly support a scam stock. I have no affiliation with PLRO or their Investor Relations. I am just a small individual investor. I do have a small investment in PLRO, and intend to do so for the long term.
I never tell anyone when to buy or sell. When posters preach about when to buy and sell, beware. I will be posting mostly facts supported by research and logical conclusions that you can reach from those facts. I am not an expert, occassionally I may make an innocent mistake, when pointed out I will gladly correct those mistakes.
Do not simply take what you read here as fact. Verify the information for yourself. Do your own Due Diligence.
Just be aware that we have many new posters that have an agenda to create FUD, Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt. They have already talked one person into selling with a loss, at just the moment that this stock might have turned around. What a shame. Some will do anything to further their agenda. They will even bad mouth a stock just to get the price lower so that they can buy into the stock cheaper. After a week or so you will have a sense of who has something to contribute here, and who to ignore. IHub does have an ignore feature, it works great.
I have other investments and interests to pursue, I will not sit here and respond to non-sensical posts all day.
Good luck to us all.
.
3 PLRO Stock Reports
1.) PLRO 16 Page Stock Alert:
http://hubbertmarketdigest.com/media/Hubbert_PLRO.pdf
2.) PLRO Valuation Analysis by Strategis Report, December 12, 2006.
3.) PLRO 14 Page Fundamental Analysis by The Research Works LLC,
December 07, 2006.
http://www.hubbertmarketdigest.com/report.htm
PLRO Website:
http://www.platinumresearch.com
p.s.
for the benefit of scoop 21:
1 + 1 + 1 = 3
.
Re: Share Due Diligence
Thank you for sharing with this Board your total lack of DD. If this is how you conduct your DD, you better buy some bonds. Let me first say (which disproves 95% of your DD) that PLRO went public via reverse merger in November 2006. Prior to that PLRO was a private company that focused for 10 years on Research and Development. Cecelia Pineda is the CEO of the company that controlled the stock shell, BEFORE PLRO took over in November. Technically, the merger is not closed yet. That is what the 256 page Proxy and March 1 Shareholder Meeting is all about.
I will answer # 1 and 2 of your 18 points of stellar (LOL) research. The company may be paying for the 3 research reports. Do you expect people to conduct extensive research and write a 14 page report for free? This is a standard practice.
Your expert DD points # 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17 and 18 do not warrant an answer since PLRO was not associated with that company at that time.
It is expected that PLRO will officially take over the "shell" when they Close the agreement, several weeks after the Shareholder Meeting on March 1.
p.s.
Where do you pople come from? Simply amazing.
.
Re: IR Response
No problem enlightened1. The purpose of this message board is to share information about PLRO, whether positive or negative. People here will be much better off getting their questions answered from reliable sources, than reading posts from posters with obvious agendas, who provide no research or links to back up their claims.
PLRO Investor Relations
Market Direct Investor Relations, Inc.
Telephone: 1-866-402-6760
Email: info@marketdirect-ir.com
PLRO Website:
http://www.platinumresearch.com
.
Pure Romance Called
Despite what some may think here, I do not knowingly promote stock scams. I try to provide reliable information. In that vein, I will share what just happened, do with it what you want.
I posted here several days ago that I called Pure Romance. They transfered me to Mr. Cicchinelli, Patty Brisben's son and the Executive Vice President. There was no answer, so i left a message. If you remember i posted the next day that I received no answer, and maybe they were blowing me off.
Well, Chris Cicchinelli called me back 5 minutes ago. I was stunned. He apologized for delay, he was out of town, he was aware that UVCL put out the PR, but wanted to call me anyway. He said the merger was canceled mostly because "the timing was just wrong". I am not exactly sure what that means, i was so stunned he called, i did not ask. He did say that Pure Romance is looking at other options, maybe a reverse merger in the future or even an IPO. I did ask if they are looking at another shell. He said "no, not at this time".
I must say i am thoroughly impressed with Pure Romance. He was very polite and sincere. I can see why the Consultants love the company, they treat people with dignity and respect. He did say he would keep my number and let me know if/when they are going public. Pure Romance, a very impressive company.
OT
I gave some of you bad news, now maybe some good. Longer term investors take a peek at PLRO. They should be on NASDAQ in the future. The price is down from recent highs. Stock Reports and DD on IHUB message board.
.
Not True AGAIN
"Name; Marcus Hubbert publisher of Hubbert Market Digest. You can send a check for subscription for $329.00. There is no phone number, no web site, no way to contact him at all. A search turns up no results online."
That is unequivocably not true, another one of your distortions of reality.
The fact is his Website and means of contact have been posted here several times. I will do so once again for your education.
3 PLRO Stock Reports + PLRO Website
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=16804467
http://www.platinumresearch.com
.
Your Agenda
See, there you go. You missed your entry point, so now you are telling others not to buy or even sell. You, Sir have an obvious agenda. How appropriate it would be if you got left behind. That is what happens to traders. They either sit on the sidelines while a stock skyrockets, or they buy when they should not and lose it all one one trade. I hope you learn before it it is too late. You financial future is at peril.
What is this "pump machine" that you keep referring to?.
.
Where to From Here?
I am not a Technical Analysis person, especially with BB stocks. However, the site I take a quick TA look at says BLTA is Neutral, but the Candlestick is Very Bullish (Hammer).
Seems like from here, the only way for BLTA to go is up.
http://www.stockta.com/cgi-bin/analysis.pl?symb=BLTA&num1=7&cobrand=&mode=stock
.
PLRO Investors Relations Response
"I don't think they have even responded to e-mails."
Not true. I contacted PLRO Investor Relations about the stock price Tuesday evening. This is what they Emailed me Wednesday:
...................
Dear Shareholders,
The last several days have been difficult for many of you, and indeed for us as well. As many of you have followed, Platinum Research Organization's common shares, which trade on the Nasdaq OTCBB under the symbol 'PLRO', have advanced to a series of new highs over the past several weeks. Unfortunately over the last few days, the price of those shares has suffered a significant retracement. Naturally, this has caused many to wonder what, if anything, has caused this precipitous decline in price.
The forces that are applied to equities listed on public markets are difficult to understand and often appear quite random. Like you, we have been attempting to ascertain whether there is a specific reason or event behind recent moves.
After discussions with Company executives, we can definitively confirm the following:
1. There has been no material event or fundamental development, private or public, that would cause recent market activity; and
2. No material event or fundamental development that might have such a negative price effect on the stock is expected to occur.
In early stage equities markets, stock price movements and volatility are often severe, and it would appear that in this instance such movements are more likely in response to outside market forces than a reflection of any real or perceived negative event at the Company.
We are well aware how trying these times are for many of you. We confirm our support for and belief in PLRO, and as always, we encourage you to seek expert advice before making any investment. We continue to strongly believe in the inherent value in the Company, and we are very excited about its prospects and ongoing development initiatives.
Sincerely,
Investor Relations
Market Direct IR
.
Re: PLRO Valuation
"Stop it--you will cost more innocent people more of their hard earned money."
Do your own Due Diligence, do not rely on others. If you are not a sophisticated enough investor to comprehend the true value of PLRO, then you probably should not buy the stock.
"This is no different than biotech companies"
EXACTLY. Sir, it is obvious from your posts that you do not understand or care about fundamentals. That is exactly what the Strategis Report states, PLRO should be vaulued similar to a biotech company. Obviously, you have never even read the Strategis or you would not make such an ignorant comment.
It is also obvious from your posts that you are a TA Trader, at the expense of others. You rely on TA because it is the simplest to learn and understand. It is well known that traders such as you lose money in the long run, incur exhorbitant broker fees and unnecessary taxes. Due to your investing lifestyle, you are so miserable that you encourage others to participate. Your type would mislead their own mother to scalp .20 on a stock. You should be ashamed of yourself.
Read the Strategis Report.
PLRO Valuation
This is simply an attempt to put some kind of a value on PLRO. For a better understanding consider reading the Strategis Report, December 12, 2006 on PLRO. Many companies have considerable market caps before they are even producing revenues. PLRO is already producing revenue in the Railroad railcuve industry. Granted, sales just started in November and are probably small at this point.
When determining a proper market cap for PLRO there are 2 important points to consider. First, PLRO has spent 10 years developing TechroBond which is a "Disruptive Technology". What this means is that TechroBond is positioned to disrupt large, status quo global markets, markets that are controlled by some of the world's largest corporations. Second, TechroBond gives PLRO a significant "Competitive Advantage". It's 57 Patents Issued and Pending should give PLRO an advantage that competitors can not match for years to come.
From the Strategis Report:
Based on interviews with PRO personnel and customers developing grease applications with PRO technology, a comparison of PRO to the timeline above would put PRO grease applications post-Phase IV (it is now revenue generating), oil applications well into “FDA review process/approval” and coatings applications in Phase III. Again, it may seem peculiar to compare PRO to a Biotechnology company, it is a very meaningful analysis to how the markets value innovative and disruptive technologies.
TechroBond is a disruptive technology that anticipates dramatic but staged growth across multiple platforms and applications. The following are 2 of the more conservative value figures cited:
* $450 million to $1.09 billion .
* $621 million to $920 million.
They both average out to $770 million.
With a fully diluted share count of 102 million, a $770 million market cap gives a theoretical share price of $7.55.
http://www.hubbertmarketdigest.com/report.htm
.
Long Term Projection
Ignore the ignorant bashers here. They have done no DD and have not offered any, because they can not.
If you have a long term horizon (2-3 years), PLRO is a magnificent bargain right now. Do some DD. Look at the product, look at the Patents, look at the stellar Board of Directors. In a few years PLRO should be on NASDAQ around $50 a share.
.
Do some DD
"Total silence from the company in the face of this kind of a decline indicates that their scam worked, they bailed at a high price leaving many, many, bagholders."
PLRO just began trading in November 2006. Management does not even own any PLRO stock, yet. The Closing to complete the merger is expected in Mid March, if the Proxy is approved.
Have you seen any Form 4's Filed?
.
Rivera Interview Highlights
The interview with Mr. Rivera is awesome. It contains most of the standard info that we already know. Here are a few highlights of comments that stuck out to me:
* He stresses we make Biofuel, NOT Biodiesel.
* Process uses 440 KW/hour energy and produces 4,400 KW/Hour energy.
* Process uses Soybeans, NOT Soybean oil.
* Every one is invited to visit Natchez.
* Biggest problem is Demand is overwhelming Supply. Have had to put off some potential customers.
* Because our result is clean burning, a by-product of 7-3-7 Fertilizer, we qualify for Green Certificates, Tax Credits and other financial benefits. Biodiesel and Ethanol do not qualify for such benefits.
* Result of Process is a Natural Gas like substance, Natural Gas produces 1,000 BTU, JR Juice 1,908 BTU.
* Extremely clean burning, you can not see it.
* Very little Glycerines, is filtered down to less than 1/2 Micron. For a Gas Turbine and Jet Engine the standards are to be filtered down to 10 Microns.
http://blogsofbainbridge.typepad.com.nyud.net:8090/ecotalkblog/files/Segment_4_Airdate_2-13-06.mp3
.
AHHHH Pinky Quotes Not Working Today. eom
Subtle Basher?
I used to think you were a subtle basher. No way. You are as BLATANT as can be. I bet when you were a kid, you used to dream of chasing Santa Claus out of the house with a shotgun.
Get some help.
.
BFUN
BFUN is not trading. (Sigh)
.
Listen Right Now
Just an 8 minute interview.
http://blogsofbainbridge.typepad.com.nyud.net:8090/ecotalkblog/files/Segment_4_Airdate_2-13-06.mp3
.
Awesome Interview!!!
Just listened to JR on the Radio. He told em like it is!!
Give it a listen.
"Biggest problem is Demand is overwhelming Supply".
.
Myriad of Applications
Here is an excerpt from a PLRO 2002 Press Release. I admit that this is new to me, and I have not heard this mentioned lately, but the point is that TechroBond has the potential to be used in numerous applications.
------------------------------------------
Although the oil industry will be a key market, Jaeger and Greer believe that the coatings market holds the greatest potential. According to Greer, it is expected that when the technology is used in a coating for aircraft, the newly treated surface will have a lower drag co-efficient that reduces air friction in flight by as much as 15 percent. "This could lead to considerable fuel savings," Greer said. The coating would also have water and ice-shedding properties, which could reduce the use of de-icing chemicals.
http://www.techrobond.com/pressrelease_aug14_02.shtml
.
Ludlow Energy SmallCap Index-Stock Report
http://www.ludlowcapital.com/reports/usse.htm
.
PLRO Info Links
I have done a lot of DD here. Realistically, as long as PLRO executes, and I see no reason why they will not, in a few years PLRO could be on NASDAQ at $50 a share.
PLRO Website:
http://www.platinumresearch.com
3 PLRO Stock Reports:
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=16804467
.
My Apologies pual
I misunderstood.
He was using your previous figure of $500,000
I am big enough to admit my mistakes, sorry pual.
.
Wrong Again pual
* That's a PPS of 0.0025 if I calculate right! *
You have turned from a Closet Basher to an outright, gutless, wide open Basher. Either take a math class or get a new calculater.
$1 M / 200 M shares = $.005
Are you going to retract your blatant bash post, or are you going to continue to expose your ignorance and agenda to this whole board?
.
Remorseful Sellers
Several people stated here that they just sold USSE this morning around .21. I think one guy sold yesterday with a $6,000 loss. They will also miss out on the .03 share Dividend. They have made a serious financial blunder and will deeply regret their decision.
I assume some succumbed to all the subtle, negative bashing on this board. There have been many more here bashing on this board, than talking constructively about USSE. How a person can feel good about fellow human beings taking a financial loss, partly based on their baseless, ignorant posts, is a mystery to me, they should be ashamed of themselves.
USSE has a Disruptive Technology. Many existing companies will resist the success of USSE. That is why it is so important for you to do your own Due Diligence. Then you can make intelligent decisions about USSE, instead of making emotional blunders.
.
Just Beautiful
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=USSE.PK&t=1d
.
UVCL Tax Loss CarryForwards
Posted by: speckulater
In reply to: None
Date:1/26/2007 2:32:12 PM
Post #of 701
Tax Loss CarryForwards
I have not seen Tax Loss CarryForwards mentioned here. This is from UVCL April 2006 10K:
< No provision for income taxes has been recorded due to net operating loss carryforwards totaling approximately $1,569,000 that will be offset against future taxable income. Theses net operations loss carryforwards begin to expire in the year 2021." >
I am not a CPA but they could possibly have a cash value of:
$1,569,000 * .33 = $517,770
.
With or without the Tax Loss CarryForwards?
.
I stand corrected.
Apparently Sean Fulda really is that ignorant and incompetant, to blow such a good deal. It just does not make sense.
.
You Need a New ID Name. eom
Correcection on $500 Million
I looked up my old post. I may have been a little optimistic about $500 Million in 5 years, looks more like $250 Million. That is still a $2.56 share price in 2001. Plus, my numbers were conservative.
--------------------------------------------------------
Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last Read Next 10 | Previous | Next
Posted by: speckulater
In reply to: None
Date:2/9/2007 11:27:20 AM
Post #of 659
Pure Romance Pt 2
While we are waiting for confirmation or rejection of the reverse merger, you might want to become familiar with PureRomance. If/when the merger goes thru you might have to make a quick decision whether to sell or not. Much better to make an informed non - emotional decision.
Check out their website (guys, just be aware there is a ton of pink, lol). Look at their recent sales history. They have an 11 year proven track record. Pure Romance has the products that sell. They now have over 10,000 Sales Consultants, looking forward Consultants and Sales could grow rapidly. Kind of like a snowball rolling down a hill. The average sales growth rate is 46%, but just use a conservative rate of 30%.
Making Sales projections:
2007 = $78 million
2008 = $101 million
2009 = $132 million
2010 = $171 million
2011 = $228 million
$228 M * conservative profit margin 15% = $34 million Net Income.
$34 M / 200 M shares = $.17 Earnings Per Share.
.17 * 15 multiple = $2.56 share price in 2011.
Not hard to envision Pure Romance a $Billion Company in 10 years.
IF the merger finalizes, some here will sell at .30, or .20, or even .10. Some will sell for pennies a share , when there are dollars per share to be had.
.
Pure Romance is a Great Company
It is not out of the question, for them in 5 years to be a $500 Million Company on NASDAQ.
.