Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Nphc hasn't won squat, especially not that DTRA grant he was pumping and failed to give an answer on. I really wouldnt suprise me if he got caught pumping and manipulating this stock again, hence the CE.
Just doing my duty and keeping new eyes aware. I wouldn't go out on a limb and say lack of urgency tho..
So quick to forget WHO let this so called current state if limbo happen AND that it might not be temporary... look at one year chart, that's the trend. Also, see the consequences of breaking the permant injunction? More civil or CRIMINAL charges.... otc markets lists a top reason for CE as criminal activity. Like i said, slick rik get caught with his hand in the cookie jar again?
Zyme cures cancer as well, and has JnJ behind it, this turd is getting flushed
How about that uptrend eh?
Way over my head, but seems like something I just watched on a program trying to sell me a package to teach me.ive speculated and been the blind retail buying blind, 2 stocks habe worked well for me but. But were holding around 10 years. I just read rule #1 and am trying to lean to value a company and buy with a margin of safety. If you don't mind me asking, how do you value a company quickly? I think I keep mixing up terminology or his method really creates a buying opportunity and I have to wait.
....... and fail........
I don't recall the case being a slam dunk on the SEC side being touted here. Perhaps Google permant injunction and diesengorment and it could be a explanation.
A permanent injunction is a court order requiring a person to do or cease doing a specific action that is issued as a final judgment in a case. ... Failure to comply with an injunction may result in being held in contempt of court, which in turn may result in either criminal or civil liability.
In contrast, disgorgement requires a defendant to give up all profits it has made as a result of illegal or wrongful acts, regardless of the actual loss incurred by the plaintiff. ... Disgorgement is an equitable remedy issued by the court, not the jury.
Now slick rik has been touting all these things, that haven't come to fruition (DTRA and it's response, starting ms trails by years end, still don't have those International sales), I wonder if he got caught with his hand in the cookie jar again?
The SEC seeks a permanent injunction, disgorgement, and civil penalties against all defendants, a penny stock bar against Deitsch and McManus, and an officer and director bar against Deitsch.
Almost 3.3 years and still going, so much for a slam dunk. Yes, this is from sep. 28 2018
SEC Charges Florida Microcap Company, CEO and Consultant with Fraud
Litigation Release No. 24295 / September 28, 2018
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nutra Pharma Corp. et al, No. 1:18-cv-05459 (E.D.N.Y filed September 28, 2018)
The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged a Florida-based microcap issuer, its CEO, and one of its consultants with making material misstatements to retail investors, among other charges.
According to the SEC's complaint, Nutra Pharma Corp., a microcap issuer that purports to make pain relief drugs with cobra venom, and its CEO, Rik Deitsch, issued or posted six press releases that materially misled investors. The releases allegedly implied, among other things, that Nutra Pharma was engaged in international distribution and sales of its product, when it was not, and that Nutra Pharma had upgraded its cobra farm facilities, when Nutra Pharma had no cobras, had no cobra farm, and had never produced cobra venom. Nutra Pharma publicized many of these press releases while Nutra Pharma and Deitsch engaged in an unregistered distribution of its securities to retail investors. In addition, on multiple occasions, Deitsch allegedly engaged in manipulative trading designed to "walk up" Nutra Pharma's stock price and create the appearance of active trading in Nutra Pharma. Further, Nutra Pharma and Deitsch allegedly failed to make numerous required filings, including filings about the company's sales of unregistered securities and filings about Deitsch's beneficial ownership of the company's securities. According to the SEC's complaint, Sean McManus, a consultant for Nutra Pharma, also made numerous misstatements while soliciting investors in Nutra Pharma. In addition, McManus allegedly acted as an unregistered broker, despite being permanently barred in 2001 by the NASD (now FINRA) from associating with NASD member firms.
The SEC's complaint charges Nutra Pharma with violations of the antifraud, registration, and reporting provisions of Sections 5(a) and (c) and 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Sections 10(b) and 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5(b), 13a-11, and 13a-13 thereunder. The complaint also charges Deitsch with violations of the antifraud, anti-manipulation, beneficial ownership disclosure, registration, and reporting provisions of Sections 5(a) and (c) and 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act, and Sections 9(a)(2), 10(b), 13(a), 13(d), and 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5, 13a-14, 13d-2, and 16a-3 thereunder, and aiding and abetting Nutra Pharma's violations of Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Sections 10(b) and 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5(b), 13a-11 and 13a-13 thereunder. Finally, the complaint charges McManus with violations of the antifraud and broker-dealer registration provisions of Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act, Sections 10(b) and 15(a) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5(b) thereunder. The SEC seeks a permanent injunction, disgorgement, and civil penalties against all defendants, a penny stock bar against Deitsch and McManus, and an officer and director bar against Deitsch.
Wild and out of control....
I've seen that theory thrown out many many times in order to attempt raise morale or defend a plummeting stock. Wrong every time.
Hate to break it to you, but look at the 1 month, 3 month and 1 year chart. Those are trends, and will show exactly what trend THIS is in. Depths pal depths.
An uptend??? That's laughable. We started this monday at the same price or lower than the previous monday.......so on and so forth..
What happened to your theory of the auditors taking inventory, you know, like they had to go back in time and account for things, that's why it was taking so long?.????
Rinse repeat? We started this week lower than last week, seems a pattern. And your volume is wrong, not 500k, it'll be red by days end, or tomorrow. Enjoy it while it lasts.
I thought he spent all his money on getting current super fast, that's why no more follow up vidoes.......the ones used to sidetrack people that he was missing deadline after deadline....
There's a waste of 25 million, market doesn't seem to like throwing money away as we're waiting on banking decision and fid.
Very long term..... around 10 years ago it was at .25 a share, factor in the massive reverse split and incompetent ceo at last year it peaked a penny! Just image where it'll be in 10 years from there! Defiantly better places to let your money sit and decline unless you just love a guy that can't run a company, hit any deadline and won't publicly update its bagholders, I mean shareholders.
Nailed it.
Really good, thanks
Much like when you said that when it miraculously got current, yet here I am....... people need to stop "feeling" and get back to thinkining.
Hmmmm well one step forward and two-step back, my predictions may still come true. The future isn't looking so hot on this one. I admitted to being wrong on current, things still aren't adding up so I wouldn't be so quick to judge.
Same could be said for the positive tunes but the result isn't there like my tune....
Don't fall for it. Haven't you seen by now there are a few certain longs here with nothing but pump pump pump, not selling a share etc. Now they are saying they are flipping, don't sell, 2022 is the year yada yada. They are taking advantage of suckers.
Lol! I'd say certain share holders do that one, oblivious to reality. Dance around like all is well with ongoing SEC case they (holders) said would be resolved by now, as well as a CE that would be removed after current (clearly 3 months and holding strong). I'm all for a little gamble, but this gets pushed like it's a sure thing, and the only sure thing is lack of transparency and meeting deadlines. Kinda a big deal... dump $50 in it and forget about it, don't believe the hype certain people push when they have millions of shares and are just waiting to dump on you if it ever gets another pump.
The hokie pokie? Not a real dance, like this isn't a real company lol.good answer tho
Rik and shareholders will not be in that club, don't get it twisted....
Where the moving forward? Two steps forward and 3 back doesn't work
I'm not here to make friends. I sold sunshine at .17, it's now hardly holding .05 so house money is laughable when it could be actual money. Should have waited to buy sol, as it'll go lower, like sunshine....
.......... listen to silence????? Great stragety. Not that taking advice from others is recommended, but the "company" won't talk.........and don't blame it on NDA
Oh wow.. how sad. He's proud of more products which are relabelbed current products that don't sell, blames the OTC for a CE that happend because he let the company get behind, re-hashes the DTRA story which is suppose to have been answered by now (no answer is a answer, clearly they aren't excited about it if we're past the deadline) then he throws out clinical garbage, where in a previous PR he states it will begin by years end........I would say buyer beware but the CE speaks volume (or lack of) there. 20 years old, this ain't no startup. This is a cash buying machine with a PROVEN shady CEO
Staying positive is not always the best thing to do. A person should stay objective. Stand on the rim of the coin and see both sides. On one side of the coin you have the typical stinky pinky, on the other side you have rik..... being positive won't have a good outcome for either option
If so, better sell this time lol I'll say not a snowballs chance in hell tho.
Exciting stuff to buy high then buy more as it drops?...... lol
Makes no sense to trust a PR put out by a CEO that's proven not trust worthy.....but continue on...... hey rik, where is that answer on DTRA you said? Hey rik, you said MS trials starting by year end, why do a fluff pr about pain away instead of what you put out in your PR?
I'll sum it up. In November 2020 they were invited to do a presentation. Rik once again jumped the gun and made it sound like a deal was going to be made, even said answer end of summer 2021. Still no answer. So he went and engages some attoryes so spu d legit and a company to make DTRA more aware, even tho they were aware, hence the invitation in November 2020.
100% speculative opinion. Invested how much money? Work how? Dates? (The answer on September/e d of summer was a bust)
This company has a bad track record. It's past the startup phase yet still lagging in startup territory. Go and average the last 10 or even 5 years of Financials and it'll be clear. Good JV investors will invest in a startup company because of who is running the show as they have faith since no track record. Here, we have a track record, a ceo that gets sued for not paying back loans, busted for market manipulation, let it get nearly 4 years behind on Financials, dont forget the prior stock promotion around the manipulation time frame, already had one massive reverse split, the products on market are unwanted and. Ot selling well. Everyone will make their own decision and it's a clear one for me and many others. If people still want to buy, they can make an account at T Rowe price.
Didn't I see a 1:2 reverse spilt happening shortly?
And there it is! I've seen alot of pumping on this and one of the longs just put the final touch on it. Enzc has been over valued due to pumping of its own share holders. This needs to be watched by all new eyes. I use to be pro enzc but nothing is materializing, and all we get is soon, early yada yada. Dates aren't being set because then they would be held accountable.
I've wondered the same. Who says the shares I own are legit shares if all the shares have been bought up.....