Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
looking forward to announcing our passive testing results of our polymer ridge waveguide device in the near future.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lightwave-logics-advanced-organic-electro-150000015.html
so it has been 2 weeks since this pr told investors to expect passive testing results in the "near future"
2 questions
1) what is the outer limits of "near future"
2) what can investors expect from the revealing of passive testing results
anyone have thoughts on this?
I thought the passive testing sets a baseline of sorts, and the active testing is where the rubber hits the road, so anyone who can add color to this please do so, tia
Steve, I like the fact that under his picture in the section titled
A QUESTION OF MATERIAL: INP, SILICON, OR SOMETHING ELSE?
it says
Michael Lebby
Chair in Optoelectronics, Glyndwr University. Board Director Lightwave Logic Inc.
not to mention he is the conference chair!
booyah!
material systems that have shown powerful electro-optic properties as well as strong thermal and photo chemical stability.
BOOYAH BABY !!
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/lightwave-logics-advanced-organic-electro-150000015.html
"We continue to advance toward our goal to demonstrate that our organic electro-optic material systems are a commercially feasible alternative, next generation technology that can solve the price/performance/scalability issues that confronts the industry. We are looking forward to announcing our passive testing results of our polymer ridge waveguide device in the near future."
keep the pr's coming Z, it's finally TIME!
are you sure?
punkipoo dominating the boards like rodman, russell and wilt the stilt
he spends an awful lot of time giving unselfishly to us all, or, maybe just hoping to shake free another lot of shares, in any case, somehow I think that this pumpkin is a bit rotten on the inside
BS meter flying off the chart!
for starters, don't think they would have completed the rigorous commercial testings of 2,000 hours each for thermal stability and then photo-chemical stability, and then further extend these tests to 4,000 hours of increased intensities
second, GP has no clue on ANY of the myriad material systems that are being used in the device builds, and as I understand they are continuing to create new material systems with even greater specs regardless of the fact that the current material systems are commercially viable and will increase speed while reducing power and cost at factors the industry cannot ignore
now be a good boy punkipoo and go back to the patch where you belong
six didn't lose money here, I got him out in the 1.20's last time it was there, it was his breakeven and he thanked me for it, he was incessantly whining last time the stock was in the tank, but he got out on the last pop to the 1.20's, his continued incessant whining just shows his true character, if you pull up a 10 year chart this stock is basically flat at 1.00 the whole timeframe, everybody invested here should be in at roughly a buck on average, and the risk/reward is favorable for huge gains imo, do I wish I had sold the 3.33 high a few years back and bought back now, heck yeah, but I am not willing to risk being on the outside when this thing rockets, bottom line, the likes of the superior talent on board here is beyond reproach, and I will not let certain bozo's like six get to me one iota, these cockroaches will disappear when this takes off, you can count on it, period
31-Dec-2015 Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities, Financial Statements and Exhibits
Item 3.02 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities.
On December 30, 2015 (the "Closing Date"), Lightwave Logic, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company") completed a Regulation D Rule 506 private placement offering solely to accredited investors of units, with each unit consisting of 82,866 shares of the Company's common stock, par value $0.001 per share ("Common Stock") and a warrant (each, a "Warrant") to purchase 82,866 shares of Common Stock at $0.80 per share (each, a "Unit"), for $50,000 per Unit, or approximately $0.60 per share of Common Stock. The Company also simultaneously completed a Regulation S private placement offering of Units having the same terms as the Regulation D offering. In total, the Company sold 50 Units for total proceeds to the Company in the offering equal to $2,500,000. Immediately prior to the commencement of the offering, the Company had 61,253,780 shares issued and outstanding, and after the issuance of 4,143,300 shares in the aggregate pursuant to the offering, or 6.76% of the total issued and outstanding immediately prior to the commencement of such offering, the Company has 65,231,348 shares issued and outstanding as of the date of this Report. The Company sold 4,143,300 Warrants in the offering, which, for the avoidance of any doubt, were a part of the Units sold.
In connection with the offering, each investor executed a subscription agreement in the forms of Exhibit 10.1 and Exhibit 10.2, attached hereto, as applicable.
The subscription agreements contain registration rights whereby the Company shall, within sixty (60) calendar days from the Closing Date, register the Common Stock and the shares of Common Stock underlying the Warrants by filing a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Warrants shall expire on the fifth (5th) anniversary of the date of subscription, and the forms of Warrant are attached hereto as Exhibit 10.3 and Exhibit 10.4. The offering was made directly by the Company and no underwriter or placement agent was engaged by the Company. The Company expects to use 60% of the proceeds from the offering for research and development and 40% for working capital purposes.
The foregoing descriptions of the offering does not purport to be complete, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the forms of subscription agreement attached hereto as Exhibit 10.1 and Exhibit 10.2, and the forms of Warrant attached hereto as Exhibit 10.3 and Exhibit 10.4, each of which are incorporated by reference herein.
WOW, punkipoo accounts for most the posts here lately, he must be trying to put one last push for sellers, amazing how he amps up the volume near the lows, it's his m.o.
hope you don't get caught off base trying to steal shares punki
Timeline showing ACTIVE DEVICE PROCESS begins now (JAN) with the new year, wonder how quickly we can get specs after this process begins, I know we are all anxious having been here so long, it also shows POLING for (FEB) and (MAR), presumably the latest we get device specs would be with the first quarter results
anyone hearing things along the way please share with us here, tia
Steve, I saw 48,000 bought at .60 right at the open, there was a buying flurry at the open, let's see if it happens again this morning, amazing how little volume it takes to move the pps substantially here (up or down)
personally adding to my position again here today, looking forward to 2016 and would never have thought after Z's update coupled with the successes of the rigorous material systems testing that I'd being getting shares down here at this level
still, keeping the faith
actually, never been more pumped too!
also, still not favoring a buyout, prefer partnering deals, royalty deals, etc
ps - don't think we will being looking for the GP in the patch this time around in 2016, at least that's what I'm hearing
x said, As for Perk no longer in the mix, I'm not sure, it depends on how you read it.
x, after recently passing all of the rigorous stability testing, how could the perk NOT be in the mix of the "material systems"
I thought the perk was the "secret sauce" to the whole stability issue that plagued the big boys who spent a decade plus in time and billions in combined costs only to all abandon all those research efforts
anyone care to weigh in on the topic please do, and anyone who has spoken with management may have crossed this bridge please share, tia
gates, it seems like an orchestrated attack on the pps, I really don't think it is raise buyers causing this, unless they are professional hedge fund type players, lpc? looks like pirates working to accumulate at lowest possible pps, can be a dangerous game if Z puts out a nice development milestone pr, they won't get the fear shares back below their average sale point, buying the blood in the street & still keeping the faith, as you point out we are at lowest pps in multiple years just after receiving most positive developments summary ever, personally looking for a big volume buying bounce very soon, perhaps today we see that happening
I doubt that, we should get a pr on the raise being filled any time now
x, walter, any others who may have participated please weigh in on the topic
whenever punkipoo gets loud and proud historically marks the bottom, so I picked up some more here at .60
x, walter, did you guys get in on the raise? If so, did you flip out of any previous holdings as someone suggested was happening driving the pps down?
I suspect it should be about filled at this point, anyone have the details yet?
from 17715 to 17723 seem to all be deleted, wonder what that was all about?
I like the tightness of the Ridge Waveguide Modulator timetable, and what gives me even more confidence is the fact that so much time was spent on the rigorous testing of the material systems yielding successful testing results necessary for commercial viability ahead of using them in the proto devices, and that adds to the credibility this time around imo
Also, the portfolio of material systems seems to be robust, with different variations designed for different applications, and new and better systems still being created even as the proto creation process has begun for the 1st gen protos, this should secure an upgrade pathway
The confidence level of Z has never been higher, but yes, I agree this has become a show me story, so please Z, be true to your timeline!
still a believer, keeping the faith
booyah!
Is the "core material" one of the "material systems" that surpassed the 2,000 hours of photochemical stability testing? From the sound of it these are two separate efforts.
Richard, I would think the core material used in the device structures would have to be part of the material systems that have undergone all of the extensive testings, the last of which was just completed, or there would be no sense in moving an untested core material into the device structures. I believe you are over-thinking it
If anyone does contact the company please confirm this with them, tia
Boooyaaah !
better hurry up and buy buy buy
sure feels like some stealth buyer (getting less stealth late today btw) thinks so!
booyah
I think the photochemical stability testing may be closing in on a successful completion based on the stealth buyer the past week or so, hope we get device news (with full specs) soon
I think chances are very high that if there would have been degradation it would have occurred by now, so imo a successful completion near-term is a slam dunk
I agree with the suspect pre-market trades, with a thin bid market makers can easily take out stop loss orders too right?
Gonna use the money to accumulate more here but darn tough to do it without raising the price above .75 and I think that's pretty steep.
why the sudden change of heart six?
and does this mean we all here will need to endure your incessant whining once again?
on a positive note, since I got you out whole in the 1.20's you can get tons more shares for the same investment dollars this time around, congrats on that score
gates, I concur, some here have said we need to hire bunches of scientists to advance this thing in a hurry, I think you got it right, we have some top names on our team that have access to the best of the best specialized players, so a small few hand selected players by these gurus is much more likely to bring this to our long awaited fruition
still, keepin the faith
coolair, only difference is you and I are not even close to being " one of the most prolific inventors in the field of optoelectronics."
With over 200 USPTO issued utility patents (and over 395 including national and international derivatives), Dr. Lebby is considered to be one of the most prolific inventors in the field of optoelectronics. He is also a Fellow and member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and the Optical Society of America (OSA).
I don't take what Lebby says about Lightwave Logic lightly, and don't think othere investors here should either, so that being said
Dr. Lebby stated, “Lightwave Logic is in the vanguard of polymer photonics. Its multi-chromophore process has already developed promising materials that offer the scalability and performance necessary to challenge Indium Phosphide, especially for high volume datacenter market opportunities. Polymers also have inherent advantages when compared to Silicon Photonics.”
booyah baby
During his presentations Dr. Lebby coined the term Integrated Photonics to describe what he saw as an unprecedented move to the miniaturization of photonics functions on a single chip and drew an analogy to the development of Integrated Circuits for computers.
Also during the presentation, he discussed Polymer Photonics and Silicon Photonics as competitive forces that could challenge Indium Phosphide—widely regarded as the incumbent technology.
Dr. Lebby stated, “Lightwave Logic is in the vanguard of polymer photonics. Its multi-chromophore process has already developed promising materials that offer the scalability and performance necessary to challenge Indium Phosphide, especially for high volume datacenter market opportunities. Polymers also have inherent advantages when compared to Silicon Photonics.”
just got in from the casinos (vegas) and read through the posts here, come on you knucklehead(s), if Lebby's statement is in quotes as having been said during the presentation(s), then I'm sure he said it. Do you guys really think our guys would just make up a statement like that & pin it on Lebby's name as having been said if it really wasn't?
should get to 2000 hours on the photochemical stability testing of its material candidates by exposing them to the visible light spectrum soon
hopefully we get device protos/full specs soon after, better bring your blankets, going to be cold in the patch this year, what with el nino , and climate change, and all, lol
whatever happened to global warming? again, too funny
Don't make stuff up unless you are sure.
I agree with you Steve, it would be wrong for six to mislead investors like that so he better post some proof of that claim
also, as I pointed out in this post, Greenlee has had 3 careers in 3 years and is on the outs currently looking for a 4th now
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=116512167
lastly, there is a big difference between Lauro and Lebby, six would have to be a fool not to recognize that the latter is much greater confirmation of the validity of the science here, and its potential for great success
yup Michael Lebby working for chump change, guess the tech here ain't worth squat, or is the opposite true, ah the tea leaves reading abilities of investors are really being tested here, lol
still....
keeping the faith
'Major' IBM breakthrough breathes new life into Moore’s Law
http://mashable.com/2015/10/01/ibm-carbon-nanotubes-moores-law/#8RNK_XVzEPqa
Hi Lou, if indeed this is you, thank you for your efforts, I as well have always enjoyed your comments on the conference calls, and certainly wish you the best in life going forward
As much as I would love to pepper you with all kinds of questions regarding the developments progress, especially relative to what you believe are the greatest hurdles or struggle points to acieving a successful device (with full specs), I strongly caution you not to engage in such discussion in a public forum such as this message board
I will ask if you are able to disclose anything about the replacement person or persons, maybe not specifically, but if this transition has occurred already or is that something that will take a matter of time to effect?
Best Regards
Rick, honestly I was thinking the same thing as what you said here,
Other similarities between the two companies are blatant. POET has lately replaced nearly their entire management team with what might be considered a "semiconductor dream team". They are also moving to Silicon Valley. Their timelines have always been slipping just like LWLG and their current ETA is also second half of 2016 for prototypes.
I am glad to hear you resonate that what they are working on currently is not truly next-gen, but there statement from the pr is impressive none the less (not sure how it is possible with material in the realm of LN)
"Put simply, that means we make what's on a wafer up to 10 times more energy efficient, 10 times cheaper and more than 10 times smaller," said Dr. Venkatesan. "And we believe we are the only company that could achieve this level of disruption."
Rick, also they said they would have a transceiver on a single chip along by end of first half 2016 if memory serves me
X, I agree, I think our tech here would ultimately trump theirs (Rick, agree?), but it does seem they are poised to get theirs to (a starved) market in 2016, so question is how quickly can we get our working protos (and whitepapers) , they may beat us to market, but hey, it is a big market, and I'm sure there is room for both companies to be successful
Gates, here is a snipet from yesterdays pr that prefaced the update call
The Company said it is poised to roll out a monolithic opto-electronics process platform that enables unprecedented improvements in energy efficiency, component cost and size in the production of smart optical components, driving applications ranging from data centers to consumer products.
"The Company's patented module-on-a-chip process, which integrates digital, high-speed analog and optical devices on the same chip, is designed to be the next industry standard for smart optical components fabrication," said Ajit Manocha. "By adding electronics functionality to optics - lasers, detectors, IR sensors -- POET powers 'smart' opto-electronic devices that demonstrate step-function improvements in low power performance, cost and size. Specifically applied to short reach VCSEL based transceivers for example, POET could enable up to 10X improvements in power consumption, component cost, and form factor," added the Company's Chief Executive Officer Dr. Suresh Venkatesan.
"Put simply, that means we make what's on a wafer up to 10 times more energy efficient, 10 times cheaper and more than 10 times smaller," said Dr. Venkatesan. "And we believe we are the only company that could achieve this level of disruption."
Gates, from the call, they anticipate proto's available for sampling in first half 2016 including a transceiver on a single chip, all sounds very promising, we may have superior tech here, but they may be first to market, that is market starved to fill a need for next-gen tech , that is why I would like to hear from Rick who is much more technical than me or you
I listened to the POETF update call, here is a link to yesterdays pr
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/poet-technologies-bolsters-strength-balance-200100687.html
and a link to the update call
http://www.poet-technologies.com/investor-relations/presentations/
imo, this company is very real competition to lightwave, I would be interested in what others think if they have the time to review/listen
Rick, Steve I know you were following this company, any thoughts?
how bout you X, are you aware of this tech?
interestingly, in the Q&A, similar to us, they say they have no known competition
their proto's are due out first half of 2016 and include a transceiver on a single chip
plenty of cash, and a strategy to commercialize, including proto's due out first half of 2016, still intend a nasdaq listing at some point
here's a link for you to access the replay, generally positive, more details will be presented in an investor update call just after year-end 2015
http://www.poet-technologies.com/investor-relations/presentations/
does anyone have specific expectations from today's update?
I know they claim to be close to commercial ready, but why the big selloff, looks like maybe some large player/fund exited their holdings recently causing the pps to be cut in half?
Rick, Steve, are you guys still following the developments here, if so, any thoughts?
fyi, POETF, public traded competitor has an update call today at 5pm et if anyone may be interested here is a link
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/poet-technologies-announces-conference-call-120000036.html
It is a canadian company, so the volume is on PTK.V mostly, not sure what to expect, but they too are theoretically close to some next gen device solutions