MARCHing onward.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Is DigiThrive current site-status due to migration? Perhaps a move from one operating system to another?: https://www.digithrive.com
Since you are good at following up on leads, I would appreciate your abilities.
TPT Strategic is not a shell company like ASHI.
VuMe strengthens with every transaction generating data..data-driven value(quality-distinguished)
VuMe is the platform for platforms
Would have-to be a fool to believe you..based-on that-logic.
Will let public reach the truth..not subpenny OTC colluders
Over 2B shares accumulated..only one trade in roughly an hour..under $2m marketcap
I pray for you..will let public reach the truth.
This proves marketcap/revenues maintain independent relationship.
Unfortunately…for you..revenues(your premise)didn’t fluctuate as marketcap has..revenues didn’t decline to all time lows as marketcap has. Your argument holds no water..I pray for you
Lotta eyes behind scenes on TPT acquisition of TekMovil..win/win
You can gift me 2 shares of TPTW..on NASDAQ
Irrelevant…Proven by the fact of how many highs/lows(and%’s-inbetween)
Trade just now..yet how many consecutive sub$2m marketcap days?..coordinated trading? Will let the public reach the truth.
Over 2B shares accumulated and not one trade under $2m marketcap so far..will let the public reach the truth, not the traders
Public can conclude traders working together..based on fact if that were not the case, there would already have been a trade.
Why subpenny OTC-traders keeping marketcap under $2m..TPTW targeted from beginning? Hmm..not looking good for these traders.
Clapping reflects intense intellect..I respect the seals
You lose when TPT goes NASDAQ.
1-yr chart shows 2 tops/bottoms p&d..3-yr 5tops/bottoms p&d..independent of company success..certain OTC traders influencing new money to buy so they can trade down and use profits from new money to buy the new shares hitting at the bottoms of the charts..to sell at the tops to new money. This is completely independent of company success to the extent of what certain traders can leverage against new money influenced by these traders.
Not enough shareholders currently to reflect accurate marketcap value.
This could-be transfer from one operating system to-another: https://www.digithrive.com/
Anyone familiar with coding know if this is due to migration?: https://www.digithrive.com
Not for you to decide. If market agrees with you, price will never reflect higher than $2m marketcap, as your arguments reflect against the truth.
TPT already strategizing improving downloads ahead of downloads
You have-to hide-behind a term..cuz you can’t define your-own.
Just because value-of TekMovil acquisition’s unknown..doesn’t-make $2m marketcap legit
Proven false iggy
Proven false.
Good, go away
How many additional posts do you want to demonstrate this, while at same time, it racks up my post count. Your choice, or you can go back and do your own data collection analysis
This can be proven false as well
Is your definition of quantity based relative to other posters or is there an absolute number?
There’s quality within the quantity, shows dedication for intolerance of false statements, as volume of posts reflects arguments countering false claims eventually proven to be false.
Holding this truth to be self-evident…I strive for accuracy.
(Updated)Will let the public reach the truth..when I use terms such as “significance”, it debunks that claim as it pertains to me. Search the term within all my posts, recognize what is significance and not significance based on the arguments I provided since what you are claiming is harsh and if not proven true beyond reasonable doubt, you are in major trouble. Not by me.
Is space only relative to the objects within it at any given time?
So dumb how you don’t understand simple logic
Not designated only for mainstream..truth for current shareholders..want the beef? Don’t focus on headlines..that’s the “skin of a chicken” behavior..read into the contents of the headlines for the beef.
How infinite is space before the object shrinking self-destructs?