Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
LOL... so, you think Grimmer is some mindless sheep just answering leading questions? That's a big stretch, even for you.
Grimmer knows very well what's happening within Anavex and within the AD field in general.
Interesting proclamation, if true...
Reassuring that blarcamesine addresses these neuroinflammatory processes, that which another company has discovered...
I only reiterate the facts... not much of a "pump" strategy is it?
You certainly have perfected your art at spinning untruths, exaggerations, misinformation... and especially false inferences! Your employer must be very proud of you.
Which HF do you represent and are paid by?
Oh dear... another investment group! How nefarious can it be? LOL
Unfortunately, we're not paid to post like you and your nefarious FUD gang.
We also stick to facts... not posting false inferences, fumbled FUD nonsense and the like.
In our group, we all do our individual investments/trades. Sorry to disappoint your dreamy notions.
LOL... the attacking response of an outed FUDster. So hilarious!
Like a caged varmint with a bright light on him.
FYI... I did my last reloading at 7.75 and below, per my previous post. Look it up.
Spoken like a true FUDster!
Crooked FUDsters like to try to turn it around to deflect from their nefarious activities.
Not fooling anyone!
Approvals first require an NDA. The company has decided to not rush AD, and instead wait for Rett, to secure the $100M voucher.
So don't expect a Rett NDA until late this year at the earliest.
An AD NDA could be about the same time... which sets up approval for both next year.
There's absolutely nothing wrong in accepting an invitation to promote Anavex, and the excellent developments happening with blarcamesine and its trials, at a biotech conference.
I'll be curious to hear if he touches on NDAs, RA discussions and/or commercialization.
Deny, deny, deny! Deniers of manipulation are likely those who are largely complicit.
Yes, once blarcamesine is approved, next year, we'll see the last of the HF FUDster plants.
Like a typical crooked Dem... accuse the other side of being and doing exactly what they themselves are doing. SMH
What name would you like to call yourself, your band of paid FUDsters and your HF employer?
I think "cabal", with its nefarious connotation, is quite appropriate, don't you?
Collusion is criminal. When two or more HFs collude to manipulate pricing with illicit trading tactics... that's criminal. Collusion is difficult to prove... thus, they go after trackable trading tactics like spoofing and naked shorting w/FTDs.
FUDsters, including AF, are hired to provide cover for their criminal trading activities.
Have you not seen the Jim Cramer interview, where he admits to his illegal tactics and hiring mouthpieces to spread untruths? AF was Cramer's protégé.
The size of the network might surprise you... all of us.
Then what name do you suggest, that would reflect the criminality of the collusive activity?
Synonyms for "cabal" are: faction, coterie, band, gang, ring
I don't think "cabal" applies only to political activity.
And it's a collusive and nefarious club... which earns the label "cabal".
So, in your opinion, who are the ones hiring the likes of AF and social-media FUDsters to spew lies?
You obviously have no idea how the collusive cabal works... anything and everything is attacked!
You should've known to sell yesterday EOD and buy it back today or tomorrow. This is the game, until there's news.
I'm hopeful to hear updates on Rett & AD progress, any inklings on NDAs... and perhaps the PD trial and any update regarding a journal.
Though we know from past experience there's little material news provided during a quarterly call, unless there's a PR the day of.
Oh, "they" know very well...
I'm more interested in getting the NDA filed, accepted and approved. From the TLR, we already know the trial results were great! I don't need to see the details.
Indeed, falconer... It's very exciting to know that we have 3-71 ("blarcamesine 2.0") in the works, that's more potent and perhaps more efficacious in addressing the many CNS disorders, as well as general life-functioning improvements (blood pressure, vision, sleep, mood, etc.). It'll also be interesting to see how small the effective dose can be.
It's rather amazing that we have something better coming as a follow-up to great!
Was it the boogieman who put out lies and twisted information after every positive trial, as cover for a coordinated short attack?
That boogieman has a name... it's Fraudstein. And it's not just him; there are several other hired mouthpieces... and some live on this MB. I'm sure you know most of them.
As they say, deniers are either naïve or complicit... but no one here is that naïve, right?
Your comments are totally baseless. Just because you don't hear anything you assume nothing is getting done. Wow... I'll just leave it there, because no amount of words will convince someone who's this naïve.
LOL... weak sauce.
How long does the avg drug take to get to approval and commercialization? Ans: 10 years.
And that is for just ONE indication. Anavex is working on THREE simultaneously!
It'll be 10 years for Missling next year, when blarcamesine is approved and sold in the market.
It just occurred to me, you likely know the biochecking toilet cleaner
https://www.griproom.com/fun/how-to-spot-fake-comments-on-stock-boards
3. The comment blames management, particularly the CEO for almost everything.
“Worst CEO in history.”
“Fire the CEO and everything gets better.”
“CEO raking in millions while we suffer.”
Stuff like that. You see it all the time. These types of posts are designed to sew fear about the company.
The CEO attack angle is often found when your stock is always red.
If the paid bashers are posting how dumb the CEO is, and you pull up a one-year chart and see that the stock is flat, or always declining, then you’re more likely to agree with their hypothesis.
Wall Street thinks in terms of years. Their discounted cash flow models are calculating profits that might not occur for a decade. Whereas you’re checking your stocks every few hours to see if anything has changed.
You’re expecting it to act like a motorboat (able to pivot at a moment’s notice) but the stock is behaving like a cruise ship beached in Mongolia.
What these bears are trying to get you to agree with is: “This CEO wants to be warm, so they’re dumb for not setting their living room on fire.”
Tesla treaded water for a decade before going parabolic. During that time lots of people said Elon Musk was an idiot and should be replaced.
Those who deny are either naïve or complicit... and we know you're not that naïve.
So, Mr. FUDster, is the price starting to correct because the "market" is now expecting solid trial results, NDA and approval soon? LOL, you're too funny!
No, it's the collusive action of several HFs who hire FUDsters to spew negative narratives as part of their manipulation schemes. I'm sure you know most...
Every basher here claims to be an "investor", who downplay trial results, spin negative narratives, say disparaging things about the CEO, never have anything good to say about either... and yet they are still "investors".
It would be amusing if it weren't part of a coordinated scheme by collusive HFs to manipulate stock prices.
There's absolute nothing ambiguous about the trial data. What don't you understand about astonishingly positive results that met all endpoints, where patients functionally IMPROVED?
You should study this data again so you don't forget it and mindlessly repeat your FUD...
You're nothing but an obnoxious MB bully with nothing meaningful to contribute... just a self-obsessed blowhard trying to impress. No one cares about your trades.
It's all about you, Leo.
... and I'd rather you not think about me so much.
Baseless FUD!
FUD is most easy to recognize. And your contributions here are nil.
Another baseless statement...
The conversation was about down titration that I was addressing... which was 21%.
The overall percentage at their assigned dosage level and not down titrated is simply 263/338 = 78%.
Another baseless claim...