Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
It is tough even at times impossible to beat the crooks when they have the support and backing of federal agencies who are also crooks.
If the company asked the shareholders to do a cert pull it would expose the shorts when shareholders still want their stock certificates and the DTCC has no more available
yes he states the anatomy correctly.
I had a stock years ago it was estimated to have been shorted over a trillion shares, the company spiraled and out of business the company went.
the crooks kept all their ill gotten gains without having to pay a penny in gains taxes because their positions were never closed.
They call it a death spiral.
Tens of thousands of shareholders lost everything and the DTCC refused to do anything likewise with the SEC. Crooks of a feather short together.
Kinda like being a politician where you have no rules and can insider trade without consequence.
If management would like to squeeze the shorts nutz they should PR a forward split, 1 for 2 or higher for the new oil stock the day after mmtlp ceases to trade.
Unpaid shorts would the be liable for the pricing the company puts on the stock in the private company.
I want to see these pigs squeal, they have stolen to much money from me over the years by destroying companies.
My comment was directed more towards mmtlp, Mmat, if it runs that is just a bonus.
I do not see mmat running seeing how the shorts are not being force to cover, and as far as them covering on mmtlp I bet many will not cover and being the bully will say "And what are you going to do about it?"
As far as the shareholders getting any help from the SEC or DTCC highly unlikely. They are just a agency to cover for the crooks.
not quite the short squeeze I thought we would have. which makes me wonder if possibly management is selling treasury stock to the brokers at a fixed prearranged price and pocketing the moneys and stiffing the shareholders.
wouldn't be the first shady trick I would have seen a company's management pull on the shareholders.
After all the did reverse split us a ways back and killed most of what I invested here.
mel cannot even retire from being the company liar, I bet he moved in with carolyn when urbie his daddy died
the short positions may hold and wait and see what the buyout price is, if any on the oil land and then cover on a cash bases based on the BO offer. now if they are betting there is no oil and our new shares in a private company become deemed worthless then they win and like most times the shorts never pay back anything, never close out their position and therefore never have to pay taxes on their ill gotten gains.
the dtcc always protects the short because in most instances it is them and the politicians that are shorting because they make their own rules and cheat.
The shorts have destroyed many a company. They always look at the situation as though they cannot lose.
and with such crooked leaders here in america they feel like they are guaranteed a win regardless.
Based on how the company has set this up, they have set it as a trap for those shorting and have done it in such a manner as the sec cannot object and accuse them of market manipulation.
buy where you are comfortable, sell where you are comfortable. Or hold and follow the companies plan.
rose
remember when the board gave pete his well deserved raise for dragging the company down to junk bond value in return pete gave them all free shares.
It's easy to give away the store when you you take no responsibility to stock the shelves.
No BP will touch this pig
I owned a digital prepress company. built it from nothing, grew it, ran it for 30 years.
Believe me I could run auph in my sleep better than peter does for a million dollars less in salary than he sucks out.
greggors this is exploding ... poof our money is gone.
price target now is dependent upon approval and the size of the short squeeze.
for me when it comes to squeezing the shorts I would like to see blood and most of them lose everything.
Seen to many shorts over the years destroy companies.
still dropping and fools keep buying.
and peter is still getting 1.3million a year plus benefits all for watching the share price drop 30.00.
Dang where can I get a paycheck like that?
Back when I was a ceo I had to work or I didn't get paid, I guess that is the difference between someone who cares and someone who could care less.
earnings mean nothing all bill has lvvv under is a management company. they can sell billions of dollars of product and we benefit zero
I agree benny, I said that all along.
so ask yourself what do you get with a quality drug 400 million in the bank?
Combined with the worst management team of all time?
you get 5.00 a share down from 34.00 a share.
but while shareholders are all underwater peter is still raking in his 1.3million payload plus bennies. and if he gets a vacation package like those that just jumped the sinking ship you can add another 200thousand to his overpaid benefit package.
I see more share dilution within the next 6 months. that is what peter has done best over the years.
Now be careful benny450 you will now be labeled a gadfly by the high and mighty.
and I was heckled for calling peter out for the idiot of a ceo that he is.
I said he only cares about his 110.000.00 dollar monthly paycheck.
heck we are only down 29.00 dollars from our high.
but then again some here are excited losing money
I hope peter gives himself a nice bonus for a job well done for the shorts.
and now we see why some of upper management left
this has turned out to be the perfect example of the peter principle.
thank you
what good is MMTLP to us? I did not have any of those in my account from the meta materials I have been sitting on for quite some time?
I guess you were figuring in the numbers after the "." as in cents.
so at 8.20 that is actually 4 digits
so I am guessing we did not get any of the mmat oil OCT spinoff shares? or was that another company.
Just curious because on the spin off they spoke of it getting back to it's high if 7.20 which is where I cot screwed.
There for a moment I though maybe we would recoup.
Wasn't there supposed to be spin off shares of other companies ???
i would like to see a few things revisited
like peter stating that shareholder value was one of his top concerns.
I guess he was just practicing being a stand up comedian.
that article is over a year old. and we had rapid growth and even more rapid decline. thank you peter. the only thing going up is peters paycheck
not a bad gig if you can get a 6 figure vacation package.
amazing the amount of shareholder funds they can just give at a termination of employment in a company that is anything but self supporting.
let me add, you all sound like a bunch of whiney kids today.
peter could have taken bmy's bo offer that most likely would have been above the 34.00 stock price at the time. Yet we sit here just above 7.00.
peters arrogance that he thinks he can go this alone is obviously proven in the current share price.
The market may see the value of the product, but with the captain of the titanic
steering the ship, all they see is not enough life boats and life preservers.
and look at her run.
actually I do have a cervelo. It is a brand of road bike.
But that is considered exercise and you would not understand as your job is to post on worthless message boards all day for a living.
she is the consort and not the queen because she is his second wife. If dianna had not been killed she would be queen and not a consort. charles had been pushing his mother to let that ugly hag get the title of queen but she never approved it.
do melvin and acca really both live together in the same single wide with flat tires?
we know acca does not exist, he helped urban scam millions from shareholders
yak that is a good response thank you.
I would hope that being the case that management would/should have thanked him for all his hard work in moving the company forward and his diligent work in the company achieving EU approval and anything else he offered while on the Bod.
I wish the market saw the EU approval as good news, share price would have moved up.
We will just have to remain ecstatic with our continued 27.00 loss after BMY announced their position to present a BO.
Things could be worse I could of jumped on the emotional redbox rollercoaster and lost 100%
since the company wrote that and not Mr. Walbert as he was leaving I would read it correctly as such. Otherwise why not make his own reason for departure.
Mr. Walbert's departure from the Board is due to disagreement with the Company and the Board in matters relating to the operations, policies and practices of the Company.
Then again it is only my opinion which I am not allowed to have here.
after getting slammed over and over. you have to admit I was right about peter and his inability to run this company. unless of course you were hoping he would run it into the ground. Maybe BR was right when he said he feared the two's.
from the 34's down to the 6's.
calling people gadflies for stating the obvious. this was supposed to be an investment
On a positive note. Under Peters superb quality management he has saved shareholders from having to claim capital gains on their tax returns.
Look at the bright side we are at 23% of value that we were just a few short months ago.
Dang I miss all the posters that praised Peter and said they wouldn't sell for under 60.00 a share.
I will be elated to get out in the teens if we ever get back there. Maybe 2-3 more years.
Remember Peter said he was here for those who needed the drug and shareholder value and his 1.3million petty cash check.
If he meant that he would have taken the BO offer, it had to be at least 34.00 where the stock was.
But like some here he was probably just greedy.
no but peter is
sitting on a quiet island drinking those umbrella drinks enjoying his self imposed retirement. he is like a government employee pulling in a big paycheck without having to perform and without anyone asking questions.
will we get back above 10.00 before end of year.?
will we ever see 34.00 ever again? does not look like it.
great drug, not so great management,
you must be the best entertainment at dinner each night making everyone laugh at your table for one.
Obviously you are new in trading.
ceo's have a fiduciary duty to shareholders.
look up ceo's such as bernie madoff and see what happened to him with how he handled investors funds.
yes petie is beholden to perform for shareholders, but he has yet to perform any better than some here at the local comedy club with their smug comments and self aggrandizement.
Actually I was in aria for 3 years and looking back it was a piece of cake compared to auph. yes it was stressful at times and a bit frustrating, but the way management is handling things, at least the way it looks is just worthless. since hitting 34.00 dollars we have done nothing but spiral down with little or no information from peter.
But then again he is probably busy out spending and enjoying his life on shareholders money of 130.000.00 a month pay check.
at some point he may end up in a court room for his lackluster job that he is not doping to increase shareholder value.
Only ones getting shareholder value are those he keeps passing out free shares too.
Which dilutes shareholder value for those who actually put real money into what looked like a promising company.
you can have the best product in the world but if your sales force and management sit around doing nothing but taking a check eventually we end up with a total loss.
now the continued downward spiral in share price makes sense. were hiring athletes.
quality management and companies unless they are fisheries don't need bait.
best way to make money in auph is to get a job there with free shares. great job pete way to look out for shareholders investment.
On a positive note
good thing peter gave the board free shares so he could get his raise before this all came to light.
It is becoming more obvious that peters goal is not shareholder value.
Heck we are only down 80% from the high.
And yet peter remains silent, must be tough cashing those 130.000.00 dollar pay checks each month while the shareholders take a hard kick in the gonads.
Where is management and the legal team?
They should have been on top of this long before now.
then again losing money is a good thing because it forecasts a huge windfall for shareholders in a buyout. LOL
Maybe bristol meyers saw this issue and that is what they ran fast away.
If there was a BO offer and peter did not accept it he is a pretty worthless ceo.
ll of a sudden 11.00 dollars where I made my last buy looks looke a good BO offer
don't worry it's probably just peter selling off his shares
Bankruptcy would not bother peter, heck he probably has a severance package all set up for himself that would see him through retirement.
Based on share price movement and petie's inability to inform the shareholders (owners of the company) the status of the company he is not qualified to be a stock clerk at ALL-A-DOLLAR.
he is as quality of a ceo for the shareholders, as biden is for american citizens.
and biden is the dumbest that could be found
A 24.00 BO would be over priced at this point