Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
keep sponging up shares. If you can pick up about a million in a day it will reach the volume level where I will feel good picking up another 20,000.
Looks good to me. Still so many alternatives and "unless"es that I am pretty sure the uplist will be soon. Also, I have great sympathy for those who misunderstand some of the statements in the standards!
Still accumulating and expecting good price increase for quite some time.
But when it says trading volume per month, I was not so sure it meant average DAILY trading volume per month. Monthly volume of a million shares would need only about 50,000 per day on average. Nasdaq seems to have so many different sets of standards for listing that it looks like some committee can look things over and put some numbers together and say "Yup, you're OK." I'm confident the uplisting is coming, but reading and rereading the standards isn't telling me when.
I havent seen a replay or transcript of today's presentation, but it does not appear to have created much excitement.
Is Chaundra back from from South Africa! With news of partnerships I hope!
Still waiting for news. If the congress folks can get together on ANY sort of infrastructure bill, it should make things look better on their proposal for bridge monitoring. But not holding my breath. They say volume precedes price, so I may add more if we see a day of a million or more shares traded with the price up a little.
I am happy with the price action today, but I, too, am fearful about the fall deadline for having adequate information. If I remember correctly, they were in a big mess over accounting accurately for shares issued to an entity that, in effect, had scammed them 20+ years ago. They will have a terrible time getting an audit completed, unless there are legal ways of simply acknowledging the "unknowns" and reporting cash on hand and income and expenses year by year--even that will take lots of time and money that they may not have unless a few true believers in the still unrecognized technology would make some loans or buy a bunch of shares privately--if there is even a legal way to do that.
This company seemed so promising when I bought in about 30 years ago, and I have made a little bit by trading back and forth, but I would be much better off if I had sold half of my 150,000 pre-reverse split shares at 60cents in 1999.
I have no explanation for today's spike! We can always say "manipulation," whatever that may or may not mean . . .
This may account for some of the big buying last week--wait until a bigger US index adds LWLG and see what happens.
Thanks for the detail. I would be very happy to hear of progress towards some sort of new government or business partnership when he returns!
Don't know if anyone has commented on this--I'm sure I have not had time to read all messages here every day. Anyway, last week when the upcoming new Hicks interview with Intel folks was announced, we were told Chandra would not be involved because he was "in Africa." Is he on vacation hunting wild game, visiting friends, or negotiating with venues for testing or sales of ENZC tech? Has anyone heard anything I missed.
Interesting discussion. The solar company guy, Malone, is really determined to paint fuel cells as dangerous and undesirable. The FCEL corporate counsel pointed out that in the official filing objecting to the choice of Fuel Cell Energy, he repeatedly made reference to problems with Bloom Energy and called FCEL simply a different "label" when the FCEL rep stated that FCEL is actually a different technology. I am wondering if the red flags about carbon dioxide and benzene emissions come from some of the Bloom plants, and that FCEL has found ways of avoiding that? Do we know for sure that FCEL's plants do not emit other pollutants? It was quite telling that the corporate counsel pointed out that the solar guy had made clear he didn't want to live near a wind farm either. A subtle way of pointing out that the objections seemed to come from looking at the project through "solar colored glasses."
I don't think that recommendation in a somewhat sketchy OTC tip sheet really is a help to LWLG. I do note, however, that they suggest waiting until the price pulls back somewhat, so this tip should not lead to an unsustainable Monday surge. I am hoping for a sustainable increase over the next few weeks, with a surge when Nasdaq listing comes solidly into view.
Great close today! May add a little if it dips tomorrow, as it usually does after a good day.
Just watched the presentation. I agree it is very encouraging. I hope to add more shares on Tuesday. Looks like we are quite close to tangible results from what the company has been working toward for a long time.
thanks for the link. I will pass it on.
Fantastic podcast. I hope someone will post a link so I can share it with friends and family. This is the most positive confirmation I have seen yet of the value of this company. I hope to increase my investment soon.
I see how you could read it that way. Perhaps Tony was insufficiently focused on long-term planning and technological advancement and the new guy seems qualified there. Tony's resume suggests he was involved in a lot of the physical work involved in setting things up, and other site-visits. I hope they are sufficiently staffed so that that end of things doesn't suffer. As another poster suggested, they are very lightly staffed for a company seeking to demonstrate their ability to handle multi-millions of dollars of business. Perhaps some things can be contracted out, but with AI everyone involved needs to be knowledgeable and fully loyal/trustworthy. I have continued to add lightly to my position but am eagerly awaiting news of actual paid contracts.
are you interpreting this to mean his focus was too theoretical and focused on data gathering, and not sufficiently focused on developing actionable plans? It looks like the biotech prospects were acquired before he left, so this suggests he was having some success. I agree that the wording suggests his leaving was not primarily his own choice and suggests some possible difference of opinion on corporate focus, but I don't see much clue to what it means. And I wonder how it impacts the company's relationship with clients for whom he may have been the primary interface. Somehow it appears you see this change as positive, so I would like you to unpack it a bit more.
I read the press releases and can't find the earlier ones archived, but I don't recall anything that indicates he was forced out. The release about his leaving was perhaps less laudatory than in the case of a retirement of an esteemed long-time board member or employee. I jumped to the conclusion that he might have been more focused on infrastructure issues as the company moved more toward facilitating biotech manufacturing. The subsequent press release about grant proposals for infrastructure monitoring showed that was a bad guess. I feel like we are back to "no news" but tidbits suggesting possible big things for future--same as a couple of years ago.
I may have missed someone's post, but I don't recall anyone mentioning that at least one of the persons who spoke in opposition to the FCEL project was noted as being a principal in a solar company, and I believe the other may also have had interests in some sort of alternative energy company. Perhaps this is not a NIMBY issue but a competitive argument.
They seem to continue adding impressive members to their team. Hope this leads to good business decisions down the road. It has been a long road!
I agree. Very impressive. There is a lot of brain power concentrated in this little company, and I would be happy to see a major announcement of grant or project award in July. I am still somewhat uncertain as to what our relationship is to Aingura. Are we an approved sub-contractor for projects they are working on or something more or less than that. I don't recall seeing anything spelled out very specifically. From the Aingura profile, they seem to be more than simply an agency that represtents others and helps them get contracts
This is quite impressive. I am not totally cear on the nature and extent of our partnership with them, but it is great to know we are partnering in some way with "the best." This would seem to mean that we have broader possibilities on the international scene, in addision to the domestic NDAs that are primarily New England. Lots of room for growth. We just need to see that first major contract . . .
I think it is mainly simply a reversal of the drop the last couple of days. Also, people are talking about an new SEC rule that makes it harder for market makers to short stocks without putting up cash up front, though some say the rule has no teeth.
Looks like some iteresting partnership possibilities.
Thanks for the update. Nice recovery today from a short drop earlier. I remain hopeful for good returns from this company.
Any idea why FCEL was not mentioned in that article?
I would hope MIT is ivolved, but I don't know the special iterests of either faculty or departments of other New England schools so as to make a good guess. I just hope they are all really serious about this and doing their best to prepare really attractive proposals!
I did not place the two SEC filings side by side to compare line by line, but I felt the most recent one did a better job of explaining what the company is capable of doing and what they are trying to do. I was also pleased by the fact that they indicated that all the projects mentioned previously are still in some sort of active negotiation--looks like no one has said "no," though they are still waiting for a final yes. With the departure of previous CTO, I speculated that they were abandoning infrastructure monitoring to focus on biomedical processes, but the more recent filing indicated that both were still on the horizon. (Today's announcement validated that)
I would still like to see some actual names and actual customers and actual revenues, but I have the impression the company is more active than it looks like from the outside, and that we have a better than 50% chance of getting some positive news.
I would like to give you something more concrete than that, but these are my gut impressions from a quick reading of the filing and subsequent announcement.
Thanks. This is very helpful! I tried to add to my position yesterday before the close as I saw the price begin to creep up, but I could not do so because some funds had not cleared yet. I will be watching closely Monday!
I am fairly new here and have not followed all the threads. Please help me understand the connection between the two items you linked to: Immunome and Enzolytics. Collaborators? Comptetitors?
This is a slightly more sustantial explanation of their business than what I have seen previously. It is a very optimistic presentation and represents either enhanced prospects for the company or good salesmanship skills on the part of the writer(s) of the document. I remain hopeful for success of the company and price appreciation on the stock, though plenty of caution is appropriate at this stage.
Much bigger spread between bid and ask at close of day than other days recently: .017/.0268, with today's closing price of .017 as the starting point of the spread. I have no idea what this means, but to me it looks good. All we need is one positive piece of news go back over .02 and start climbing, in my opinion.
or maybe had more expertise in monitoring heavy stuff like bridges than in the biotech/pharma field where they seem to be focusing now. Time will tell.
Someone said this morning they were skeptical of the move up on Thursday and would wait to buy until it was over. 20. Wonder how much they paid this morning . . .
I agree with both of you. I think that this is a very promising investment, and a short term gain of 50-100% is very likely, with moves back to a share price in $s within a year or two not impossible. Good talent, good contacts, but we still know very little about exactly what they have to offer and whom they are dealing with. For now I am holding but open to buying more.
Looks like the "ask" is pretty tight. I tried to get a small lot of 6000 today at .0184, the raised offer to .0185, & at 2:30 to .0186--got zilch.
Nice uptick in last couple of hours today, on better volume. I have a feeling something is cooking. I sold a chunk of my position a few weeks ago at .039 but have bought back a little bit in the last few daysk at less than half of that price. Still waiting and hoping. The company is very tight-lipped until they have something they are required to say, but I like the general caliber of people they seem to have connected with them.
Looks like a pretty good explanation to me. Once this is resolved, I would think we get another blip up.
Too bad I didn't have the courage to buy more when the bid and ask both dropped horrendously for about an hour this morning. Not sure what happened, but price is right back near the highs again already!