Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You’re very helpful. Is the company operating during this period?
Thanks for the updates!!!
D-Thanks to you & Butters. Apple actually offered to pay 19 cents per unit for use of the VPN feature however the jury determined it to be 94 cents per.....
NO large/smart entity wants to have their fate determined by our courts, especially with a jury!!! Waco, Waco, Waco.....
V-Totally appreciate your caution! The previously scheduled November 3rd oral hearing regarding the 2nd Alice that Hudnell provided a fabulous written response to in February is "still" to be decided upon shortly, however w/o the need for the actual "physical" hearing.
So, are you saying that this specific case has been dismissed?
I am successful trading vplm with TD Ameritrade.
Did Wade show up and participate in the court hearing today? What else happened in the hearing?
R1-Year end closing, formal audit for the last (2) years, S 1 registration: ALL compressed in est. six (6) weeks is a LOAD! They are likely trying to manage the news, preferring to RELEASE after leaving the PINKS.
Looks like we're absolutely poised for a hell of a RUN!!!
DB-I believe that the announcement (see excerpt below) of sanction removal contributed "largely" to the increase in volume/pps! It certainly provided me with renewed vigor. None of our named defendants want this to proceed as far as specifying damages. Therefore one if not several have to be prepared or preparing to reduce their exposure to significant LOSS! I believe each of these corporations have committees that assess the status of their legal complaints and our complaint is now earning attention.... Any legal complaint is a RISK; one that has progressed this long, asserting perhaps $$$billions and starting to get publicity, further exacerbates it!
If I were Twitter I'd be the 1st one to lock up a license deal, NOW!!!
"The CAFC also affirmed the PTAB's ruling that Voip-pal's '815 and '005 patents are non-obvious. Moreover, the Court rejected Apple's bid to invalidate certain claims that had not been declared ineligible in a parallel district court case".
HD, that would be fabulous, so I'm greatly supportive, NOT betting on it! We traded over 101,000,000 shares in the last (5) working days which represents app. 14% of our indicated float. Someone(s) is really accumulating.
Such a “fundamental” & critical achievement!!! It REQUIRES a corporate PR or explanation! Am I MISSING something; where would we be without this success?
This decision is DIRECTED at Apple.......
Hudnell succeeded in negating Apple’s request for sanctions; it was a necessary & quite positive step! More positives I believe are on the way, very shortly.
Hudnell’s 2nd Alice written appeal request was an outstanding brief submitted almost (7) months ago. While we wait for the Waco venue decision we just might get this answer in the meantime.
It has been an uphill challenge (Alice II) for us but the quality of Hudnell’s written brief is difficult to overlook! Clearly more working than Waco....
Thanks....still interested in whether these services are gifted or are they a part of a service contract/agreement?
The announcement sounds like it's at best performance for a "future" assignment....
Still might be great?
Are we NOT being paid for this assignment?
Seeing the (2) executives while listening was very useful on Wednesday. I “feel” better but I am not sure of anything of substance that I learned. Will anyone “share” what of substance you may have learned?
DB-Thanks for posting this pertinent piece, for it helps us to understand the JUDGE!
Judge Albright is a "CRUSADER" of sorts, and a stickler; how else do you truly get things completed in a timely manner?
It will be a huge challenge for the defendants to get this case MOVED! It is clear that "HE" really has the attention of Apple and others with his NO nonsense approach with MANAGING his cases. "THEY" (defendants) are use to having their way, shunning structure and protocols. They are bristling to adherence to his established process.....
Therefore it's likely that this proceeds further along thru claims construction. In my view getting PAST this venue decision allows this to become a 50/50 proposition again for which the "BIGS" will consider as too RISKY!
Remember VOIP-PAL has real support in Patent Office!!!
Waco is where we should be, however Hudnell did a fabulous job (in my view) with his written brief relative to Alice 2 so I’m at minimum interested in the response.
Alice 2 written brief submitted on February 24th while the Oral was on March 4th I believe.
DB-You’re likely aware that IBM is considered the largest patent troll!
DB-Just saw that Carlos Slim was in the news for financing a coronavirus vaccine for Mexico. Isn't he rumored to be one of our major shareholders, in fact once rumored as an acquirer, RIGHT?
D4L-10/19 The USPTO exercised their right to intervene in Apple's appeal to the PTAB. My perspective on this needs enlightening, for I've always considered this as greatly positive, perhaps unusual support for Voip-Pal. What are your thoughts?
Great that we’re still on beginning August 7th! Despite the incredible resources of the defendants, THEY ALL WANT THIS GONE”! They NEED/WANT Emil out of their hair; one person’s opinion.
DB-Are you able to conclude that the 1st case management conference is still scheduled in Waco on Aug 7th? Is it also your understanding that this is “scheduling and major issues identification”?
Case management conferences are approaching quickly; can we actually get prepared in time?
D4-Your today’s post reminded me of the written brief that Hudnell provided the court regarding Alice II; this was I believe completed and presented on February 24th. When do you recall is the court suppose to respond to us?
.....and it’s NOT illegal....and it has a current valuation of $19,289,000ish....and many investors have soared and moved on..,.yet there are still many who are UP and still nibbling....and we have enough money to get to our court dates-smile!!!
CHILL....
Just maybe, they are willing to negotiate licensing?
Legal complaint causing people to look at us again! So much POTENTIAL!!!
Great trades today!
.....whatever it takes!
So, Hudnell files an amicus brief for us, then he hires himself (smile) as our new attorney! He “BELIEVES” (did I mention contingency)!!! Research has directed us to a different strategy using our most recently issued patents in a jurisdiction with a judge whom appears to embrace claims construction as fundamental to his cases.
The next six months, starting NOW might be downright positive.
G-Who are you saying developed and produced this patent being utilized in this legal complaint? I have continued to observe the "continued" development dollars invested for IP over the last several years by VOIP-PAL.
11. United States Patent No. 10,218,606 (the “’606 patent”) entitled “Producing
Routing Messages For Voice Over IP Communications” was duly and legally issued by the
United States Patent and Trademark Office on February 26, 2019. A copy of the ’606 patent is
attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
12. The ’606 patent is referred to in this Complaint as the “Patent-in-Suit”.
13. The inventions of the Patent-in-Suit originated from breakthrough work and
development in the internet protocol communications field.
Thank you! Please continue to provide us with “any additional “ ideas or thoughts that might support our efforts to WIN! We want every advantage; we are in it to win it.....
Lew is running the show and in a completely different venue, exploiting “more” of our IP! I am appreciating the continued ongoing investment the company has made in the further development of our IP! Each and every company needs “freshness” to thrive; looks like Emil recognizes it!!!
C’mon Lew...
NM-The brief was posted here by someone and I read almost ALL of it except almost 100 pages of references. It was uniquely composed, in conversation tone. I thought it had such clarity, therefore I was stoked for the orals. I’ll continue to look for it.
I have been around technology and IP since 1967. “ALL” that I hear is that this person is the real deal, incredibly shrewd and AMBITIOUS.
We’ll see......
DB-The Feb 24th written brief by Lewis Hudnell requesting appeal from the court’s Alice II decision was an incredibly well written document! In fact it was so well done that his March 3rd performance for our Alice I ORALS was a complete and unwelcome surprise; it felt like it wasn’t the same person.
Subsequently I continue to hear & learn of his high regard within all of IP (he’s considered unusually smart). This tells me he’s just getting started!!!
So C’mon Hudnell; LEAD the WAY.
$400K for Q4 would be very exceptional, especially given that Q3 was app. $163K and down from Q2. We’ll gladly accept that growth but perhaps ($400k) is over zealous!
DB-Your IP Watchdog link included this excerpt that reminded me of our strong E U patent. With resources it's a huge opportunity, perhaps realizable?
Huawei, Digital Technologies Take Top Spots in EPO Patent Applications – On Thursday, March 12, the European Patent Office (EPO) published statistics showing that Huawei was the top patent applicant at the EPO, with 3,524 patent applications in 2019. The EPO’s statistics also showed that the tech sectors with the greatest growth in patent applications include digital communication and computer technology.
Thanks,