Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Don't lose hope oneman. There are a few eyes looking at this stock from a running / momo aspect since the ask is thin to about .0005. If you want to sell for .0002, that will be your time, when they "swoop". Yesterday I thought the 2s, 3s and 4s dried up, but either I was having a problem with my L2 or the MMs were doing some reshuffling. I would have posted a follow up, but I ran out of posts for the day.
The stochastic looks good, very bullish;
http://www.stockta.com/cgi-bin/analysis.pl?symb=TSSP&num1=3&cobrand=&mode=stock
I send an email to the CEO asking about a shareholder update, but haven't heard back from him yet.
When this group pulls the trigger on buying this up (and selling it, since that's what they do) it should be an op for you to get out. It will also create a better base for this stock for the hard liners that want to wait for bigger and better things.
Just MHO
.0002s, 3s and 4s just went off after hours. Current level 2 shows (if it remains) a gap up to 5 in the morning (.0005 on the ask).
Most of the trades today were Buys with a ratio of roughly 2 1/2 to 1 buys vs sells.
Wow! I was looking at L2 and it had some .0002s and .0003s and one .0004, but it was thin. (In fact, I just posted asking for someone else to take a look) NOW it's .0005?!?!?! Not sure what's going on there, but yes, obviously it was thin from .0002 on. Lucky I got in when I did! ;)
TSSP - I could be all wet, being new to this, but I'm looking at TSSP and it does appear (to me anyway) to be fairly thin to 5. Anyone else have a take on this?
This IS like going to the casino, only you get to see what each table has paid out and what it's payout quota is. ;0
Nevermind, must be a browser problem...it doesn't like Google Chrome.
Any idea why I'm getting "Invalid Symbol" on my iHub level 2? Everything I try, AWTW, TSSP, IGAI, SIRI keeps giving me "Invalid Symbol"
What's the L2 look like on that Lotto?
ATWT, I'm in.
IGAI You know VZ, I just might change that order to .0005 before the EOD. ..thinking....thinking. I don't know, I just have a hunch.
Oh, you bet. I'll be there with bells on. ;)
I'm trying to get in at .0004, but doesn't look like that's happenin.
Anyone have a read on CXAC or any L2 information? (Damn, I'm going to have to make some money so I can pick up my own L2 subscription)
TIA!~
Thanks!
Does anyone have L2 on TSSP?
I'm in AGEL, there were an awful lot of buys last week, just about every day, very few sells.
Hahaha, now THAT'S grasping at straws! lol!
Have a good weekend all!
IGAI it is for me.
I'm hoping for lower! ;)
yea, the selling is not over yet. The problem with investors, typically is they are the biggest bunch of "scardy cats" on the planet. The second your symbol is mentioned in anything involving the SEC, people run. This is the biggest sell of I've seen, it was amazing to see that trade screen light up. 9/11 was no different. It didn't matter if trading continued, people just wanted their money out, now and at a loss.
Thanks Global.
Anyone here have any advice on AGEL or CXAC? I'm holding AGEL at .0002 and I'm just wondering if I should expect anything more than a 50% gain?
Thanks!
That would be nice. I have a position in AGEL. ;)
Milton: A hammer is a type of candlestick using that type of analysis. Being a very bullish signal does not mean the stock has gained a bunch during the day, it is a signal that the stock is in a very bullish position. The hammer is a very strong chart signal.
...come on...I thought you were so smart. ;)
Charts look good so far with a "very bullish" overall. Decent buying today. News would make for a nice play.....not 2 cents kind of nice,...but I guess that would depend on what the news is I guess.
Good luck all. Have a good night.
PWLK, nice one those who got in....wish I did! ;)
We hit a hammer yesterday on the charts, so good buying today. Should be interesting to see.
Hey, I'm with you on the bashers too. Bashing with verifiable substance, yes, I can stand that, I want to know about the bad along with the good so I'm not making a one sided judgement. It's the kids that shout "this stock is going in the crapper" without any substance that I don't have time for. I'm usually pretty good at ignoring that crap but still don't like it, it seems pointless.
"People should try to have some information, ie, who-what-where-and-why's before coming to any conclusions. "
Yes, I agree with that completely, which is what I was trying to find out. I wasn't bashing, but was merely "anti-pumping" tryign to find out why people thought this would mean "tons of cash for the company" without any basis. I have complete faith in re-juv as a viable product to make the stock price move, but it's the pumping with no substance that I don't like; tens of millions of dollars over 7 years means nothing if it cost tens of millions to produce, OR if there are nasty side effects, OR if the product has run it's course and the market is full of competition etc.
I'm not busting Jorge's nuts, I'm looking for answers and questioning the pumpers, that's all.
Sorry MJV, I haven't decided whether to upgrade my membership here or not yet. To answer your question, no, I don't think it is a targeted campaign, I think the company has value. I do thing though, there are some attempts by a few members on the CXAC board. I'm just leary, that's all. I always find it alarming when you ask a relevant question on the board and it throws people into detonation mode.
You'd rather I follow blindly than ask the important questions?
Hi MJV,
I saw that update as you did, but for some reason, others seem to think it will make "Tons of cash" for CXAC even if it was "revived" to be 3/4 of what it was, with no thought to expense, validity, competition etc. I think we're on the same page, but I'm always leary of a pump. A good stock needs no pump, and personally, I think statements like that are suspicious. That's just me. I don't like pumpers or bashers and I like as many answers as I can get.
Sorry Neo, I've been distracted elsewhere...playing in the sandbox of sorts. ;)
This is funny. Yes, I understand that I missed putting the "Seven year period" in my paraphrase, but either you missed the point entirely, or you're just trying to detract from the point being made. What I posted was that I don't like to read posts of that nature without any supporting costs or why the product is being sold if it's a great revenue generator etc., without any other questions being raised.
Hahah, high horse?!?! I think my questions were pretty relevant. As much as trading in the pinks is like gambling, there should still be some semblance of value. That value is determined, among other things, by revenue versus expense.
Numbers are only crap if they are misreported.
I think this company is worthy, but don't like reading crap bout "it's going to make 45 million dollars a year" without knowing what other factors impact the bottom line and also without knowing why the "owner" is selling if it's such a money maker.
This is information that I haven't been able to find as hard numbers, so I'm just wondering how anyone can say it's a HUGE money maker if they don't have that information either. And if they do have that information, where can I find it, since I'm obviously barking up the wrong tree.
Any idea what the expense is to create this product i.e. what the gross profit is?
My apologies for trying to find out where your DD comes from. How to you know this product will make money, and it already does, then why is it being sold to CXAC and for how much?
I guess pumping requires no DD, so carry on.
Thanks. That's what I figured. I just saw the figured being thrown around and wondered where the hell they came from and wondered why it would be handed over if it was such a revenue generator.
If this product generates so much revenue, why would anyone want to sell the rights or the product itself? What is the reason they are selling to CXAC? And if the product is so great, why does it need "reviving"?
A new base it looks like. Can anyone answer my last question?