Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
lakers17, with your thoughts & actions...
I respectfully understand, but I'm wired a little different. I have enough control to not respond to them sometimes. Sometimes I do. Right now, I think I'm good with responding to them for a while as I see they don't want to have any logical conversation. I'm going to be bad, wrong, stupid, etc. no matter what in their eyes. Let's get back to talking about NHMD.
We should be seeing some more updates on their jet fuel deal and the elimination of the debt/notes that were previously mentioned was based upon the jet fuel deal happening. I'm betting that such is going to happen as that 8-K strongly suggested that they know something positive that we don't know yet.
v/r
Sterling
shotsky, why I agree and disagree, respectfully...
Respectfully, I agree and disagree with what you are saying. You have no idea how much over the years I had not responded to. Every now then, they will get a response, especially when they are challenging my integrity and my character. Most of the times, since I believe the playing field is not fair and equal for me to speak my peace, I actually say far less.
Also, I am my own man just as you are your own man. However, they are not coming at you even close to how they are coming at me. I value my character and my integrity. So when someone is trying to publicly challenge that, every now and then I will respond. Heck, go back and look at the the hundreds and hundreds of posts that I hadn't responded to. Because I've been doing this investing thing for over 30 years, most of the people that have been around for a few years know me. But there are those that have not been around for many years and that don't know me really at all. I'm not the "Boogey Man" as some of the bashers would portray.
In the end, I get it. It's really not that serious and is really something small which is why I usually don't respond very often. It really has nothing to do with the success that is about to happen in my opinion here with SPZI to shut up all of the bashers.
v/r
Sterling
rockie101, why the bashing doesn't really bother me...
I have been fighting against those bashing me for over 30 years, mainly over the past 20 years. It really doesn't bother me as I only entertain it sometimes to set the record straight since what they post is crooked. When things are not going right with a stock at that moment, they seem to want to blame me. Or when they are afraid that a stock just might be real, they try to clog the forum up with topics to try to bash me instead of talking about the stock. In my opinion, I think it's actually stupid with how IHub allows this, then often when I say far less harsh things in return, sometimes my posts get deleted, even after the new rules (LOL). That's what's frustrating at times. Go figure. So I have no choice except to humble myself and positively move forward.
Some of those bashing have lost money in a stock that we were in over 20 years ago. Instead of blaming themselves, they blame me because of being just as stupid as they were back then for believing in that stock. Heck, I can admit that. They can't. If a stock doesn't work out, it's not because of little old me or any of my posts. It is always going to be up to the company to make things happen as they have stated for their success and not what I think or post. The same will be here for NHMD too.
I post what I believe and feel is good to know. If I am wrong, then so be it. It's not because I'm trying to intentionally mislead or deceive anyone. What they don't get is that I'm not afraid of looking bad. I'm not afraid of failure. Especially since it means taking risks to achieve success or to help someone. When you take certain risks to achieve gains, you are going to have some successes and some failures. Within the penny stock world, you are likely going to have more failures than success. So looking bad is going to happen sometimes. Of course, I never try or intend for such failures to happen. They just happen based on the company not doing what they claim what they were to do. Those are things out of my control and out of all of our control.
If NHMD delivers on their $5 billion jet fuel deal to where what they have turns out to be real and they have a significant stake, then it is going to shut all of those bashing up. If they don't then, well, I think you know the rest of that story too.
v/r
Sterling
elks...
What's sad is that some are going to allow their emotions to still get in the way to see what is happening here with SPZI. Some are still trying to make themselves somehow to be right about what they are trying to negatively create to believe about SPZI. If they were truly and really smart, they would simply do the due diligence (DD) and be fair at heart and they would see the decision that they need to make. And even still, there will be some that simply will not be able to remove their emotions and they are not going to ever see it.
v/r
Sterling
jdcpa1, why he has no DD...
He has no DD. He is conjuring up old posts from RagingBull and trying to find something that sticks to the wall. SPZI was not frontloaded and I believe they are very afraid that it is going to run very big and I know why they think such. I've done my DD too! They are trying to make this about little old me. They can't be that stupid to think such success of a stock is all predicated upon little old me. I urge everyone to simply go back and read their posting history to see how desperate they look in their posts. They look very ridiculous.
Like I said... I believe they are very afraid that it is going to run very big and I know why they think such. I've done my DD too!
v/r
Sterling
TEFFY, here with SPZI...
It's really a shame with how the bashers are allowed to come to a forum to do what they do, especially the way that they are doing things here within the SPZI forum. It's fine because I'm really going to have a lot to say when we are trading over .10+ per share. Then I'm going to have even more to say when we are trading over .20+ per share and that's without ever doing a reverse split. I'll let them have their fun now. Hopefully people don't get confused with their ignorance.
Reading all of the lies from the bashers about me is a shame. I have been offered over the years stock and cash compensation numerous times. However, like I said before... I don't take stock based compensation or cash compensation here with any stock. I even told the bashers that are doing the accusing that If they have proof of me ever doing such, please, post it. Share it with everyone here publicly since they are making this a topic of discussion for the public.
Also like I said before, I don't take "any" compensation. I post on stocks that I am in and because I either believe in what they are doing or because I'm taking the risk to believe that what is being claimed by the company will manifest into a reality. If it does, then I think you know what will happen with the stock price. If it doesn't, then oh well. You win some, you lose some. Here with SPZI, I'm very confident this will be one where we win!
v/r
Sterling
chumfm, here with SPZI...
I'm hanging tough with SPZI. Don't pay attention to any of the bashing. After doing further due diligence (DD) here with SPZI, I'll just say that we shareholders are better than good. In due time in fairly short order, I believe the company will provide either all the answers or enough answers to where any concerns about how real things are will be a thought of the past. People will know that SPZI is very real!
The bashers claim that SPZI is frontloaded even after I have shown proof that it wasn't in the post below:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173399690
The bashers really are not stupid. They are just hateful at heart. It's just not my style to be so hateful and to fight hate with hate. So I have to just let them hate. I think the bashers have learned that something really big is coming here with SPZI that is going to prove that it is not like any other penny stock. SPZI will be in a world of greatness of its own.
v/r
Sterling
uber darthium, please tell your friend...
I don't take stock based compensation or cash compensation here with TONR or any stock. If you have proof of me ever doing such, please, post it. Share it with everyone here publicly since you are making this a topic of discussion for the public.
I don't take "any" compensation. I post on stocks that I am in and because I either believe in what they are doing or because I'm taking the risk to believe that what is being claimed by the company will manifest into a reality. If it does, then I think you know what will happen with the stock price. If it doesn't, then oh well. You win some, you lose some.
Here with TONR, I personally have no reason to doubt what they are claiming to have for their new AI acquisitions coming into the company. Let's hope that they are everything and more than what we all who are pro TONR have been expecting.
v/r
Sterling
ProfitChaser, with SSOF...
Thanks for nudging me! I'm still holding SSOF. I'll have to get over there to see what was going on. I just noticed that it is moving for some reason.
v/r
Sterling
Papalaka...
No, some of it was pre-written from fighting others that think like you. What? You think I'm supposed to let people think what you were insinuating? Is that what you would do? No need to answer... rhetorical.
Let's just move forward and see what the company is going to bring to the table for doing what they claim they are going to do. That's where the rubber is going to meet the mat here with TONR.
v/r
Sterling
Papalaka, since you asked and trying to bash...
I think you are hilarious with your comments. Your comments are uneducated at best like the bashers. Let me educate you a little, but understand, none of these stocks ran because of little old me as I was in all of them below. If TONR runs higher, it won't be because of me and any valuation post I make. It will be up to the company to deliver the proper substance. I probably sold too early on all of them, but that's a different topic (LOL)... TONR posted that with the two Artificial Intelligence (AI) companies coming in, one of them is an AI company that is generating $120 Million in Revenues and has a 42% Net Profit Margin. Heck, you do the math and post what you think TONR is worth is they actually bring that company into it. Heck, this is not me saying this. This is the company saying this... NOT ME! Since you are making comments like I'm bad luck for a stock, read below and go research these stocks to see that i was in them all... make sure you make it to the bottom to read my closing paragraph...
** Go look at TSNP when it ran from under .0001 per share to $1.93 per share.
** Go look at PTSC when it went from under .02 per share to $2.20 per share because of the patent infringement piece against Intel.
** Go look at VKNG that ran from .002 per share to $1.10 per share. It was later bought out by CONMED Corporation (NASDAQ: CNMD) which now trades at over $114.00+ per share
** Go look at ENZC that ran from .0001/2/3 per share ranges to .90+ per share.
** Go look at ADZR that ran from .02 per share to $1.30 per share.
** Go look at PNNX that ran from .0031 per share to .88 per share.
Heck, I'll give you some blasts from the past since you want to go there! I was in VCSY back in early 2000 when they announced doing a 20-1 Forward Split on Jan 28, 2000. They announced that their Date of Record for their Forward Split was Feb 7, 2000:
http://www.vcsy.com/press%20releases/021400.html
I held past the close of business of the Date of Record of Feb 7, 2000. I kept holding and a little while later, on Feb 23, 2000, the stock (VCSY) had hit a high of $6.125 per share post-split for the day with plenty of volume. At that price, that’s equivalent to $122.50 per share pre-split price that’s derived by multiplying $6.125 per share x 20 Forward Split Ratio.
Here are some more Forward Split stocks that I was in back in the year 2000 that I will allow you to go back and research for yourself...
COOX announced a 100-1 Forward Split on Oct 4, 2000. On Oct 3, 2000 it closed at $1.50 per share. On Oct 6, 2000 it traded between $12.50 - $19.00 per share. On Jan 09, 2001, it hit $1.87 per share post split. That $187.00 Pre-split Price Equivalent.
BIFS announced a 100-1 Forward Split on Feb. 28, 2000. On Mar 1, 2000 it traded between .75 - $2.00 per share. On Aug 16, 2000, it hit $2.26 per share post split. That $226.00 Pre-split Price Equivalent.
I hope you get my point. Still, if not, I'll just say to go research some others I was in back then to see similar huge moves with the 50-1 WTPE/SKGV announced on Nov 27, 2000, the 30-1 DMPT/COBB announced on Nov 14, 2000, the 15-1 - VNCAF announced on 18 Feb 2000, the 15-1 SSCP announced on Aug 25, 2000, the 10-1 SWTI/SYWI announced on Sep 19, 2000, and the 10-1 RCVR/ESYG announced on Nov 22, 2000.
Look, I can name a few more, but I don't want things to look like I'm tooting my horn. Like I said, it's not up to me for where a company goes. It's up to the company and what they do. People have a tendency to want to only remember the bad or remember those companies that had failed. That's what the bashers do. I've been doing this investing thing for over 30 years. Every single year that I have been investing, I have been in some stocks that have not done so well, but I have also been in some that have done fairly well. I'm not going to go back through my 30 years of posting history for the past 30+ years to prove to you how you are looking at things wrong. All I am saying is that I might not be as good as some might think, but I am not as bad as you insinuated with your response.
Like I said...
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173740146
Keep in mind, all of my valuation posts are not based on if I am right or wrong. My posts are not the gospel. They are based on the company having what they say they have and doing what they say they are doing. If the company executes on such, then my valuation could be used as a framework for investors to use to be able to gage a better investing or exit strategy. If the company don't do the things they are claiming to manifest into a reality, then my valuation posts would be of zero value.
v/r
Sterling
stockgringo, here with MONI...
Here are my thoughts regarding MONI... Some of the timing has been off. It happens within the penny stock market or really within the market in general. I still believe in Frank very much. I think investors should simply sit back, relax, and know that it is coming. "It" meaning something significant. I keep telling you, he only has to get it right once and that, I believe, Frank will do. I believe those exercising patience here in MONI are going to be greatly surprised and greatly rewarded as shareholders.
v/r
Sterling
BERKSHIRE AGENT, about pps valuation for TONR...
Yes, I can do a pps valuation on TONR based on what they have released within their PR yesterday to possibly help people out. Just by doing some quick math, the pps could fundamentally be worth somewhere north of .10+ per share or actually higher depending on how many shares they buyback as stated within their PR. I'll lay it out to get something more finite for all to view and understand in detail.
Keep in mind, all of my valuation posts are not based on if I am right or wrong. My posts are not the gospel. They are based on the company having what they say they have and doing what they say they are doing. If the company executes on such, then my valuation could be used as a framework for investors to use to be able to gage a better investing or exit strategy. If the company don't do the things they are claiming to manifest into a reality, then my valuation posts would be of zero value.
v/r
Sterling
Nadendla, with your TONR thoughts...
I agree with your thoughts on TONR. I believe we have a winner here with TONR if they can truly execute on those things that were within the PR today. A lot of nuggets in there, Here are some more of them:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/TONR/news/story?e&id=2752979
In evaluating the prospect of a merger and the overall market impact of such a move, we are mostly focused on the finalization of a deal with one of the most impressive entities we have evaluated thus far. One of the potential AI merger candidates boasts an impressive track record of over $120 million in revenue with a remarkable 42% net profit margin. This partnership holds promising prospects for accelerated growth and development, particularly for projects like Maddie, our virtual trading assistant.
As part of our growth initiatives, negotiations are underway for potential other mergers with technology sector companies. One of these candidates has introduced us to a substantial AI and machine learning component that can enhance Maddie's capabilities by connecting her to a more extensive range of online products and services, such as Amazon.com, Zoom, and Google Meet.
mick, with your TONR thoughts...
You are correct. Very solid day for TONR. There are a few parts of today's news that looks intriguing:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/TONR/news/story?e&id=2752979
Concurrently, we are in discussions and negotiations with both AI companies to include a significant share buyback as an essential part of the final plan, underscoring our commitment to optimizing returns. In addition to my moratorium on authorized share increases and successful efforts to eliminate debt, addressing outstanding noteholders remains a priority, and we are exploring several non-dilutive means to safeguard shareholder interests while upholding the integrity of our capital structure.
BERKSHIRE AGENT, with this IGPK thought...
I agree with that IGPK thought. Further merger confirmation news would send this. It's been a long time coming for many of us IGPK longs that have been here with it for years.
v/r
Sterling
Facts About The Facts...
Fact: I have never in my life scammed anyone. Before anyone can prove that somebody has scammed someone, you have to prove that that person had "intent" to scam. Sorry for the bashers out there thinking such, but I have never in my life scammed anyone. Also, I have never in my life had any "intentions" to scam anyone. Have I made some stupid mistakes in the market? Yes I have. Have I invested in some stocks that I later learned were bad investments? Yes I have. I think we all have had some successes and failures within the market. As for ever scamming anyone, sorry bashers, but it's never been in my heart and mind to do such to anyone... EVER! I'm just not that kind of person.
Following, I posted some factual numbers that debunk the bashers' claim about me posting too much or posting so many pumping posts as the bashers would try to trick one into believing. Before seeing those numbers, let me explain some other things of note.
Let's see. It's starting to look too obvious. This is a international stock forum for people all over the world to come here to talk about the stock. Instead, people come here and see that the forum is clogged up on purpose with a few bashers that have been following me around for years on IHub trying to change the narrative from talking about the stock to negatively talking about me. Wow! I didn't realize little old me put so much fear and anger into those bashers. As like with any stock... The success or failure of any stock will reside with what that stock produces for substance to the market and not with what I think, do, or post. I still believe that the bashers here have learned something big that is coming that could warrant huge price increases in SPZI. The bashing is just simply too redundant and ridiculous.
And the bashers say that I talk too much; they say that I post too much. They think that I post too much and do nothing but post a bunch of pumping posts. First, I don't pump stocks and I have never pumped any stock that I have ever been in. Sometimes my excitement might have been twisted by the bashers to be pumping, but there's a difference between "pumping" and "believing" in a stock and posting with excitement. Again, the intentions of a person is what helps to define such too. Every single stock that I have ever posted here on IHub or RagingBull, I had believed in. If things didn't work out, then I made the decision to still hang around hoping for change or I simply just moved on. Each investor has to make their own decision for doing such to their liking. Saying that a stock is going to the moon without providing the justification to explain through logical deduction for why a stock has such potential to do so could be considered pumping. Any stock I have posted on, I think people know over the years that I have tried to provide due diligence (DD) to help people and to not hurt people. If a company fails to provide what they are claiming, then such is always out of my control.
Now, look at my "post" to "member mark" ratio then compare it to the bashers' "post" to "member mark" ratio to see who really have been posting and doing the most for posting BS based on the facts below. As for those bringing up my RagingBull posts, I had over 7,000+ member marks from my forum so my "post" to "member mark" ratio was even lower from RagingBull. Take a look at these facts below to compare my "post" to "member mark" ratio to a few that are bashing me to really see the gist of what I am talking about:
stervc (me)
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=1551
Followed By: 5208
Posts: 23,937
Post to Member Mark Ratio = 4.59 to 1
This means that for every 4.59 posts that are made by me, stervc, I get 1 member mark on average.
Huggy Bear
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=172007
Followed By: 502
Posts: 74,327
Post to Member Mark Ratio = 148.06 to 1
This means that for every 148 posts that are made by Huggy Bear, he gets 1 member mark on average. This means that Huggy Bear is 32.24 times worse than how bad he thinks I am compared to my ratio.
uber darthium
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=45100
Followed By: 78
Posts: 14,671
Post to member Mark Ratio = 188.08 to 1
This means that for every 188 posts that are made by uber darthium, he gets 1 member mark on average. This means that uber darthium is 40.95 times worse than how bad he thinks I am compared to my ratio.
I-Glow
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=315468
Followed By: 728
Posts: 74,347
Post to member Mark Ratio = 102.1 to 1
This means that for every 102 posts that are made by I-Glow, he gets 1 member mark on average. This means that uber darthium is 22.22 times worse than how bad he thinks I am compared to my ratio.
dinogreeves
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=552395
Followed By: 1069
Posts: 25,621
Post to member Mark Ratio = 23.9 to 1
This means that for every 23 posts that are made by dinogreeves, he gets 1 member mark on average. This means that dinogreeves is 5 times worse than how bad he thinks I am compared to my ratio.
surfkast
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=74322
Followed By: 1034
Posts: 113,234
Post to member Mark Ratio = 109.5 to 1
This means that for every 109 posts that are made by surfkast, he gets 1 member mark on average. This means that surfkast is 23 times worse than how bad he thinks I am compared to my ratio.
zombywolf
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=17484
Followed By: 192
Posts: 14,287
Post to member Mark Ratio = 74.3 to 1
This means that for every 74 posts that are made by zombywolf, he gets 1 member mark on average. This means that zombywolf is 16 times worse than how bad he thinks I am compared to my ratio.
trader59
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=655617
Followed By: 186
Posts: 16,015
Post to member Mark Ratio = 86.102 to 1
This means that for every 86 posts that are made by trader59, he gets 1 member mark on average. This means that trader59 is 18 times worse than how bad he thinks I am compared to my ratio.
I could go on and on with posting more facts in regards to these facts and I could even add some more bashers to that list. However, from the factual info above, I'll let each individual determine who are the ones that are actually posting more BS than me, the accused.
v/r
Sterling
Facts About The Facts...
Fact: I have never in my life scammed anyone. Before anyone can prove that somebody has scammed someone, you have to prove that that person had "intent" to scam. Sorry for the bashers out there thinking such, but I have never in my life scammed anyone. Also, I have never in my life had any "intentions" to scam anyone. Have I made some stupid mistakes in the market? Yes I have. Have I invested in some stocks that I later learned were bad investments? Yes I have. I think we all have had some successes and failures within the market. As for ever scamming anyone, sorry bashers, but it's never been in my heart and mind to do such to anyone... EVER! I'm just not that kind of person.
Following, I posted some factual numbers that debunk the bashers' claim about me posting too much or posting so many pumping posts as the bashers would try to trick one into believing. Before seeing those numbers, let me explain some other things of note.
Let's see. It's starting to look too obvious. This is a international stock forum for people all over the world to come here to talk about the stock. Instead, people come here and see that the forum is clogged up on purpose with a few bashers that have been following me around for years on IHub trying to change the narrative from talking about the stock to negatively talking about me. Wow! I didn't realize little old me put so much fear and anger into those bashers. As like with any stock... The success or failure of any stock will reside with what that stock produces for substance to the market and not with what I think, do, or post. I still believe that the bashers here have learned something big that is coming that could warrant huge price increases in NHMD. The bashing is just simply too redundant and ridiculous.
And the bashers say that I talk too much; they say that I post too much. They think that I post too much and do nothing but post a bunch of pumping posts. First, I don't pump stocks and I have never pumped any stock that I have ever been in. Sometimes my excitement might have been twisted by the bashers to be pumping, but there's a difference between "pumping" and "believing" in a stock and posting with excitement. Again, the intentions of a person is what helps to define such too. Every single stock that I have ever posted here on IHub or RagingBull, I had believed in. If things didn't work out, then I made the decision to still hang around hoping for change or I simply just moved on. Each investor has to make their own decision for doing such to their liking. Saying that a stock is going to the moon without providing the justification to explain through logical deduction for why a stock has such potential to do so could be considered pumping. Any stock I have posted on, I think people know over the years that I have tried to provide due diligence (DD) to help people and to not hurt people. If a company fails to provide what they are claiming, then such is always out of my control.
Now, look at my "post" to "member mark" ratio then compare it to the bashers' "post" to "member mark" ratio to see who really have been posting and doing the most for posting BS based on the facts below. As for those bringing up my RagingBull posts, I had over 7,000+ member marks from my forum so my "post" to "member mark" ratio was even lower from RagingBull. Take a look at these facts below to compare my "post" to "member mark" ratio to a few that are bashing me to really see the gist of what I am talking about:
stervc (me)
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=1551
Followed By: 5208
Posts: 23,937
Post to Member Mark Ratio = 4.59 to 1
This means that for every 4.59 posts that are made by me, stervc, I get 1 member mark on average.
Huggy Bear
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=172007
Followed By: 502
Posts: 74,327
Post to Member Mark Ratio = 148.06 to 1
This means that for every 148 posts that are made by Huggy Bear, he gets 1 member mark on average. This means that Huggy Bear is 32.24 times worse than how bad he thinks I am compared to my ratio.
uber darthium
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=45100
Followed By: 78
Posts: 14,671
Post to member Mark Ratio = 188.08 to 1
This means that for every 188 posts that are made by uber darthium, he gets 1 member mark on average. This means that uber darthium is 40.95 times worse than how bad he thinks I am compared to my ratio.
I-Glow
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=315468
Followed By: 728
Posts: 74,347
Post to member Mark Ratio = 102.1 to 1
This means that for every 102 posts that are made by I-Glow, he gets 1 member mark on average. This means that uber darthium is 22.22 times worse than how bad he thinks I am compared to my ratio.
dinogreeves
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=552395
Followed By: 1069
Posts: 25,621
Post to member Mark Ratio = 23.9 to 1
This means that for every 23 posts that are made by dinogreeves, he gets 1 member mark on average. This means that dinogreeves is 5 times worse than how bad he thinks I am compared to my ratio.
surfkast
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=74322
Followed By: 1034
Posts: 113,234
Post to member Mark Ratio = 109.5 to 1
This means that for every 109 posts that are made by surfkast, he gets 1 member mark on average. This means that surfkast is 23 times worse than how bad he thinks I am compared to my ratio.
zombywolf
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=17484
Followed By: 192
Posts: 14,287
Post to member Mark Ratio = 74.3 to 1
This means that for every 74 posts that are made by zombywolf, he gets 1 member mark on average. This means that zombywolf is 16 times worse than how bad he thinks I am compared to my ratio.
trader59
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=655617
Followed By: 186
Posts: 16,015
Post to member Mark Ratio = 86.102 to 1
This means that for every 86 posts that are made by trader59, he gets 1 member mark on average. This means that trader59 is 18 times worse than how bad he thinks I am compared to my ratio.
I could go on and on with posting more facts in regards to these facts and I could even add some more bashers to that list. However, from the factual info above, I'll let each individual determine who are the ones that are actually posting more BS than me, the accused.
v/r
Sterling
Proof SPZI Not Frontloaded: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173399690
chadlewis78, very interesting for non-bashers to read...
Thanks for sharing as this is a post that all should read that are not bashers. I read this post a few years ago. I don't know if it is true, but it does make a lot of sense:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173715390
v/r
Sterling
Very Important & Huge Article for SPZI (JP3E) Translated...
Very Important & Huge Article for SPZI (JP3E) Translated
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173628081
v/r
Sterling
This is Very Good for NHMD...
This is very good for NHMD. If they can retire and settle the convertible notes, such would be huge for NHMD. I believe that such is the #1 reason why we have not seen new highs for NHMD.
Now consider that doing so is going to be done via using the proceeds generated from the company's fuel purchase orders. This leads me to think that the jet fuel deal is very real and better than what some had originally thought. This could mean that this jet fuel deal is going to be bringing in significant revenues very soon on a monthly basis.
This is a very powerful 8-K for NHMD:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=17205492&guid=S1d-kaJI9XDvJth
Item 8.01 Other Information.
(1)
The Company is currently in active discussions with its existing noteholders to retire and settle the convertible notes, using the proceeds generated from the Company's fuel purchase orders. This strategic initiative aims to completely pay off the note, leading to the cancellation of the convertible note. Furthermore, it will allow the Company to significantly reduce the number of authorized common shares by approximately 40%. Once the initial fuel transaction is successfully completed, the Company will be able to finalize the details with the noteholders with the goal of eliminating the convertible note.
(2)
In response to inquiries received via email from our shareholders regarding the possibility of initiating a stock buyback program using profits generated from our jet fuel deals, we are pleased to confirm that the Company has been internally deliberating this matter. We are diligently formulating a comprehensive plan to commence the repurchase of common stock utilizing the proceeds generated from our jet fuel transactions. Rest assured, we are committed to enhancing shareholder value and are actively exploring avenues to achieve this goal. Once the initial fuel transaction is successfully completed, the Company will finalize the details of the stock buyback program.
This is Very Good for NHMD...
This is very good for NHMD. If they can retire and settle the convertible notes, such would be huge for NHMD. I believe that such is the #1 reason why we have not seen new highs for NHMD.
Now consider that doing so is going to be done via using the proceeds generated from the company's fuel purchase orders. This leads me to think that the jet fuel deal is very real and better than what some had originally thought. This could mean that this jet fuel deal is going to be bringing in significant revenues very soon on a monthly basis.
This is a very powerful 8-K for NHMD:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=17205492&guid=S1d-kaJI9XDvJth
Item 8.01 Other Information.
(1)
The Company is currently in active discussions with its existing noteholders to retire and settle the convertible notes, using the proceeds generated from the Company's fuel purchase orders. This strategic initiative aims to completely pay off the note, leading to the cancellation of the convertible note. Furthermore, it will allow the Company to significantly reduce the number of authorized common shares by approximately 40%. Once the initial fuel transaction is successfully completed, the Company will be able to finalize the details with the noteholders with the goal of eliminating the convertible note.
(2)
In response to inquiries received via email from our shareholders regarding the possibility of initiating a stock buyback program using profits generated from our jet fuel deals, we are pleased to confirm that the Company has been internally deliberating this matter. We are diligently formulating a comprehensive plan to commence the repurchase of common stock utilizing the proceeds generated from our jet fuel transactions. Rest assured, we are committed to enhancing shareholder value and are actively exploring avenues to achieve this goal. Once the initial fuel transaction is successfully completed, the Company will finalize the details of the stock buyback program.
This is Very Good for NHMD...
This is very good for NHMD. If they can retire and settle the convertible notes, such would be huge for NHMD. I believe that such is the #1 reason why we have not seen new highs for NHMD.
Now consider that doing so is going to be done via using the proceeds generated from the company's fuel purchase orders. This leads me to think that the jet fuel deal is very real and better than what some had originally thought. This could mean that this jet fuel deal is going to be bringing in significant revenues very soon on a monthly basis.
This is a very powerful 8-K for NHMD:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=17205492&guid=S1d-kaJI9XDvJth
Item 8.01 Other Information.
(1)
The Company is currently in active discussions with its existing noteholders to retire and settle the convertible notes, using the proceeds generated from the Company's fuel purchase orders. This strategic initiative aims to completely pay off the note, leading to the cancellation of the convertible note. Furthermore, it will allow the Company to significantly reduce the number of authorized common shares by approximately 40%. Once the initial fuel transaction is successfully completed, the Company will be able to finalize the details with the noteholders with the goal of eliminating the convertible note.
(2)
In response to inquiries received via email from our shareholders regarding the possibility of initiating a stock buyback program using profits generated from our jet fuel deals, we are pleased to confirm that the Company has been internally deliberating this matter. We are diligently formulating a comprehensive plan to commence the repurchase of common stock utilizing the proceeds generated from our jet fuel transactions. Rest assured, we are committed to enhancing shareholder value and are actively exploring avenues to achieve this goal. Once the initial fuel transaction is successfully completed, the Company will finalize the details of the stock buyback program.
SPZI back to Pink Current! https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SPZI/news
StealthGold, with this MGON & FDA thought...
Respectfully, you might be right as I was thinking the same thing too until I kept reading down further to where it stated...
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/387165/content
The material has shown no irritation in the standard protocol for acute skin irritation used for FDA submissions on medical devices.
TNBI ** New Management & New Direction Coming...
TNBI ** New Management & New Direction Coming:
TNBI ** New Management & New Direction Coming...
TNBI ** New Management & New Direction Coming:
TNBI ** New Management & New Direction Coming...
TNBI ** New Management & New Direction Coming:
BERKSHIRE AGENT, with this TONR Key Points Update...
Thanks for sharing this update of the Key Points from the TONR Twitter spaces:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173656576
HUGE KEYPOINTS FROM YESTERDAYS TWITTER SPACES
-NO REVERSE SPLIT
-NO CONVERSIONS
-NO DILUTION
-NO A/S INCREASE
-NEW CEO
-NEW AI PRODUCT
-MULTIPLE PARTNERSHIPS
-REAL ESTATE BUSINESS
- HUGE ASIAN MERGER WITH COMPANY TIED TO BILLIONAIRES.
MGON CEO was with €27.7 Billion Danone Group
MGON CEO was with €27.7 Billion Danone Group
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172707393
With this MGON Huge FDA Approval Pending
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173628123
MGON: 3 years of Audits completed/More coming
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173669806
v/r
Sterling
MGON CEO was with €27.7 Billion Danone Group
MGON CEO was with €27.7 Billion Danone Group
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172707393
With this MGON Huge FDA Approval Pending
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173628123
MGON: 3 years of Audits completed/More coming
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173669806
v/r
Sterling
MGON CEO was with €27.7 Billion Danone Group
MGON CEO was with €27.7 Billion Danone Group
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172707393
With this MGON Huge FDA Approval Pending
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173628123
MGON: 3 years of Audits completed/More coming
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173669806
v/r
Sterling
JV44, with MGON...
To do three years worth of audited financials lead me to think that somebody huge is involved and that is something that they required for them to be fully engaged with MGON in my opinion. With an OS of 291,876,881 shares, hitting a few dollars is not out of the question if they get FDA Approvals and a huge diapers contract with a big name company like Huggies, Pampers, etc.
MGON CEO was with €27.7 Billion Danone Group
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172707393
With this MGON Huge FDA Approval Pending
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173628123
MGON: 3 years of Audits completed/More coming
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173669806
v/r
Sterling
stockgringo...
All that matters right now is that I am here right now with MONI. After two years, I'm still here! I only have to be right once here with MONI. It looks like the company is going to prove me to be right for believing in them. Let's see if I am right!
v/r
Sterling
Correction: MONI Merger 100% closed/New Management...
I think this is finite indicating that the merger is closed here with MONI per the update from the company below stating that an 8-K will be published upon approval from legal ...
$MONI. The newest officer and director has been submitted to OTC Markets. The merger is 100% signed and COMPLETED, and an 8-K will be published upon approval from legal. Thanks to all for your continued patience and support.
— MOON EQUITY HOLDINGS (@moon45184976) January 19, 2024
Correction: MONI Merger 100% closed/New Management...
I think this is finite indicating that the merger is closed here with MONI per the update from the company below stating that an 8-K will be published upon approval from legal ...
$MONI. The newest officer and director has been submitted to OTC Markets. The merger is 100% signed and COMPLETED, and an 8-K will be published upon approval from legal. Thanks to all for your continued patience and support.
— MOON EQUITY HOLDINGS (@moon45184976) January 19, 2024
Correction: MONI Merger 100% closed/New Management...
I think this is finite indicating that the merger is closed here with MONI per the update from the company below stating that an 8-K will be published upon approval from legal ...
$MONI. The newest officer and director has been submitted to OTC Markets. The merger is 100% signed and COMPLETED, and an 8-K will be published upon approval from legal. Thanks to all for your continued patience and support.
— MOON EQUITY HOLDINGS (@moon45184976) January 19, 2024
edro, with your thought...
You are correct. I stand corrected with that MONI post. It does not say an 8-K next week. It says an 8-K will be published upon approval from legal. My apology.
v/r
Sterling
MONI Merger 100% closed/New Management...
I think this is finite indicating that the merger is closed here with MONI per the update from the company below stating that an 8-K is coming this week ...
$MONI. The newest officer and director has been submitted to OTC Markets. The merger is 100% signed and COMPLETED, and an 8-K will be published upon approval from legal. Thanks to all for your continued patience and support.
— MOON EQUITY HOLDINGS (@moon45184976) January 19, 2024