Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Lol... Nope. Incorrect. They are Not mutually exclusive. Third option, your interpretation of the data is incorrect and we don't have all the data. That's my vote.
Lastly, it's not me that is right or wrong, I am just reporting what has been officially said and filed in the court documents.
Typically happens with cash, and that ends up the # of shares divided by the buyout price. For example Microsoft just bought linked in for $196 a share which was about a $60 gain for share holders per share. It was trading in the 130's and is now in the 190's. It sometimes happens with stock, but that is less common with larger companies (who I assume would be the type to purchase this because of the patents) in the software arena.
"Excluding property and other assets"
Nope.
"Excluding property and other assets" -Ed
"No factual evidence to support the allegations" -auditors
And as has been echoed time and time again, the judges will have the final say.
Gltu.
Not sure what you're looking at there...
"Excluding property and assets"
And no, most do not agree with you, nor do the auditors, nor does Ed.
Have read it, all 3 filings, completely disagree with your interpretation. Waiting on the judge.
Not sure what is unclear about this.
"No factual evidence to support the allegations."
Okay, still not getting your meaning though? Stock promoters? Shitty musicians?
Not sure what you're talking about with this stock promoters and shitty musician stuff? Gltu.
Exactly....
The "even if" stuff about the properties was a secondary clause after and was supposed to be ironic in that even if there were properties purchased after greenpay which we have already stated there wasn't and there is no materiality, it wouldn't matter for Ken's case. It was an example to show that any way the cookie is sliced, Ken's complaint is garbage, and while there was no property purchases after greenpay, even if there was, Ken still loses. Not sure how stuff can be so misconstrued all the time. It is important to read ALL the filings smh...And like you said, the judges will have the final ruling.
That is in no way reflective of what was said in the filings... Not even close.
Yes sir! $$$
"Misplaced" lol... This is hilarious
Lol, he "bought" the shares knowing the SEC filings did not acknowledge them...
What does one do when this is the case? Create auditor error and materiality...
This is amazing DD, fantastic work.
It's all coming to a head
I wonder how court turned out today
Incorrect, and more bullshit. Iink? Please extrapolate the data to show the pattern? Lay it out there. By definition this is horseshit... The very fact of the different volume in large trading quantities is by default not a pattern because it is.... Different. More non issues...
Incorrect. Every stock in the universe has trades that occur at the end every day. There is no pattern, the volume is different every day. More ludicrous bullshit.
It does come down to the judges in the end, and that should be very telling. No one here has all the information and we are all trying to piece it together.
Borderline absurdity and complete bullshit. One might as well call every last trade a paint job then, and where is the cut off, the last 10 minutes? The last half hour? The last 4 hours? Lol.... Ridiculous. In this case there was over a million volume in the last 10 minutes...
Laughable.... 200,000 buys are hardly a paint job... Wow... Yes the amount matters, no it's not a paint job they are called trades, as in a solid day of green buys. Trading ends at 4pm, is every last trade every day a paint job lol???? Complete and utter bullshit.
Exactly and well put.
The properties are the crux of the lawsuit, which is why so much effort is being put into making them an issue. Without them there is no "materiality" and Ken cannot proceed with the lawsuit, so obviously he is going after the auditors.
Obviously a lot, professional auditors are on record in court documents disagreeing with you lol...
"No evidence to support the baseless allegations." Seems pretty cut and dry, but as you said, you can choose to ignore it.
If by dire, you mean nothing at all, I completely agree.
Not ignoring anything, just stating as usual that the facts are being misinterpreted. The auditors have already seen all of this, and are on record, "no factual evidence to support the allegations." That is the only fact one needs.
No one is ignoring anything, and they are hardly "facts". Nothing in that lawsuit is anything close to a factual representation of what is happening, which is why no one takes it seriously.
It's true... The whole thing is a joke.
Laughable at best... Getting a DUI is hardly indicative of some crazed alcoholic lunatic behavior or personal demons.... Wow
Not sure what promoters you're talking about online? I don't see that happening either. People who disagree simply might just be that, people who disagree.
Scooping party!
I guess that would make sense of there was more volume, but even at this pps, if it was all guys it is only 14k today. I just don't get it, for a company that is doing so well.
I don't either, but it is clearly being controlled
This stock is trading so weird.... All the 4,999 trades... Weird buys throughout the day... Definitely being manipulated..
I've been long for a long while now... I don't understand why the pps is so low. It has Cash on hand, a product selling, a mildly low SS for OTC.... I don't get it.
Not convertibles?
It's a good point though, does anyone actually know the SS here?
I'll be scooping again tomorrow.
Oh I think the product is great, and maybe a buyout in the future, but management gives zero shits about shareholders.. Bloated SS...
Pressure on the ask? Looks like another zero volume day here... Completely BS
Moving on up!