Retired
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Just please do not lose sight of the very real possibility that folks wish they'd gotten out in time. Me, I wish I'd not listened to Linda's Good-Time-Charlie conference calls and got out while it was still over $2.00 per share.
Just sayin'.
IF -- and this is a huge 'if' -- revocation doesn't take place and the judge relents, one should hope that the mysterious wealth group would have a big say within management which, up to this point, has been vacant.
IMO, of course.
Agree! Pink is definitely your color.
Backhand notwithstanding, a rise in the pps is always welcome. Sometimes a dip even more so.
Everyone has their windmills.
IMO, of course.
You are well aware that there were plenty of wrong turns prior to DC. Insofar as DC is concerned, only time will tell if it was/is a success. Thus far, all are hanging their collective hats on DC but can it survive on revenues that are, at best, minimal?
IMO, of course.
Ehhh .. Not quite what you had to say. S'okay, tho. I get your point -- this time.
Each and every "turning point" witnessed over time has been nothing more than just another dead-end.
IMO, of course. Predicated upon personal observation.
In what sense was that response germane to my post?
I was quoted verbatim.
Could be. Could also be a ball-buster here.
DBMM's entire existence has been one continuous mitigating circumstance. One tale of woe after another. One lie after another. One busted plan after another. DD 101. Basic stuff.
IMO, of course.
After being dragged, kicking and screaming, into court. What good do-bees. Old info. Good info.
"This is nothing. Every business has to file"
Again, glad to hear.
"Old info is not necessarily without due consideration"
Glad you agree.
Old info is not necessarily without due consideration. Old info should be part of a healthy DD diet. Old info is usually fact and accurate. Those who choose to discount old info do so at their own risk.
IMO, of course.
Just sayin'.
And whether it does or does not get revoked might well -- strike that -- WILL depend on what the judge reads into the super duper. The same super duper that had a whole plateful of sizzle and very little steak.
Again, IMO.
That is, YO. Although never stated.
The audited super-duper, although quite professional
Yes, with "diarrhea nonsense".
I believe that WAS the Q and am damned certain you are aware of same.
If given the 'go-ahead', how long you figure that 745 mil will remain untouched?
I didn't mention anything about being paid with shares. Addressing the content of my post would be sufficient.
But sales were -- at best -- lethargic.
It also looks as if there's a 'back door' in the event they don't wish to put out the entire $3mil. I.E., "first right of refusal".
IMO, of course.
Wellsir, it doesn't appear to be "happening" as of this particular moment.
Total falsehood, Pinkie.
Seems to me that in order for the company to move forward, the judge is going to need far more than a LOI from the mysterious "family wealth group". He's going to scope these negative numbers and need total reassurance that things won't go back to "business as usual" due mostly to lack of financing.
The Super Duper included all kinds of data outlining the industry in which dbmm would like to be a player but do they have the chutzpah to do so? No more lame excuses will be the name of the game.
IMO, of course.
FWIW, I believe there were 2 R/S's -- 1/100 and 1/1000.
Win, lose or draw they made their case and made it about as well as could be done. The bottom line is that the judge must decide if it was well enough. Ain't nothing said here that will change that.
IMO, of course.
Just sayin'.
.....live in the past or make a future.
With all those wonderful things going for them, one would think they'd be well ahead of the curve ... maybe back around the $2.00 range where I first got in. Oh .... wait .... that was BEFORE r/s's totaling 1/100,000 took place with the pps crashing and burning after each. If there really IS a WM group and they are dedicated to making this thing work, I would suggest that the King and Queen of this travesty be replaced.
The rubber should be meeting the road as of tomorrow. Could be positively entertaining.
Goes to bed with loan sharks.
Habitually missed federal mandated paperwork.
Finally catches the SEC's attention.
Revocation hearings forcing a very expensive Super Duper.
Closing in on their final crash and burn.
BOOM.
King Reggie and Lady Linda go bye bye.
BOOM.
IMO, of course.
If they miss this deadline, rest assured it won't be their fault. I expect the Hindenburg defense to be trotted out by their crack legal team should the miss occur.
IMO, of course.
Some simply cannot begin to fathom how thoroughly jaundiced others are with this outfit. Promise after promise busted. The only things remotely accurate with all of their 'good-time-Charlie' PR's were the Safe Harbor statements that outlined the worst that could, and would, happen. Investor after investor drank that kool-aid right on down only to be pasted with dual r/s's that sucked the life out of everyone. Then, after each r/s wherein a "respectable" PPS was achieved, awarded new investors with triple-ott share prices. Now it appears as if dc is for real and might even find a niche in an already stiff market led by huge companies with deep pockets and the expertise to get where they want to go. Meanwhile, our troupe of vagabonds are still attempting to forge some credibility with yet another group of investors but have hindered themselves with, well ....... everyone knows with what. All IMO, of course.
DC going to explode post super 10k with wealth management capital infusion imo.
IMplode looks to be more like it.
IMO, of course.
More noise.