Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Probably because Fox News was reporting non-stop that she "already ordered fireworks for her victory" and how arrogant it looked.
then, why were the Clinton fire works cancelled on monday the 7th?
Someone around her had the brains to cancel them to contain the damage.
I know all we have is speculation now but the fact remains that not a single state was called when the 15 hit at 4:37PM EST. If conspiracy theories take hold I'm really gonna have some fun!
Good luck to us all!
Which one of the 4 things in your post do we NOT "know"?
You beat me to it. The "15" was filed 2.5 hours before ANY polls were closed so not a SINGLE state was called. Like you implied, Clinton was still planning her victory party at this point.
I thought Roche already has control & wouldn't a tender offer totally suck at this point?
Excellent analogy to "LOST"!
The "timing" of the recent actions (and those coming) make sense, it's the "actions" that remain a mystery, for now.
Roche made the $90k "investments" for 9 months like clockwork. We knew "something" had to happen in October, just nobody expected going dark. And, why throw another $200k in with a very short term, unless to accumulate even more shares? Also, like I posted yesterday, Pacchini seems to make bank with RVUE shares. Is there any significance to what looks like a precise 1 year plan? ($90k Jan-Sep & now a bridge thru Dec)
I hope I'm not implying I know the end result. The only thing I'm confident of is either looking like a visionary for getting & staying invested here for a big payday or looking like a big dope for risking more than I should have in a company losing money that went dark!
Another thought process to consider:
Pacchini has basically been working for minimum wage when you consider his background. His latest employment contract was written August 2015. He only gets "paid" if RVUE achieves revenues substantially higher than what they are now, OR, if there is a "sale of the company / change of control".
There appears to be a "bigger bonus" in the form of stock and/or stock options, lot's of 'em. The exercise of the options appears to be .04 cents.
Would Pacchini be hanging around for worthless RVUE stock? The contract has some conditions related to the "sale of assets" too but unfortunately I don't fully understand it?
My brain hurts. The first sentence in the default clause is a mile long. I keep reading it trying to see if there is some kind of circular logic or something I'm missing but I think it's just over my head?
I also keep going back & forth between "wow, never thought of that one" & "duh, that should have been more obvious". I've even contemplated could RVUE be ready to announce a "positive event" that satisfies the $200k or "right after" Roche gets his 2.5 more shares?
I "can't see" how liquidating assets would benefit Roche? I'm assuming that even if RVUE has something worth "much more" than what's on the balance sheet, it's not like he could sell it for more than the debt due & then pocket the extra, right?
I think he wants more shares and he would only want more shares if he thinks he can make more money with them which would mean we would too.
Looking forward to whatever the answer is!
I realize anything is possible in the OTC, including BK, but if it went that way wouldn't Roche still need to explain it to a judge and get approval?
Yes your honor, I am the majority shareholder of RVUE and basically control the company & make the rules. I have been a director for years and have provided millions of dollars of my own money to the company. I am intimately familiar with what the company does and their technology, and also own related businesses.
However, even though I just lent myself a relatively small amount of money compared to what I already invested here (like 2-3 months ago), & I'm nearly a billionaire, I have concluded I can't pay myself back the money I lent to me, or whatever. OK?
IMO, you're not thinking this through. There is no "working app" so he never spoke to any bankers. How do you get an appointment?
Hi, I've been working on a stupid savings app based on the Martingale gambling system. I started this idea a couple years ago but nobody wants to fund me. I don't have a working product yet but I can show you some screen shots of a beta thingy. When can I come talk to you and try to sell you my concept?
Quote:
Wonder what the banks have said to a poorly made app?
Yup, kind of my point. It's complicated and maybe at one time he "thought" it was due in 71 days but that date has passed & he is now allegedly saying December'ish.
Agree, I'd say it's possible "he" didn't understand the 71 day thing when he told you about it? It may not even apply?
Moving "k" dates & things like "the notes are almost done" & "the notes are done, except the $38k note that was just converted and that part is done but the absorption isn't done", ain't helping.
I do know I'm holding 3.8 at .0024 avg. (ironic?) & did not sell any. Feeling a bit stupid that I didn't take some profit.
RELEASE THE K!
There actually is "something" to the "71 day stuff", it's just that it's confusing. (At least to me) Like other SEC rules, there are many heretofore's, ifs, ands, exceptions, etc. There is also a clause that refers to rule 3-05 acquisitions blaa, blaa, blaa. Add to that, the rules change if the acquired company is 20%, or 40%, or 50% of something else.
I feel I'm making things worse? Anyway, the stuff below is one of many things I found regarding filing requirements related to acquisitions. This was under "8k acquisition requirements".
The financial statements of an acquired business (Item 9.01) must be filed no later than 71 calendar days after the date that the initial report on Form 8-K must be filed (four business days plus 71 calendar days).
Thanks for the reply. I'm too lazy to go look, but I thought "this qtr", as in Q3, was the one where we'd be fully funded? Dan also seemed to imply that working capital will always be an issue?
I'm pleased about the ebitda but some of those "letters" equate to big amounts. My "going concern" remains they may never overcome over- paying for our brands and Big T will ultimately grind us down. I'll continue to hang on for now but with less optimism. Cheers...
I'm curious if what you heard yesterday matches anything you were expecting based on your recent correspondence with management? Obviously the revenue wasn't.
my target price has got to be somewhere closer to 50 cents and above. This Monday is gonna be huge. Fingers crossed for 14 million and above. Then hopefully he sets the expectation of 16 million or more for Q4.
The Q "was" released Friday, it's on the OTC markets website. It doesn't show what time so I assume after hours?
Donald Trump is 70, Bernie Sanders is 75. Think about the hours the President puts in & the stress. Ginsberg (supreme court) is 83 & has more than 1 cancer. She has the body of a 125 year old but thinks she's just fine. Scalia (supreme court) was 79. He had so many health problems & knew he was walking death, yet the prick wouldn't retire.
Many rich/powerful people never "think they are too old" to stop. I don't know dick about Dick but I wouldn't count on it.
Damn, thanks for making me bum myself out...
I hope the product is ready before Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, etc. are all obsolete...
I guess a "1 sentence" update, with a grammar error, is better than nothing, but not by much!
Let's hope the "next update" actually says something or they at least get back to "current"...
I believe we'll know the plan sooner than some may think. Roche was providing $90k per month "working capital" under the .013 plan. The last purchase/cash infusion under this deal was September 8th.
We just heard about the "bridge loan" effective October 11th which netted $195k, or, 2 more months of "required working capital".
This puts the next "something" at mid December. Why do a 2 month bridge loan unless you're confident that's all that's needed? I predict the plan comes together by calendar year end.
IMO, they probably were right on the line of legal vs. not. Way too technical for me. As far as complaints, I only know of filing with FINRA but my gut tells my when FINRA sees a complaint for an OTC company, it goes straight to the "round file"...
I can't blame you for trying to remain positive, but I'm afraid this is indeed what they had in mind. They likely did the bare minimum to remain "legal". They gave us a "technology company", unfortunately it's a useless company with no viable products, patents, monetary ideas. But they can "say" the opposite.
Quote:
Then again I can't imagine this app to be the deal of the year. There's gotta be something in the works that they just can't reveal yet.
Obviously the app isn't what they said it was, but as far as their opinion, remember when Manny said "we are putting a deal together with a company that can revolutionize the banking industry"? (Something close to that anyway) Remember the excitement here & speculation as to who the IPO might be with? The app will NEVER materialize but this is indeed what Manny referred to.
The only we move up now is with some bogus, bs, hype about merging with or acquiring some other pretend company.
I saw his reply to you on Twitter. "We" have never been on kickstarter. Yeah, smooth answer. EEGI or Cranium hasn't, but Romario and his dopey app were. It raised ZERO dollars.
If anyone needed more data to know this is a complete fraud, adding a "donate" option on the corporate home page should lock it up. Is it even legal? What might the "prize" or "reward" be for donating to a FREE app? What will it cost shareholders?
Instead of kickstarter he should list "Accrue" on a site called "non-starter", because that's what it is!
What's next, a tweet that his "uncle" has won the Nigerian Lottery & he just needs a few grand to get it out of the country?
As I predicted, we heard "something of magnitude" before the Q. To be honest, this isn't what I thought, unless it is "step 1"! I also added today & am willing to wait so hopefully I'll end up as one of the visionaries...
ChuckBits Member Level Wednesday, 09/21/16 12:32:22 PM
Re: koen2 post# 5779
Post #
5810
of 6845 Go
Yes, IMO with the financing deal complete, "something" of magnitude must be announced between "today" & at the latest the Q (mid-November).
Hey, all we simply need is 8 more days of a 39% gain with no pull-backs and we break a dollar! Is that too much to ask?
Actually, other than being "an app" that transfers money from a checking account, they have absolutely nothing in common.
I've added about another 1.5 million, hope I don't regret it!
The stupid app is a non-starter. I cannot imagine a single bank in the United States that would want to be associated with it.
Aside from the scrutiny banks must be under right now, can you picture a bank telling a customer: "we have an app that helps you save by starting with change and then compounding it daily by using an exponential numeric value"?
The only way out of this mess is with a new pump of bs about some other nonexistent product, person, company, etc.
Actually, if your avg is about .0013 (like mine), & the pps being .0002, I'm down by "11 runs". So it would take back to back to back grand slams! Yeah, that happens all the time...
Has anyone ever seen the following sign hanging in a bar?
Free Beer Tomorrow
I keep going back "tomorrow" for free beer but the bartender tells me "read the sign", so I just buy beer until "tomorrow".
Sound familiar?
Have a GTC bid in at .0025 for 1 million, 270,000 filled today, adding to the pile...
So what you're saying is the PPS has held "for 0 days in a row since you bought, right?" Jinx! (Sorry)
Honestly I hope it works out great for you since that would help me & many others too! I've "averaged down" for over a year and let's just say it hasn't worked out. I thought about it at .20, .15, .10 thinking they were bottoms but glad I didn't. Thought about it at this level too but, well, see previous sentence...
Still holding (foolishly?) every share, (about 75k at about .75)
PS, like Phappy, I live on the SC coast south of Myrtle Beach. Wish us luck!
Seinfeld made a career with a long running show "about nothing" and was very successful...
With no news, it is going to be about nothing, which is a jeopardy
Thanks for the nod. Still here & watching closely, have some small bids in too.
I live ON THE OCEAN in South Carolina. As of now we plan to shelter in place, assuming we'll lose power over the weekend so I "might be in the dark" in more ways than one!
Another "Vape related death" in San Diego area...
I will try to say this in a way that makes some sense, but IMO there is NO WAY we go past Nov 15 without knowing “something”.
I think it is safe to assume RVUE needed the capital Roche has been providing on a monthly basis from the beginning of the year. That agreement has ENDED! (Let’s not forget Roche also PAID OFF the previous convertible debt) Clearly he has “something” in mind.
I personally hate conspiracy theories but the current uncertainty about where future capital will come from leaves us ripe for manipulation. The “fear factor” in the posts lately has definitely increased and that’s why I think the PPS has and maybe will continue to have big short-term swings. I was able to average up a bit yesterday by picking up a measly 25k at .025. Can people imagine how fast the buying would come if we do touch .02 again? I digress…
I keep running thru the possibilities (other than 99.99% sure of something by 11/15):
Roche goes a.w.o.l. & RVUE takes out new CD (yeah, I know…)
RVUE announces some major contracts that will provide revenue while we still hear nothing from Roche.
The financing agreement is extended for a few more months at the old .013 PPS (I don’t even know if that’s possible?)
A new agreement is set at a new PPS for more shares for X number of months.
A reverse merger, merger, takeover, or goldilocks scenario thru one of Roche’s many options is announced.
My point is we will either know a “little” or “a lot” BY NOVEMBER 15! NOT just the Q3 results. Can anyone imagine hearing nothing significant by 11/15 and then nobody asking direct questions at the CC?
I am a bag... I mean shareholder here so I realize I'm shooting myself in the foot, but I can't help it. I knew this was a big risk based on all the bs leading up to this point but ignored the warnings & decided to take a chance.
Try to forget for a moment all the nonsense to updating the share structure and coming clean with OTC Markets. This post is about the "life changing app".
It is my opinion that "Accrue" is a worthless joke, unfortunately it makes this a legit scam. "Legit", since there is "something" related to banking, but a "scam" since they already knew it was worthless by virtue of zero funding interest a year ago.
I have gone thru the entire beta multiple times and read the sales pitch over & over. The description contradicts itself. I can not come up with a reason why ANYONE would want to use this app?
Quote:
Accrue was designed for the most need-based of income levels.
Most people at a “need based income level” can’t even think about having a savings account. I live in area where most people work multiple jobs just to make ends meet. A savings account pales in comparison to paying the rent.
Quote:
Users just need to know a few things to get started: how much is my net pay, and what’s my pay cycle?
What about “my bills”? There is nothing in the settings regarding income to debt. Does this mean if I net $500 per week I can save $500 per week? We also need to assume the user has their check automatically deposited via electronic transfer from their employer, right?
Quote:
For a while now I've been trying to help my girlfriend (now fiancé) save, but each time I urged her to save she would cannibalize her savings account.
Using the app, what prevents her from transferring money “out” of the savings account?
Quote:
The app uses change and compounds it using an exponential numeric value. Then every day thereafter- doubling the previous day's amount and depositing the funds in the user's savings account.
Can you imagine asking the cashier at your local Walmart if they would be “interested in an app that helps them save money by compounding change daily using an exponential numeric value for a pre-set number of days”?
I challenge anyone to ask somebody: “quick question, if you saved money everyday starting with a nickel and doubling it everyday, how much money would you save after 12 days”?
The answer is $204.75. (By the way, that is using the smallest factor of “2”, not the ridiculous factors of 3, or 4. But to take it to a more stupid level, if you set it at ONE PENNY with a factor of 4, after 12 days you would “save” $55,924.05! Awesome, right?) So if you could afford to save $204.75 in a 12 day period, and you actually do have a checking & savings account, why wouldn’t you use your bank’s existing system to setup an automatic transfer from checking to savings on each payday?
I started my career as a computer programmer/systems analyst. Moved on as an IT Consultant and finished as an IT Director of a small international manufacturing company. I rarely claim to be the smartest guy in the room but think I have a better than average understanding of computer based solutions. Maybe I'm missing something here, but I don’t think so? Anyone?
Wasn't sure, thanks...
Did you include TODAYS T trade?
All good! Team "Roche", I like that.
Go NY Giants!
Garden City Beach, SC