My brain hurts. The first sentence in the default clause is a mile long. I keep reading it trying to see if there is some kind of circular logic or something I'm missing but I think it's just over my head?
I also keep going back & forth between "wow, never thought of that one" & "duh, that should have been more obvious". I've even contemplated could RVUE be ready to announce a "positive event" that satisfies the $200k or "right after" Roche gets his 2.5 more shares?
I "can't see" how liquidating assets would benefit Roche? I'm assuming that even if RVUE has something worth "much more" than what's on the balance sheet, it's not like he could sell it for more than the debt due & then pocket the extra, right?
I think he wants more shares and he would only want more shares if he thinks he can make more money with them which would mean we would too.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.