Retired
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
D'oh to all feel-good, yet unsubstantiated whimsy that conveniently sidesteps reality.
IMO! Of course.
D'oh! Not hardly! IMO!
Of course they were profitable at the start. But then they had to pay people (especially the nice lady), pay the bills, pay the IR girl, etc., etc. That adds up!
it was less than 2 years when they were suspended.
Getting interesting here.
Magnificently stated!
Loans predicated upon cash flow which we know is kinda bleak (the 'cash flow' that is).
IMO, of course.
Perhaps they rolled out the ol' "disruptor" chestnut for the pinkie-swear folks?
Just sayin'.
And in a month maybe more, maybe less, when revocation becomes reality, all of THIS will be in the past as well.
IMO, of course.
Just sayin'.
Technology hasn't helped dbmm gain profitability.
Technology hasn't kept dbmm from seeking monies from known loan sharks.
Technology didn't assist them in filing federally mandated forms necessary to remain a viable concern.
Technology didn't keep them from finding their asses on the judge's hot seat.
On the other hand, technology IS assisting their competition who have played by the rules in gaining an even more competitive advantage while awaiting the court's decision.
D'oh!
IMO, of course.
IMO, Scooter. IMO. Waiting for IR to be selected to, hopefully, deliver accurate information and do so in a professional manner.
Agreed! 'Stickied'.
Where's IR when you need him/her? Need some answers here, right? Perhaps the wealth folks decided to cut and run after seeing the latest Q?
Just sayin'.
IMO, of course.
Really? Opposite? Opposite of what?
Nah. Need more positive juju than what has been presented thus far. What is needed is a capable, efficient, no-nonsense IR person that is in a position to shed light. IMO, of course.
Try Schwab.
IMO, Scooter. All IMO.
converting at this point would be suicide. IMO -- Nest ce pas?
acknowledged by this writer as about the most positive thing that came out of the latest filing. it made a totally dismal report almost palatable. So why the downslide, particularly when some heavy-hitters had announced that they were gonna do some serious adding? IMO, of course.
Maybe the Supremes will intercede and order the judge to look the other way. IMO, of course.
Well, the NEW news isn't really kicking butt, now is it? Methinks dc can't be the panacea everyone seems to think it is without some major changes being made. But first, there's that sticky SEC, judgement wicket.
IMO, of course.
"if actually converted" So, you don't think that'll happen if given the chance?
Ummm ... Asher has been dispatched. It is officially Old News. All else mentioned is still on the table. But, yes, it really is funny.
IMO, of course.
IMO, Scooter. IMO.
Did Twitter, Amazon, et al ever find themselves walking the plank (so to speak) with the SEC?
Are you saying that dbmm is going to become giants in their field? Making that case might be simpler were everyone to see, first hand, exactly what is being provided to these big names (K1, Mercedes, etc.) being bandied about.
IMO, of course.
Whoops. Spoke too soon. That's about a 40% drop. Given all the excitement, it seems very unlikely that there'd be anyone making shares available at less than the robust 0.0015 level. IMO, of course.
Ragtime noise. LOUD noise.
Predicated on several posts made recently, I was expecting some heavy buying pressure yesterday and today. Guess not. The light of day does not bode well for our band of gypsies, apparently.
IMO, of course.
Acknowledged and re-acknowledged. Old news now. Time to move on.
Yeah! Who cares?
Hmmmm. Interesting that with all these seemingly significant developments as well as an almost carnival atmosphere, the investing public appears to be giving dbmm a 'bye'. One would think that just the dispatching of Asher alone would have resulted in some kind of tangible result.
Curious, IMO. Just sayin'.
What you're saying is that the SEC shouldn't concern themselves with "technicalities"? Apparently they agree with you. How else would this schlock outfit have lasted as long as it did without repercussions? Perhaps they (the SEC) should be sent a letter asking that they be more lenient with their scofflaws?
Yup. Pretty basic stuff.
Knowing that: 1) The company is on thin ice to begin with and, 2) The SEC is known for their 'nitpicky' ways, one would think that following instructions would be high on the bucket list. Pretty basic stuff right there.
IMO, of course.
Time becoming equally thin.
Yes, yes. We are all aware of the 'basic stuff'. But ..... Who cares?
So you're saying revocation is a possibility?