Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
GUARANTEED TRIPS COMING HERE!!!!
And the reason is easy to see.
Good for shorters maybe. Whats gonna happen? The company is gonna release another 600 million shares like it has in the last year?
MAJOR DILUTION HERE. Run away while there's still time.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingPdf?FilingID=8769652
For the 3 months ending June 30, 2011 weighted average shares outstanding 22,163,517.
For the 3 months ending June 30, 2012 weighted average shares outstanding 623,730,502.
This makes an increase of over 600,000,000 shares in the last year!
Direct Link to the article.
http://www.foxnews.com/health/2012/08/31/coming-soon-pot-chewing-gum/?intcmp=trending
IMVHO this makes perfect sense. One of the issues with medical use is the need to smoke it. Chewing gum is perfect.
Loving the action again today. Friday should be renamed Protday, and monday renamed Prot2day.
Great day guys! Looking forward to next week. Have a great holiday weekend!
Huh from what I've seen you're 0-6 on PPS here.
The initial test for the MFCC will attempt to verify that the MFCC uses approximately 90% less power from the grid than the standard 36V, 16A golf cart charger. The MFCC will be tested against a standard 36V, 16A golf cart charger, charge and drain a 36v lead acid battery bank repeatedly for one week. "Legends expects this test to show that the longer you use the MFCC, the longer it will take to drain your batteries," said Sablon. Legends states that the MFCC tends to not heat the battery like the standard 36V, 16A golf cart charger. Not heating the battery has been shown to extend the life of the battery.
The MFCC is described as a state-of-the-art multi-function charging controller, which digitally and thermally continuously adjusts throughout its charging cycle. The device will automatically detect and charges 12, 24, 36, and 48VDC lead acid batteries utilizing complex charging algorithms in association with bi-directional feedback to attain the optimal charging sequence for each charging session.
=============================================
I like this. We have a long road ahead paved with glittering gold.
Hey "Professor" I hear your predictions are 100%. Good to know.
By the way its "investOrs" not "investErs"
That good sir is a recipe for some MONEY TO BE MADE!!
There can be NO DILUTION as well because nobody can clear ANY certs regardless of how they were acquired.
So the float is what it is. The company is producing Press Releases and developing technology without assistance from outside funding.
This is a WINNER bro. BIG BIG WINNER.
Hiya BOS. The news flow out of here is amazing. Almost every week for the last two months straight.
I think you're 100% right on the idea this company is gonna be a major score!
It was VERY nice of management to state in the Fins that they were once a shell company and that nobody with certs can get them deposited until the company gains SEC compliance.
That's a long road, and tbh very costly. I see a LOT of promise here.
That's FANTASTIC NEWS! Thanks for letting me know about this one Doog.
Chart is beautiful! Took a position today just before the news hit so I appreciate your tip!
That was the first good action we've seen in weeks. Hopefully its a sign of the future.
Lucky you. I was takin a nap when this big dip hit. Wish i was up to get some >.<
The company is looking for someone like a Geologist to assist with the mining side. If you really have the qualifications you say then you should call.
702-475-8887
Seems to me any shareholder would jump at the idea of being able to help out a company they're involved with.
Big News will be here first.
I stated that the placer mines in Utah where the Bayport claims are located were produced by volcanic activity.
That is correct. On all accounts it is correct. Do you have any evidence to dispute that?
If not, then simply do not answer.
This is not a dispute of the overall gold content, as we will find that out soon when the company does their own tests.
Please, I have not had a good laugh in a while, please continue.
Igneous rock (derived from the Latin word igneus meaning of fire, from ignis meaning fire) is one of the three main rock types, the others being sedimentary and metamorphic rock. Igneous rock is formed through the cooling and solidification of magma or lava.
*Sighs.....*
So much for accurate Mkt Predictoration.
YES. But with a major difference. The Gold Rush Alaska deposits are more of an alluvial discharge, where glacier activity churned up the surface, and gold deposits were carried away as the glaciers melted.
In this case, its easIER to determine where to start looking as the gold would follow the path of the water, with the largest quantities where the slope "flattened out" and the water flow slowed down. AKA valleys.
The larger pieces gold would "fall out" and be left behind, and the smaller pieces would continue until the force of the water was such that it could no longer support them.
In the Utah area, the deposits are from volcanic activity. Imagine a Mount St Helens type volcano (stratovolcano) where lava and any other element is forced up a single centralized vent, resulting in ash and other particle debris to be scattered just like a person with a shotgun scatters pellets if they point it straight up.
The particles fall in "random" places, which means the debris field is not as easily found. If you've seen the show "Meteorite Men" you'll note how an asteroid debris field can be determined by the angle of the meteor and the approximate location of the impact.
Unfortunately with this particular placer deposit it is not that simple. So Bayport will have to take samples, see how much gold there is in the sample and determine from there what to do.
You're assuming that:
A. They sold the shares for cash, and
B. That they received the cash in the same quarter.
It's possible that the shares were part of another contract, and wouldn't show up on Cash Flow. It's also possible that the shares were issued during the quarter and IF they were sold the cash was not received till the next.
My last buy was at .35 and sold as high as $6.70. So whatever this bum has been sayin about a quarter by summer, I HOPE SO cause I'm sittin on a goldmine ready to buy again.
It will run again. This is far from done. Only question is... are these .70s the bottom?
Good luck explaining something logical to this one.
The white knight is talking backwards, and the red queen's lost her head.
Thanks for that super keen insight. Wish this board had more valuable imput like this.
I bet it sucks to be short here... either have ppl hopping your bid to pick up cheapies or not sellin on the bid.
Hope they burn.
The old firm was in NYC. The new one is in Irvine CA. Completely different coast, that seems to tell me that this was planned.
In addition, the old resigned on the 24th, the new one was accepted by the Board of Directors on the 25th.
Thats not enough time to go searching for a new firm unless it was intentional and preplanned.
Also, the IR firm they contracted is also in California. Makes me wonder if there is a reason parts of the company are moving to the West Coast?
Here's a quote from the new CPA firm.
Hmmm lets actually stop and READ the 8k?
1. Accounting firm NOTIFIED the company that they were resigning on April 24th.
2. Board had a meeting to accept this resignation on April 25th.
3. Board authorized another Accounting firm From IRVINE CALIFORNIA to take over on April 25th. Now why would they hire an Investor Relations firm in California....... and then hire an ACCOUNTING FIRM in California...... hmmmmmmmm.
Do you SERIOUSLY THINK PEOPLE HERE ARE STUPID? Feeble attempts to cause insecurity here are just that. Failed feeble attempts.
In my experience T-Trades are usually Dilution, not short covers.
Sterv, after reading that document, I've found something pretty interesting with regards to Lowjack's claim that it was filed in 2012.
That claim is TOTALLY FALSE, and if I were you I'd be very very ticked off.
January 16, 2012 is NOT the date that the notary acknowledge the signature, but the DATE HER NOTARY EXPIRES IN THE STATE OF TEXAS!
Look at the notary stamp. First line is the date that she acknowledged the document.
Second line is where her signature goes.
Third line is where her printed name goes (BUT SHE WROTE THE DATE HER COMMISSION EXPIRES HERE)
Fourth line is where the date her commission exipires goes... Jan 16, 2012.
LOOK MORE CLOSELY ON THAT NOTARY STAMP.
The first line is the NOTARY SIGNATURE LINE
The second line is the NOTARY PRINTED NAME LINE
The THIRD LINE is the NOTARY COMMISSION EXPIRATION DATE LINE.
January 16, 2012 is NOT the date that the notary acknowledge the signature, but the DATE HER NOTARY EXPIRES IN THE STATE OF TEXAS!
"This instrument was acknowledged before me the 14th day of March, 2011 by Harold B. Naylor, Jr."
Instead of printing her name in the 2nd line she spelled out the date that her notary expires.
No conspiracy.... try reading.
Dang! Was wondering who got the cheapies! Congrats!
Put the marketing power of say, Johnson & Johnson or some other pharaceutical equipment etc company behind this the profits would skyrocket.
I'm in for the long haul. Be glad to sit and hold this for as long as it takes.
Actually I don't believe ANYTHING I see on this or any other iHUB board.
My statement was in regards to "Investors are very good 'risk assessors' though." says the guy with SUPPOSEDLY 97,000 USD wrapped up into this?
Penny stock investors are gamblers. Nothing more, nothing less. In for a fast profit and out.