Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
OBLIGATION TO TRY TO SETTLE
Initially, for the joint submission brief, these parties were to discuss the possibility of settlement. By the time of (iv), they must specifically certify (basically affirm) that they have engaged in a good faith effort to explore the resolution of controversy by settlement (see Rule 16.3(c)(12) of the Local Rules of Civil Practice and Procedure of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware). Initially, they have to state whether there's a possibility of settlement whereas, later along in the case, they must undertake to engage in a good faith effort to settle. Despite getting smoked at the Markman hearing, it appears the Defendants haven't yet tried to engage in a good faith effort to settle.
Agree, nobody knows what the winnings are going to be. In my case all I want is a win so I’ll take what ever it is. Of course the more the merrier.
don’t get me wrong I believe in dreaming as it could come true
Winning is all we should care, at least that’s how i see it. There’s not much any one of us can do but accept the outcome either from negotiations or a judge’s ruling
There are some people on this post that I like reading their comments and you are one f them, thanks for your input always appreciated
That is exactly what I mean, you only pay taxes when you make money. Those who make nothing pay nothing. I just love paying taxes or capital gain an I hope that UOIP will make me pay a lot of capital gains
With all the optimistic news we have had so far why would anyone be afraid or the outcome.
The more tax or capital gain I get the more I earned, I don’t have a problem with that. Better to pay tax than not at all. Only pessimism prevent you from making gains.
My take is to win first and talk to your accountant
III. CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, we determine that RPX has not shown by a
preponderance of the evidence that claims 1–31 are unpatentable.
IV. ORDER
It is
ORDERED claims 1–31 of the ’822 patent are not held unpatentable;
and
FURTHER ORDERED that, because this is a Final Written Decision,
parties to the proceeding seeking judicial review of the decision must
comply with the notice and service requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 90.2.) This f
Sometimes it’s good to review older comments, good for the morale and faith in our case. MAJOR VICTORIES FOR UOIP/CHANBOND against the Cable Companies!
The Patent Board just ruled in UOIP/CHANBOND's favor over RPX (the cable companies.) This follows their recent win over CISCO!
The court documents listed below show that the neither Cisco or RPX could discredit UOIP's patents.
WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT? In 2015 UOIP/Chanbond filed a lawsuit against the 13 major Cable companies for patent infringement. The cable companies through RPX and Cisco then challenged UOIP's patents with the Patent Board (PTAB). The PTAB not only ruled in UOIP's favor but from reading the documents it looks like CISCO and RPX both were grasping at straws.
These wins are admissible in court! They Cable companies have lost their petitions. If they continue with the court case and lose which is likely given these wins with the PTAB they will lose all leverage in negotiating with UOIP.
A settlement now is the most logical answer!
Settlement is much better for us no doubt, but the defendants know that too. So what is better for us is worst for them. “MAYBE” I will be glad when this is over and the money in my bank account
Replace “ICE” WITH SIZE
I suppose that each cable company would pay according upon the revenue the patent(s) used. This would in my mind be according on the number of clients each cable companies have.
QUESTION: Are all the cable companies using the same 3 patents or could there be one or two using,depending on their ice, just one, two or there
Of course it makes good sense that there will be only one payment to UOIP but each company will probably pay different amounts
This makes a lot of good sense to me. The bigger companies may see it differently than a smaller one
ALLINFUN I AM GLAD TO offer my 2 cents worth as I got on this stock while reading a post from you so I am grateful for your comments way back in April I think. A few years back I owned have VALERO and one day they did a SPIN-OFF on a stock that I owned, one morning I opened my computer and there it was thousands of dollars that I never knew was coming. I believe this will pan out the same way. Once a settlement is reached we will be advised that we will be receiving x # of dollars per share that we own as of the date of the settlement and of course they will have stop trading until all is settled
We went down today for the same no reason that it climbed up two weeks ago. When I joined in April I wasn’t expecting to gain nada till an agreement or a win in the court so today I am taking the dip with no worries and I am still waiting for a settlement or a court decision
Let’s not forget that Arista just paid Cisco $405MM for their own infringement. This is an eye opener for what an infringement might cost to a defendant. Not necessary meaning that we will get that much from each cable company but surely could be a precedent for a fairly big settlement.
Good morning all, let’s hope for another green day.
I have reason to believe that your comment is right: they are the ultimate longs and they know what the future holds. (Which I hope is the case)
There is a reason that Mann keeps buying. I guarantee, that it's not to prop the PPS at .03 and hold it there
I get Michael Maann’s form 4 weekly and since he’s adding up on a daily basis and I know he’s not stupid so I feel very good with my investment with ENDV
Keep the faith. It’s coming
So if we get only $0.50 I’ll take it since I only paid about $0.0130. But no worries I am convinced we will get a lot more
I am with you jbbb I am quite happy with what we have at this time. Nobody ever told us that the pps would go up, we knew that we were investing with dead money until we have a settlement somehow. We are doing really good, no worry or stress from me
The fact that Arista paid $400MM to Cisco for infringement of patents might be a precedent for our case. Not only to show that infringement is not acceptable but also the price that one single company is paying that much. It also gives notice to Cisco that if they can get that much others could also be paying a lot to settle their own cases
My idea was just a thought which now I realize that UOIP and its lawyers have decided against for legal reasons. I am not a lawyer so we have to believe that what they do is best as they know what to do
At the moment there’e not much UOIP can do but wait for the court. The defendants have the cards as they can negotiate now or at any time or also wait for the court.
But I am just wondering if UOIP could ask the court for an injunction to stop the cable companies from using the patents until an agreement has been reach
RPX see themselves as GOLIATH and don’t want to look weak by giving in to UOIP or better know as DAVID. So in my views they are in no hurry to negotiate a settlement. They may be bigger and stronger but now a days that don’t count anymore, there’s something called RULE OF LAW that could screw them pretty nicely
Today was a down day as it happens all the time to every stock. On top, ours is still speculation at this time. Soooooooon will get news and days like today will be forgotten
May be 13X. ????
I just extended mine till Sept. 28 at $3.25 with RBC no problem
I locked mine at $2.00 which I think it’s pretty safe. That was a couple weeks ado. I am going to try to lock them up for a longer period and higher and will let you know what I get
I am with RBC Direct Investing and quite happy with exchange and transfer. I used to trade with TDCanada Trust but didn’t like it. RBC for me is the best
So true, the media, CNBC almost don’t talk about OTC. Kramer would never mention an OTC stock at least the only time I heard him was XM SIRI, he was in love with the CEO of SIRI and was pushing the stock.
I had an awful lot of shares in both Fannie & Freddie for over 7 years. I finally gave up and sold everything at a lost. Fannie & freddie are very profitable but the government is fill with crooks. As we all know the twins never needed a bailout that they have paid back but treasury said they didn’t pay back yet they paid dividends according to the agreement. Personally I am out and I have now ended my living the dream that so many are doing. I am not telling anyone to get out, simply saying what I did. I took my cash and invested in something that is real instead of a dream managed by crooks
No worry I am in for the long run and my shares are all locked in. I am well into good profits at the moment and adding on dips.
Well, yes I am new, just about one month and I really like the stock and I know that you guys are right. But Arris name comes up often and they only have $400M for insurance. I am trying to catch up with you all, but Arris coming up confused me. I am getting it now. Thanks to all of you who has responded, I really appreciate your comments. I am long OUIP.
Just hoping for a green Friday
My goal is to make at least one to two millions by the end of 2019. And I am quite confident. What is happening is not representative of what we will see in the next few months
RPX talking about going to SCOTUS at this time is something like they are sure to lose in the lower court. That doesn’t say much for their défense at the lower court
I have to tell you all, I lost a bundle with FNMA and in about one month I made it all back and more with UOIP. To me this is the best stock I have owned in the last 5 or so years. FNMA would have been good if the Washington slump had not been involved. But that is history as I am very happy with my shares in UOIP.
All locked up