UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[rbd1]

III. CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, we determine that RPX has not shown by a
preponderance of the evidence that claims 1–31 are unpatentable.

IV. ORDER
It is
ORDERED claims 1–31 of the ’822 patent are not held unpatentable;
and
FURTHER ORDERED that, because this is a Final Written Decision,
parties to the proceeding seeking judicial review of the decision must
comply with the notice and service requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 90.2.) This f