Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Exactly.
I would call if I were that close for sure. What they tell you could be very 'telling'. Although it would be limited but at least there is some 'evidence' so to speak.
Give it a try see what they say.
By the way when you call, the 'investor relations' ext. just goes to nowhere. But if you try 972-248-2244 x106 it goes to Steve's v-mail. No idea whether or not he'll pick up or call you back. I'm still waiting.
That's why I inquired.
It all starts with dd.
Just left a message at Steve's extension. Sent an e-mail as well.
Asking about updated share structure, restructuring, possible share restructuring, connection to Chris etc...
Concerned about pink sheets #'s. With a low float, 300,000,000 as per pink sheets Jan 6 2009, this should move very easily on some decent news. Today's is quite vague though but sounds interesting.
Continental told me to call corporate for the share breakdown.
Will let you know if I get a response.
'Last time SH stepped down from the CEO the company went through the roof...'
How long ago was that?
Anyone have an updated float?
'It's merely odd that it took them so long to get around to changing it.'
Agreed.
And still insignificant.
AGAIN FOR THE LAST TIME,
It was a non-issue as was stated!
It was officially rectified weeks ago.
It happened regardless of your sentiment.
Point proven.
Have a pleasant weekend.
Significant how?
There has been no ramifications whatsoever for not filing the paperwork sooner.
A non-issue as was stated by Santini and later Bezzano.
Ummm, o.k.
I rest my case as I'm sure you agree.
'A process of which should only take no more than 15 minutes to complete.'
AGAIN,
It was stated by Santini and Bezzano that it was not an issue as it was just a matter of paperwork.
There was NO FINANCIAL EFFECT WHATSOEVER.
Slap them on the wrist for not doing it sooner, I guess.
Again, as Santini at the time and Bezzano stated it was just a matter of paperwork.
It made no financial significance whatsoever.
Some signed paperwork and it was back to 75 billion.
Even YOU know that...
I thought.
How was it significant?
Verbatim only please.
Don't want an 'in my opinion' or 'basically'.
Of course you may have to blank out your personal information only.
Waiting.
Thanks.
Please as I have asked before, keep us up to date of all correspondence re: 'your incessant whistleblowing'.
Thanks.
So how are they doing business then?
But I thought it was a scam?
He stumbles like that often on other boards as well.
If you are to hold confidence in ANYTHING that wack job says than you are surely the same.
Say hi to Bobandy and get some cheeseburgers into 'im.
O.k.
Make sure Ricky cleans up his piss jugs.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Do you mean 'Mr. Lahey'?
LMAO!
Scam or not?
Ummm,
You need to keep up with the history on this board.
Good luck.
More power to you.
So if it's a scam then there is no worries of RMDM doing business with N. Korea. No worries.
If it isn't a scam and they are doing business with N. Korea then it is legit.
Am I right or am I correct?
Funny!
Back at ya!
Stay tuned.
Not on everyone's radar right now.
A lot of good news and future revenues to come.
This should go once the buzz gets around.
My post was merely about the fact that her post was informative.
No where did I read that she was pumping SMAS or shouting from the rooftops.
'Don't shoot the messenger' so to speak.
Get it?
Slow down fella.
I read her post as informative. Nothing more or less. Take it as it is.
Good to know.
Why would you assume it's a pump?
No wonder she has you on ignore.
So they are gagged because you don't believe them? That's just nonsense and physically impossible.
Once again your credibility lowers.
You are.
Let us know.
Just relaying what was said.
Yes.
She didn't know.
And to you!
No!
I am saying that you are wrong about the T/A being gagged for the second time.
Stop changing the subject.
Sigh!
Again,
My point is about you stating that the T/A is gagged which they are not, for the second time.
Nothing more or less.
Your credibility is questionable.