Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Already saw this kind of news multiple times in past 2 years, but have not seen any revenue from deals so far. . 0 revenue deals are not present in financial reports, cannot attract public. But I am happy to see they signed more deals. It shows they are looking for clients. This should be helpful in the long run, if not bringing in funds for the time being.
Hopefully the company will sign some deals which can bring in some solid revenue.
Volume has been 0 for a while.
Wish RG takes big bad infringers to count, instead of settling before court. Their stealing deserves triple punishment.
If I were not in already, I would like to wait to see something positive before I load shares. I am tired of reading about Speculations which has no solid revenue support.
The company has mentioned several deals, some big deals in the past years. So far, we have not seen one cent revenue from any of those claimed deals. Retails have been bad. Where the meat comes from? I would be a little bit confident with my investment if the company gets revenue from one of those deals, no matter how small the revenue is.
I don't care how many big deals the company has signed or is going to sign if they keep on getting 0 revenue from those deals as they have been.
Great to know. Cannot wait to see companies who make money by stealing be punished.
Do you have sufficient message to show they will lose for sure?
Will they have to pay 3 times the money they have made by infringing SFOR? I hope so.
It might be because what he told you in email was not fact. Several months ago he told me not to post his email in this board. It turned out the info in his email was fake. I am not going to ask him anything in emails any more.
Yes, they should pay for previous infringing first, then stop further infringing, unless they pay for the permission.
No matter which one the IPR is for, I wish it is denied. We need a solid good news in any case.
I have been waiting for the moment for a long time. cannot wait to see Strike Force kick the infringers out of business.
Revenue is the thing which moves share price up. PR without revenue is nothing.
You are right. Holding on shares until all the infringers are forced to pay for their stealing.
Thanks for the explanation, I understand now. I hope and believe Strike Force will win in both IPR petition and lawsuits, but feel more comfortable after it is confirmed.
I saw people say the IPR will be dismissed in multiple posts. But I have not read related files myself. You said it is still pending until middle OCT.
Have you got proof to confirm that the IPR will be dismissed??
Kay said no R/S. There has been no R/S since he promised us in June, 2016. So I chose to trust him about this.
It seems the share price is controlled by somebody. When people complain really bad, the price goes up. When no complain, price goes down.
Wish I have some cash to pick up more shares.
Do you think it is decent for big companies to steal technology of others for huge financial benefits? What is the essential difference between those giant thieves and the general thieves in grocery stores moneywise?
No matter how rich those big stealing companies are , they should always be looked down on by decent people. It is a shame to be on the side of thieves or robbers.
"Via MSFT Azure Cloud, StrikeForce reached 120 countries, securing 100 million devices already"? Really?
But where is the revenue?
What matters is whether people are willing to pay for using their products, not using as a free gift.
Anybody knows why this stock has been dropping for so long time? When will the red trend get reversed?
The volume has been very low for several months.
Where did you get the message? Is it real?
Anyway, the fact that leading attorney leaves his client before the final moment is a horrible signal for DUO.
Is it possible for DUO to hire another attorney firm and apply to judge for settlement delay? Hopefully it is not allowed.
There were some. I bought 50k shares at 0.0084 this morning. This time next year, I expect the money I spent this morning will become $25k.
Is retail the primary source of revenue of Strike Force?
Lose 1m every quarter, not every month.
Ok. I will.
Thanks for the message.
Why is that?
What happened today? Any bad news?
I thought we got red just because of the Friday. So I picked some shares this morning at 0.0084 before checking posts on this board.
Why are you frustrated?
Several lawsuits will settle and Strike Force will win for sure. Why are you waiting IPR dismiss? That is just a big plus. Others will not wait, they will push the price up. By the time you see the results, the price might be higher than 0.024, where you sold.
If I were you, I would keep some cash in case the price might drop some, and buy some now, in case catalysts come out one after another pushing the price all the way to north. SFOR is different from most other stocks. Most SFOR shares are held by longs, only little part are going to be traded in market. It does not need much fund to push the share price up.
But if you don't load any, and SFOR goes up from now on, you will feel bad in the future.
Are you holding some shares? Spending so much time on this board to bring the price down, if you have not loaded any, it would be too funny.
Are you waiting for 0.004?
Kay said in email 9.7m was all the one time lump sum payment the company got from MSFT, no more. He was very positive about that. But in the same email he also said SFOR licensed MSFT, and SFOR would get paid by MSFT for AZURE.
Now the 9.7m became "non-disclosable one time lump sum payment". How can an old settlement becomes active after 20 months?
You can do the calculation until 12 months. Is it equal to 100*1.16*12 with compound interest? Should be 100*(1+16%)^12.
But your result about 1.5m loan at 16% interest for one year is right. It will be 8.9m after 12 months. Guess Kay expects some funds for him to pay back soon. Otherwise he would not take this type of loan. The interest for this type of loan is horrible.
Take an example, if I lend you $100 at 16% monthly interest, are you going to pay me $116 at the end of first month, $116 at the end of second month, and $116 at the end of 3rd month, ... $116 at the end of 12th month? Are you going to pay me 100*1.16*12 for a year?
Or you are going to pay me back
$100+ $16*12 for a year?
If you can find a company who takes loan in the first way, tell me how much they want, I will loan money to them.
Do you see the problem in his funny calculation?
Taking 1.5m loan at 16% monthly interest, after one year, it becomes 1.5+ 1.5*0.16*12 not 1.5*1.16*12.
Is 1.5+1.5*0.16*12 equal to 1.5*12+1.5*0.16*12 ? Wonder which university he took his math classes.
Are you sure your calculation is correct? 16% =1.16?
Is there any reasonable excuse for them to give all the settlement income to ACS? Do you give all your life time income to the person who helps you out once?
Is TrustID Premier related to the TrustID patent of Strike Force?
Equifax has TrustID premier to help their clients whose SSN numbers have been stolen from Equifax in the past 3 months,.
I see. Thanks.