Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The dates will come and pass with the promise of a new date, over and over. We will be talking about this next summer asking if anyone has seen or touched a bottle.
____________________________________________________________________________
I have to agree! fist is at the beginning of august than mid and than end... now is labor day??!!
Yes, Its Pink for a reason. Dilution
Where is that Very late Unaudited 10Q?? I guess they are not done diluting, perhaps they we will finally see the 10Q
_________________________________________________________________________
Brutal Truth about Premier Brands Inc.
Reality check. If the company was such a good company selling such a hot product, they never would have been listed on the OTCBB in the first place. They would have opted for an original listing on the Nasdaq in the first place. The cost for a listing on a major exchange is hardly more than a listing on the OTCBB. The only difference is the reporting requirements. The disclosure that the company must provide investors on a timely and regular basis.
There's the dark truth. The only reason a company lists on the OTCBB is precisely because they do not want to meet the stricter reporting requirements of a major exchange. They do not want to disclose to investors the truth about what's really going on.
For some mystery, Premier Brands Inc. elected to list on the OTCBB rather than Nasdaq.
Why?
I'm not really sure... But Bad Boy Vodka product will put huge change in their revenue slot.
One huge advantage of being on OTCBB, is they can stall reporting earnings..
Which can be good thing... For shareholders.
now that's funny, usually the date a product is said to come out comes and passes without anyone ever seeing the product, then the company releases some excuses and another date for people to wait.
Its still early August and already we are seeing post about Stores being told they will have to wait until after Labor day for their orders to be filled.
August will pass by without 1 single location getting a single bottle, wait and see.
________________________________________________________________________
Update: I went to a local store in Brooklyn, NY and asked about Bad Boy. They said they will get it, just after Labor Day!!!!!
No doubt, and sooner than end of month. Flippers were controlling this. It has yet to have anything interesting since its run to .036. Pretty much all down hill as investors done their DD
______________________________________________________________________
Got a feeling this is heading back to the .006's before another move north.
End of August is an eternity for most penny stock flippers...
Perfect and appropriate, this is however a Lotto Play
Good Luck with that ticket, are we on halves?
______________________________________________________________________
Do you think $1,700,000 would be enough to buy up 170,000,000 million shares?
Clearly, the average public dont have enough cash...
We need a powerball winner to buy at least $2,000,000 worth of stock.
Maybe CostCo deal, Preimer might have extra $2,000,000 to buy its stock.
don't be surprised if your reply is simply
"LOL"
Good Luck
_______________________________________________________________
Premier Brands need to find another large hedge fund to take stake.
Public has no interest in buying these micro caps.
I'm going to write few letters to few hedge funds tonight.
Yes, Volume speaks Volumes
And its saying not many cares about BRND
__________________________________________________________________
I agree, Warren Buffet stated in every book, shareholder must promote their stock.
This board seem to be lacking in skills to promote their stock.
Volume tells the story.
I disagree, there are no longs, the PPS haven't allowed the rest to sell yet. Some learn the hard way.
Good Luck
_________________________________________________________________________
Longs are the ones who still remain. Flippers have left.
BRND long and strong
I see, very good then...I disagree
Good Luck
_________________________________________________________
There is very little downside left. They are playing the little that is left. The sky is the limit on the upside when news hits.
this won't be pretty by Friday if the company don't update shareholders with something. They have plenty of time.
However they certainly don't have to, perhaps they have more important things to be working on than be worried about what shareholders want. That being said the nature of the game in Pinkland is about today not long term, so extended periods without any updates turns things ugly.
_____________________________________________________________________________
I agree, volume is lacking here..
Scalpers, day traders, swing traders, all need volume.
Major market topping out,
So your saying MM's will make their money taking it down?? I don't expect any news for it to Fly as you say.
_________________________________________________________________________
Sorry doesn't work that way. Wherever the MM's can make money they do it. When news hits time to fly. MM's love news, they make alot more. BRND WILL FLY SOON.
Without news it has to, any stock can only take so much of low volume days, eventually people get frustrated and move on to better plays, daytraders especially. This week so far has been a nightmare for any daytrader who relies heavily on decent Volume .
I say they will stick around another day or 2 hoping for news to flip for a profit, if no news a race for the exits to move on to the hottest ticker on their trading screens.
Seen it on every pink I come across when news is expected and didn't show. Worse here with the very late 10Q
Yes, I agree, sideways to lower here
________________________________________________________________________
I have to agree, on the Analysis part where it should of went already.
Most likely, sideways trading action to lower from here..
Again we disagree on direction, MMs will have to make money here on the way down.
If this were going up it would have by now. I suspect the 10Q filing will help clear up as to why this keeps near or below sub-penny. Thats when the company can get the few bucks together to file it.
________________________________________________________________________
Daytrading is the way MM's maker there consistent money on huge spreads. The next phase the daytrading will be gone and this will continue to move up till MM's find another spot to spread..
I doubt it very much and the current PPS agrees with me, I'm talking real money here, not daytraders. If those in the know bought the PPS would be .25 or much higher. Yet here we are struggling to stay out of sub-penny land.
Why now is that.
__________________________________________________________________________
Pretty sure those type people would've bought before the first DR PR. If not, it would've been shortly after the PR.
Another day we close Red
Obviously there are NO People "IN The Know" on this stock, no Friends, Brokers, Legal Departments, Pencil pushers etc. IF there were with so much potential I keep hearing about for BBV and BRND SURELY they would be buying ALL the can.
How is it possible that we still have Red days at all????
Where is that very late 10Q??
Where is the Picture of Dennis Rodman holding a Real bottle of BBV?
Why would anyone chance a stock that's in a down trend. Today looks to be another Red day.
Without news or something positive from the company this downward trend will continue.
_______________________________________________________________________
Longs holding all the shares now. Peeps waited to long to get in and or cover. Time for em to start chasing.
that's your opinion, I prefer to see and actual bottle, to see it on shelves. Not rumours and promises.
Does not prove anything
_____________________________________________________________________
That's ALL the PROOF we need. "It's not a fake product"
We can agree to disagree, at least I can
________________________________________________________________
So what you're telling me is a well known online liquor sales website would already be accepting pre-orders and taking people's money on a product that doesn't exist? Give me a break!! You have no proof at all that it doesn't exist! All we have is proof leading to the existence!!
even these guys haven't seen a bottle, per-order may never be filled.
Waiting for 10q, doing nothing until its released.
________________________________________________________________
I wouldn't exit now if I bought @.028
Just hold and average down!
BRND $$$$$$$$$$$
Volume had dropped less and less each day, would be difficult to exit this now without taking huge losses. No One is buying at all.
I can't blame them with no proof that BBV even exist, not even 1 picture of anyone holding a bottle. Terrible promotion by any company.
Where is that very late 10Q and what are they hiding by not filing it???
Your welcome, anytime
You need to read instead of skimming through, it is a subpoena related to the ongoing case files in 2012
Only trouble for BRND, perhaps this time they will show up
___________________________________________________________________________
I see we're still referring to an unfiled subpoena of Dennis Rodman. A hodgepodge of emails pieced together from an unreliable source is no substitute for a real court filed document. Besides, at this point, it has more to do with the fact that the unfiled document was used deceivingly to represent a real court filed document. That means trouble.
UPDATED - Subpoena Dated JULY 11 2013 for Dennis Rodman
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/159749136/Subpoena-of-Dennis-Rodman-with-respect-to-Premier-Brands-Inc-pump-and-dump
It is because BRND was named as one of several Defendants in the case. The Defendants were all companies and their officers promoted through spam email by Stock Castle and their associated newsletters. It is easy to confirm on the court docket at www.sdcourt.ca.gov. Also, the wire service always checks these things out before allowing a news release to get out, confirming case numbers and actions.
From: ******** [mailto:******************************]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 3:59 AM
To: george@clippercp.com
Subject: Case 37-2012-00101057-CU-NP-CTL BRND
Hi Mr. Sharpe,
I have a question about why this case dated back in 2012 would have the same case number 37-2012-00101057-CU-NP-CTL as the one in this link dated July 11 2013 with Dennis Rodman to appear on Sept-26-2013?
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/159749136/Subpoena-of-Dennis-Rodman-with-respect-to-Premier-Brands-Inc-pump-and-dump
Many are claiming it’s a fake document as its not been officially stamped by the court.
Can you help clear up the matter for the iHub board.
Oh and BTW, 3rd party deposition subpoenas are issued by the court but not filed or stamped, so you can tell the smart guys to quit playing lawyer. As soon as Rodman is served there will be a press release.
Ask yourselves this question: What kind of a “real” company gets sued, has their New Jersey attorney contact me but doesn’t even try to defend the lawsuit. By the way, the attorney told me that the company was broke. They offered me $10K to go away and I told them to shove it. Still it only takes $40 to file a general denial. They didn’t even do that even though I gave them several reminders and plenty of extra time.
GS
From: ******** [mailto:******************************]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 3:59 AM
To: george@clippercp.com
Subject: Case 37-2012-00101057-CU-NP-CTL BRND
Hi Mr. Sharpe,
I have a question about why this case dated back in 2012 would have the same case number 37-2012-00101057-CU-NP-CTL as the one in this link dated July 11 2013 with Dennis Rodman to appear on Sept-26-2013?
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/159749136/Subpoena-of-Dennis-Rodman-with-respect-to-Premier-Brands-Inc-pump-and-dump
Many are claiming it’s a fake document as its not been officially stamped by the court.
Can you help clear up the matter for the iHub board.
TY
And here is the evidence of the way your public company is run. Nice investment. BY the way, the address in Sacramento is fake too. There is no Unit 360. In fact, the whole building is only two stories.
From: Gregg Jaclin [mailto:GJaclin@anslowlaw.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 6:29 PM
To: Clipper Corporate Partners
Cc: Jamie Yi Wang
Subject: RE: Sharp v Premier Brands
Mr. Sharp
I appreciate your patience. Unfortunately my client has not responded to me. I am traveling myself tomorrow so I am copying my associate, Jamie, so she can reach out to the company again. If we hear anything we will let you know.
Gregg E. Jaclin, Esq.
Anslow + Jaclin LLP
195 Route 9 South l Manalapan, NJ 07726
T 732 409 1212 x 202 l F 732 577 1188
gjaclin@anslowlaw.com l www.anslowlaw.com
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that unless specifically indicated otherwise, any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachment to this communication, other than an attachment which is a formal tax opinion) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any tax-related matter addressed herein.
This electronic transmission by the law firm of Anslow + Jaclin LLP contains information that may be confidential or proprietary, or protected by the attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents hereof is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify Anslow + Jaclin LLP at once at (732) 409-1212.
They can insist what they want. There is only one case and all subpoenas relate to that case. The subpoena was issued to discover the assets of BRND so that I can seize them. Jorge Olsen, Greg Jaclin and several others have all been subpoenaed. A UC1 lien on the company was filed yesterday. And as I said before, subpoenas are issued by the court but not filed or file stamped. I don’t care what the iHub board thinks and they can stop playing lawyer.
From: ******** [mailto:******************************]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 5:24 AM
To: 'Clipper Corporate Partners'
Subject: RE: Case 37-2012-00101057-CU-NP-CTL BRND
Hi Mr. Sharpe,
Thank you for your quick reply, However this information still relates to the 2012 case which is not being questioned on the iHub board.
They are insisting that the July 11 2013 with Dennis Rodman to appear on Sept-26-2013 is a fake document, http://www.docstoc.com/docs/159749136/Subpoena-of-Dennis-Rodman-with-respect-to-Premier-Brands-Inc-pump-and-dump
can you help with proving its real with a link or official stamped document?
Thanks again for your help on the matter.
From: Clipper Corporate Partners [mailto:george@clippercp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 9:35 AM
To: '**********'
Subject: RE: Case 37-2012-00101057-CU-NP-CTL BRND
It is because BRND was named as one of several Defendants in the case. The Defendants were all companies and their officers promoted through spam email by Stock Castle and their associated newsletters. It is easy to confirm on the court docket at www.sdcourt.ca.gov. Also, the wire service always checks these things out before allowing a news release to get out, confirming case numbers and actions.
The email is from the company’s attorney and in the subject of the email you can see who the client is.
From: ******** [mailto:******************************]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 5:30 AM
To: 'Clipper Corporate Partners'
Subject: RE: Sharp v Premier Brands
Hi Mr. Sharpe,
Who was this letter from and who is the client mentioned?
Ty
From: Clipper Corporate Partners [mailto:george@clippercp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 9:53 AM
To: Stingray
Subject: FW: Sharp v Premier Brands
The email is from the company’s attorney and in the subject of the email you can see who the client is.
From: Gregg Jaclin [mailto:GJaclin@anslowlaw.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 6:29 PM
To: Clipper Corporate Partners
Cc: Jamie Yi Wang
Subject: RE: Sharp v Premier Brands
Mr. Sharp
I appreciate your patience. Unfortunately my client has not responded to me. I am traveling myself tomorrow so I am copying my associate, Jamie, so she can reach out to the company again. If we hear anything we will let you know.
Gregg E. Jaclin, Esq.
Anslow + Jaclin LLP
195 Route 9 South l Manalapan, NJ 07726
T 732 409 1212 x 202 l F 732 577 1188
gjaclin@anslowlaw.com l www.anslowlaw.com
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that unless specifically indicated otherwise, any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachment to this communication, other than an attachment which is a formal tax opinion) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any tax-related matter addressed herein.
This electronic transmission by the law firm of Anslow + Jaclin LLP contains information that may be confidential or proprietary, or protected by the attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents hereof is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify Anslow + Jaclin LLP at once at (732) 409-1212.
Subpoena Dated JULY 11 2013 for Dennis Rodman
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/159749136/Subpoena-of-Dennis-Rodman-with-respect-to-Premier-Brands-Inc-pump-and-dump
Jorge himself incriminated them all by saying on the webinar they have been working on this for close to a Year.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2013/8/3/zyedrBRND-Pump&Dump3.png
Links for PUMP and DUMP Proof
http://beforeitsnews.com/financial-markets/2012/10/premier-brands-brnd-pump-and-dump-watch-2461072.html
http://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2013/8/3/dnlgbBRND-Pump&Dump2.png
http://thehypetrader.com/pump-dump-watchlist-friday-19-april-2013/
http://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2013/8/3/btrdvBRND-Pump&Dump1.png
Another article here as well, Legal verifiable article.
http://globenewswire.com/news-release/2013/07/11/559519/10039858/en/Hearing-for-Damages-Scheduled-After-Premier-Brands-Inc-Found-Guilty-of-Spam-Email-Pump-Dump.html
Launch July 27th and yet Not even 1 picture or video of an Actual Real Bottle being held or drank by a single person.
Transfer is Gagged, shareholders can’t call to confirm anything about the current share structure. Authorized Shares? Float? Outstanding Shares?
Gagged TA = Red Flag
Post 21940 by totffe
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=90626658
State of California Alcohol supplier and labeling licensing department
has never heard of Premier Brands, or Bad Boy Vodka. I just talked to
Kelly and she did a computer check, and assured me that there is
nothing. Please feel free to give them a call. Neither have the package
(label) and product been submitted for testing. Both are mandatory.
ABC Headquarters State of California
3927 Lennane Drive, Suite 100
Sacramento, CA 95834
(916) 419-2500
I was just proving that the post were not fake and made by me as some of the attacks have been childish, their motives are obvious. The email is there for anyone to question about all the info I posted today, go ahead any drop Mr Sharpe a line as he suggested.
_____________________________________________________________________
Sorry it's just confusing the way emails default to the ending locations time zone man.
Also dealing with someone like that is just asking for confrontation. He's too embroiled in his reality of being a victim to discuss alternative possibilities, so emailing him would be an exercise in futility. Time will tell all. If I were you I'd ask why he chose to forego legal counsel and represent himself... Could it be that he just has all the experience he needs to do so from suing slews of other companies? I don't know. Perhaps you'll find out
It is because BRND was named as one of several Defendants in the case. The Defendants were all companies and their officers promoted through spam email by Stock Castle and their associated newsletters. It is easy to confirm on the court docket at www.sdcourt.ca.gov. Also, the wire service always checks these things out before allowing a news release to get out, confirming case numbers and actions.
From: ******** [mailto:******************************]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 3:59 AM
To: george@clippercp.com
Subject: Case 37-2012-00101057-CU-NP-CTL BRND
Hi Mr. Sharpe,
I have a question about why this case dated back in 2012 would have the same case number 37-2012-00101057-CU-NP-CTL as the one in this link dated July 11 2013 with Dennis Rodman to appear on Sept-26-2013?
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/159749136/Subpoena-of-Dennis-Rodman-with-respect-to-Premier-Brands-Inc-pump-and-dump
Many are claiming it’s a fake document as its not been officially stamped by the court.
Can you help clear up the matter for the iHub board.
Oh and BTW, 3rd party deposition subpoenas are issued by the court but not filed or stamped, so you can tell the smart guys to quit playing lawyer. As soon as Rodman is served there will be a press release.
Ask yourselves this question: What kind of a “real” company gets sued, has their New Jersey attorney contact me but doesn’t even try to defend the lawsuit. By the way, the attorney told me that the company was broke. They offered me $10K to go away and I told them to shove it. Still it only takes $400 to file a general denial. They didn’t even do that even though I gave them several reminders and plenty of extra time.
GS
From: ******** [mailto:******************************]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 3:59 AM
To: george@clippercp.com
Subject: Case 37-2012-00101057-CU-NP-CTL BRND
Hi Mr. Sharpe,
I have a question about why this case dated back in 2012 would have the same case number 37-2012-00101057-CU-NP-CTL as the one in this link dated July 11 2013 with Dennis Rodman to appear on Sept-26-2013?
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/159749136/Subpoena-of-Dennis-Rodman-with-respect-to-Premier-Brands-Inc-pump-and-dump
Many are claiming it’s a fake document as its not been officially stamped by the court.
Can you help clear up the matter for the iHub board.
TY
And here is the evidence of the way your public company is run. Nice investment. BY the way, the address in Sacramento is fake too. There is no Unit 360. In fact, the whole building is only two stories.
From: Gregg Jaclin [mailto:GJaclin@anslowlaw.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 6:29 PM
To: Clipper Corporate Partners
Cc: Jamie Yi Wang
Subject: RE: Sharp v Premier Brands
Mr. Sharp
I appreciate your patience. Unfortunately my client has not responded to me. I am traveling myself tomorrow so I am copying my associate, Jamie, so she can reach out to the company again. If we hear anything we will let you know.
Gregg E. Jaclin, Esq.
Anslow + Jaclin LLP
195 Route 9 South l Manalapan, NJ 07726
T 732 409 1212 x 202 l F 732 577 1188
gjaclin@anslowlaw.com l www.anslowlaw.com
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that unless specifically indicated otherwise, any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachment to this communication, other than an attachment which is a formal tax opinion) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any tax-related matter addressed herein.
This electronic transmission by the law firm of Anslow + Jaclin LLP contains information that may be confidential or proprietary, or protected by the attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents hereof is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify Anslow + Jaclin LLP at once at (732) 409-1212.
They can insist what they want. There is only one case and all subpoenas relate to that case. The subpoena was issued to discover the assets of BRND so that I can seize them. Jorge Olsen, Greg Jaclin and several others have all been subpoenaed. A UC1 lien on the company was filed yesterday. And as I said before, subpoenas are issued by the court but not filed or file stamped. I don’t care what the iHub board thinks and they can stop playing lawyer.
From: ******** [mailto:******************************]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 5:24 AM
To: 'Clipper Corporate Partners'
Subject: RE: Case 37-2012-00101057-CU-NP-CTL BRND
Hi Mr. Sharpe,
Thank you for your quick reply, However this information still relates to the 2012 case which is not being questioned on the iHub board.
They are insisting that the July 11 2013 with Dennis Rodman to appear on Sept-26-2013 is a fake document, http://www.docstoc.com/docs/159749136/Subpoena-of-Dennis-Rodman-with-respect-to-Premier-Brands-Inc-pump-and-dump
can you help with proving its real with a link or official stamped document?
Thanks again for your help on the matter.
From: Clipper Corporate Partners [mailto:george@clippercp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 9:35 AM
To: '**********'
Subject: RE: Case 37-2012-00101057-CU-NP-CTL BRND
It is because BRND was named as one of several Defendants in the case. The Defendants were all companies and their officers promoted through spam email by Stock Castle and their associated newsletters. It is easy to confirm on the court docket at www.sdcourt.ca.gov. Also, the wire service always checks these things out before allowing a news release to get out, confirming case numbers and actions.
The email is from the company’s attorney and in the subject of the email you can see who the client is.
From: ******** [mailto:******************************]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 5:30 AM
To: 'Clipper Corporate Partners'
Subject: RE: Sharp v Premier Brands
Hi Mr. Sharpe,
Who was this letter from and who is the client mentioned?
Ty
From: Clipper Corporate Partners [mailto:george@clippercp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 9:53 AM
To: *************
Subject: FW: Sharp v Premier Brands
The email is from the company’s attorney and in the subject of the email you can see who the client is.
From: Gregg Jaclin [mailto:GJaclin@anslowlaw.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 6:29 PM
To: Clipper Corporate Partners
Cc: Jamie Yi Wang
Subject: RE: Sharp v Premier Brands
Mr. Sharp
I appreciate your patience. Unfortunately my client has not responded to me. I am traveling myself tomorrow so I am copying my associate, Jamie, so she can reach out to the company again. If we hear anything we will let you know.
Gregg E. Jaclin, Esq.
Anslow + Jaclin LLP
195 Route 9 South l Manalapan, NJ 07726
T 732 409 1212 x 202 l F 732 577 1188
gjaclin@anslowlaw.com l www.anslowlaw.com
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that unless specifically indicated otherwise, any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachment to this communication, other than an attachment which is a formal tax opinion) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any tax-related matter addressed herein.
This electronic transmission by the law firm of Anslow + Jaclin LLP contains information that may be confidential or proprietary, or protected by the attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents hereof is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify Anslow + Jaclin LLP at once at (732) 409-1212.
I disagree, much more will be heard
When Dennis gets served with the subpoena
and again in September when they have to appear in court
___________________________________________________________________
George Sharp is obsolete to BRND. dead issue.. move on
its there under the case number
______________________________________________________________
How do we contact? You blocked the address
My current time as I reply to this post 11:22
Need any more help
__________________________________________________________________
not to good with time zones are you, lol
Its called DD, try reaching out and see how it works out for you.
________________________________________________________________________
How on earth are you getting Sharps emails? Something smells bad here
If there is Good news I would want to hear it
If there is Bad news I would want to hear it
Only ones who want otherwise have a motive
Good Luck
__________________________________________________________________
LOL..would be nice if something other than negative was posted though. More positive news today and only negs will be listed
The Subpoena post will remain, I have much more information to post later this morning when its compiled. This info was just sent to me for all to review.
Dennis will be served a Subpoena any day now is just a piece of the info to follow later today.
The document was uploaded for the same reason as all the other links, to bring all and ANY news out there for all to read and decide for themselves from their own DD what's real or not.
ALL Information is welcome, from that one can read and decide whether its Positive or Negative.
______________________________________________________________________________
I will. However, we're discussing the authenticity of what this particular document is representing. If there was a court filed document, then we're not seeing the copy of THAT document.
And because of this hastily uploaded document, if there is an actual filed document, the big question will be: WHAT TIME WAS IT FILED??
Finally, Many questions have yet to be answered.
perhaps they will explain to shareholders why no one has yet to officially see the infamous bottle (Should have been ready to unveil on launch date July-27) or why they are so late filing their unaudited 10q. How many and which locations will be first to receive BBV and When. What are the current Authorized Shares, Outstanding Shares and Float...etc.
All simple questions to answer and PLENTY of time to prepare the answers by Aug-13th. Lets see what we find out.
Good Luck to all
_________________________________________________________________________
Premier Brands Inc. August 13, 2013 Webinar Schedule
CEO Jorge Olson, will be conducting the Webinar. Please sign up,
News can be found on Premier Brands Website lower left hand corner, blue. Here is sign page.
https://premierbrands.clickwebinar.com/PR/register
Webinar will be How to regarding public relations.
Catch a Wave! And you'll be sitting on top of the world!
Other than opinions, Provide a link proving its fake or an email from the courts department stating so, I'll then verify your findings and if satisfied it will be removed.
___________________________________________________________________
I'm still not convinced its not real based on these links so the Post will stay up until further notice, in fact the link proves its more likely to be real as it states. "When you first file, you will not have a case number." As you can see from the link this filing HAS A CASE NUMBER STAMPED ON IT. So obviously its been filed with the courts or it wouldn't have been given a Case Number by the court clerk.
Looks real to me. Thank you for clearing the matter up
From link you provided
When you first file, you will not have a case number. The clerk will stamp it on your paperwork, and that will be your case number throughout the case. Once you file as a plaintiff or petitioner, you will always be referred to as the plaintiff or petitioner. This is true even if, later in the case, the other side takes you to court for a related request of some type.