Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I saw much of what you posted and decided to cash out half my shares for what I paid. I bought 900,000 shares for $.0143 for about $13,000 then after seeing the debt convertible notes that also got me thinking to maybe just dump half what I own for the same $13,000 so I now hold 450,000 and got all my investment back. Plus the buy in was short profits but profits is still money so I just decided to back out of half so I am still good with 450,000 at no cost.
Those other tickers I posted that would tank TMC, FUUFF, and TREN, I made some decent profits on those shorts but still waiting for TREN to drop below $1.10. TREN went up on the high priced pump and soon the debt dilution to $.50 so ill make about $2,500 on that ticker as well. It’s all too predictable. It’s like taking candy from a baby. You got into MMNFF at $.018? But that’s ok; you will probably double your money soon also. I still have some feeling this MMNFF is not over yet. They may be down but not out like those other marijuana scams with nothing but BS.
We at least can see MedMen is real. Many other companies with the same writing on the wall managed to turn around and with so many buying dope and MMNFF with real stores and cultivation, they are well ahead of the scams by far, and even though they are having issues, they have too much to lose other then just dumping shares and folding the company.
But you never know.
Tilray has lots of cash on hand and I think they may try and buy 100% of MedMen. But I wonder if they want to own two public companies and could elect to swap stocks with MedMen like they did with HEXO.
Like MedMen, Tilray stock is cheap at $1.89 when is used to be $25 3 years ago. MedMen has certifications in place for all US states so any change in legalization and they will likely be the first to get into those markets and have an easy time finding lenders knowing they will be a good risk. And if mushrooms were legalized they would also be one of the first to get certification, but won’t hold my breath.
Changing names on those certifications may cause Tilray to have to re-file under the new name and get re-certified but not sure. It would be easier to just leave MedMen as is for a while even if they did acquire control of MedMen. I am sure many pump and dumps will emerge soon as mushroom stocks and take away investors from MedMen. But MedMen is so cheap right now it may pay for investors to take positions in many tickers.
Also any new mushroom pump and dump will start the shares much higher like all pump and dumps do that will market heavily at $1 or more in the beginning before they add all the debt thru affiliates or subsidiaries. So that takes time and in that time well either see the MedMen deal happen or not and also monitor the shares price.
Only a few will jump in on mushroom scams at $1 or more as they start out with 100,000,000 in the float and dump 500,000,000 or more short that will be covered as soon as they add debt and increase the authorized to 20 billion or more.
That would end up dropping the shares even below MedMen at $.03. We have to also watch the filings of MedMen to make sure they are also not setting up to debt dilute but at $.03 they really don’t have much room to make much like others tickers that dump shares at $.50 or more before they drop to $.03 or less.
If they do a stock swap you would get 1 share of Tilray for every 63 you own in MedMen at $.03. Even though Tilray is down ($1.89 per share) If MedMed could hang on with the new funding and debt reduction and rise to even $.09 would mean Tilray would have to rise from $1.89 to $5.67 and I believe MedMed has a better chance of that then TIlray.
I just don’t know what Tilray or MedMen is up to but ill poke around some more and see what I can find internally. I think Tilray is more interested in getting their stock up then to use the MedMen deal to get MedMen shares up. A guess but maybe not.
But you never know. Tilray going from $2 to $20 is a 10 times gain. MedMen going from $.03 back to even $1 is 33 times gain and at $5 is 166 times gain. I think it will be more likely MedMen will rise with higher gains then to see Tilray go back to $20.
Once you get past $.25 per share with any ticker, You lose 75% of low level retail investors who see it as to expensive and gravitate to the $.00 stocks hoping for a major score. But if the shares rally, more of the investors who paid $5 or more will jump in. Tilray may also see the MedMen stock as a cash cow.
If they do move into the markets with more and more locations and expansion and debt reduction and move MedMen shares back to $1 or more, Tilray would then have enough shares in MedMen to sell and totally eliminate all debt. So they may keep MedMen public but still not 100% sure. Maybe keep MedMen as a subsidiary company.
If Tilray keeps MedMen public as it is now and does expand into more states and reduces debt, they may find that they can make more money with the MedMen stock and company sales then their own and just leave MedMen as it is now.
Tilray says they do $210 million annually. To make $210 million with MedMen with only one store in each state, each store would have to do $4,200,000. If they opened 3 stores per state, each store would only have to do $1.4 million that seems to be easy based on the market. Leaving MedMen public (No stock swap) and planning the expansion could send MedMen back to $1 or more and Tilray would then maybe seriously think about merging Tilray into MedMen but well have to wait and see.
Besao, no, Jimmy did not break any laws. People say yes he did when he did no such thing. If he did, the SEC would open a case. So anyone saying he will pay is delusional! People are not mad they lost $500, they are mad because they believed the shares at $.01 (50,000 shares) would rise to $5 on NASDAQ making them $250,000. They blame Jimmy they lost $250,000 not just $500.
Also the roller coaster with MMNFF! I LOVE IT!
As for SGMD, no lawyer will take the SGMD case on contingency and also retailers would instead just dump money into another scam ticker before paying for an attorney to win back nothing. Plus SGMD has no money or assets to take even if a court case was won. You cannot win when SGMD has the disclaimers on their side. I cannot say it enough times over and over. All these disclaimers protect schemes that never pay out or make investors any money, and no one can sue, plain and simple.
Well you can sue, you just won’t win.
Buying an OTC pump ticker is like going to a yard sale and buying a bicycle and the owner says you have to sign a contract that the seller is not responsible for any damages or injury.
You sign the contract (Same as buying SGMD with the disclaimers as the contract). You take the bike to the local bar and get drunk then ride home, pass out on the bike and fall causing injury and damaging the bike.
Then you tell the seller you were injured and the bike ruined and want you money back for the bike and want the seller to pay your medical bills. You call the police or attorney and they say sorry your fault. Buying a pump and dump stock that fails is also the investors fault for the damage to their bank accounts.
Think of it like this at the same yard sale. What if the buyer said you could fall if you get drunk and hurt yourself and damage the bike (Same as SGMD disclaimers) and you say OK ill just be careful and not drink and ride. Then you go out and do the opposite. When you buy into a pump stock’s structure and news that it could be a winner is the same as drinking the booze. Then when you do buy the stock is like getting on the bike drunk and crash.
Pumped news, then buying diluted shares that decline in price.
Buying a bike then get drunk causing damage with no legal recourse.
Both are the buyer’s fault, Stock or a bike.
What I am saying is: Since they are already in the controlled and taxed marijuana environment and mushrooms may soon be legalized under the same standards as marijuana (more or less) they have 95% of the hard part done. Facilities, compliance and licensed to sell weed.
My guess is it’s similar to a liquor store that sells only liquor then they file to sell beer and double their sales so it should not be that hard for MMNFF to do since they are up and running and in the dope space already.
If they only have to do some slight regulations to sell mushrooms vs. some scam pump and dump saying they will, may or intend (All means they won’t) enter the $100 billion dollar mushroom space and open stores like YOU KNOW WHO SAID! Or so they pumped.
You can see MMNFF has the real shot at being able to lead that new market for mushrooms.
MedMen has so far done what all others MJ pump and dumps claimed they will do that never did. Next all those pump and dumps will say they are moving into the mushroom space and buy land, grow them sell them for $100 bazillion dollars and never make one penny.
MedMed is up and running in the space so I am taking a shot at what is proven vs. intent. But you never know, one day they can fold or go bankrupt but at least they are holding on and opening more stores and selling under performing stores.
If they cut the fat and thin out costs they may just make it. At $.014 per share buy in for me, it is worth the risk. And I keep digging to see what’s on the inside not like the sugar coated pump and dumps that sell investors a frosted cake that is made of Styrofoam underneath.
Besao, 35,000 shares on level 2! 10k, 10k 10k 5k then onto $.54 I said $.50 you will have to excuse me, I was $.04 off. But we also know the market will sell 10k on level two and replace it with more of the same before we hit $.54 but that is usually on a pump and dump that shows 1,000,000 on level 2. I have a feeling and looking at data and what’s happening behind the scenes to see if I can turn my confidence from 80% to 99%.
Beseao, Here is what I am thinking....
My gut tells me that we are very close to having the mushrooms legalized. I am sure 100’s of pump and dumps will switch to a scam to sell shares in mushrooms they will never even get approved to sell let alone even have a facility.
IF MMNFF that has the facilities, the licenses to sell and the established markets, we could see this stock move well. Some MJ facilities are already selling the mushrooms. If MedMed gets ahead of the fake scams it will be a very Merry Christmas!
I am looking into investors and data that are buying MedMen stock so see if they are in the cultivation business and could supply MedMen with inventory.
If suppliers or cultivators are buying MMFFF shares knowing it can rise back to previous highs that would indicate something big is going to happen.
I still don’t like the share structure so I am watching that as well, very carefully.
ALSO Besao, I do not do what I am told. I do things far different.
Remember they are a real company with real products and real sales and they opening up more locations and I am sure NY will be a cash cow as well.
OK $.35 I may dump them or some of them. Remember I used short profits for this play so even at $.000001 I can't lose. But I have a feeling about this ticker. TO many bought at $5-$8 per share and many who wish they got in early will now say they won't want to miss on it this time. This is not an INTENT pump play, this is real business. I am watching some behind the scenes stuff and so far it looks good. I just hate the share structure but at least they did what they set out to do unlike most tickers that do nothing.
I changed by strategy I will hold MMNFF till $.50 If it hits $.50 ill cash out at $450,000
I think the Canadian company will get the MMNFF page back up.
I did not know the board over at MMNFF was not active. Ill check it out.
BRGO has done a few reverse stock splits. Each time they pump it up, let it crash and burn and do another RS again and again.
Capital Change=shs increased by 12 for 1 split, payable upon surrender. Pay date=11/09/2009.
Capital Change=shs decreased by 1 for 12 split Pay date=12/27/2010.
Capital Change=shs decreased by 1 for 1000 split Ex-date=10/14/2014.
Capital Change=shs decreased by 1 for 10000 split Ex-date=09/27/2019. Pay date=09/27/2019.
Capital Change=shs decreased by 1 for 500 split. Ex-date=04/17/2023. Pay date=04/17/2023.
Suiss, they can legally pump and dump as long as they stick to the disclaimer. I took out just under 500,000 MMNFF, taking a shot at the new regulations and states allowing legal MJ activity.
Besao, you are going to lose all your money. You are asking me for guarantees about price and time frames yet you lose money at every turn on 100% proven scams. My advice is to stay out of the market place. You question validity yet invest in proven scams. That is now how you invest.
Besao, did you grab some MMNFF up 21%
We have a good position in this ticker. I have a good hunch about it.
Beasot35- They want the data to look good, low float etc. They want to sell more then what people think they have in the float so investors think any slight movement the stock will rise.
Here is a good way to look at it.
If a new pump is at $1 and they have a 100,000,000 float and they spend money and get people lined up to sell shares, they want to make as much $1 sales as they can before the scheme is exposed and knowing that more debt shares will follow to cover shorts, this is why they do it.
If they start and pump at $1 and they sell 100,000,000 for $100,000,000, they are out of shares to sell. If they issue another 100,000,000 debt shares to the float they wont be able to sell them for $1 because now there are 200,000,000 in the float so they can only sell the other 100,000,000 for $.50, then another 100,000,000 for $.10.
The more they add to the float in real time, the less money they make. That is why they add shares in fake time.
If they sell 100,000,000 at $1 and raise $100,000,000 and everyone only sees the 100,000,000 float, anyone buying 100,000, 10,000 or even 100 shares thinks they own that percentage of that 100,000,000 float when they may own only a fraction of what they think they own due to the added naked shares in the market that no one knows about.
If people keep buying shares for $1 you can bet they will keep selling naked as long as that cash keeps rolling in and knowing billions of shares will be soon available cheap to cover the over sold. Eventually the $1 per shares will slow down and then enters the debt dilution to cover the over sold.
They sell 100,000,000 for $1 then short 300,000,000 for $1 but no one know about it. Then when they make the big bucks, they eventually change the data to show the true float (sometimes they never change the data) but the market cap data shows the TRUE issued and float.
Since the shorts know they will be covered soon, everyone sells the shares high with the protection more will come their way to cover the oversold. THEN the price starts to drop.
I put some money in MMNFF (MEDMEN) they are real and operational and with more markets opening up and them cutting off assets that are not doing well. I have a good feeling about that ticker.
They do have unlimited authorized so that's not good and they are in debt also not good but they make money and are cutting the fat (I think) and at this price I am using some short profits so either way its less risk for us. Keep in mind that one factor is, you can buy products from Med Men and that is one key part to investing.
Most pump and dump scams that are in the marijuana space have investors believe that if they legalize marijuana in all states the stock will rise. That is not correct because those operations do not exist so they cant expand on what they don’t have, yet people think its going to help when all they do is sell more shares.
Besao, Also to point out, math can be powerful when you look at tickers.
Ticker DIDIY sold $19,000,000 in shares just Friday alone.Here is their data.
- $7.6 million debt, and the debt is increasing when it should be declining.
- No operations and the authorized and outstanding last updated in 2022. float and DTC data not available.
- Here is what I find when I do the math. The DIDIY shares are $3.80 Friday, they show they only have 300,000,000 outstanding.
- DIDIY has a share price of $3.80 and it says they’re market cap is $18.45 billion!!!! but the data below says they only have outstanding 301,452,592 shares.
The market cap is the share price x the outstanding $3.80 x 301,452,592 that comes to $1.2 billion market cap NOT $18 billion as posted.
The TA will calculate the TRUE market cap but what you see posted on the OTC is out dated (2021) That means the accurate $18,450,000,000 (billion) market cap divide my $3.80 per shares means the outstanding is really 4,868,421,052 (4.8 billion) shares not just 300,000,000 as posted.
They are selling debt probably cheap to unload the billions of shares before they are required to get current on the data but by then they will drop to the grays or just close up shop.
This data no one looks at. its shows the true picture of the problems with these stocks.
Retail investors who play the PINK OTC stocks, will buy any ticker that is cheap just so they can see they have 1,000,000 shares believing they can go to $1 per share. The pump and dump tickers know full well they have to dilute and drop the price to sell more cheap while at the same time make even more money on a declining share price. If retailers took the smart path, there would be NO OTC MARKETS!
Retail OTC investors do not buy high priced stocks. And by high priced I mean $.01 per share. They want millions of shares for $10 knowing full well they never pay off.
Retire, camon! most scheme tickers will say they got a $9m, $10m, $50m order. All they have to do is have a friend give them a check for $9,000,000 even though the account only has $10.00 in it, The company deposits the check and promote they got a $9 million order.
Eventually the check bounces and the order never took place, but they wont post that part of the story. If BRGO did get a $9m order we have to wait to see if that sale moves its way to the financial data before next quarter. My guess is this is the way to move the RS shares up so the debt dilution can take place yet again.
Well have to watch this one but I have my doubts. My guess is now that they raised the share price and reduced the float, they will lay low, regroup and emerge as an artificial intelligence ticker. The stock will rally up then debt dilute down. You have to jump in on the short when they pump it up because it never stays up for long.
I'm watching MMNFF carefully. With new states opening MJ to retail, MED MEN can fill the gap. It's cheap now so maybe worth a small position. At least they are operational not just some intent ticker. I have a good feeling!
I agree....
Again I will remind you, we are not the company, if you have any issues you can email the company directly through the company website. We short stocks and also buy stocks depending if it's a pump and dump (short) that of course are most tickers listed, or one of the few valid operational tickers like GNGR (Long).
Some keep addressing me as if I am the CEO. If I were the CEO it would have been quite the process of having GNGR’s CEO become a biological women that gave birth to two kids. I email the company to get updates and focus on the play at hand and you should do the same. Other than that, I have no corporate answered to give to you that you seem to think I have. Most of the data was once on the website but has since been updated. Anyone can buy shares in any company, some or all of the shares if desired. If a company had one share in the float at $100 anyone can buy the share and claim they own the float. If we choose to buy 100,000,000 shares that are in the float of GNGR we also have that option. The cheaper the shares the better.
We are in this for the money but it will be fun to watch everyone try and figure out how is it they have more shares in their accounts then what is in the float. When we accumulate the 100,000,000 shares we will then work with GNGR to make things happen very quickly. It will happen as quickly as all of you saying, “well there goes another ticker in my account that folded and reversed into a new pump and dump but at least I still have GNGR.” All while GNGR is still proving they have what it takes to survive and continue to expand. We want some of that success and we will end up with a good chunk of the tradable shares while we also focus on other tickers to short.
GNGR maybe our last play since it looks like it could be like winning the lotto!
We tried to short GNGR initially but it’s impossible to short GNGR. They have no debt and debt in this industry means lots of revenue. A company that does not need to sell shares for revenue while most OTC’s sell debt for revenue is the difference between a valid operation vs. an intent debt dilution operation. GNGR has never diluted the float and with no debt to sell for revenue, they have to earn capital by selling products. It is sad to see the price where it is but that’s good for us while at the same time, GNGR was never a high priced stock to begin with. The difference between GNGR and other tickers that are around the same price per share are, those other tickers started much higher (Over $1.00) then debt diluted the price down to $.002 to even $.000001 while adding billions to the float and many also end up doing one or more reverse stock splits.
Even if GNGR investors wanted to buy more GNGR to cost average, they can’t. There are not enough shares to buy and at this price it is still too costly to average down because GNGR was never a high priced stock to begin with. To make any dent when cost averaging, the ticker has to have billion in the float at $.0001 or less on the asked price. If GNGR was at $.0001 on the asked, the low true DTC 100,000,000 float could be taken out for only $10,000. I would love that!
Fact; GNGR is not a pump and dump and can’t convert debt to revenue because they have no debt. They have a low float that was never at a price high enough to justify cost averaging at the current price and there are not enough shares available for anyone to cost average down.
GNGR has fewer shares in the float then most tickers on all exchanges and what are listed on the OTC and gray markets. Any slight change of plans means less shares will be available, once the oversold shares are taken out of circulation.
A low float, low priced stock on a valid company is a monster waiting to be awoken.
And it looks as though we have the alarm clock in our possession.
It would have been impossible to buy billions of float shares had GNGR emerged as a pumped stock years ago. Being able to buy a low float cheap is found money for sure and will also ignite past issues and expose what we are betting on, will cause a series of events that have been proven with 100% accuracy in the market place. The only issue with GNGR is any move to make the stock more attractive and liquid will be quickly suppressed when those who own naked shares start to sell holding the float hostage to what looks to be at least 400,000,000 held by investors over the float that can be as many as 2 billion or more over the true float.
The true DTC float being what it is, 100,000,000 is big enough to have everyone believe they own part of that float. Since no one owns over 100,000,00 DTC float shares there could be 2,500 investors who each own as few as 50,000 shares putting the total well over the true float yet they each believe they own that percentage of the 100,000,000. Some posted if I recall, own 10,000,000 more or less shares and still think they own that percentage (10%) of the float (And they do) when in reality they own a smaller percentage of what is actually in the market place as over sold that can hurt their position on any spike in price or liquidity movement. If there are 2 billion naked shares, those 10,000,000 represent only one half a percent not 10%.
In order for those who own the true DTC registered 100,000,000 shares and benefit by the success of GNGR, the naked shares need to be forced out of the market place first. Here is another problem. Since many brokers hold shares in a street name (Allowing them to be lent out to other short sellers) and for example if TD has 200,000,000 shares in many investors accounts and the broker only owns 20,000,000 DTC shares, they will not be able to pick and choose who owns the street shares, They will be forced to call in all the lent shares and still be short having over sold naked. And those borrowers who also lent the shares out will be faced with the same issue as they call back the shares they lent out. This can multiply the 100,000,000 true DTC float to be 10 or 20 times the true float. Their could in fact be over 2 billion over sold held by investors.
That is why any good news or attempt to move GNGR will remain stagnant with those over sold killing any benefit to the 100,000,000 true holders of GNGR.
Since all GNGR shares, DTC true 100,000,000 and the naked oversold shares are all considered real shares in real buy transactions, brokers have to treat all shares sold as real shares and they must deliver them. They could try and buy back billions of shares but it would expose a run and more will jump in to buy driving up the share price so they would have to first attempt to buy shares from the company, or anyone holding certificates before they start a public buy back to mitigate costs.
Anyone holding certificates will be very popular with brokers.
If noting is done to close the shorts, those additional shares above the float are never really exposed and end up just part of what is available to buy and sell with no oversight. That is why the oversold shares will be exposed by design not chance. When the shorts are exposed and the issue not corrected it becomes criminal. Why would (GNGR) the company work hard to have the shares really when the over sold shares will also trade on the open market? Close the shorts then move to higher ground is what needs to be done and in a specific order and time frame.
Also to mention, closing the shorts would put millions into GNGRs war chest.
I’ll say it again. Our attorney said in a meeting that if GNGR is trying to be a scam or questionable company they are doing it wrong. I have to go and focus on other tickers we shorted and get ready to close those out and make some money and continue to work on this play that is so out of the ordinary and looks like it may be a first in the market place. Super excited to say the least.
On that note.
What is a vortex machine? And yes! Anything is better then a PO box.
Time to hit Chuck E Cheese!
When my youngest starts to kick and cry I say stop acting like a typical OTC investor when they look at their stock account. I have yet to try the cheese to the face tactic.
$GNGR
Splinter, again sorry I don't have PM and to get on line at a certain time is hard since I have to much going all day to set a time aside for the free PM.
We don’t buy stocks unless it’s at a lower price to close out the shorts. But we do buy stocks in companies that do not have a scheme set up in place. GNGR.
And knowing full well GNGR has open shorts and a low float the simple answer is to buy the float, retrieve the certificate and leave only 1,000 in the float then make an offer to buy the 1,000 shares for $10 each. Drive the bid up to $9.50 and the SEC forces the brokers to close the 300,000,000 open shorts at $9.50 per share.
We then sell the 100,000,000 well own on the short squeeze for $9.50 per share to the brokers who must close the short positions. This will also trigger an investigation into the fraud from brokers, market makers and independent series licensed traders.
This will affect everyone involved as far back as 2008 that helped cause this issue.
2 of the individuals who helped structure the naked short selling are dead (2 more to go!)
Why would we buy any ticker that has debt and no sales and is located in a PO box that used to be different ticker? They will simply use the debt to make millions off sucker investors.
GNGR never had a chance to be a scheme pump and dump because the structure was not there to be one. Over time one would see the situation and know a move needs to be made with millions on the line, it could be a cash cow for us.
Splinter, also the data goes way beyond posted data, Look at the TA's!
Transfer Agents that issue shares (restricted or free trading) do so at the companies or debt holder request. HOWEVER! Some transfer agents will not issue free trading shares on a debt conversion until after the debt holder shows they have paid the debt.
Schemers do NOT like to pay ONE PENNY out of pocket so they choose to use transfer agents that allow shares to be issued free trading on the debt conversion approval before the debt us actually paid. Those transfer agents are hand picked by the scheme before the ticker or reverse merger is in play.
Then the debt converters pay after they dump diluted shares so they are out no money up front. They pay the debt with investor’s money, and is a small fraction of what they rake in.
GNGR uses Pacific Stock Transfer and they require proof of debt payment before they release the free trading shares to the debt holders. And scheme debt holders stay CLEAR of those LEGIT transfer agents.
Since going public GNGR has survived while twice the listed OTC tickers since 2012 have traded hands, had name changes, ticker changes, or folded. People hate GNGR and that is good for us. We see things differently then what all retailers see.
Pump and dump retail investors see the pretty frosting on the cake even if the actual cake is cement. We see what the cake is made of before any frosting is put on it.
Those pump and dump schemes are like a cute Panda Bear, you want to reach out and pet it and when you do the bear rips your arm off.
GNGR is like a harmless turtle or un-frosted cake. But a turtle is not as cute as a Panda Bear but at least you won't get your arm ripped off. And no one likes un-frosted cake
The problem with retailers is they want the frosting over cement and to keep petting the Panda Bear. And the outcome is always the same.
Broken teeth and no more arms! :)
Splinter, Look at the data not a fancy website and PR news about intent. That is not a reason to invest.
Experts say to call the company and see if you can buy any of the items they sell. That is why so many are in the mining industry (gold, Lithium, Uranium etc) because it’s a hot topic and you can’t buy the products so the pump is covered by a huge (fake) operation with no products.
You can see the reverse merger data, the debt, the float, the authorized; you can cross-reference the address and phone number (usually they are to lazy to switch addresses and also they know NO ONE looks at data).
If they have no debt, they cant be a pump and dump, If they HAVE DEBT, they turn that into huge revenue! $20-$250,000,000 or more!
ALL pump and dump schemes have debt and little to no revenue. The debt is their revenue!
When you connect the dots, the end result is Scheme pump and dump! The problem is finding one that IS NOT a scheme pump and dump.
You are looking at one now!
$GNGR
Their HQ is same as First Lithium Mines?
Splinter, Here is a perfect example of what is headed our way.
An abundance of new OTC AI tickers.
PMEDF a NEW artificial intelligence ticker just arrived. It was previously two different companies. Also the address in Canada is also the registered address of First Lithium Mining. When Marijuana stocks were the hot topic that switched to Lithium mines that are now switching to AI tickers because AI is HOT right now.
They have as authorized, UNLIMITED shares (more then 100 billion if they want). Since this looks like a new issue with the data not up to date yet, I see this price going UP before the crash back down. My reason is that they can’t make much money selling at the start at shares priced so cheap. Or can they?
They usually want to make the huge hit at $1 more or less before the debt conversion, and BOY do they have debt! But then again with unlimited shares, they don’t have to change the authorized so this may in fact be the scheme that just starts low and sells billions at $.07 on down to $.000001. Usually they add to the authorized after the high priced shares are sold but since they have unlimited, I would not risk too much betting it goes higher.
They will probably sell 20-100 million between $.02 and $.10 (because their float is only 68,000,000 also dated 2022). Since they have debt and unlimited shares already, they may just short the $.07 and sell 500,000,000 and take in $35,000,000 cash! Add the debt shares to cover the 500,000,000 short and that will be the new float (still low for a scheme) but then soon after that the decline to $.01 on down to $.0001 selling off another 2,500,000,000 at even $.01 is another $25,000,000 for a total of
$60,000,000 (Sixty million) all from $1000 in PR news releases.
You think with $60,000,000 they would just pay off the $1.5 million in debt? No way! Debt is what makes them the money, you get rid of debt you lose your revenue. And also because the $60,000,000 does not go to the company.
That ticker had a 15/1 split then a reversal of 1/85.
They have debt and little revenue. The shares are $3.28 but very few trade.
If the company has,
No revenue
LOTS of debt
Compensation members
And very few shares trading to justify enough capital to come in to pay debt and compensation, where is the money coming from?
They have a very low float and 300,000,000 authorized (similar to SGMD). Now here is the question you have to ask yourself.
How are they paying the employees, the overhead, paying off debt, compensating members?
All that takes CASH that they clearly show they do not have. Selling shares at $3 initially and only selling a few thousand is far from the capital needed to expand the operations and to be honest I read their data and still don’t know what it is they do. Usually is nothing.
The ONLY way they can make money at this point is to SELL SHARES! But they can’t sell many at $3+ so they must soon start the debt process. Thanks for the link, I may short this one as well at $3 and buy back at $.05
The 3 main people are listed as compensation committee members (debt holders eventually) or will just sell the $3 shares and take all that loot.
They cannot sustain the public entity with their business model and alleged revenue and with the $3 shares, there is just not enough cash coming in to keep things alive especially when compensated members are taking all the capital.
If they claim to have made $53,000 (and that is dated 2022) so my guess is a reverse merger soon into an AI company. But with no revenue data since 2022 and the float of 600,0000 is also dated 2022 so you don’t know what they are making or have in the float.
Great transparency!
They also have a 60% short interest that will likely remain open until the shares drop in price or they release debt shares to cover the shorts. You can’t make money on a company that has huge debt, no revenue and compensated board members with no real business operations. Money does not fall from the skies. But it is free when you legally take it from investors.
Remember this. It is their money; only theirs and investors get none of it. When others invest you think those who paid less will cash out? That is why they keep the price on a downward spiral so no one can sell except the schemers.
If the company sold 10,000 shares at $3 and they took in $30,000 and the stock went to $5 per share, most who paid $3 will sell, that means investors make money but when that happens, the scheme loses money and the schemes never lose money!
To keep the cash coming in for just themselves preventing anyone else from selling, they keep the price down and debt dilute further and end up dumping 5 billion at $.01 to make $50,000,000. No one can sell except at a loss while the schemes makes money even when the shares drop in price.
So far the ONLY ticker we can find with no debt, profitable and no debt dilution with a low float?
Your looking at it!
$GNGR
Time to short this play. then dump it at $.0000
Besao; you wrote...
OK the price per share has to drop and in the future you are certain to cover at a much lower price, you are saying.
If the price drops below what debt holders sell for you just buy back at the lower market price and pocket the difference between the selling short high and buy back low. If the shares don’t drop much so you don’t make much or they even rise in price, you buy debt shares form debt holders who end up with unlimited shares and they sell like it’s a fire sale and you still make money regardless if the price goes up or down.
The big boys are putting TREN into this scheme. They are massively shorting at this price level. Are these invisible naked shorts or properly registered shorts? Why would the price per share be rising while these massive shorts are occurring?
I don’t know as a fact TREN is being put it into a scheme, I rely on the data to tell the story. When the share price rises on a schemes launch or pump, remember the share price rises on very few trades. When the shares rise in price, the volume drops. Retailers do not like high priced shares and savvy investors stay clear of questionable high priced low volume stocks because they want liquidity and to get liquidity you need more shares trading and to do that you need more investors who want lower priced shares (debt dilution). Schemes also like to keep the float low to fool retailers that if they take out the Asked the price will rise. (Usually pumpers say slap the asked, take out the level 2 and it’s to da moon)
If pumped stocks are so GREAT, whey aren’t the pumpers buying them all and keep the profits for themselves? Why tell strangers? Pumpers are paid to post lies that are not linked to the company pump and face violations. If someone on IHUB said it’s a sure thing, the company cannot be responsible for what others say but we know they are paid by third parties to post what the company can be blamed for as a violation.
Retailers will buy any scheme that has a pumper say. To da moon, train leaving the station, it will explode or 10 bagger etc.
If TREN sold 19,000 shares at $1+ they took in $28,000 (pocket change). They want to make $50,000,000 and will never sell 50 million at $1 because to do that they need higher-level investors they will never attract. Even if they kept things the way they are and not dilute, the $1 shares will be sold back and forth on the open market that does not help the company if they are just selling shares. If they were making money from company sales, they would not need to dilute or need capital to operate. If a company is at a loss and is not making revenue from sales, and they do not do debt dilution, they have no choice but to close the ticker down.
If a scheme can only survive selling shares, they need to keep selling shares to keep the money flowing in. To keep selling and have liquidity, they need more shares and to attract more buyers they need to offer shares for less and less. It’s easier to find 100,000 people to spend $200 each, then 200 people to each spend $100,000.
Schemes debt dilute to make money period! Or make the company plans generate real revenue. Since most schemes have to be a really HOT TOPIC news to attract retailers that is always associated with mining or getting into a Trillion Dollar industry, the problem is the costs to get those operations up and running cost more then what they raise diluting shares.
If a company PR’s says they are making sales with no debt and expanding on what is working, they won’t need to sell shares for revenue and no debt dilution can take place.
If a ticker has no debt they cannot be a pump and dump.
NOTE: When you see 100 shares trade, its not a real trade, the 100 is a market maker signal they put as an order, 100 means “I need shares.” Most times when you see volumes like 100, 200, 300, 400, they are not trades, they are various signal to other market makers.
200 means a MM needs shares but don’t take the price down.
300 means a take the stock down 30% so I can load up
400 means trade it sideways. (You can Google the list of signals)
700 means to move the price up and 777 also means to move the price up.
I have personally purchased shares in a scheme and bought 777 shares that sent the signal to have the price moved up. The Market Makers figure it was one of the schemers getting ready to make a move. When they took the price up I sold and in about 1 hour someone traded 300 to take the price back down.
ANY stock on the OTC that only wants to sell shares can only make money by selling lots of shares cheap on news that is just intent.
The fact that it’s all intent will keep the savvy investors away and the ones buying the shares now are penny players who are DYING to buy more when the price tanks so they can get more shares for less then the $1+ price is so there is some belief they will rise back up to $1 or the company will claim they will file to move to NASDAQ.
You think a company would just start with 50 billion shares and sell them for $.01 but there is no higher price investors would see a goal that they were once at $1 and they may go back to $1. Its always start at higher price, debt dilute and more will figure it could go back to $1.
Some do not realize that on an S1 conversion even if the company does not fulfill the NYSE or NASDAQ requirements they can trade on that exchange but 5 months and later be de-listed to the OTC.
YES! OTC tickers even current are all de listed stocks
Since OTC tickers are on the de-listed website known as the OTC Markets, they are exactly like GRAY market stocks, they are all de-listed but that does not mean they are not trading and have a ticker that is active.
People think that moving from the OTC to Grays means they have been de-listed. That is 100% incorrect. ALL OTC tickers are de-listed like gray. They just pay to advertise on the OTC so they can publish the schemes false data to get the retailers who cannot buy shares on the grays to buy into their scheme.
Don’t you wonder why so many OTC pump and dumps end up on the EM Grays? They know they can’t sell anyone any more shares so that is the sign they are folding or reverse merging. When a company elects to move to the Grays like GNGR, they are in fact saying ADIOS to the scams and retailers and any further short attempts.
GNGR is likely being held at bay by over sold borrowers who were likely adding more naked shorts when on the OTC to retailers to help keep the price down. Now that they are on the Grays, no more can short GNGR and any move they make will only attract savvy and accredited investors who are the ones who say this could be the next needle in the haystack.
Even if retailers can buy gray stocks and if the shares rise to $.01 it’s too much for them to invest and they continue to gravitate to $.0001 shares to hope for a killing. De-listed and revoked are two different things. In fact GRAYS are where the BIG boys buy shares because they know Grays cannot be shorted and it also keeps retailers away because Grays with validity do not want those crazy retailers who want to buy $100 worth and hope it turns into $10,000,000 on some pump debt schemes cheap shares, and since the ticker cannot sell to those investors the Gray ticker cannot be just a share selling scheme.
Investors that bash the HELL out of tickers dilution is not because they lose $100 but because they blame the scheme for them losing $10,000,000 they had spent in their minds based on the hyped numbers. Must be hard to tell your wife to start looking for a $1,000,000 home and new cars and plan to retire only to end up saying to her “don’t quit your day job so fast”.
If you’re a pump and dump scheme on the Grays you can’t sell to retailers and would lose your customer base that lets the scheme make $50,000,000 on dilution, and shorting Grays is not allowed. So the Grays seem to be safer then the OTC listings. Any valid gray market stock (not some pump and dump that was moved to grays) but companies that are doing what they set out to do that is not just to sell shares are likely going to survive and expand to higher markets.
GNGR has been called a scam, crook CEO, POS stock etc. That is only due to the price being down even though the structure of the company and data is the opposite of a debt diluted pump and dump scheme. Our firm’s attorney told the group in a meeting that if GNGR were a scam they are doing it wrong.
It is also a fact that some who own GNGR since 2008, may be the only stock they have left and need GNGR to make back all their other investment losses.
When the stock price goes back up, the same idiots who cry scam that don’t even know what a scam is will be cheering the CEO calling him an asset to the investment community.
The lunatic investors even call a CEO of a scam a genius if the price rises. But good luck selling the shares as that Genius soon turns into a crook. Investors are their own worst enemy.
If a stock price at $.01 went to $.10 then down to $.0001 back and forth each day, you would see the same investors post, Crook CEO, Hero CEO, Scammer CEO, Genius CEO, Thief CEO, Great CEO etc.
And no retailers like to invest $1 to have it rise to $20 because they may only put in $400 for 300 shares (like TREN) and at $20 they only make $6,000. Even if TREN goes to $50 per share and most only bought 300 shares that also is only $15,000 and can’t compete with the lotto dream.
The only way to win the $1,000,000 lotto dream on an OTC ticker is to buy a few shares high and buy millions on the diluted cost average down price and then they go back to $1. Problem is they never go back up. If the company can’t sell 100,000 $1 shares, how do investors believe that after the dilution adds billions to the float that they will go back to $1 and the brokers can sell 5 billion shares when they couldn’t even sell 100,000?
Schemes know full well they will not sell many shares at $1+ so they must debt dilute or they lose $50,000,000 and also because everyone will be lined up to buy for less and less knowing they used to be $1.00 and cost average. People actually hate when a $1 shares goes to $5 because they only bought 200 shares and bet on them dropping so they can cost average really cheap. You see the problem and also WHY schemes set up things the way they do. FREE CASH knowing investors don’t want the share price to rise until after the dilution. Crazy Huh?
GNGR was never a high priced stock to begin with so even at a low price it is not far off from where they used to trade at and with a SUPER low float and no debt they cant be debt diluted and now they cant be shorted and also stops retailers from buying while they make their net move. Seems now that the GRAYS are the place to find legitimacy not the OTC! A nice turn of events I might add.
Do the big boys also own the toxic convertible debt while they are also doing the massive shorts? Where do you see the amount of toxic convertible debt listed and also the fine print that is important to see and understand? You say that actual short positions are usually invisible. How do you know that what the big boys are doing is actually going on? Do you ever purchase or offer toxic convertible debt yourself or with your group?
I don’t do toxic debt, that is just so wrong on so many levels. The rule says if someone pays part of a company’s debt, the restricted shares issued by the company to those debt payers can be changed to free trading when the debt is paid. The debt payers pay a third party company that is owed money from the ticker. A third party company is usually an affiliate with no ties to the debt payers or the company. In some cases, they pay the debt after they sell the shares.
That is why you often see a ticker say they are buying a company or an affiliation so they can claim they owe them money (consulting or just because they have debt on their books or the company owes them for the affiliation) that starts the debt dilution process but the debt payers do not have any link to the third party debt holders even though they are usually related or a partner in secrecy.
When the pump is in full swing the data is usually posted late on the company data so they hide the added diluted shares that will soon show up in a few months. That’s when investors say Crook scammer adding shares and those same complainers are the first to rush to buy more cost averages shares cheap.
No one ever wants to say they bought 300 shares for $1.50 and then they tank to $.001 and they only keep the 300 they have knowing the shares will never go back to $1.50 so to limit the self embarrassment, they cost average down to $.15 and say WHO ME! I never paid $1.50 I only paid $.15 so if they go to $.16 I make money. Yeah Sure!
It’s not a guess; its how the data shows what will happen with the same accuracy as knowing if you threw a baseball up in the air high it will come right back down just like OTC stocks.
A company selling 100,000 shares (maybe) at $1+ will never make much money So they short more then 100,000 and soon let the shares drop to an affordable $.20 and dump 300,000,000 short. Then they cover with debt share and also make a killing selling short knowing cheap debt shares will soon follow to cover the open position as the float goes from 100,000,000 to 5 billion or more.
I repeat. EVERYONE MAKES MONEY except retailers. It’s their money and YOU can’ t have ANY OF IT! Not one PENNY!
The longs must be stupid naive inexperienced investors who have been deluded by a pumped dream of a huge AI success story that has no chance of materializing. Will these stupid investors ever gain a clue about what is really going on?
They are clueless and not longs, like I said, longs don’t dump huge sums of money into these schemes, its more like the low level retailers who just want some just in case it takes off and also knowing they can cost average. You will never see $10,000,000 in trades on a given day on a $1 stock to only 50 trades on a scheme ticker.
If you watch Amazon real time trades every other trade is one share or 3 shares or 2 shares, Not high finance by any means, they just want to tell people at the local bar “I OWN AMAZON STOCK”!
Higher priced questionable tickers will always have many trades at low volume averages for a few hundred bucks, than you know it’s the LOTTO retailers even on a high priced scheme that must debt dilute to make any real money because they are not going to make money on the plans that got investors to open their checkbooks.
Retailers will always buy some of all OTC schemes and never stop! It’s like playing the same lotto numbers each week, you dare not miss one week because what if that is the week your numbers were picked. Same as not buying into any specific scheme what if that is the one that EXPLODES?
Most never win lotto but have a slight chance while with a debt-diluted scheme you have no chance.
You can't buy the shares until after the debt holders that own the shares have them made free trading by filing 3(a)10 and offer them for sale, It's a process. You have to let the big players do their thing first and we jump in after they make the initial big bucks.
RS, Yes! See the D added to their ticker.
SHORT IT!
When people cost average on pump and dump scheme stocks that drop in price in hopes they go back up over the average price that rarely happens. You have to know it’s doomed when you see the debt and increased authorized.
When you short stocks that go up in price, you short more. Like cost averaging down on a diluted pump and dump you short average up, KNOWING full well they will drop in price eventually. The more you sell higher the more you make when they drop.
If we paid $1.10 and they go to $1.40 we short more. When the shares drop to $.01 or less we make $1.09 on the $1.10 shorts and $1.39 on the $1.40 shorts. Knowing the stock will tank, you short more even if it goes higher on the initial pump stages and you make that much more when it crashes to the floor.
TREN went to $1.55 today but only on 19,000 shares, that is NOT much money to raise on a scheme. TREN is like SGMD initially sell high. When that tranche is over, add debt increase authorized and dilute, and diluted shares always tank.
These are not blue chips or high priced well structure companies where shorting is risky, they are schemes that start the pump on few shares at a higher price, let the price rise up so they know when they drop, people will cost average and more cheap players jump in.
If a ticker sells 10,000,000 shares at $1.00 they make $10,000,000.
If a ticker sells 5,000,000,000 shares at $.01 they make $50,000,000
What makes people think these schemes will just sell $10,000,000 at $1 and then close up shop (Because they have no revenue or business)?
Schemes sell shares for money not to make the company work and what scheme will say NO TO $50 MILLION MORE! When they make more on cheaper shares and sell to more investors who are more willing to spend $.01 per share then $1 per share. It’s a SURE THING the stock will tank. And brokers know they will never have to call back shorted shares with diluted shares available.
The fact that the highest share movers on any given day are all from tickers under $.0001 and they take in $300,000,000 a day on average, when that data never changes you can bet you will never lose shorting these schemes. EVER!
The lenders know they will never call back shares and any shares needed to cover open short positions and never fall into a squeeze. Why would we buy shares on the open market for more then the short selling prices and lose money? We can just buy debt shares for much less then what they were sold on the short even if the current price is higher then the open short position. You can’t lose!
Some are still missing the point I post. You don’t have to cover the short and lose money if the price goes UP. You buy back for less if the shares drop to cover the short and if the shares price goes up you still buy debt shares for less then what you sold the shares short.
You sell $1.10 short, the shares go to $1.50, you buy debt shares for $.25 and deposit them and cover the short position. The debt holders know they will dump most at $.001 or less so they are very happy to get $.25 or even $.10 so everyone wins but the retailers.
What you failed to notice is our plan only helps us not you. You are prevented from buying any more GNGR and that is how we want it. So I am not pumping to anyone to buy GNGR, I'm showing why others are bashing it and why good things happen to good companies regardless of share price or trading platform.
Choose your tickers structure.
Hot pumped intent plan (Bad but looks exciting)
Debt dilution (Bad)
Large float low price (Bad)
Large float high price (Even worse)
Audits (Legitimizes fraud, Bad)
Previous ticker change (Bad)
No products you can buy and have no operations (Very bad)
Vs.
Low float, No debt (Great)
Products you can buy and see sell (Great)
No hanky panky or questionable issues (Great)
Low share price on the above, low float and validity (Better then Great)
Do you choose Bad or Great?
That seems more like a question for Bar1080 not me.
I have seen two CEO's agree to terms and they meet and sign all the contracts but at the last minute they switch to a new document with the last page altered. One day the CEO gets a court order to hand over controlling shares in his company.
I have seen wording that is so confusing it seems like a good thing. Little things to make the CEO excited I have seen are, "In the event the shares go higher then the agreed price, we would like to know that the company will allows us more options for shares at the higher price" and also if the opposite should happen. This is how we committed to great future with you company”. (The opposite is they can get more shares for their money as the price drops they end up owing the company).
Also many CEOs are so far into the failed ticker they just sign anything at that point.
As for audits? Some think audits means legitimacy? Look at all the pump and dumps that are audited. Audits mean NOTHING on any given ticker. The more a pump and dump adds audits, fake purchase orders, and fancy PR’s the more money they make.
If people say they only buy into an audited company then what do they look at to be convinced they are legit, if it’s just the audit you’re DOOMED!
You are better to buy shares in an EM market stock that has no audits but has the proper structure. Structure is REAL and tells the storey about a company that no audit, PR, intent news, or people pumping can. DO you buy into reality or the dream?
Since most dream stocks sell 1,000,000 shares for only $100, the LOTTO mentality kicks in not reality. The hope is they go to $1 and that dream negates reality and the schemes know very well how to sell the dream.
Look at
SGMD “Audited” stock hit $.000001
BRGO “Audited” stock his $.000001
And 100’s more!
All an audit does is make FRAUD LEGITIMATE! Period and 100% fact.
Some will be penny stock exempt so they don’t have to register with the SEC by achieving one of these requirements.
1) A price of over $5 per share, 2) the issuer has Average Revenue of at least $6 million for the last 3 years, or 3) the issuer has Net Tangible Assets in excess of $2 million if the issuer has been in continuous operations for at least 3 years or $5 million if less than 3 years. See: SEC Rule 3a51-1 - Definition of a Penny Stock
Look at GBTC, one of the biggest (over $2 billion) money raising schemes I have ever seen. Audit, penny stock exempt and still they post this on their disclaimer. IF you can make out what this means, please let us know.
Investments in the Products are speculative investments that involve high degrees of risk, including a partial or total loss of invested funds. Grayscale Products are not suitable for any investor that cannot afford loss of the entire investment. The shares of each Product are intended to reflect the price of the digital asset(s) held by such Product (based on digital asset(s) per share), less such Product’s expenses and other liabilities. Because each Product does not currently operate a redemption program, there can be no assurance that the value of such Product’s shares will reflect the value of the assets held by such Product, less such Product’s expenses and other liabilities, and the shares of such Product, if traded on any secondary market, may trade at a substantial premium over, or a substantial discount to, the value of the assets held by such Product, less such Product’s expenses and other liabilities, and such Product may be unable to meet its investment objective.
WHEW!
Audits are now used to legally tell lies only it’s certified. Audits are not a sure thing, and there are 100s of SEC (Questionable) lawyers that will issue an opinion letter for a few bucks knowing they may not be 100% accurate.
Look at the list of banned lawyers on the FINRA website, blow your mind! I guess some hacks can’t cut it as a litigator or smart enough to be an accident lawyer. Making few bucks as a per-hour hack is also not what they intended so they move to where the money is. OTC and helping the diluted schemes thrive.
So when you look for a ticker do not look at the trading tier NASDAQ or GRAYS. Do not look at the share price or what people say. You look up the company and see if they are real or an intent just information website with no operations.
You don’t look at the profits or EPS, that is what happens down the road. But you have to get in some time and early so you get in before all the compliance happens.
Low float, no debt, (Means debt diluting is IMPOSSIBLE)
No ticker changes (not a previous pumped ticker they reversed from)
No FINRA or SEC enforcement issues.
No debt and Profits no matter how small. $1 profits and a low share float is better then $10,000,000 in debt with a diluted float. Some say that is incorrect yet they keep losing on the big debt dilutes stocks.
They have to see they keep losing or just in denial. OTC current, even NASDAQ and also with Audits, Intent hot news, Penny Stock Exempt on a company that has no proven operations (Not just a PO BOX) no sales and is in debt up to their eyeballs and is too good to be true, Is a SUCKERS play.
Do not listen to anyone who hides behind a screen name, they are not your friend. They say what NOT TO BUY and there are reasons for that as well. No one bashes a bad stock!
Bashers only bash good stocks to keep the price down to accumulate or prevent a rinse in price to maybe expose fraud or expose short positions. You only see pumpers pumping a bad stock because they want to sell shares fast knowing the price will drop.
Bashers of a low priced stock know they can be affected by a rise in share price. If a stock is down the plan is to keep is down to not expose fraud. Bashing a stock is one thing but making others believe its bad when it’s actually a great company have other motives and investors need to look at data for themselves.
If someone wants to bash bad stocks all day and night for decades, that can’t be a real job or can it.
I never told you what to buy or pump some scheme. I don’t do that. I’m just posting how this all works. GNGR is a low float, no debt, profitable and great performing company with sales globally and they are expanding.
All proven and true, even without an audit. :)
$GNGR