Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Can you please make Tommy Boy aware of this since he apparently has no clue.
I say you email him and ask. I'm shocked no one has emailed him asking him what the hold up is with the financials he's been touting the past couple of months.
I hope a short squeeze is being created. If it is, this can pop to over 1,000% just because of the short squeeze. Short squeezes can do wonders to a penny stock price and I have a feeling one will take place once financials get filed.
Aren't all otc 10Qs due August 15th??
Tommy Boy better be careful and learn from this guy's mistake:
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/08/04/business/dealbook/martin-shkreli-guilty.html
TRUEKEY is a Intel product not a ACS product. There is nothing on the web that connects ACS to TRUEKEY.
That's Strikeforce's twitter not CV's.
Can you post (copy and paste) the information on here?
Sorry I meant they are their attorneys and they pay the fees on behalf of their client, not a question.
THEY PAY THE DUES BECAUSE THEY ARE SFOR ATTORNEYS? The patent attorneys submit everything to the USPTO office on behalf of their client.
What is your point with all of this??? . They paid their USPTO fees?? So what??
With that said ZPaul I do appreciate all the work you do for this board!
This is in reference to their MobileTrust app or GuardedID app. It has nothing to do with Apple using their technology. It's like saying Candy Crusher is an Apple and Android partner/technology user b/c you can download the candy crusher app on an Apple phone or Android phone. I am SFOR long but a lot of your posts are starting to sound like noise. We need more real evidence that ACS is giving SFOR credit for using their technology or even evidence they are using their technologies not just giving them credit.
Why would they buy shares if they can give themselves shares?? Why would I pay for something I can get for free? So yeah I know the difference!
They have, all three executives have given themselves a ton of shares. It's in the last 10Q.
The 8K mentioning IBM just lists them as potential infringers. I also don't see the connection with Microsoft Azure and SFOR besides SFOR winning a lawsuit against phone factor. Let's be honest with ourselves, the reason no one has heard of Strikeforce Technologies is because they are what they are, a small 3 person penny stock company. Maybe they will make a name for themselves at some point, but I get why no one has ever heard of them now.
LOL
I doubt SFOR would go after IBM but if they win these lawsuits and do, I'd be one happy gal.
What does any of this have to do with SFOR? Is there anything in here that ties this to SFOR?
ACS is on top of their list as a Partner, mostly likely because the list is in alphabetical order but still good to see it on their actual website:
https://www.mcafee.com/us/partners/partnerlisting.aspx?azFilter=&pFilter=data_exchange_layer&mFilter=&cFilter=false
Thanks Splithappens and everyone else who responded. I'm definitely long SFOR. I just hope they get what they deserve as the real patent holders. I also hope our loyalty to the company pays off. I need this investment to be life altering b/c I had gotten very very financially screwed investing in a scam Chinese company called CDII. So this (SFOR) is my lifeline from coming back from horrific experience of CDII.
My concern isn't if SFOR is going to make any money off of ACS deals. My concern is that ACS is making the most money off SFOR products, more than SFOR itself. From an investor's standpoint, I'd rather invest in the company that is directly connected to big names than the manufacturer of the products of that company. It's like ACS being Apple and SFOR being the company that makes the chips inside Apple phones.
SFOR should have never sold their patents to ACS because ACS will be bought out and SFOR will only be left with 15-20% of the buyout amount, if that even. Don't get me wrong I'm LONG on SFOR and want it to succeed, I just think ACS should be giving SFOR more credit, mostly since they haven't even paid them the $20 million yet.
My biggest worry is SFOR isn't the real business anymore, it's just the penny stock business where the company gets a little bit of stockholders money here and there. SFOR is also just the company that deals with the lawsuits because if they lost the lawsuits, SFOR tanking is less of a concern. And the true business, the one they all care about and are more invested in and where all the revenue is recorded, I'm worried that business is ACS and the "channel partners". I hope I'm wrong and SFOR is the true money tree and not ACS.
I have a question. From reading everything about ACS and looking at their website, it seems that ACS isn't giving SFOR any credit, they don't even have them listed as a partner on their website. So with that said, how is SFOR's stock price expected to go up? It seems like a private company ACS is making all the money from SFOR's patents and taking all the credit, there is nothing out there in the public eye that connects SFOR to ACS or McAfee or Intel, only information out there is connecting ACS to McAfee or Intel.
If ACS was a public company I'd invest in them instead of SFOR. I get they are "channel partners" but it's these "channel partners" who seem to be getting all the credit and attention for SFOR products. We need Mark Kay to be more aggressive with connecting SFOR to ACS. Unless ACS and SFOR become one company in the near future, SFOR will lose all it's hard work and money to "channel partners" like ACS.
Mark Kay Email from Jan. 30th: I asked if there will be an R/S in 2017.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mark L. Kay <marklkay@strikeforcetech.com>
Date: Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:29 AM
Subject: RE: Question about SFOR Stock
To: ///////
/////
That is a question many people asked us last year. The answer is NO, that there is no plan for a reverse split and with the monies we made off of our last patent infringement with Phone Factor/Microsoft, we are good. Plus we expect major revenues from our current new channel partner, ACS, whom has already bought an option to give us $9mm by 2020 if not sooner. So there is no plan for a reverse split no matter what people say or recommend.
Thanks for asking
Mark
Sincerely,
StrikeForce Customer Support
StrikeForce Technologies, Inc.
1090 King George’s Post Road, Suite 603
Edison, NJ 08837 USA
info@strikeforcecpg.com
www.strikeforcecpg.com
866.787.4542
732.661.9641 ext. 225
Use GuardedID® and MobileTrust® to prevent malware from stealing your confidential information!
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attached documents contain information which is PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL, are protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521, Federal and State copyright laws, and are intended only for the use of the addressee(s) named herein. No part of this document or any attachments may be reproduced or transmitted without permission from StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. Thank you for your cooperation.