Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Your news is much better than even LWLG breaking thru the 200DMA!
After Schwab solicited short shares by email last week 3 times in 28 minutes, they have sent me two emails at 3:01 this morning(see below) downgrading LWLG to a sell......still trying to scrounge up shares.....
Rationale Behind Our Rating
Rationale Behind our Rating Table
Current Previous Average Importance
Schwab Equity Rating of A for Growth GradeGrowth Grade Positive Positive LowLow
Schwab Equity Rating of D for Quality GradeQuality Grade Negative Neutral MediumMed
Schwab Equity Rating of D for Sentiment GradeSentiment Grade Negative Neutral HighHigh
Schwab Equity Rating of D for Stability GradeStability Grade Negative Negative MediumMed
Schwab Equity Rating of D for Valuation GradeValuation Grade Negative Neutral MediumMed
Changes since prior week
Based on data as of 07/01/2022 market close.
Schwab Equity Ratings® Alert
As you requested, we are notifying you that the Schwab Equity Ratings guidance on one or more of the stocks that you monitor has changed. Login to your account and click on the link to the stock's Schwab Equity Ratings Report for more research information including rationale for the current rating, third party opinions and other highly-rated stocks in the same sector.
Downgrade to Sell
Schwab Equity Ratings Schwab Equity Ratings Report
Equity Current Previous
LWLG D C View Report
If you have questions about the rating(s), please log on to Schwab.com or call Schwab at 1-800-435-9050 to discuss.
Access sector-specific stock ideas by using the Schwab Stocks Lists® or the Schwab Equity Ratings Stock Screener Tool. View Schwab Equity Ratings Performance data.
Schwab Equity Ratings use a scale of A, B, C, D, and F, and are assigned to approximately 3,000 U.S.-traded stocks. The Schwab Equity Ratings model universe is generally composed of the combined set of stocks in the FTSE Russell ("Russell") 3000 Index and the Standard & Poor's ("S&P") 500 Index. Schwab's research outlook is that A-rated stocks, on average, will strongly outperform, and F-rated stocks, on average, will strongly underperform the equities market during the next 12 months. The explanation and table below are included to assist you in using Schwab Equity Ratings as one component of your own research to evaluate stocks and investment opportunities.
This email has been triggered because an equity's buy/sell/hold guidance has changed. Look to the table below for information regarding these changes.
Schwab Equity Ratings Distribution
Schwab Equity Rating Percentile Ranking Distribution Schwab Equity Rating Distribution 12 Month Return Outlook General Buy/Hold/Sell Guidance
A 1-10 Top 10% Strongly Outperform Buy
B 11-30 Next 20% Outperform Buy
C 31-70 Next 40% Marketperform Hold
D 71-90 Next 20% Underperform Sell
F 91-100 Bottom 10% Strongly Underperform Sell
Descriptions for Non-Rated Stocks
Schwab Equity Rating Definition Description
NR Not Rated Schwab is not publishing a rating on this stock due to unusual or extraordinary business circumstances related to this company. Although Schwab generally does not monitor C, D, and F rated stocks for unusual or extraordinary business circumstances, from time to time, a rating of NR may appear on a particular stock. View a short summary of the extraordinary business event by clicking on the stock's Schwab Equity Ratings symbol - NR.
NC Not Covered This stock is not currently in the Schwab Equity Rating universe or is prohibited from coverage for regulatory reasons.
The general buy/hold/sell guidance is relative to other rated equities only. Before considering whether to take any action, an investor should consider whether equities generally are performing well in comparison to other asset classes and whether other equities in the same sector or category with the same or better rating may be more appropriate.
UNSUBSCRIBE PRIVACY CONTACT US lock LOG IN
The Schwab Stock Lists and Schwab Equity Ratings are generally updated weekly, so you should review and consider any recent market or company news before investing. The Schwab Equity Rating and other information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation or needs, nor does it represent a personalized recommendation of a particular stock or stocks to you. Stocks can be volatile and entail risk and individual stocks presented may not be suitable for you. You should not buy or sell a stock without first considering whether it is appropriate for you and your portfolio. Certain information presented is provided by third-parties. Schwab believes that such third-party information is reliable, but does not guarantee its accuracy, timeliness or completeness, and it is subject to change without notice. For more information, see About Schwab Equity Ratings.
This service is for personal use only. Commercial use or redistribution in any form, printed or electronic, is prohibited.
If you have any questions or concerns, PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Instead, visit Schwab.com/contactus to identify a fast and simple way to get in touch.
For your protection, we are unable to accept instructions to change your email address sent in reply to this message. To update your address using a secure channel, please log in to your account.
For your security, Charles Schwab will never request personal information through email.
View SchwabSafe® and The Schwab Security Guarantee.
Notice: All email sent to or from the Charles Schwab corporate email system is subject to archival, monitoring and/or review by Schwab personnel.
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., 211 Main Street, San Francisco, CA 94105.
©2022 Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. All rights reserved. Member SIPC.
Schwab emailed me 3 times in 28 minutes(3:10, 3:19, and 3.38) to lend out for securities in "high demand"....the pressure is building! This has NEVER happened to me before and I have been with them for over 20 years... have shares in both taxable and roth accounts(4)
We have owned since Feb 2021 ...Has to be LWLG!!
LWLG investor, Susquehanna Investments, has a front page story in today's Phila Inquirer.
https://www.inquirer.com/business/jeff-yass-susquehanna-pennsylvania-taxes-tiktok-republicans-20220621.html
Sold another stock and added some at 5.98
Funny.......
From today's WSJ
Highlights a couple of ways of manipulating share price....
Archegos Founder Bill Hwang, Former CFO Charged With Securities Fraud
"Mr. Hwang’s use of swaps allowed him to manipulate the prices of stocks in his portfolio because the agreements prompted Wall Street firms to buy shares of the stocks too, the indictment alleges. As the size of Archegos’s swaps grew, so did the amount of shares bought by the Wall Street firms, pushing up prices in the process. Prosecutors also allege that Archegos traded at certain times of day and in other manipulative ways to prop up stocks in its portfolio, including to keep share prices from falling too much. Prosecutors alleged that Mr. Hwang avoided publicly disclosing his positions to regulators and market participants by using swaps rather than buying stocks outright as his positions in companies approached 5%, a level above which public disclosure is required."
"The charges also point to unseen risks posed by so-called family offices—private entities set up to manage the fortunes of wealthy families—whose positions aren’t monitored by regulators. In recent years, many large hedge funds have converted to such family offices."
, and this patent application serves that purpose acutely- (having a sharp, severe, or intense effect).
Thanks X- I kinda surmised that but good to get your clarification and confirmation
Don't remember who posted this link, but I shared it with a HS classmate and below is his interesting reply.
Amen... Chesco here....if I remember correctly, WaWa is an Indian name for goose.
Per your request- cut and pasted....
Big Stock Sales Are Supposed to Be Secret. The Numbers Indicate They Aren’t.
Share prices fall ahead of 58% of large sales, a WSJ analysis finds. Regulators are investigating.
By Liz Hoffman Follow
, Corrie Driebusch Follow
and Tom McGinty Follow
March 30, 2022 9:45 am ET
SAVE
SHARE
TEXT
118 RESPONSES
Listen to article
Length9 minutes
Queue
For years, something strange kept happening on Wall Street.
Before a big shareholder could carry out plans to sell a slug of stock, the price dropped. It was as if other investors knew what was coming.
It happened when Bain Capital sold shares of Canada Goose Holdings Inc., the maker of trendy parkas; when 3G Capital sold stock in Kraft Heinz Co. ; when Apollo Global Management Inc. sold shares of Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. ; and when Alaska’s state oil fund trimmed its stake in an artificial-intelligence software firm.
These transactions, known as block trades, are supposed to be a secret between the selling shareholders and the investment banks they hire to execute the trades. But a Wall Street Journal analysis of nearly 400 such trades over three years indicates that information about the sales routinely leaks out ahead of time—a potentially illegal practice that costs those sellers millions of dollars and benefits banks and their hedge-fund clients.
The Journal’s analysis, covering 393 block trades between 2018 and 2021, found that 58% of the time, the share price declined in the trading session immediately beforehand, controlling for the performance of peer companies. Of the 268 trades for which the Journal was able to determine how much the banks paid, the sellers would have received $382 million more if the stocks had performed in line with the benchmark, or about $1.4 million per trade.
A handful might be explained by a negative headline or chalked up to bad luck. But the persistent pattern of stocks falling in the run-up to big insider sales suggests a more widespread problem: Information that should be confidential is getting out.
Selling Low
Morgan Stanley executed the most block trades in a three-year period, and the stocks in question underperformed peers on the day of the sale by the widest margin on a median basis, a Wall Street Journal analysis found.
0.25 percentage points
JPMorgan
Chase
OUTPERFORMED
0
Goldman
Sachs
UNDERPERFORMED
Barclays
–0.25
Jefferies
On the day of each of
Morgan Stanley’s
174 block trades,
the stock it sold
underperformed its
benchmark index by
0.7 percentage points
on a median basis.
Credit Suisse
–0.50
Morgan
Stanley
–0.75
0
50
100
150
200
NUMBER OF BLOCK TRADES
Note: Based on sales from July 2018 through June 2021 in which a single bank executed the trade. Performance is the median spread for all of a bank’s block trades. Spread is the change in a stock's price on the day of the block trade minus the corresponding change in its sector index.
Sources: WSJ analysis of data from S&P Global Market Intelligence, IPO Boutique, Dealogic and regulatory filings
That pattern is now at the heart of a federal investigation into whether banks tip off favored clients to coming block trades. The Securities and Exchange Commission has sought trading records and electronic communications from a number of big banks and hedge funds, and the U.S. Justice Department is running its own probe, the Journal first reported in February.
The investigation for now appears to be focused on Morgan Stanley, MS -1.33% the dominant bank in block trading in recent years. The firm disclosed later in February that it had been responding to information requests from the Justice Department since the summer. In November, it put one of its senior executives in charge of block trading, Pawan Passi, on leave. A Morgan Stanley spokeswoman declined to comment on Mr. Passi’s behalf and repeated attempts to reach him have been unsuccessful.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. has also received requests from regulators, the Journal reported.
The investigation, along with a broader market decline, has chilled the big business of block trading in recent months, bankers and investors said.
The Journal’s analysis found that when Morgan Stanley executed a block trade by itself, the median stock trailed its peers by 0.7 percentage point in the trading session leading up to the deal, meaning half performed worse than that. That was the worst record of any of the biggest banks that are major players in block trading. The median of Credit Suisse Group AG’s deals was underperformance of 0.4 percentage point, the analysis found. The median trades executed by Goldman and Barclays PLC roughly matched the market.
Across all banks, the median stock lagged by 0.2 percentage point.
Morgan Stanley, Credit Suisse, Goldman and Barclays declined to comment. The other companies and investors mentioned in this article either declined to comment or didn’t respond.
Morgan Stanley has been the dominant bank in block trading in recent years.
PHOTO: LUCAS JACKSON/REUTERS
Leaks could come from a number of sources. Companies tend to approach multiple banks to bid on block deals, leaving open the possibility that someone other than the winner of the business has leaked the information.
There isn’t a comprehensive public list of block trades. Some are registered with the SEC. Others can be gleaned from more obscure corporate filings. Many leave no trace at all. The Journal’s analysis drew from databases maintained by research firms IPO Boutique and Dealogic as well as information from market participants, and matched details of those trades to securities filings where possible, but the list likely isn’t exhaustive.
HOW WE ANALYZED WALL STREET BLOCK TRADES
• The Wall Street Journal examined 393 trades from a three-year period
Insiders who want to sell a slug of stock have a problem: Posting the order to a public exchange would likely tank the price. So they turn to Wall Street.
An investment bank agrees, generally around midday, to quietly buy the shares at a discount to the market’s closing price later that day. The bank then aims to flip the stock to its trading clients at a higher price and pocket the difference. It is a clubby world: Four or five banks do the vast majority of trades, and the same roster of hedge funds line up to buy the shares, according to the data and market participants.
Wall Street thrives on information edges, and at the beginning of a block deal, the bankers are holding a valuable nugget: They know that a wave of selling is likely on the way. That is because public shareholders, assuming that corporate insiders are better informed, tend to copy their trades. A flood of shares for sale also knocks the supply-demand balance out of kilter.
Regulators suspect that investment banks have been tipping off their top clients, who jump in and sell ahead of that wave, according to people familiar with the probes. In many deals examined by the Journal, the stock-price slide began in late morning or early afternoon, around the time sellers typically alert bankers to their plans.
The ultimate losers in these situations are often pension funds, endowments and foundations. They invest with private-equity firms, which use block trades to unwind stakes in newly public companies.
Bain Capital, which lost out on $33 million after Canada Goose’s stock fell in the final hours of trading before it sold a slug of stock, counts Indiana teachers and Los Angeles city workers among its investors, according to public records. Pension funds are also big investors in Boston-based T.H. Lee Partners, which missed out on at least $31 million of proceeds on five block trades between 2018 and 2021 due to unexplained price declines, trading data show.
Block trades can be risky. Banks compete to buy the shares at slim discounts, and if they misjudge investor demand or there is a sudden, unexpected drop, their profit margin can quickly evaporate.
Stumbling Block
Share-price and index performance in the trading session immediately before a block trade was executed, minute by minute.
Stock
S&P 500 sector index
Aug. 7, 2018
Feb. 26, 2019
Sept. 3, 2019
Consumer staples
Consumer staples
Consumer discretionary
+0.04%
–0.6%
–0.4%
–2.4%
–6.5%
–1.6%
Kraft Heinz
Blue Apron
Restaurant Brands Intl.
Nov. 26, 2018
June 5, 2019
Feb. 5, 2021
Consumer discretionary
Consumer staples
Information technology
+1.1%
+2.6%
–0.2%
–14.1%
–1.7%
–2.4%
Canada Goose
FreshPet
Unity Software
Nov. 28, 2018
Aug. 8, 2019
June 14, 2021
Consumer discretionary
Consumer discretionary
Information technology
+3.2%
+1.0%
+2.0%
+1.2%
–1.8%
–0.5%
Norwegian Cruise Line
Restaurant Brands Intl.
Ping Identity
Source: DTN (historical intraday data)
That creates a financial incentive to leak details ahead of time. Knowing which investors will buy the shares, and at what price, could help a bank fine-tune its bid and decrease its risk of losses. And tipping off top funds to a profitable trade—selling short a stock heading into a block sale tends to be a winner—could curry favor with important clients.
There are other reasons a stock might fall ahead of a block trade. When a company goes public, employees and early investors are usually prevented from selling their shares for a period of time, generally six months. Hedge funds know when those so-called lockups expire and often short the stock ahead of time.
But fewer than 20 block trades in the Journal’s list appear to be linked to the expiration of IPO lockups, and they performed only slightly worse than the rest. In the vast majority of examples, there was no obvious reason the stock might have underperformed.
SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS
Do you think a federal investigation will put an end to leaks about big stock sales? Join the conversation below.
Most resemble what happened to 3G Capital, a private-equity firm known for its investments in household brands. Between 2018 and 2021, 3G executed at least three block trades to trim its stakes in two of them—Kraft and Restaurant Brands International Inc., the parent company of Burger King. Each time, it hired Morgan Stanley to sell the shares, and each time the price moved against it.
On Aug. 7, 2018, shares of Kraft climbed all morning, outperforming the S&P index of other big consumer-products companies. At 12:26 p.m.—right around the time that sellers of block trades typically engage banks—the stock price started to fall sharply. It closed down 1.6%, lagging the index and costing 3G Capital some $13 million in lost proceeds.
In another 3G block trade a year later, shares of Restaurant Brands cratered at noon and closed down 1.8% on a day the index rose. The famously penny-pinching investment firm—which pioneered a style of cost management and requires employees to get permission for color photocopies—lost out on $56 million in proceeds, according to the Journal’s analysis.
—Susan Pulliam and Juliet Chung contributed to this article.
Write to Liz Hoffman at liz.hoffman@wsj.com, Corrie Driebusch at corrie.driebusch@wsj.com and Tom McGinty at tom.mcginty@wsj.com
Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
Appeared in the March 31, 2022, print edition as 'Leaks Appear to Dent Profits on Big Stock Sales.'
Wall Street Journal analysis show lots of shenanigans going on with large block trades.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/big-stock-sales-are-supposed-to-be-secret-the-numbers-indicate-they-arent-11648647914
Thanks Paullee....owe you big time!
Also a long time IDCC holder since 1999, formerly kajo7710. My sincere thanks to whomever referenced LWLG on the IDCC board. I moved about 50% of IDCC....began nibbling in Feb '21 buying some at 1.40 and adding since up to the 14s with an average cost of 5 to 6.
On a fixed income,I would not have had the confidence to take the plunge without the exceptional DD and logic presented daily on this board...my deep appreciation and thanks to all!!
Those who don't know Loop will get to know a sincere, modest, humble man with a keen legal mind.
He worked hard to get a bunch of widows in IDCC to help secure their old age. Loop were you able to move any of them into LWLG?
Loop, going forward, I hope you will feel comfortable weighing in with your knowledge and wisdom on the best practices, pitfalls to avoid in handling the degree of wealth most are expecting.
Today's WSJ article on the Chips Act
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-be-more-like-china-act-house-democrats-competition-bill-industrial-policy-11643841005
Wall Street Journal
From the article below, what's the thinking whether this will hinder/stop Cathy Wood's Ark fund from investing in LWLG?
https://www.wsj.com/articles/cathie-wood-ark-innovation-performance-11642175833
Little strokes fell great oaks..... if we all do our part, we'll git'er done. JoPa preached "nobody has a good life unless everybody does!"
This article points out how data is growing exponentially.
From the WSJ
How to Understand the Data Explosion
“The prospect has researchers seeking radical alternatives, including synthetic DNA. Its information density far exceeds what’s possible with storage media like magnetic tape or optical discs. One project, sponsored by the federal Office of the Director of National Intelligence, is funding several teams with the short-term goal of producing DNA technology that can encode and retrieve up to 10 terabytes of information a day. The goal is to lay groundwork to shrink what now takes a full-size data center into a machine that sits on a desk.
It isn’t only hard to wrap your head around. All that data is a challenge to store, process and retrieve, and it will become more difficult as the volume surges and data stewards confront the sustainability of using immense amounts of electricity and water to power and cool data centers. Data-center construction will grow at compound annual rates of 5% to 10%, market researchers estimate”.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-to-understand-the-data-explosion-11638979214
Very insightful Scope!
Prayers to you and your wife
"A little money never hurts."
Hopefully you'll have humongous boat loads to relieve that worry!
Was at the movies and heard an appropos line in the Cyrano preview:
"Children need love....adults need money."
X & Scope thanks.
I know that any downside would be temporary....was hoping to pick up some cheaper shares...think those days are gone.
Question-
What is the likelihood of funds that have accumulated a decent profit will unload in whole or part by 12/31 to dress up their quarterly statements?
All-
Would like to echo that sentiment in spades. As I mentioned before, this board is peerless. I would not have had the courage to give up dividends in other holdings at my age and pull the trigger without the integrity, knowledge, insight, connecting the dots, unselfish sharing and unswerving belief and conviction of the contributors to this board! Thank you all!!... which seems so inadequate compared to what I have received and will continue to receive down the road.
I was most fortunate not to have to wait 14 yrs.I dipped my toe in water on 2/5/21 with 575 shs at1.58 and have been accumulating ever since until this AM with 285 at 12.55.
I hope the good Lord will give me enough years to wisely benefit our large family and some charities.
May you all have a blessed and happy Thanksgiving and God bless you all.
Jeunke-
Your statement almost perfectly describes Steve Jobs thinking after Apple met with Microsoft.
"Intel has a typical bureaucratic, big company attitude and is not very good at nurturing small, innovative start ups into maturity. Too many “ know better” characters involved."
If I remember correctly, Apple was in its infancy, Microsoft was dominating in main frames and started to get into PC's with DOS and Jobs was afraid Goliath was going to eat his lunch and wanted to see if some kind of accommodation would save his bacon. After his due diligence meeting(s?), Jobs confidently concluded that MS's cumbersome DOS PC's could never compete with Apples sleek "Ease of Use Promotes Use" I-Macs. The rest is history. I persuaded a school board in the 90s to install Apples with The "Ease of Use" argument.
We can argue "Ease of Adaptive Manufacturing Solutions" with three time the speed with half the power.
Just sent him 10Q and PR
Andy's articles are frequently crystal-balling in a sweeping kind of way. My intent was not to have him reply to me. Rather than try to make the case for him, I was hoping to peek his curiosity so he investigates and when he sees how transformational the tech is, it's the perfect subject for the kinds of things he likes to write about...not to mention the kudos he would get for being the first to write about it in the WSJ.
Thanks for the history...so many interesting backgrounds for members of this board.
Leapfrogging Gordon Moore's 1965 Law
Tryin to earn my keep on this board….sent the below email to the author of the article.
From today’s Wall Street Journal celebrating the 50th anniversary
The Chip That Changed the World (INTEL’s 4004 chip)
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-chip-that-changed-the-world-microprocessor-computing-transistor-breakthrough-intel-11636903999
Leapfrogging Gordon Moore's 1965 Law
Dear Andy-
I read with great interest your article “The Chip That Changed the World”. I was particularly drawn to the following:
“Someday Gordon Moore’s Law from 1965—the number of transistors per
chip doubles about every two years—will poop out. Someday John von
Neumann’s architecture of processor and memory, first described in
1945, will no longer meet our computing needs. My guess is that we
have another decade or two to squeeze more gains out of our
current chip technology and computer architecture.”
Lightwave Logic Inc. (LWLG- Nasdaq) is promising an additive(not competitive) green, carbon, ubiquitous solution with triple the speed at half the cost while utilizing half the power(less cooling required). Can you peruse your crystal ball and render an opinion as to whether the proposed solution would obviate the limitations of Moore’s law?
You can see I have no shame in plagiarizing this board..[img][/img]
Spartex
Don't want to take up space with off topic...forever grateful to GOD for finding LWLG and this peerless board for making an old man of 83 a true believer. With grandkids approaching 20 and other issues, we have many needs!!!
My short PS career- 1960 Blue Game...only played last two minutes and threw 2 TDs..back to throw a third- all covered- over right tackle cut to middle for 20 yds before being tackled by my brother.... no money... both trying to get walk-on scholarships under Rip Engle...JoPa still assist!!!
Hope to be at Mediabuzz's Delaware waterfront Party where I hope to hear the interesting stories of the many contributors to this board. I have shaken hands with a few millionaires... wouldn't mind shaking hands with a billionaire or two!!
PS:Played my best and most competitive ball in US Army at Fort Knox(before PS)under player-coach Bob Pellegrini, All American from Maryland and former Eagles Linebacker.
Cap
Was a walk-on QB in the 1960 Blue White gme
From today's Wall Street Journal
Semiconductor Industry Isn’t Spending Big on Scarce Old-Tech Chip
https://www.wsj.com/articles/semiconductor-industry-isnt-spending-big-on-scarce-old-tech-chips-11636453801
Small world...will try to make the party when it happens! Time is getting short...just turned 83!
Sorry Media...this was meant for you
Son-in-law Glen Davis and brother Ben Davis both graduates of MP. 2 grandsons (Glenn's) currently attend MP.
Son-in-law Glen Davis and brother Ben Davis both graduates of MP. 2 grandsons (Glenn's) currently attend MP.
Media-
Few miles from you in Malvern.
Hope CEO Lebby's Moat is robust enough to to withstand this. Personally, I wouldn't enter the China market at all and just try to grow the company by maximizing every other market..... I don't trust them at all!! disclosure.. I am an IDCC holder
China Wields New Legal Weapon to Fight Claims of Intellectual Property Theft
Wall Street Journal
https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-wields-new-legal-weapon-to-fight-claims-of-intellectual-property-theft-11632654001
I had the very same problem at age 12!
A Major Reason for Apple's Success
When it came time for me to recommend to the School Board in the 90s which personal computer should be put into our schools, the COMPLEX DOS system or THE SIMPLICITY OF Apple, Apple won hands down.
In addition to the cost, speed & temperature advantages of LWLG, they will win as apple did with their slogan:
"EASE OF USE PROMOTES USE"