Unfortunately, no.

Interim Dividend Distribution
As of June 30, 2017, the Receiver had approximately $2.76 billion to distribute to holders of claims allowed by the receivership, according to the priorities established in 12 U.S.C. § 1821(d)(11)(A). The most recent receivership balance sheet summary can be found at the following link: (WAMU Quarterly Receivership Balance Sheet Summary). After paying JPMC in full, the Receiver made an interim dividend distribution on September 26, 2017, on all approved senior unsecured claims of the receivership, including the claims of DBNTC, general trade creditors, and the WAMU senior bondholders. This distribution represented approximately 95% of the receivership’s remaining total current assets. The allowed senior unsecured creditors shared equally (on a pro rata basis) in this distribution. The remaining funds in the receivership are expected to be sufficient to cover future expected and potential losses and expenses.

https://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/wamu-settlement.html

RE : Escrow Markers ... Unfortunately, I don’t see any major windfall here to escrow markers from the Interim Dividend Distribution. :(

The only possible distribution to the escrow markers is the reserve 1.5 M WMIH shares.

Using sidedraughts calculator with WMIH @ 1.25 about $1 in value for every 5P’s or 200K’s or 2500 U’s (escrow markers)

Any excess $ in the trust will go to the LTI.

As stated above, the Escrow CUSIPS were established solely to facilitate potential distributions, if any, of shares of
WMIHC common stock. The only source of common stock available for any such a distribution would be from the
1.5 million of shares remaining on deposit in the Disputed Equity Escrow. Specifically, the Escrow CUSIPS do not, in and
of themselves, represent an entitlement to any possible future cash distributions from the Trust, WMIHC or the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (either in its corporate capacity or as the receiver for Washington Mutual Bank), as the
case may be.
In accordance with the Plan, the Trust will issue Liquidating Trust Interests to WMI’s former shareholders if, and only if,
the Trust is able to monetize Liquidating Trust Assets in amounts sufficient to pay-in-full claims held by beneficiaries of
the Trust who are senior to members of Classes 19 and 22, and then, only if a shareholder had satisfied timely all
conditions applicable to receiving any such Liquidating Trust Interests. There can be no assurances that the Trust will be
able to monetize assets in a manner sufficient to give effect to the foregoing

http://www.kccllc.net/documents/8817600/8817600170531000000000001.pdf

There is NO notable excess in WMI Liquidating Trust for Classes 19 and 22, read the 10K.
http://www.wmitrust.com/wmitrust/document/list/3612
http://www.wmitrust.com/wmitrust/document/list/2897

IMO, Classes 19 and 22 have no recovery coming via the LTI.


- - - - - - -

On to WMIH and the Interim Dividend Distribution ...

What about WMMRC ? It was not mentioned in the Informational Notice letter from DB on Feb 14th 2018 - Interim Dividend Distribution

WMIH is the direct parent of WM Mortgage Reinsurance Company, Inc., a Hawaii corporation (“WMMRC”)

This post talks about 6 trust assets in 2009 worth 460 million as part of the WMMRC.

Does anyone know the names or ID's of the 6 trust assets ?

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=48335682

The spreadsheet was from sidedraugh.
It has a lot of formulas and info like the release ratios etc in the calculation.

It looks for input of settlement, in this case dividend number.

I entered 666,328,957 and it returned

1 P = 70.48
1 K = 1.76
1 U = .14

Again, not my spreadsheet. Thanks sidedraugh where ever you are.

1 P ($1000 face ) = 40 K ($25 face)

Here is the calculator.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=9&ved=0ahUKEwjPxu2E66fZAhWNLFAKHTJXD6kQFghoMAg&url=http%3A%2F%2Fsidedraught.com%2Fstocks%2FWashingtonMutual%2FWhat%2520if%2520Spreadsheet%2FWMI%2520Equity%2520Escrow%2520Share%2520Calculator.xlsx&usg=AOvVaw1cALRORJXmpLuVFh5S1pBK

Thank you Linda.

Is any party moving forward for rescission of the tenders/releases coerced under duress and obtained by the misrepresentation of the DIMEQ being part of the Washington Mutual bankruptcy ?

Could this be incorporated into a second version of an objection as a dual pronged attack with stronger language as to the actions of JPM ?

While there appears to be a hint of animosity from a couple posters to the ones who released, would fighting the releases be more clear cut and involve heavier accusations ?

Thank you Linda, If you or anyone else knows of a group that is organizing to do this, please send me a message or post any information.

Thanks Philipmax.

Respectfully, not to incite any division of the released or non-released. Everyone has suffered enough.

Is any party moving forward for rescission of the tenders/releases coerced under duress and obtained by the misrepresentation of the DIMEQ being part of the Washington Mutual bankruptcy ?

Because I opted in I released JPM and FDIC. The only two targets for the anchor litigation.

If class 21, the DIMEQ.ESC is the LTW holder.
Is there a separate distribution for LTW ?

Or after the LTI balance is paid is that totally it for the DIMEQ.ESC that OPTed IN ?

How do the class 19 WAMKQ.ESC fit in here ?

thx

Because I opted in I released JPM and FDIC. The only two targets for the anchor litigation.

If class 21, the DIMEQ.ESC is the LTW holder.
Is there a separate distribution for LTW ?

Or after the LTI balance is paid is that totally it for the DIMEQ.ESC that OPTed IN ?

How do the class 19 WAMKQ.ESC fit in here ?

thx

In this litigation speculation scenario on the ownership of the Anchor Litigation Award, would this only apply to DIMEQ that did not release and not to those that did opt in and release ?

Who again are the LTW holders ?

Linda1, thanks for all your work in bringing an old wamu'er up to speed.

Ran out of posts for today :(

The DIMEQ and WAMKQ were converted to new WMIH shares.
Had to sell those WMIH for life reasons.
It left WAMKQ escrow and DIMEQ escrow in the account.
Broker just removed the DIMEQ.ESQ over a year ago with the reason - delisted.

1. Have all the DIMEQ.ESQ that OPTed IN been paid ? Or just the ones under $500 ? What would that $500 mark be in relation the number of DIMEQ.ESQ held ?

Because the WAMKQ.ESQ is showing 0 value the broker is trying close the account.
Contacting the broker now these items.

2. You would not need to keep the WMIH to retain your escrow markers. Would you ?

3. Is the $3 number (that Linda1 was referring to) for the DIMEQ.ESC that OPTed IN or OPTed OUT ?

Thanks for your time in helping me catch up. :)

Broker removed the DIMEQ a year and a half ago [color=red][/color]and is telling me now they will liquidate the WAMKQ escrow because I don't have the min balance ?

From the wmitrust.com faq :
Interests in the WMI Liquidating Trust are not transferable or assignable except by will, intestate succession or operation of law.

LTIs are recorded in the name of the corresponding Liquidating Trust Beneficiary via an electronic book-entry system (the “Book Entry System”) managed by the Liquidating Trustee.

Are these Tracking Escrows in WMI liquidating trust held as a security or just in a record with the liquidating trustee.Do I need to maintain a brokerage account ?

What's the outlook for the WAMKQ or the DIMEQ that opted in ? I read Linda1 was putting a value on the opt outs ? Is that outside of the liquidating trust ?

Sorry for all the Q's but I've been away from this for a while. I appreciate your help.

Question on DIMEQ and WAMKQ holders who opted in. Do they have any interest in wmitrust or the LTI ?
Thx.