Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
ILT - wish that we’re true. But, unless we get an en banc, the lazy judges we drew will carry on indifferent to their own injustice
Agree. Thero is so slow that patents/exclusivity almost don’t matter:)
Good to hear from you Irish!
Are you sure you don't mean Document 333? Doc 333 is Hikma's proposed finding of fact
BB - are the Appendices you and others have referred to (regarding the Kura table) available on PACER? If so, what is/are the document number(s)?
Interesting read about NWBO that may apply to AMRN
https://insiderfinancial.com/nwbo-stock-has-enormous-potential/180421/
Sorry if being slow but page 523 of what document. Can you give me the doc number on Pacer?
BB - I have the Kura paper. The only thing cropped in Doc373 are the notes under the original table. The %change at week 48 says 6.9% for EPA group with. P value of 0.001.
So what, of significance, was cropped?
I’m not seeing the cropped issue. Kura Table 3 is on Page 73 of Doc 373 (Defendants Post Trial Brief). It is not cropped as far as I can tell
HK - the Kura paper is on my Google Drive
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1TVMOk2AEN67gVca3eYOCLFRpr0HJD-Tl
The paper has the full Table 3. We need the table the scumbags gave Du
Count me in
Thx Meowza. Got the file
Meowza - What is the Document number of the Appendix?
Marjac - do you know if anyone has the original Kura paper. I was trying to find it this morning but could not get the full article.
Marjac - what about also addressing the fact that none, zero of the prior art references provided by the scumbags were relevant to the patents as they were not studies on subjects with TG > 500.
How can those studies meet the threshold of “clear and convincing” evidence? If allowed to stand, the standard should be changed to “sorta, kinda, maybe”
Go for it
You would do excellent job! Will the lazy asses read it?
Mark - are you going to write the amicus?
He is absolutely awful
CBB - how about we pool our money and do it?
HK - think you nailed it
This is gonna be dead money for a loooong time. Thero mentioned this morning that they are still "rolling things out" (my words). Jeez, two years since results. Glaciers move faster. Heck, the patent loss may not have been that big of a deal as Thero would probably still be 'rolling things out" when they would have expired.
Listening now to a CEO of another holding (AGRX). So much better than Thero. Enthusiastic, confident, good speaker. Complete opposite of Thero.
Well, he's done. The pps is holding! This may be a first!
Did you catch the first "Robust"?
Louie - it looks like we can ask questions?
Anyone else gonna listen in this morning?
If Thero had half the intellect of certain posters on this board (I ain't one) we might stand a chance.
Or, we will know nothing more. Other than Thero babbled on, said nothing, and the stock price went down.
This is a great idea, assuming the lazy pukes would bother to read. Need a heavy hitter to write the amicus.
Me thinks you are a RINO
Let us pray for that to happen
Thx ILT
300k+ shares. Much of the volume near 4. Either some news or market just preparing for dipshit to speak
ILT - I’ve looked at NWBO. One thing that bothers me is the share count (750M or so). Would seem to limit pps growth or lead to a RS
Thx Capt! You sent this to IR? Any response? Would be a welcome change for Thero to say something useful at a conference
If there is a man on this earth dumb enough to GIA it’s Thero
Email Thero