Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Our newest short seller..... obviousness
Judge Du's initial ruling and now her new ruling on motion's 24/60 combined with CAFU'S Appellate ruling AND invoking rule 36 truly under scores something else is in play..... what or who has the power to initiate this manipulation ????
Everyone is so focused on the choice of Nevada and Judge Du's left wing bias. She just proved how corrupt our legal system has become. WHO controls her is the real question and why did the Appellate Court follow. Everyone can try to blame Kennedy for going to NEVADA, but that does not explain the Appellate court acting how they did ( a disgrace putting it mildly).
Is Amarin's drug to good ???? Why haven't the other Pharmaceutical Companies not supported Amarin in their legal cases, when the courts have disregarded Presidential Law ( Graham Factors ).
QUESTIONS to be answered.....
not mine
bidmark
They are working twice as hard because insurer's are making them fill out multiple forms to help physicians... they are also visiting pharmacies to stop Generic switch/ substitution, etc. Being down to just over 500 reps
keeps office visits down. Amarin is keeping costs in check....
Amarin's sales rep's are now in the low 500's and losing a few every week....SALES PRETTY STEADY considering.... waiting for lawsuits to point the future direction.... Patience
rafunrafun,
generic scripts (4/9/21) 7739 to (4/16/21) 9077 +diff of 1338 or %17.3
oneragman
I will not totally disagree with your statements, but I am quoting from Amarin's financial reports ( 10k).... they reserve an amount by ratio, so many items are considered in Trade Allowances..... I was just trying to simplify the original statement by LRICH
Lrich
2020 Amarin 10k :
Accounts Receivable NET $203,875M
Trade Allowance 36,342
Chargeback 12,114
Allowance For Doubtful Accounts 945
Trade Allowances.... this allowance is based on "possible" accounts at risk or uncollectable.... Amarin states what accounts are being worked on to collect monies owed to Amarin. Amarin works on a 30 day payment with vendors and this amount is unpaid balances after the 30 days.
oneragman
HDG sold most of his shares in the $7/8 dollar range ... IS that your target range ???
Amarin's IR group signs off:
Sincerely,
Investor Relations
Amarin Corporation plc
north40000
I have emailed him 8-10 times over the years cocerning his negativity towards AMARIN with overwhelming information..... he just keeps to his own agenda....manipulating for some entity.
Jim Cramer.... said Amarin is a "SPEC" and a bad company... knowing that under $5 means a company is a SPEC..... THINK he had an agenda...
Jim Cramer is part owner of "The Street".... He is a market manipulator
helping institutions wring your shares out to increase their purchases at a cheep price.....he has always been negative towards Amarin at specific timing.
HDGabor...
Thank you for lettings us know EU acceptance..... what label did they give Vaskepa ....
HDGabor....
Do you know what label has been authorized with approval....
marjac,
please send me your email address... carldoverton@gmail.com
marjac
I communicated with Elisabeth and Amarin on APRIL 19,2020 that they were only taking a legal approach in their filings and it should have been AND should be in the future based on scientific data... we know which direction they proceeded... thank you for your efforts, truly remarkable.
marjac,
An excellent submission of facts and scientific filings upon which was used in this court filing... You deserve all the credit in bringing scientific
data to base your court filing which AMARIN'S legal groups
failed so egregiously to do. This should put our Court System on full view is so many ways.
sleven,
Still waiting for your response to my inquiry concerning your email response from Nissen.... it should be 1st amendment, public response.
Are you withholding printing it word for word because itreally says nothing of value?
Number sleven,
Utilizing a link that RAF sent you, which was his email address does not put any liability on you, since his email address is public. His response to you also remains public ( 1st amendment ), unless he specifically stated to keep personal an confidential and not to be publicly printed. You can print his exact statement word for word also 1st amendment. This would allow EPADI, etc. to respond. His response allows for anyone to respond with factual information to contradict anything he says.
He is fair game, and posters like WHAL, etc. hurt AMARIN by not letting us respond to his fraudulent claims.
Sleven,
Did his response to your email state personal & confidential, not to be forwarded... and liability for doing so...
His responding allows you to discuss his response...
PS
I have UHC, Blue Essential in the state of NEW YORK
Whal
I know a few individuals who took statins and did not like their effects, but had their physician prescribe Vascepa anyway, me included...over time it will become easier and insurers will accept SCRIPTS.
sts66
You may be right about those that seaked off label to get VASCEPA..... BUT
that percentage is small and the REDUCE-IT parameters to get a physician to prescribe Vascepa is not hard.... We know that the generics were looking to take the vast percentage of Vascepa scrips for those with CVD indications... your outlandish reasoning fails in so many ways...
abe1234
just can't help yourself !!!!
jasbg
thank you for your post on manipulation.....
see posts by : skipperdog11,abe1234,djjaeger82..... ring any bells
note
Elisabeth left Amarin to take a job that she was in before and wanted to return too... Separation from AMARIN was backed by JT....
Marjac
The court gave Healthnet up to March 18 to file brief... Wouldn't Amarin want a few days to review said brief and respond to the court if Healthnet makes any fraudulent claims... then on March 31 both parties work on court dates, submittals ,etc.
Keep in mind ( Judge Du ruling on obviousness -- stated that USPTO did not look at Mori/Kurabashi studies and results ) ... she had an agenda
Amarin posters/shareholders
I have always followed GOLDEN RULE ' occum's razor ' the simplest explanation
Amarin received two positive results today, that's two in one day
1. EMU approval with better label than in the USA
2. Hikma filed on Jan.4,2021 to have Amarin's case dismissed... didn't happen ( motion dismissed today )and we proceed to pre trial dispositions and motions.
WHAT'S not to like... some posters still trying to find negatives.... read the last 50 postings....
Patience is a virtue....
amarin board
The JPMORGAN conference was very limiting to what we already know... the young lady from JPM should consider herself to be embarrased from her attitude as a whole.. she sounded like who cares, I don't want to be here... She shouldn't have been handling this conference call...
DAR53
Amarin had 4 suppliers of API IN 2013... they discontinued with BASF because BASF want a large contract and committment from Amarin for future purchases.... Amarin simply ended purchases from BASF...
The Generics are receiving API from CATALENT .... at the appropriate level, but most likely the breakdown is when the API is sent to their encapsulators ... Amarin has a patented process which the Generics do not have... Generics put fillers into their capsules to keep the costs down...
Marjac
Knowing that AMARIN and HIKMA (DEFENDENTS) filed their post trial briefings
on the same date (last day on January, 2020 it makes you wonder if Amarin's legal counsel picked up the cropping of the table and thought it was so minor that Judge Du would not be thinking of invalidating their patents in the first place....because the trial itself did not lend to that conclusion....Then you would be absolutely right (correct) in stating that AMARIN's legal counsel failed completely ... this would lead to wondering if Kennedy failed also not to dissect the defendants post trial briefs and rely on their legal counsel.... FINAL QUESTION ???? did someone in AMARIN's legal group pick up on it and talk to Judge Du to no avail....
marjac
Was the cropped table filed in findings of fact (interrogatories) sent to Amarin before depositions and during depositions of potential witnesses. And if so, was the cropped table available to the judge in preliminary briefings sent by either party, before the case started in January, 2020.
Bio
If CAFC focus stays strictly to reviewing secondary considerations equal to primary obviousness AND DISQUALIFING weighing secondary considerations against each other then needing a brief from HIKMA would not be necessary.....
tucaman
please continue posting scripts.... we'll be able to see how the market is reacting while we wait for EU approval....
Please and I say this accordingly...
Prior to the OA beginning today, which were delayed by the Judges asking many questions of the prior case in vibrant fashion.... this board was ramped up to hear SINGER give a bold opening statement....
Go back and listen quietly to the oral argument and see that Singer did emphasize the clear errors of the Prima facia ruling and did cover the SC's being weighed against each other... we wanted bold and forceful,but he controlled his responses and seemed to be looking for the panel to ask more direct questions
Meowza
Taking an opposite viewpoint... Maybe JT was soliciting finding out just where the Genetics are in coming out into the market.... and finding out whether he needs to check his supplier base accordingly...
johnking/ggwpq
Have you read the pretrial,trial records ??? your opinion is based on post trial briefs... the trial itself was abbreviated by Judge Du's schedule... Amarin's attorney dealt with MORI/KURABASHI, HADASHI during the trial... Mori's population and patients under , <500 tri's and Kurabashi APOB reduction as Unexpected Benefits was discussed ETC. Sipes and Covington spent more time fighting Infringement during the trial, since almost everyone believed Amarin's Patents were solid. Who new the Judge would CRAFT patent invalidity to meet her desired goal...
Both sides filed their post trial briefs without each other knowing what would be submitted.... Judge Du wrote her final ruling coming up with defendants submitted trial views( including cropped table ) as well as some of her own enhanced opinions... like KARABASHI not being cited / discussed by USPTO ,OR HADASHI showing expected LDL lowering in #400, 500, 600, when Amarins's expert trial witness talked about lowering TRI's not LDL during trial, OR weighing SC against each other , ETC.
Please keep in mind, we should be concerned with PRE-TRIAL briefs submitted to the Appellant Court by both parties,as well as the judges selected for the Oral Arguments on Sept,2...
marjac
Lawyers are just lawyers... give me written proof ....absolute concrete affidavits and then we can proceed accordingly.... sometimes you just have conversations with individuals, the right individuals and something is stated or quoted or answered by the right question.... lawyers don't always elicit the information sought, they aren't all knowing... I sent Singer an email back in May ,2020 and posed handling the appeal using scientific knowledge and not just legal discourse that simply puts two lawyers opposing each other, looking to see who can come out on top.... I stand by what I PRESENTED....