InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 19
Posts 628
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/17/2013

Re: ggwpq post# 292327

Sunday, 08/23/2020 11:49:54 AM

Sunday, August 23, 2020 11:49:54 AM

Post# of 425907
johnking/ggwpq


Have you read the pretrial,trial records ??? your opinion is based on post trial briefs... the trial itself was abbreviated by Judge Du's schedule... Amarin's attorney dealt with MORI/KURABASHI, HADASHI during the trial... Mori's population and patients under , <500 tri's and Kurabashi APOB reduction as Unexpected Benefits was discussed ETC. Sipes and Covington spent more time fighting Infringement during the trial, since almost everyone believed Amarin's Patents were solid. Who new the Judge would CRAFT patent invalidity to meet her desired goal...

Both sides filed their post trial briefs without each other knowing what would be submitted.... Judge Du wrote her final ruling coming up with defendants submitted trial views( including cropped table ) as well as some of her own enhanced opinions... like KARABASHI not being cited / discussed by USPTO ,OR HADASHI showing expected LDL lowering in #400, 500, 600, when Amarins's expert trial witness talked about lowering TRI's not LDL during trial, OR weighing SC against each other , ETC.

Please keep in mind, we should be concerned with PRE-TRIAL briefs submitted to the Appellant Court by both parties,as well as the judges selected for the Oral Arguments on Sept,2...
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News