Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Humbly report, FG, re your, "Perhaps you should brush up on the Laws concerning Freedom of Expression...."
"Congress shall make no law..."
( http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html )
"About iHub" -- http://www.investorshub.com/advertise/about.asp
Humbly don't see anything in the above "About iHub" -- a private enterprise with absolute power over member conduct on its premises, whose owners/admins choose (or not) to allow us to be here -- indicating it is the US Congress, so yes, perhaps someone should indeed brush up on the Laws concerning Freedom of Expression.
Humbly suggest that someone is FG, first and foremost.
Cheers,
Svejk
Humble thanks for restoring my message, to whomever did that:
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=90333
Back to just watching, until the CoB system's functionality matches market reality, or unless I humbly cannot help but point out blatant BS.
Cheers,
Svejk
P.S. Info I received today regarding who the real money is behind IH, from somene I have no reason to doubt, does not inspire me with confidence. (No, I am NOT speaking about Matt Brown)
HuBob, you may want to take a serious look behind the scenes. My last word on the subject.
Humbly report, FG, I read it, and could not possibly care less about what you wish. As long as I am within the ToU, I'll post wherever I want, to whomever I want -- period.
Now, get that post restored!
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=90333
Oh, and since I am on "ignore" by you, what the heck are you doing posting to me?!? Hmmm? Stikes me as supremely typical of you -- say one thing, do another -- in my humble opinion.
Cheers,
Svejk
Humbly report, FG, SOMEONE removed my post here today, and since I do not have access to the info that would tell me WHO removed it, I incorrectly assumed you did, since you ARE the CoB here!
My apology, now get it restored!!!
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=90333
As to my "copyright violations" I answered you, in great detail, and told you that's the last of my comments on the matter:
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=90167
Case closed!
Cheers,
Svejk
Humbly understand, FG, why you deleted the post to which I am replying -- contained a personal attack by you, right?
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=90309
So, why is my post stating precisely that removed?!? Hmmmm?
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=90333
Cheers,
Svejk
Humbly understand, FG, why you deleted the post to which I am replying -- contained a personal attack by you, right?
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=90309
So, why is my post stating just that removed?!? Hmmmm?
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=90333
Cheers,
Svejk
Humble OK, HuBob, I remain extremely skeptical, but will hold my breath a while longer, to see if your dreams can indeed come true.
Meanwhile, an SoB CoB removed a post of mine:
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=89625
Didn't notice until today, and then ONLY because I went back to that thread -- once again, I maintain, only Admin should be able to remove, CoB's should be only able to mark post for removal.
Cheers,
Svejk
Humble question, FG, can you please explain your logic?
You said, "Ken, your opinion is wrong because... you're a disgruntled employeee with a grudge, IMO.."
Assuming you are correct, and Ken is indeed a "disgruntled employee with a grudge," how does that lead you to the conclusion that his opinion is wrong. Only because of that?
If I say FG's opinion on the peanut market is wrong because FG hates peanuts, would you not say that I'm nuts?
Sure you would!
And BTW, your statement, "you're a disgruntled employeee with a grudge" stikes me as a personal attack, based on vapor, and your "IMO" does not change my impression!
Cheers,
Svejk
Humble thanks, HuBob, for your detailed answer -- very much appreciated.
I do have one question. You said that you "disagree about CoB's only being able to mark a post for deletion." I think that in the rest of your post you sorta kinda may have answered why, but I'm slow and didn't get it, so I ask -- why do you disagree on this one point?
Humble thanks in advance!
Cheers,
Svejk
Humbly just went back, QT, and realized it was you who suggested it in the first place:
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=79902
Thanks!!!
Cheers,
Svejk
Humble question, Joemoney, you've been posting your "professional" investing advice articles all over this place, yet you don't know how to find out if a ticker changed?!?
Wow. That's investing 101, dood!!!
Here ya go, found out on a site that seems to be extremely obscure to you, given your question -- Yahoo! -- bookmark it!
http://quote.yahoo.com/q?s=teli&d=v1
Oh, and guess what? OTCBB's are routinely shorted. Thought I'd tell you one more time, since you haven't absorbed that FACT the last two times I humbly told you.
Cheers,
Svejk
Humbly report, Bob, time for me to humbly speak up about the CoB concept and my major problem with it.
Picture this situation. The market is hot, and moving fast. The CoB of a thread of a given stock is a pump and dump scammer, an evil, evil man that is very smart, very clever and extremely manipulative. Yes, we do have folks like that here, have run into them, in person. So have you. One such person that is a CoB of a number of threads here is precisely that kind of a slimeball -- you know exactly who I am speaking about, as an example!
Anyway, for example's sake, an extremely important and very relevant post is made on a thread of a fast moving stock in a fast moving market. A post that can mean do or die for people in that stock, reading that thread. The despicable CoB deletes the post, which is, hypothetically speaking, as I said, of earth shaking importance. He/she deletes it instantly. Never mind the excuse for deleting the post -- irrelevant for this hypothetical example. So, the market is moving on. You are at lunch. Or racing, or taking a dump, whatever. By the time you get around to restoring the post -- too late. Tons of money made and lost. Ringy dingy, your phone, lawsuit.
I hope you understand where I am going with this, and hope you will REALLY hear what I have to say now, have already said it once, in agreement with someone else who suggested it on this thread first (forgot who):
The CoB should ONLY have the ability to MARK posts for possible removal by YOU, the admin, PERIOD. Additionally, when a post is removed, the poster MUST be notified of the removal -- at the time of removal, along with receiving the contents of the removed post, so they can SEE what has been removed, and why.
Why do this? As things stand, a post can be removed, and the poster whose post has been removed has no idea it has happened. Not good. Not at all good, especially in the hypothetical situation I outlined above, and double that especially, given the fact that before you came here, removing post willy nilly was the rule, so the evil manipulators have practice. And people must know their post was removed, and must have a chance to repost in a timely fashion, which is why when a post is removed the contents must be sent to the poster in question, so they can quickly edit out whatever may indeed be against the rules, and post again.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Svejk
Humbly stunned, FG, you, of all people, could not POSSIBLY be serious about that! I mean really. Day after day you re-post entire contents of stuff that is, under the rules you so haughtily posted to me, clearly in violation, yet you give me grief for posting LINKS to images here, with the copyright on the images NOT removed, indicating to whom they belong? Does that not strike you as even a little bit hypocritical?!?
Oh, just dawned on me, GENI not doing too well, so you're trying to displace the conflict, right? Fergitit, my last post on this ToU copyright bit. Not gonna get into a fist fight over it with you, not even going to say didly about it from here on, regardless of the additional whatever you will undoubtedly post about it.
Cheers,
Svejk
Humbly report, FG, can't humbly believe your reply is still on about the short position, after what I posted to you.
Whatever, it's your money, not mine.
Oh and regarding my glass being half this and yours half that...
( http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=89137 )
Hey, I just posted those links about the economy for All to consider for a balanced picture, so please, don't tell me what my glass contains, or how much, and I could not possibly care less about yours, no matter how much you think your (ehm) glass is bigger and fuller than anyone else's!
My humble opinion remains -- regardless of how big your glass, as far as I'm humbly concerned, it's full of you know what.
Cheers,
Svejk
Humbly report, FG, this GENI stuff sure is getting interesting...
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=15732064
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=15732160
Cheers,
Svejk
Humble welcome to IH, Kevin!
No, I will not ax about FBTV, though I'm cracking up just remembering it!
Cheers,
Svejk
Humble hmmm, HuBob, you laughed? Was it funny?
Humbly trying to learn...
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/board.asp?board_id=594
Cheers,
Svejk
Humbly report, All, three articles I find interesting.
"Buffett Warns Company Shareholders"
http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A16277-2001Apr28.html
"Stocks View: Slowdown or Ugly Recession?"
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010428/bs/markets_stocks_dc_2211.html
"Hypothetically, Pro Forma May Be a Mirage"
http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A17929-2001Apr28.html
Cheers,
Svejk
And humbly adding one more interesting site, FG, "Today's Computerized Scan":
http://home.nyc.rr.com/ramkorolland/Commentary/scan.htm
Questions? Here is the author:
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/profile.gsp?id=1343381
Cheers,
Svejk
Humbly report, FG, here is another interesting one -- Nightly Business Report Transcript. Updated daily. Saves a lot of time -- I read the transcript in a couple of minutes instead of sitting in front of the tube for half an hour:
http://www.nbr.com/trnscrpt.htm#STORY0
Cheers,
Svejk
Humbly report, CH, one more post to clarify, then I'm out of this thread, as I said earlier. Felt the need to come back and explain my reasons for asking HuBob to remove my post.
When I made the now hidden post, the thread had the same name it has now. After the name was changed (by Matt I gather, an unwise move, in my humble opinion) to "SIers on IH" or some such, my post no longer made any sense here, since it no longer related to the original title, "Is iHub A Scam?" so I asked for it to be removed. You turned me down, so I asked Bob to do it. I did not know then that the original thread name would be restored (a very wise move, in my humble opinion).
That should explain my humble thought process.
I'm out of this thread, see you elsewhere.
Cheers,
Svejk
Contrary Investor Market Observations, May 2001:
http://www.contraryinvestor.com/mo.htm
Humbly beats me, FG, but, as you know, "calling yer certs" has not accomplished what you suggest in the past (there is a pattern -- a number of companies that did "call in certs" with zero positive effect).
As you know, the market is not perfect, and there are many legal/illegal ways to get around just about any attempt to systematically influence the trading of stocks, and "calling in yer certs" is, in my humble opinion, just one of those many futile ways to attempt just that.
Read the info you provided, nothing new there. And your "beliefs" are irrelevant, as are mine.
Figure we can drop this, for now, and watch what happens. If "calling in yer certs" works in this case, I'll be the first to say I was wrong. Let's give it a while, though, I'm NOT talking days here, OK?
Cheers,
Svejk
Humbly report, HuBob, re your, "Still trying to figure out "second level software". Anyone know what on earth that is???"
( http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=87671 )
Fergitaboutit, way outdated:
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=6990746
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=7085505
Cheers,
Svejk
Humbly report, FG, no matter what the short interest, my point has been, all along, that one, "call in yer certs" will change nothing, and two, you know that.
Cheers,
Svejk
Humble "observation," L/V, the whole "thing" strikes me as supremely silly -- on ALL sides, and has for months -- which, I hope, is the point of my two posts on the subject.
First off, paid trading sites rub me the wrong way; second, if one is a Grew, then one should just stick to grewing in their own back yard, period; and third, the armies of pro/con pebbles yapping all over the place about it all are, well, boring.
And while we're on the subject of silly and boring (or should I say clownish, given the local), one more "thing" that fits into that department, in my humble opinion -- HuBob slamming for having come here. Been watching the dood in action since he got here and, well, as I've said elsewhere, he's doing a heck of a job of turning a tanker on a dime, if you know what I mean.
Just my humble opinion, of course.
End of post (duh) as I've read someplace.
Cheers,
Svejk
Humbly begging pardon, jenna, have we met? Humbly don't think so. Good.
Cheers*,
Svejk
*Good bye.
Observation: seems people are always complaining all OVER THE PLACE. Sigh.. One proponent of one COMMERCIAL site and corresponding thread has a beef with another COMMERCIAL site both of which for reasons that are known to everyone are said to have lost credibility because of a certain thread hosts supposedly being incarcerated for FRAUD, others accused of such, bla bla bla. These same threads.. have spawned way too many clones which are gung ho to attack on all kinds of grounds such as legitimate business practices, better results, whatever. Also seems that these same folks themselves have 0 tolerance for the truth, but can dish out innuendo and nonsense. Coming to a thread and posting nonsense and running to complain is not the conduct of a mature mind.
Grow up, this market has spewn many failures. If you are one of them, just try harder maybe you will do better next time. Try to learn that if you have a service that will attract and hold subscribers, a service that has results and has wonderful satisfaction and customer re-sign rate then it will run without constant pushing and pumping and beating of chests all over the place. Also it would help if you spent some time to research stocks a bit and are prepared to put in all the work it takes to be successful. But I guess its easier this way. Only I can't see what anyone gets out of it? Have a good life folks, and know we also know nobody is very impressed.
Humbly report, Joemoney, the market could not possibly care less about people's beliefs. That is why I posted information that explains the reality.
Wishing you well with your beliefs, and as far as I'm concerned the subject is exhausted and closed.
Cheers,
Svejk
Humbly just forwarded your post to ENFORCEMENT@sec.gov , schoffer.
Cheers,
Svejk
Humbly report, FG, back on the GENI track for a moment, given our discussion on this thread really did start with you transplanting here the continuation of our GENI "call certs" talk on the SEVU thread, starting here:
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=85611
Have a peek at: "The Anatomy of a Pump & Dump"
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=15725706
Cheers,
Svejk
Re: GENI - "The Anatomy of a Pump & Dump"
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=15725706