Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
LOL, crowin, it's the Shuman confidence game v2.0, wonder if some of the old team is operating with her, new aliases of course, LOL.
Cheryl Shuman DD:
Some of the comment sections on these web pages are pure gold for Cheryl Shuman DD, lots of links to other info on her.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=84348280
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=84348280 (gets really good around page 74)
http://www.tokesignals.com/cannabis-patient-brave-mykaylas-dad-says-just-avoid-cheryl-shuman/
http://tinyurl.com/ktkwo27
http://www.tokesignals.com/moms-for-marijuanas-lindsey-rinehart-i-will-no-longer-be-silent-about-cheryl-shuman/
http://www.celebstoner.com/news/celebstoner-news/2013/11/26/cheryl-shuman-attacks-parents-4-pot/
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=272317
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/Profile.aspx?user=272317&page=14
https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Cheryl_Shuman
Cheryl Shuman is now pumping OSLH all over Twitter and Facebook, and relentlessly too.
LOL, "It implicitly infringes on the defendant's right to a speedy trial."
No, in fact, it doesn't at all. The "speedy trial" clock stopped ticking when the Defense filed their evidentiary motion, and it won't start again until that matter is concluded, which BTW includes any resulting appeals on the motion's final ruling. I provided the relevant section of US Code for anyone who cares to educate themselves on the actual written law relevant to "Speedy Trials".
"It's not an Act. It's the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution."
I was referring to the "Speedy Trial Act of 1974" which is the existing US Code the courts use, and which defines the 6th.
"The delay "for a ruling" has been too long." again, the clock stops running for Defendant motions:
18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(1)(d)
BTW, my sister is sitting here with me right now, she's an Attorney and has been trying cases in Federal courts for over 40 years, Northern Georgia and 11th Circuit.
"The defendants' right to a speedy trial has been infringed upon."
ROTFLOL!!! The defendant is awaiting a ruling on their own pretrial motion, which was only heard a couple of months ago. Defense Pre-Trial motions, in fact, pretty much all delays caused by actions of the Defendant, are automatically excluded from the time limits of the "Speedy Trial" Act.
It's only an evidentiary ruling in a District Court, it's not going to change anything of any great consequence--except maybe for the defendant.
Filing Late???, ROTFLOL!!! Considering that RFMK doesn't sell anything other than it's stock, and the fact that it operates entirely off of Allinder's kitchen table and out of a PO box, it's quarterly ledger can't be more than a page or two at the most, maybe the Chinese New Year held it up?
Yeah, I thought I recognized that name.
LOL, "wait until the Pocket Puffer 2.0 rolls out, that's where the big money will be."
Pocket Puffer is really referring to how this goofy product has been used as a prop to pump the stock whenever the operator of RFMK, and connected insiders, are cashing out some of the paper, get it? Pocket Puffer, dumping shares into the market to puff up Tom's pocket.
Cheryl Shuman
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=84348280
https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Cheryl_Shuman
http://www.tokesignals.com/cannabis-patient-brave-mykaylas-dad-says-just-avoid-cheryl-shuman/
http://www.tokesignals.com/moms-for-marijuanas-lindsey-rinehart-i-will-no-longer-be-silent-about-cheryl-shuman/
http://www.celebstoner.com/news/celebstoner-news/2013/11/26/cheryl-shuman-attacks-parents-4-pot/
http://tinyurl.com/ktkwo27
Some of the comment sections on these links are pure gold for Cheryl Shuman DD, lots of links to info on her.
"This is a screenshot of the patent", actually, it is a Trademark, same Government office, but completely different mechanisms and protections, a very very basic description would be that Patents protect technology and trademarks protect identity.
"How long does it take to fix a little blue light?" LOL, I wonder if the upcoming Chinese New Year might be playing a roll in the delay, ROTFLOL!!!!!!!!
"they were not denied for the NAME so therefore they can continue to use the NAME without infringing on TM's"
LOL, sure, they can continue to use the name, but if they use it commercially in any way, they run the risk of getting sued by the current owner of the registered trademark, and the remedies available from registration can prove to be quite expensive and treacherous to the violator.
32saorise32, declared categories for Trademarks are mostly just for the application and prosecution phase of the registration process, once a Trademark is awarded registration, its pretty easy to amend the categories, and in fact, once the registered mark is actually used across another category, it is Federally protected even if it wasn't specifically registered for that category, in addition, a registered mark is not only protected in category, it is also so in any area of commerce where it's use might cause confusion as to the product, mark, or owner of the mark, or dilution of the marks value(for instance, using the mark for something illegal under Federal law).
TRTC is just plain dumb to try and use it, the registered owner has clear superior rights to the mark under both common law, due to it's first use in commerce, and Federal Registration, true TRTC can try and challenge for their use, but Trademark cases are in Federal court, and they can get expensive really fast, not to mention perilous on the loser end from sanctions, awards, and other nasty remedies.
Actually, the category really doesn't matter as much as you think once the other party's brand is awarded registration by the USPTO and they are actively using it in commerce--that carries a lot of weight in the ultimate prosecution of the mark, all they have to do is challenge TRTC's registration on the basis that the TRTC is trying to use the mark in the same general public sector as the registered trademark is already used, and that it's use creates a confusion, that's all it requires for denial.
"Under a different sub category of items! It has ZERO impact on us."
Actually, that would be wrong, the Trademark was already registered to another party, and being that they have already been actively using the Trademark in commerce for a couple of years, a newcomer trying to claim it could have a good deal of trouble using it, let alone being awarded registration of it, depending on the current registrant's defense of their mark, defending Trademarks is pretty expensive since it's in Federal court, but trying to claim or use a mark already registered can be far more costly, for a startup, trying do so would be just dumb, an extremely poor business decision, and a huge waste of capital.
LOL, Call Joe Lanza??? the long time ex-con stock promoter, the guy has never made a penny for shareholders of any biz he was involved with, his specialty has always been to get control of an entity, suck all of the capital and assets out of it, and then distribute it across a large web of other biz entities and trusts set up to benefit his family.
And you do understand how easy it is for money affiliated with the company to become unaffiliated with the company and this a third party, right?
I also here that the expert at removing DTC chills is working tirelessly at getting RFMK off of it's chill status, could be any day now, LOL, the directors and management of RFMK are very lucky to get him to join the team, and speaking of that team, it has to be quite a sight to see them all gathered for a meeting at Allinder's kitchen table, him at the head of the table, and a mirror, AKA "the rest of the team" facing him from across the table, ROTFLOL, geezz I miss the Shu, she really did add pizzazz to this cartoon of a company.
"changed from Schedule I drug to Schedule III drug. See Judge Mueller case in California."
ROTFLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This case is not going to change the Schedule of Marijuana!, it is just an Evidentiary Hearing on a Pre Trial Motion, not an actual trial on the Classification, so any ruling the judge makes will only apply to this particular motion in this particular Case, that is not to say that the ruling can't be referenced for precedent in future cases, but the Judge's ruling itself will not reclassify the scheduling of marijuana.
Besides, RFMK only sells stock, the guy operating this entity is a professional penny stock promoter, nothing more, history is very clear on Allinder, his every attempt at marketing an actual product over the years has resulted in dismal failure at every step.
ROTFLOL "RFMK Money Mike Predicts a DOLLAR"
Even more funny 2 years later...
"Proprietary Vaporizer ", just what this sector needs, another Cannacig/Pocket Puffer, LOL.
Corruption? In Nevada? Really???? Who could have guessed????? LOL
LOL, No, this case is in a US District court, not an Appellate court(FYI, The Ninth Circuit is the Court of Appeals for this district), and it is just an Evidentiary Hearing on a Pre Trial Motion, not an actual trial on the Classification, so any ruling the judge makes will only apply to this particular motion in this particular Case, that is not to say that the ruling can't be referenced for precedent in future cases, but the Judge's ruling itself will not reclassify the scheduling of marijuana.
DrewSmith75, having personally been answering party in two SLAPP suits myself, and my Sis practicing Business Litigation for close to 40 years, I think I can read between the lines of MJNA's suit pretty well, after the motions and such, I'll be surprised if there is even 1 defendant left to negotiate a settlement with, any decent lawyer is going to tear MJNA's guy up, and he's going to be facing a team of them in all of the defendants he named.....
ROTFLOL, this Koenhke guy sure is connected to some real shady characters, and go figure, he's also a broker himself, LOL, I read through the complaint and it's pretty much what you would expect, throw a bunch of excrement against the wall and hope something sticks, LOL, I think the biggest problem this case will have starting off will be getting venue on each of the individual Defendants, considering they appear to all be out of state, especially so for the foreign business entities.
There are a couple of things that did jump off the page at me though, one which I asked my Sis about, and she pretty much affirmed my thought, that being by MJNA claiming there was damage done to their stock price, they pretty much painted with a very broad brush that, for the most part, opens all of the Corporation's records, communications, social network entities, and business actions, as well as those of it's officers, and yes, even stakeholders, to wide discovery, as my Sis put it, She'd have a field day with this putz. As a plaintiff, you don't make claims which open you up to scrutiny, which force you on defense, he's one attorney and he's going to be facing a wall of them from the other side should he be able to land venue and survive the inevitable motions to quash, dismiss, and etc.
The other item is the company claiming the Defendants libeled MJNA with malice for financial gain, just proving the malice claim is going to be quite the feat, but also with financial gain?????????
Well the answer fillings should be in over the next few week, so those should provide interesting reading, wouldn't be a bit surprised though is some merely respond that they don't submit to the State venue.
"the 100million lawsuit mjna has filed for defamation."
Ah yes, the 100million lawsuit PR, can't really call it a real lawsuit when, to date and by all accounts, none of the named parties have even been served.
LOL, a Cheryl Shuman promo, still have to laugh that MJNA hired her.
Actually, RFMKs AS is completely maxed out when you account for the convertibles.
Cash $2.674M, Total Assets $8.874M, Debt. $6.497, Lost $4.555M In 2014Q2, Borrowed $1.804M In 2014Q2
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/TRTC/financials
"TRTC has $6 million dollars in cash"
ROTFLOL, TRTC is flashing a big bankroll only due to all of the debt financing they tapped, lots of warrants and other convertible debt chicanery showing in the fins.
Actually, if one really reads through MJNAs SLAPP suit, their claims have a lot of holes, and further, some of MJNAs claims actually open themselves up to some deep discovery.
In my experience, stock specific "closed" chat groups, such as the TRTC Facebook group posted here, are usually ultimately created/used for group think related manipulation.
"MJNA is accepting resume's", LOL, They couldn't afford me, besides, I'm long time and very comfortably retired.
Well apparently the MJNA IR person only takes exception to those in the investing public who inquire on things the operators would prefer to not discuss, or shine lights on things the operators prefer to keep out of public sight, I'm sure he really likes to talk to those who devour his script with nary a question.
Det_Robert_Thorne, "this goes to the corporate mindset at MJNA "
I agree, after all, this is also the operation which hired Cheryl Shuman also, it would appear that they've had a few misses in regards to selecting good employees.
That response was about as pathetic and amateur as I've ever seen from a Company's Public Representative in my 46 years of playing with equities, even for the people just trading the stock, his response pretty much says to the average investor that the Company does not take them seriously.
WOW, That's got to be about the most irresponsible and unprofessional IR communication I've ever seen, the guy sounds like a complete jerk!, hope you don't mind that I share that with a couple of my journalist friends, who knows, one in particular would/could definitely have a field day with that guy and his client.
Thanks for sharing it.