Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Do you have a link to the source of that quote?
Thanx
Mines can be kept on books WITHOUT a reasonable expectation.
Expectation of winning a claim has nothing to do with whether assets are listed on financial statements or not.
IMO
Best to all.
In further research, it has been shown that other companies contesting Cinco Minas have their operations suspended.
The issues with Cinco Minas have been sufficiently noted in the corresponding section for SRGE. To apply additional references to other companies borders on off topic. If you want to promote another company please use another board.
IMO
Best to all.
If you have a problem with the ibox, please talk to an admin.
I have tried to be fair and accomodating to all sides involved.
Since no one has cared about updating SRGE information before this week, I don't know why there should be complaints now, particularly since nothing from before has been deleted.
IMO
Best to all
Thanx for the reminder> Will post in ibox.
Where do you think a running shortlist should be placed?
Any suggestions on improving the ibox?
Third parties verify SRGE claims (SINEM and other mining websites).
SRGE doesn't need to substantiate itself since that is done already by government websites and mining interest websites.
IMO
Best to all.
SINEM has verified that SRGE information is correct.
Again unverifiable information provided. Claiming phone calls and emails doesn't count as proof or serious DD on SRGE.
IMO
Best to all.
The Mexican Mining Projects government website verifies SRGE claims.
The proof from Bandera's website is a conflict of interest. It would be as if I said I'll show you I own SRGE, let me go to my personal safe, and I'll scan the proof to you.
Yah you wouldn't trust my proof as far as I could throw a house.
And
The government website is:
A third party and trustable.
IMO
Best to all.
Can you provide the title numbers for SRGE?
I'll look them up from the mexican government website and post them in the Ibox.
IMO
Best to all.
Reminder on posting: Strict moderating on this board
This board is being strictly moderated according to the TOS.
Please refrain from mentioning the involvement of users from other companies or including names of other stocks (which includes using place fillers like -*-) that have no substantial link to SRGE.
You can contest your post being removed with the IHUB admins since its the moderators who remove posts.
Best to all.
Do you know why when I access Southridge by link from IHub it logs me out of IHUB?
This occurs with IE and Dolphin on an Android phone.
Update the ibox with the proof.
Stand alone statements without proof make for sloppy DD.
If there is no proof, then the statements just become permanent postings, and counter arguments begin to run underneath whatever is posted in the ibox.
IMO
Best to all.
No proof provided for the BDL liens.
Either by link to BDL claiming it, or by material document posted.
I'm all for having complete information. But having evidence differentiates between rumor/lies/opinion and substantive information on SRGE.
IMO
Best to all.
Another baseless allegation without proof.
A link or something with Southridge Enterprise (SRGE) name listed in a document is proof.
Making claims out of thin air is just that "air".
IMO
Best to all.
No proof given for disputed property claims that concern SRGE.
When that's provided, I will gladly add it to the ibox.
IMO
Best to all.
That's ONLY one interpretation.
It seems more likely that the code is not on the website, but in the server itself. Someone could have hacked into the server and planted the malicious code, and no one would know about it since it wouldn't cause any disruptions in service for SRGE.
IMO
Best to all.
Website is out of date.
Actually, Lone Ranger is accurate about the website being out of date. There have been a few PRs since April and they have not been posted by SRGE.
As to why that is, is anyone's guess and interpretation. If you have connections with management, let them know about the website, and also the linking issue. That is still occurring, and the ibox will not contain links directly to Southridge until the linking works properly.
IMO
Best to all.
Check the Ibox (being revamped), not quite there yet.
Actually, SRGE is only surface mining for the time being. There hasn't been any real digging yet to tap into the full value of the property.
When they do start digging, you can expect the $1 Billion pie in the sky to come down to earth.
IMO
Best to all.
5/17 PR Southridge Announces Assay Results on Trench #7 for Los Compadres Gold and Silver Mine
DALLAS, TX--(Marketwire - May 17, 2012) - Southridge Enterprises Inc. (PINKSHEETS: SRGE) ("Southridge" or the "Company") is pleased to announce the initial assay results from Trench #7 at Los Compadres (LC). The Company has been actively conducting a trenching and sampling program at their Los Compadres property at Santa Maria del Oro, in Nayarit, Mexico.
Samples assayed from Trench #7 at Los Compadres measured an average grade of 4.42 g/t Au at surface and were highlighted by grades measuring 16.23 g/t Au and 224.4 g/t Ag.
Santa Maria del Oro, located in the state of Nayarit, on the western coast of Mexico, is a well-known historical producing region for gold and silver. LC is situated inside the Sierra Madre Occidental belt, the world's largest epithermal gold belt.
"Trench #7 has produced some exceptional sample grades for Los Compadres, and has defined several geological structures on the property. With the assays we have from our current trenching and sampling program, and the detailed information we collected at the property over the past several months, Southridge has confirmed that Los Compadres is an exciting gold and silver property that warrants further exploration and development," says Michael Davies, President & CEO of Southridge. "The assay results from Los Compadres, and the recent acquisition of El Horconcito, are significant recent developments as Southridge moves forward implementing their strategy to increase the company's footprint along the Sierra Madre Occidental gold belt."
Additionally, Mathers Research has initiated research coverage of Southridge, with a "Speculative BUY" Opinion and a near term price target of $0.20 cents per share.
The Mathers Research report is available as a free download on the Mathers Research Website @ http://mathersresearch.com/srge-report.
For further information on the Company's Gold and Silver projects, visit our website: http://www.southridgeminerals.com.
Southridge Investors can access the following Southridge Minerals social media channels:
YouTube Cinco Minas Mexico Project:
(
Charts only show trading patterns of investors and how a stock trades in regard to volume.
I agree that SRGE could react exponentially to good news or promo run.
How do you come to a prediction of a substantive event occuring from the charts?
Imo
Best to all
I was wrong about the website links.
There is a bug with hyperlinking from IHUB to SRGE website.
Has anyone contacted the company about this, and what type of response did you get?
Going to the website by use of copy and pasting the link works fine though.
/www.southridgeminerals.com/
IMO
Best to all
SRGE is CURRENT according to otcmarkets.com
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SRGE/financials
A hoax wouldn't go through the trouble or waste money on this process.
IMO
Best to all
game NOT over!! :)
Only way that can be claimed is if:
1. Bankruptcy
2. SEC freeze
3. Company decides to liquidate and relinquish its charter.
4. Company decides to trade specifically as a private entity.
None of these are possibilities right now as communicated by the company.
It seems it is the exact opposite for the BFLX:
1. No debt problems with creditors.
2. In good standing with the SEC.
3. Company seeking assets and resources.
4. Company comunicating to the public who have free trading shares.
IMO
Best to all
$10 million in funding!!
The reasonable person would not consider that a sporadic detail. If it was I certainly wish my life was more "sporadic." Take a look at the videos provided for its product. How much easier can it get to putting out a small kitchen fire or car fire (which I've seen more of)!
Anyone can see why a financing company would risk $10 million to make even more back from BFLX and its business plans, implementation, and success.
IMO
Best to all.
What type of financing would you recommend for a company at this stage of its development?
BFLX
Who are you talking about?
There was no mention of Home Depot providing materials to BFLX
Please stick to the topic about BFLX
Best to all
Should be March 30
I know exactly which one you are talking about. I have that one as most promising stock by the end of summer. I can't put a time frame on BFLX, but hopefully it will be more of a surprise than planned.
IMO
Best to all.
NR? Nuclear Release??
Awesome!!!
IMO
Best to all
A stock doesn't trade in a healthy way under a promotional catalyst. That initial promotion was good for creating market awareness. Now BFLX needs to move by its own two legs through company development and PRed updates.
IMO
Best to All
Set it and FORGET IT!!
I'm throwing in the towel a different way. I'm setting a price over $1.00, and I'll wait for an alert when the stock trades over it.
IMO
Best to All
No kidding. . . Boy is this turning tricky to flip.
I was going to make an attempt tomorrow, but the news has suspended that plan.
IMO
Best to Allen
OTCMarkets is prone to outdated info.
If you notice the share structure in the 10K from 2010 to 2011, it shrunk from 130mill to 93mill. It is quite possible for it to be at 30mill now.
IMO
Best to all.
Actually, I read balance sheets.
There are a couple companies I'm looking at for long term potential. Flipping them is unpredictable, but likelkhood of revenue development is strong. Revenues always allow a company to move into improved market environments. I'm unsure about BFLX since I'm here more for momo than anything else.
IMO
Best to all.
If the pps is low do to shorting for the most part, what happens to shorts if this is chilled for 30 days minimum without notice?
From what I gather about the conference call a store serves 2 purposes. It serves as a storage room for the online orders, and it serves as a storefront for a brick and mortar establishment.
It sounds like online sales are maxing out current storage capacity, and additional storage is needed in order to prepare for increased sales.
Some may not agree with the vision of a physical presence and an online presence for the company. I think it is working out well. As enticing as the online growth is, I think the physical store is just as important with establishing brand recognition, perception, and overall marketing. The majority of people like going into a physical store. Even if it doesn't result in an immediate sale, people will go home and check out online for additional styles and order there. Without doing an expensive survey, I think the physical presence has contributed to the online success more than people have thought thus far for BRAV.
IMO
Best to all
Lucky for you, BRAV, and me, I'm not a lawyer.. . .lmao.
IMO
Best to all
For a more complicated situation like that, it would need to be decided by a court.
But with what I wrote about concerning negative statements of fact that are proven to be untrue, the courts will most likely deem them to be defamatory. Even if they were meant for a "positive" outcome, the statements on face value can be argued as causing more harm than good. If 10 years from now someone comes across the negative post, how is he/she suppose to know the context they were given in? He/she will take them at face value as a negative aspect about the company.
IMO
Best to all.
LMAO. . . that would be nice.
I think any remedy would be only a few thousand dollars in damages with an additional amount for attorney fees and court costs.
IMO
Best to all
Positive speculation does not harm a company. The only time that would be a legal issue is if the company is making the claim beyond what the safe harbour statement allows, or its part of a clear P&D scheme the SEC can pursue. The courts aren't interested if someone benefited from someone else's actions, only if there was harm done to a person or to the public good. A rise in share price is seen as causing no harm.
On the other hand, negative statements of fact that are untrue about another company or person causes harm. This harm is a legal injury subject to legal remedies through the courts. One would not want other people making statements that their wife/gf/mom was a prostitute if she wasn't or making unsubstantiated statements about his/her character. A company has the same right to defend itself against the same type of injurious acts. I assume that the statments BRAV is interested in were clearly statements of fact and not opinion.
Fortunately, BRAV has a written record to bring as evidence to the courts. I suspect that if the case was weak they wouldn't be mentioning it. Additionally, this course of action can be seen as a type of temporary revenue stream. Since this is a civil matter this will require the defendant to pay money to the plaintiff in the event of a judgement for the plaintiff.
IMO
Best to all