Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yes, and just spitballing here…
It is possible they want to keep to a minimum… pre-holders…who are no longer involved to get wind of it. Water down the area so sparks don’t ignite.
For the one who is cast from a dark cloud overhead;
My own thoughts are more a narrator of a concerted effort.
… a head scratcher non the less...
Keeping as many pre-holders at bay…if that’s possible… is all I can think of at this point …Dimon mouthing off about the 30B surprise didn’t help much on that front…escrows can’t be sold, and anyone buying into the negativity of escrows are just going to hold tighter to WMIH.
If it is truly caring, time would be better served helping to dig water wells in a populated drought stricken area.
Thanks investor123
Enjoy yours as well.
If it is all JPM's... 50B/1.9b = 2632% return if I did that right....not too shabby.
Looking forward to a surprise for our side.
It's hard to rule anything out when 7 years later Jamie seems to find something he didn't know he had.
It seems odd...or intentional...the examiner missed that 30B asset. I believe there was also 20B at FSB. A lot of moola for 1.9B
Makes me wonder what WMI may have under the covers.
This will now give Rosen an opening to act surprised on what they found at the old headquarters.
It has happened many times; 1M today….150000 tomorrow….. 75000 the next day etc. If it was mostly buys, why didn’t it go up. If it was mostly sells, why didn’t it go down more. Are the MM’s just moving it back and forth between themselves to paint a picture?
I do not know.
What is interesting to me is when I think about the SH meeting two years ago and someone said they have looked at several companies. Well……..what is with that? Were they really looking or just trying to appease the shareholders? If they were serious about that, I would think we would have seen it by now. Every year that goes by is one year closer to NOL expiration.
It makes me think Wamulicious, LG, AZ, Tanja, and Board are on to something.
I have been thinking of adding more shares to my account as I have periodically.
I am hesitant to do so thinking about the AZ theory. It has been awhile, but “I THINK” I recall a WAG as part of the 3.5B shares might come back to escrow holders as WMIH shares…dilution; ok for my escrows, but limiting upward growth for any new purchase in WMIH.
If my recollect is right, I must say I like the AZ theory.
If my recollect is wrong someone please correct me……for now, I think I’ll wait and see what happens.
I was a slow learner thinking it was just coincidence the first few times. It comes down to the stop loss price or slightly lower and then back up. I said WTF a few too many times.
Long long ago I vowed to never place a stop loss again 7%, 10%, whatever. Had them come down and take me out too many times; and then back up she goes. You are correct.
I learned to just check for any news that would justify a decline and trade accordingly.
On the contrary
Ditto on Drrugby Biz. The first one I read if available. thanks for your info Dr.
The hedgies are already living a posh lifestyle, and I believe if it was up to them they would like to send us a message to deter this from happening again….
Message……..
If you want to hire an equity committee and intervene on the way we do business, you will wait 20 years to see any results.
Travelmile, nice post. I think fair and reasonable would equate to the shareholders who bought wamu before even a thought of a downturn took place; those who really believed in Wamu. To me that excludes those seeing the price plummet and seeing $3, $2, $1 etc. and trying to bottom feed.
For those people (the believers) I would say, yea.. distribute the LTI proceeds to them. I wouldn’t have much of a conscience if I thought otherwise. Those are the ones who were really bent over. Just let the value of my WMIH shares grow (hurry please).
If some comes my way however, I will think of my children and their families (not having an easy go of it) and the living trust the proceeds will go in.
EDIT; I am not a pre holder.
Not sure if this has been posted or how reputable it might be.
http://victoryoverchase.blogspot.com/2014/10/is-washington-mutual-bank-fa-straw-man.html
I not trying to lock horns Catz, just trying to figure out what was meant by review of the loan portfolio. I have always appreciated what you write (strictly what is documented by the court system)without trying to cram it down someone.
So yes it was WMI and not WMB in BK. However, just a friendly question; would the examiner be reviewing the portfloio of WMB if it was not in Bankruptcy and if so why? The bank was gone so their only concern should be WMI. That is why I was asking (in my own way) if he was reviewing a loan portfolio of WMI's.
Thanks BBAN, and yes, so we wait. eom
Are you saying he could not conduct a review of WMI's loan portfolio as opposed to the banks.
Well.. we'll know when it's over..in the meantime keep searching for that link; you never know you might convince me. If you do (convince me that is) you can say, "well thats 1").
Thanks LG eom
AZ, 3.5B authorized. So hypothetically if all 3.5 are allotted back to escrow holders as WMIH shares, will the $2.30 share price range hold up?
That would be roughly be an 8B plus company. I am guessing that some type of material public information would have to be presented in order for the share price to not take a hit.
If we have Billions in Mtg. value, how can they come out and say that without others crying foul.
Conspiracy? Could Wamu have been in this from the beginning? Fishman and Killinger arguing against the takedown as a sideshow (misdirection). Wipe the shareholders out and split the proceeds with all involved. I mean…Why file for BK when you have 32-8. Why not file a lawsuit for unjust seizure and battle the FDIC to get the bank back.
Powers that be needed tarp funds (the stealing of taxpayer dollars). Wamu was the final nail in the coffin they needed for that one. Wamu missed out on the no short list. Too bad. Things were sad shape, but the reverse Robin Hood effect of stealing from the poor and giving to the rich?
GS selling sub par CDO’s and then buying credit default swaps on them knowing they would fail…. AIG going down because of it…..Goldman raking in billions on the credit defaults…Oh….Paulson in charge at the time…..gotta take care of GS.
They had to know they were eventually going in front of congress for this. Another sideshow? Possibly. Congress had to show they were looking out for the little people…. But no one goes to jail? Strange.
They had to let the hedge funds in on it otherwise it wouldn’t look like a normal BK.
Wow that was a weird dream last night…. I think it stemmed from AZ’s post of the melding of WMIH and WMILT.
…. how did we ever survive as shareholders against all that power? Susman and Judge Mary? Maybe.
Sorry folks….still not awake yet…..diehard swing shifter…need more coffee….
Tanman, I appreciate the effort that you, AZ, Boarddork, LG and others have put into this. Now let me ask you this; Banks borrow from the Feds and then use that to loan to consumers for mortgages, vehicle loans, student loans etc. so the 240B in mortgages sounds great, but it seems a large portion of that has to go back to the Fed as repayment.
Wamu would just be gaining the difference in the interest rate between the fed and the consumer. Plus the original loan fees. Correct or not?
Thats a good theory. I have always thought something was coming from GS, in some indirect way. Susman and team are too "top notch" to go after GS without being 100% positive they had incriminating evidence. Thanks for all your efforts.
Bob,knowing RD's past posts, I'm sure he meant to say "soar" instead of sour.
Do the SEC, and the regulators, and the rating agencies etc. go by their written documentation on how to proceed with business at hand? And what about major media stations; Think you are getting the whole truth there? You have to lift the corner of the rug to see certain things.
BK, did Greywolf buy in before or after exit from bankruptcy. If they bought in on March 27, I think that was after, but can’t remember. Hedge funds would probably know a reorganized company would come out of BK at a certain price then come down and hang for awhile like WMIH did. Were they waiting for it to come down to buy as many as possible?
If they had bought in before exit, I would see it as though they thought getting escrows would be the better buy.
Seems like a few billion here in this BK would be like a rain drop in a pond. I wonder if WMI had off-ledger books.
Nice post Blue. It is my opinion most companies incorporate in Delaware because it favors these tactics (withholding value) to wipe out shareholders when BK becomes essential; thereby leaving enough funds for reorganization. I am in the Cowboy camp and believe a parent company is not going to put all of its assets in subs that can be taken.
"Market Maker Speaks Out: "Ways of a Market Maker"
Not sure where I got this, probably from someone posting here.
"Market Maker Speaks Out: "Ways of a Market Maker"
submitted 9 months ago by [deleted]
I was an OTC MM for about 10 years ending in the late 80's. Since then I have been strictly an investor. Since I have not been that up to date in MM rules I will only make statements that I feel fairly confident are still accurate regarding these activities. By and large most MM don't have a clue nor do they care to learn, about the fundamentals of the stocks they trade.
They just try to make orderly markets. When dealing with BB stocks it is very easy for a MM to get trapped into being short in dealing in a fast moving market. Reason being; most of the MM's in this stock are what are called "wholesalers" this means they don't have retail brokers "working" the stocks.
So they have to rely on what's known as the "call" from larger retail houses. If a "Big" retail firm like an E-trade calls up a market maker to purchase say 5,000 shares of a stock, they expect to get an "execution" from that market maker. If he turns them down, or only gives a partial then the "Big" firm will go to another MM.
If this second MM "fills the order" then that "Big" firm has a moral obligation to continue to give future "business" in that stock to that MM who performed (his life blood). This will go on until he "fails" to perform and so on.
Contrary to popular opinion the "Big" firms Do NOT neccessarily go to the "Low Offer" to fill a buy order (Or high bid for a sell). They "Go" to who they think will perform to fill the order and expect that MM to "match" the "low offer" in the case of a buy (bid in the case of a sell). Even though this MM might in fact be the "high bid" and not really want to sell any more.
As a wholesaler he must perform or he will get a reputation as a "non-performer" with the "Big" houses and will cease getting "calls" which means he will soon go out of business. I mentioned above that this activity is very significant to BB stocks. I say this because most of the trades in these BB stocks are "unsolicited" and are done through discount houses.
With the above groundwork laid, let me try to explain how market makers get short even if they like the Company; Lets say that a stock (shell) has been lying quietly at $.25 bid $.50 offered. A limit order comes into one of the MM's to Buy at $.50 for a thousand shares. Prior to this trade that MM may be "flat" (neither long or short any shares). He fills the order and is now short 1,000 shares. He may raise his bid hoping to find a seller to "flatten" out his position. But before he realizes it a wave of buyers have come in and cleared out all the $.50 offers. Now the stock is $.50 bid .75 offered. Here comes that "Big" firm he just sold the 1,000 shares to at .50 with another bid for 1000 at .75. He makes this print. Now he is short 2,000 at an average of .625. The market keeps moving and now its .75 bid 1.00 offered. Now he has to make a decision.
Just like investors, MM Hate to take a loss. So 9 times out of 10 he will now sell 2000 at 1.00 making him short 4000 but with an average .81. At this time he would love to see a seller at .75 so he can cover his short and make a few bucks.
But instead the market keeps moving up. Now it is 1.00 to 1.25 and here comes the buyer again at 1.25. He doesn't want to lose the call so now he needs to sell 4,000 at 1.25 to keep his break even point above the bid. Now he is short 8,000. Market moves up to 1.25 bid 1.50 offer here comes the buyer now he feels he must sell 8000 here because "stocks don't go up forever".
Now he is short 16,000. And so on and so on. If the stock keeps moving up, before he realizes it he could be short 50k or 100k shares (depending how big his bank is). _________________________
Finally the market closes for the day and on paper he may look all right in that his "break even" price may be around the closing price. But now he has to figure out how to entice sellers so he can cover this short. It is important to note that if this happened to one MM it has probably happened to most all of them.
Some ways MM's entice sellers; Run the stock up with a "tight spread" in a fast market, then "open" up the spread to slow down the buying interest. After it has "cooled off" for a little while lower the offer below the last trade right after a small piece trades on the offer then tighten the spread so that the sellers feel they can take a "quick profit" by "hitting the bid" on the tight spread.
Once the selling starts the MM's will walk it down quickly by only making small prints on the way down with the tight spread. Another way is by running the stock up in the morning, averaging up their short then use the above technique to walk it down in the afternoon.
Hopefully after doing this for several days, it will demoralize the buyers. The volume will dry up and the sellers will materialize thinking that the game is over.
Contrary to popular opinion, MM usually Do Not Cover in Fast moving markets either Up or Down if they are short. They Short More. They usually try to cover after the frenzy is out of the market. There are many other techniques they use but the above are the most popular.
This technique works about 9 times out of 10 particularly in a BB market. However that is because 9 out of 10 BB stocks are BS. Remember what I said above. Most MM's don't have a clue as to the value of a Company until they get trapped. If the Company has solid fundementals and a bright future. Then the stock will do very well. And the activity that caused the situation will prove to even help the future stock activity because it created an audience."
Market Maker's Operating Procedure
The savvy long-term investors never chase stocks up. For the most part that is momentum players and daytraders where most of it or what follows is dumb money. Instead the long-term investors use a couple of simple strategies in order to position themselves. One is to find a stock no one immediately sees has huge potential and accumulate. Long-term investors are not interested in trading against the public mind or the dumb money. That's where the majority of the money can be made but even more can be made if the base of a stock is held extremely strong by investors. However the second is not to doubt the research which is the underlying basis for going long and holding.
More and more investors are winning the game nowadays despite all bashers that float through the Internet that has become part of the game. Floor traders of market makers often watch CNBC, news wires and bulletin boards in order to follow the market during trading session. OTC BB market makers (MMs) don't use fundamental and technical analysis. However, what they do realize is a lot of dumb money does use this newest nitch charting or TA (Technical Analysis) to run a stock either up or down. To the MMs this is like taking candy from a baby. Simply they will paint the tape and use whatever tactic to affect the charting bands. Thus the public and dumb money they will have eating out of their hands. Effectively the MMs can show a strong stock growing weak by manipulating the close price in order to generate selling volume, delaying trading time to manipulate trading activities, or even stalling the ask without honoring orders to hold a stock price.
MMs follow a simple code of business when making a market in a stock especially an OTC BB. That is the level that stocks will seek that yields the most volume. Now this is very important because they make money on the volume buying at the bid and selling at the ask. In other words, by making the market they are buying low and selling high. Now smart money adheres to that rule, so do all the market makers. They could careless whether the stock is at $83 or at $0.23. All they care about is the action thus being able to sell stock at the offer (The high) and buy stock at the bid (The low). To increase their profitability, they make the spread as great as possible on as many shares as they can especially if the volume falls off.
When they have mostly all "buy" orders, that's not the price that's going to yield the most volume. They need both buy and sells to get the maximum action. Remember, MMs play the volume. If the volume decreases and there are mostly Buys that become a one way volume, Buy volume. So what they do is let the stock run up to a price where it runs out of steam. They fill all the buy orders there that they can and then comes the pullback one way or another naturally or induced. During the pull back they can buy tons of shares and flip them to those averaging down or trying to catch the bounce. At some price, the stock will be relatively stable and yield the most volume. Now that is the average price you will see
The average price is the point where a stock seeks a level where MMs can profit on the most volume. So during the day that is the price that MMs and momentum/day traders want to see the stock at. Why? Because they know the public and dumb money was chasing the price thing up. Most of the time, the MMs love a flurry of Market Orders which is a dead sign of an artificial run or momentum. Merely it is money in the bank for them. Most get hung in a momentum or day trade or by the tactics of Market makers, who are in the business to screw the public every chance they get and the NASD is not going to do anything about it. They are merely making the market liquid is there reasoning.
The market makers have created an added complication to the OTCBB's chaos of the already volatile intra-day price movements created by dumb money, momentum and day-traders. MMs can not relate to long-term holders in the OTC BB. That makes absolutely no sense what so ever. They feel a large percentage of trades in the OTC BB market consist of short-term or day-trades, MMs merely view the barrage of buy and sell orders as relatively neutral to the market. How they figure it is when the average dumb money buys shares in a company, the MMs feel or rather know with some certainty it is very likely that dumb money will want to sell back those shares relatively quick on the slightest drop.
Now somewhat comfortable with this logic the MMs merely short sells into the buying and attempts to take the stock down in an effort to "shake out" the weak. Since it is tough to know for sure whether a move is the beginning of a trend, or a routine shake out, this type of deception works quite well for the MMs. What the long-termers do to a stock is surprise the MMs because instead of falling the shorting has no effect and the price goes up. Now that puts the MM at selling low through shorting and thus having to buy high in order to cover.
Boy, when this happens, the MMs are not very happy campers. The investors and traders are supposed to be doing that no them. Now it becomes time to pull out every trick and tactic in the book in order to attempt to get a Bear Raid at every dollar mark or percent from where the stock started. Could be a penny in smaller priced securities? What MMs do is give you a chance to make a small amount of money for your momentum and day trading style by shorting it at these levels and trying to get a bear raid each time. Each failure is compounding the MMs short position so they let it go to the next level. Now come more deliberate tactics MMs use to coerce Bear Raid or panic selling.
Once the MM is caught short and the strength of the buy is overpowering the MM will want to cover his short position. So the MMs call up one of his friendly MMs and says some like "the weather is sure rough today." The MM along with the other "friendly MM initiates a down tick about the same time. Now this can also be done with a certain amount of shares such as an infamous 100 shares flag. This down tick gives the illusion of weakness designed to hopefully begin the bear raid of selling. The fickle, fearful, day trader, momentum and short term begin to sell out allowing the MM to cover his short position at lower prices. They will move it down quickly to get it to a price of least financial damage. Problem they have is long-term investors in the OTC BB. They start accumulating and buying comes flying in when they take it too far thus the MMs took it to the point of volume again and not only investors the other MMs step in the make money on the spread.
Alas the poor MM does not get to cover. Now comes various tactics like stalling, boxing, or even locking the Bid and Ask for a while.
Of course, MMs aggressively deny any sort of collusion designed to fix quotes or spreads, but a recent SEC investigation tells another story.
MMs have a vast resource of tactics and it would take probably more than my lifetime to figure them all out.
So how do investors somehow manage to overcome the obvious deception in OTCBB arena? One answer is indirection trading style by going long which the MMs do not expect. In the war between investors and public companies on the OTC BB vs the MMs, if the MMs have all the advantages due to position or other factors, direct confrontation such as momentum or day trading hitting the stock is a definite death sentence.
However, an indirect approach tends to weaken the path of least resistance before slowly overcoming it. The most effective way is long-term investors slowly accumulating and holding thus drawing the MMs out of its defenses making them as naked as their short position. This is war so this slow accumulation and holding for the long term easily achieves the desired effect to force MMs to cover and knock off the tactics or bury themselves deeper.
The MMs when caught will especially use every trick and tactic in the book to get a Bear Raid thus playing on the individual fear of most people. The MMs feel they have information and position advantages over the investors as long as the holding of the stock is in weak hands or short term holders. Since they are OTC BB MMs who believe all OTCBB companies are not worth investing and management is ineffective regardless what is happening within the company.Furthermore, MMs know they are in the position to impose a great deal of influence in OTC BB stocks trading when it suits their needs.
This inherent power of position enables the MMs to move the markets at any time up or down. As a result, the only way to draw them out of their favorable position is going long. Now this does not mean just any company but to effectively nail the MMs, Longs must find the great company on the floor and accumulate long before the MM tactics and games begin.
"Market Maker Speaks Out: "Ways of a Market Maker" Author: Unknown
Hey LG,
I know you like this one as much as I do.
Ms. Lonstein from Blackhorse