Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Oh, and Sluice, stop trolling me. ;)
LOL no, I've never been employed by SFMI, or any of PQ's other enterprises; I've never met any of the personnel involved in any of it; I'm just a schlub on the internet.
Pretty sure you DID name a date, but doesn't really matter.
As for the stock -- it's not a matter of being soft -- I never EVER buy stock in a company that doesn't at the very least have audited financial statements. Not a matter of "softness", it's a matter of transparency.
Oh Sluice, it's your big day. Last chance to post on this board, as you promised to scoot if the audited financials weren't released by April 30.
Thank you, and have a nice day.
Oh, and don't take that last post of mine to in any way make any implications whatsoever about the Company. My assertions have been that we needed to see audited financial statements, and have related parties disclosed. Nothing more. I haven't said anything bad about management, unlike Riditman; I have said that I don't like the lease arrangement as it doesn't seem to be in the interests of the public stockholders, but that's about it.
Here's hoping it all works out for everyone. Ciao
GoldSilverMines, could you post an email addy? I want to ask you something but I can't subscribe to PMs atm. Thanks.
But I'm curious, why would you ask?
I think ho-hum would be a massive upgrade to this stock.
You don't say
Yeah if you can't tell me, tell him. I promise not to look.
Now, how did I know you'd post that? ROFL.
There was an alleged auditor listed a couple of years ago, but, amazingly enough, he didn't come up at all in google, or on any state boards of accountancy that I tried him on -- one would think that he would be in New York, or Idaho, or perhaps Georgia. No dice. No reports, either, so no surprise.
You talked to "the auditor"? What's his name and number? I wanna talk to him, too.
Wow this board's deader than Kurt Cobain...
Exactly.
Financial statements would keep me busier...
No, like I've said before -- I don't want anyone to lose anything -- that's why I bring up the things I do. If the FS show sufficient strength, I may even buy some of the stock -- but that's kind of the point -- I would hate to buy a company without knowing the very basic things -- like whether or not they have the cash to operate for the next year; whether the auditors think they are a going concern; what related parties are there and what is their relationship to the company, etc.
You've been posting that every few days for months now, Ourigan. Kinda reminds me of McDermotts post about the "big run to .40" beginning TODAY, that he posted on February 9th. Today hasn't seemed to quite arrive yet, but there's always tomorrow -- or 10 days from now.
But good job on spelling.
That's a fair bet.
If audited financials are publicly available (ie I get to read them by downloading or whatnot) by the close of business April 30, 2009, I will leave the SFMI portion of investors hub, and as an added bonus, I'll throw in the SFMI Yahoo board as well.
On the other hand -- if they don't produce them by then, there's no need for you to go away; it will be terribly painful to remain, anyhow. ;)
BTW, I highly doubt that this company will EVER release audited financial statements. And if they do, I highly doubt it will result in a jump in the stock price, unless I'm very much mistaken. Which I very well might be, who knows.
Who would go to the trouble to "naked short" a penny stock? That's nuts.
I don't have a "boss", I also don't have a vendetta or frankly, give a crap about the company -- other than I don't like how it smells, and I'm curious to see how this all comes out in the end.
Believe it, or not. I've never bought a BB stock in my life, although I owned one that became a pink (LIPD) much to my chagrin.
First off, how does one short a penny stock?
Second, you don't need bashers -- just time. ;)
TI has a deal with Nokia to come out with a projector phone at least 6-12 months before MVIS can make it to market, at least according to what I read.
I've seen the MVIS projector running off USB; it's very very impressive and they have the size and power down quite a bit, and better than TI -- but they were having the dickens of a time getting the green lasers they need from Corning, etc. Haven't looked at it too close in a few months what with all the other things to worry about.
Not to mention that this is the SFMI board so never mind lol
Oh, you don't want mine, they uniformly are sucking, although I'm hopeful.
Here they are anyhow: I'm long CX, MVIS, SONS, CYTK at the moment outside of mutual funds and ETFs. I'm not very happy with management at MVIS at all; they are looking to get taken out by TI's new devices which is no fun at all.
But, since I'm not a trader, we'll see. My costs on all of them are good, though, so long term I think we'll see some decent returns. SONS and CYTK look like rollers so I may actually trade those a little.
Love the new PR. It's far more creative, without saying anything of note, than other, previous press releases -- PLUS they are claiming once again to be working on their financial statements.
Can't wait to see the related party disclosures footnotes; that should be a hoot.
And an obvious takeover target for ADM...
Not so sure coffee would grow so well in Idasnow; could be wrong. Taters, on the other hand, grow really well, and perhaps we could kill two birds with one stone as all that gold flake is bound to stick to the taters... then they could put them through the mill, add a flash freezer to the end for the resulting hash browns and Bob's yer uncle.
You know you may be onto something there. I wonder if Pierre will start another company -- this one will try to extract good coffee from leftover grounds -- I bet he could make it happen. Brilliant!
That post smells like Riditman, only with LOTS of coffee...
Isn't the press release a little late this time?
Well I know my posts haven't been very popular with the longs around here but they are still here -- I appreciate that. You CAN'T be "investing" in an environment that doesn't encourage transparency -- that's one of my biggest problems with penny stocks and SFMI in particular -- but it's not an issue here; everyone seems free to spout off all they want, in a civil manner, and I like it.
Well, and as I've said, I don't own any shares -- I certainly hope that all this stuff has been truthful and they will be putting out thousands of ounces and you guys all make a fortune.
Except for that Ourigan fellow over at Yahoo, that is. ;)
Of course I'm not all right with it at all; without public reporting, there's no way to really know anything about the company, unless you're an insider -- and I don't see anyone claiming that status here...
I think the belligerance (sic) over there is due to what is thrown back at me by some dude calling himself "Ourigan". ;) I'm not at a crossroads but I am getting run over on my longs.
Yes, I have no life -- my only joy in life is in pestering SFMI for audited financial statements.
You're a funny man.
Seriously, I'd love to know if anyone has any independently verifiable real information on the company, that's all. The SEC certainly doesn't, so wondering if anyone else does.
LOL yer a genius ;) I never varied my POV or my writing style; just used my more common nom de pleume ala intarweb.
;)
I'm not talking ANYTHING down. Seriously. I have no interest in buying or selling this stock. It's much more just a fascination. I completely recognize that it could rise. If the company actually published audited financial statements, and or actually produced any saleable minerals, it could very well go much higher. I see no indication, however, that it's anything more than a vehicle to perhaps fund GoldCorp's eventual use of the property itself.
But as I have no ax to grind, I don't wish anyone any ill -- I hope that those who have made a bet on this company do fine. I just suspect that in the long run, they won't.
Hope it's not "last rat off the boat's a rotten egg..."
For the record -- I am not at all accusing you of being untruthful at all -- and I apologize if that was the impression I gave. I think, though, that when something is not independently verifiable, one should use extreme caution in putting money on the line.
That's why I've asked over and over (and reasonably, I think) why the company hasn't issued audited financial statements to the public, ever. They have said that they would, including announcing that they had hired one or more accounting firms over the years -- and yet no financial statements.
I know a little bit about this kind of thing -- audited financial statements contain the attestation of the independent accountants that the financial statements are fair, follow GAAP, represent actual assets and liabilities, etc -- and no CPA can sign them if they don't think that's the case.
We're not talking about a lot of money for an audit, either; a local firm in Idaho could do it, with perhaps one two-day trip to the New York HQ.
I suspect, however, that the auditors didn't sign off on the reports, or were unable to audit the books in the first place -- and that bothers me, especially in the absence of any statement to the contrary on the part of the Company.
Anyone want to address this?