Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
And you are absolutely sublime!
In case anyone does not know this - Fibiconni spelled backwards is Innocibif, which is Russian for "dam the torpedos, full speed ahead".
Awww... shucks!
I posted it again because my brilliant, dry, outrageously humorous posts all get deleted!
Delete this -----
Posted by: slazenger7
In reply to: None Date:4/13/2007 10:16:14 AM
Post #of 37662
What if BHUB decided to amend their stance and put out a press release that states they are no longer seeking to cancel the 1.5 billion allegedly "fake" shares, but will be seeking to find solutions (or comprimises) to having them officially registered as legitimate shares by the TA that issued them. That "solution" of course would for the shares to be bought back and either retired or legitimized. Wouldn't that be a comprimise that would avoid lawsuits between BHUB and the TA, and change the status of the stock to "pending certification" instead of the current accusations of "fraudulent". Thus enabling trading to resume.
Remember this -Posted by: slazenger7
In reply to: None Date:4/13/2007 10:16:14 AM
Post #of 37662
What if BHUB decided to amend their stance and put out a press release that states they are no longer seeking to cancel the 1.5 billion allegedly "fake" shares, but will be seeking to find solutions (or comprimises) to having them officially registered as legitimate shares by the TA that issued them. That "solution" of course would for the shares to be bought back and either retired or legitimized. Wouldn't that be a comprimise that would avoid lawsuits between BHUB and the TA, and change the status of the stock to "pending certification" instead of the current accusations of "fraudulent". Thus enabling trading to resume.
Is Nikki on plane back to Moscow? Superfly Ruskie spy!
What if BHUB decided to amend their stance and put out a press release that states they are no longer seeking to cancel the 1.5 billion allegedly "fake" shares, but will be seeking to find solutions (or comprimises) to having them officially registered as legitimate shares by the TA that issued them. That "solution" of course would for the shares to be bought back and either retired or legitimized. Wouldn't that be a comprimise that would avoid lawsuits between BHUB and the TA, and change the status of the stock to "pending certification" instead of the current accusations of "fraudulent". Thus enabling trading to resume.
What about Certificates? If I bought this stock on Tuesday and was not able to sell it, what happens if I ask Ameritrade to send me the certificates? Will they send be bogus certificates? If the transfer agent has no certificates, or they are bogus certificates, what does Ameritrade have to do?
Of all the Gin Joints in all the one horse towns to pick from, why did that covert Ruskie dame have to pick this one to walk into.
Most heard quote of the week on BHUB board - " I only lost the FREE shares I had." Second most heard quote of the week -" I sold my shares just before they announced the halt." - yikes! sounds like a Ruskie plot to me.
Ruskies?? I ain't afraid of no Ruskies!
It's those dam Ruskies... I always knew the Ruskies were the worlds problem!
Just listened to the interview - everyone needs to listen to the entire interview. I came out with an extremely positive outlook. There will definitely be more to this story. The share problem will eventually be resolved. The people behind BHUB are too experienced and have too much at stake to let this one drop.
Interview link - http://www.tradersnation.com/player/?id=312
Sell at what price? Is it only at Market?
My Alpha Trade say PINKS and OTCBB closed.
Maybe Cede & Co have all the shorted shares. Just cancel them out and everything is peachy keen again. In fact, just cancel them out anyway, just for the hell of it.
Is there anyone posting on this board that stands to actually lose any money on this stock either on paper or real? So far, all I have heard is "I am now riding on free shares" or " I sold for a profit and then bought back in at .0019 and have nothing to lose". Or "I sold the bulk of my shares before the big drop and stayed in with a few hundred just for fun, so whatever happens next doesn't matter". Jeez... Seems to me, almost everyone here are absolutely brilliant traders who always sell for a profit and then only have "free shares" at risk when things get problematic.
BHUB is not the problem. BHUB are the ones who were screwed with by unscrupulous brokers/transfer agents/ etc.., not the other way around. The DTC warning was actually giving even more credibility to the BHUB press release! It is the
transfer agent(s)/ brokers who shorted the stock that have the problem, not BHUB or current shareholders. If you sell your stock, that is one less shareholder they have to worry about covering. If you hold your shares, they eventually have to buy them back to cover the illegal shorting. Of course they don't want anyone buying anymore. They want people to sell as low as possible so they can cover. They need to figure out how to get shareholders to sell, and they will use any tactic they can to do that. That is when the "squeeze" manifests itself.
Imagine where this would be if the bogus panic scam had not stampeded the weak.
I still hold 2 mil and I am NOT selling.
moving up
One good thing about these false rumors - They will not work a second time here. The bashers will have to come up with a new scam rumor to cause panic selling again. Hopefully the weak hands are out and will be replaced by a more steady crowd.
Gee.. I guess now there really are only 25 share holders! Lol.. I am still holding my 2mil shares - does that mean I own 10% of the company? Lol
The conference tomorrow should be very interesting!
moving back up - bogus halt posters are laughing while they buy!
fake halt rumor worked - now back to reality!
heading back up - someone is getting rich off of fake rumors!!
That fake rumor worked like a charm. Some fools bought it hook line and sinker Now there will be a scramble to get back in.
.005 coming up -
.04 gone
Eating up .04
Here we go! .04 coming up -e-
Moving back up again -
Thanks for the reply milo3. I agree with you on the value Dexter Morris' experience brings to the negotiating table in the process of searching for and acquiring large contracts. Labwire must have plans on how to successfully manage additional contracts while keeping their reputation for quality personal service intact. I am sure Mr. Morris is aware of any staffing problems involved when over reaching on the sales end.
Could one reason that large new contracts may be taking a bit longer for Labwire, is their committment to ensure quality, personilized service to each customer? I believe this committment to service is referenced in past interviews with Mr. Morris. ( this one from 2004)
"--- Morris says Workplace Screening will not follow that business blueprint. He expects the company will generate $10 million in annual revenue within two years, but he wants it to stay small enough to give personal service to clients.
"That's what we think is missing in the industry right now," Morris says. "Our clients trust us. They stay with us a long time." ----
http://www.bizjournals.com/houston/stories/2004/03/08/story5.html
http://www.profolioplus.com/featured.html
This committment to service is also referenced in press releases -
May 4, 2006 - Labwire Announces Contract Renewal With Leading Oil, Gas and Chemical Company
--------
----- Company will continue to provide its services to NORCO, La. Chemical and Refining Facilities ---------------
---- "Our hard work and the quality of our services have been recognized allowing us to continue for another year working with Norco," said Dexter Morris, CEO of Labwire, Inc. "This annually renewable contract represents continuing revenues of $130,000 for the year. We will continue to meet their needs over the next twelve months by supplying them with our top- notch services."
This committment to service may have some impact on Labwire's time frames in signing new contracts in the short term, however it will no doubt ensure that the contracts they do sign, will remain loyal customers for years to come. You may notice that there are options in some current contracts, that offer one or two year extensions to Labwire after the initial contract period ends. These extended option opportunities would certainly be strengthened with an excellent personilized service record to their client. To render that type of service to several major new contracts would in all likelyhood, require an expanded, well trained workforce. Has anyone asked Mr. Morris about plans for adding and training new staff? How is Labwire planning their expansion so as to ensure their current and new customers service remains top notch and personalized?