InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,431.60
(
-0.04%
)
US TECH 100
19,168.00
(
0.52%
)
Dow Jones
38,589.16
(
-0.15%
)
Brent Oil
82.03
(
-0.12%
)
Bitcoin
66,321.46
(
-0.48%
)
Post# of 56797
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

slazenger7

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 107
Posts 11954
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/06/2007

slazenger7

Re: None

Friday, 04/13/2007 8:40:47 PM

Friday, April 13, 2007 8:40:47 PM

Post# of 56797
Delete this -----

Posted by: slazenger7
In reply to: None Date:4/13/2007 10:16:14 AM
Post #of 37662

What if BHUB decided to amend their stance and put out a press release that states they are no longer seeking to cancel the 1.5 billion allegedly "fake" shares, but will be seeking to find solutions (or comprimises) to having them officially registered as legitimate shares by the TA that issued them. That "solution" of course would for the shares to be bought back and either retired or legitimized. Wouldn't that be a comprimise that would avoid lawsuits between BHUB and the TA, and change the status of the stock to "pending certification" instead of the current accusations of "fraudulent". Thus enabling trading to resume.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up