Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Number 1 — it is not trump responsible for the security of DC
No, he is not. Why would you think he is? The person responsible for the security of DC is the mayor of DC. And his people--the DC cops--were at the Capitol on January 6. Being attacked by the outta control mob.
And the mayor of DC has no National Guard to call on.
No2 Biden, for sure is POTUS for the next 6mos - you are dreaming of you think he is capable of dealing with Putin
Beg pardon? Why does Biden have to "deal with" Putin? Let's let the Ukrainians do that.
What on earth are you talking about? I have NO idea.
Daily occurrence here, you yourself will slander without hesitation
Now that is something I NEVER do. Nor do I defame, which is the correct word. I suggest you prove what you say.
Good luck.
I think she just likes money.
Yes, sad to say. But we've had other bad moments, and recovered from them. So fingers crossed.
lol, maybe. Though I'll bet he'd rather think of himself as the éminence grise. But very likely even that would make him uncomfortable.
I wonder whether he expected what happened today.
Oh, that's comforting.
I'll bet they're upset.
Chew on this instead:
Chewy executives alarmed at 'Roaring Kitty' stake in pet-product retailer
By Manas Mishra, Greg Roumeliotis and Suzanne McGee
July 1, 20245:45 PM EDTUpdated 4 hours ago
https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/stock-influencer-roaring-kitty-discloses-66-stake-chewy-2024-07-01/
It would. So.. Who should we call "His Majesty" now?
It really has. God, I wish I'd stayed in Italy.
A White House official said the president "is deeply appreciative of the residence staff's work, but is unused to being waited on regularly or having butlers, so some staff are often allowed to go home early."
Um, how many private butlers does anyone need? Usually, it's one per household.
And he obviously DID have a cold.
I can easily see how, under this new SC ruling, that would be a perfectly plausible scenario. A tidy solution to an unpleasant problem.
Really, Hap, you are no longer mentally okay. First of all, His Majesty wasn't talking about third trimester abortions. He said, and has said dozens of times, "abortions" that take place "after birth". THAT is how stupid he is. And how stupid his followers are, for imagining such a person is qualified to be president.
Nancy responsible for DC security -- admitted as such -
She did no such thing. There's video of her and Chuck Schumer calling nearby governors and other officials, begging them to send the National Guard. Finally they got lucky with Larry Hogan, the Republican governor of Maryland.
Yes I have read most all those refuting it which means it really is true.
No it doesn't, Ordie. Conspiracy theories are not more credible the more bizarre they are. But you're obviously addicted to them.
But here's a clue: Jill Biden is a real person. She's 73 years old. She's been married to a public figure since 1977, when she was 26. A lot of people have known and followed her life for many years. And they know the "babysitter" story isn't true.
Hey! I have an idea!! Why don't we make up some lies about YOU and spread them all over IHub!! Sound like fun?
Those questions are corrupted -- did not steal documents.
Yes he did. And no, HE is corrupt. Tremendously corrupt, as he himself might say.
talking to his VP about anything is immune
Really? Let's say he talked to his VP about robbing a bank. And then the bank was actually robbed. Would he and his VP still be immune? I think that would piss off most sane people.
True, he'll never do it.
FBI planting "top secret" stuff -- do not know...
If you don't know, then don't make unsupported allegations. There is no reason to suspect the FBI of anything. They were courteous and correct, which His Majesty didn't deserve. They'd been trying to get those documents back from him for a year. And he kept avoiding turning them over
Finally, when he knew they were coming, he had his goons HIDE some of them where he hoped they wouldn't find them. Alas, when Nauta went to move some of the boxes, he was caught by the security cameras.
every recent ex-president has a library full of documents
Of course they do. The key word is "library". The documents contained in those libraries--the ones that come from the president's time in office--are OWNED BY the National Archive.
The former president in question is not allowed to take them home and read them in bed.
You don't have any issues with RFK Jr? Is that what you're saying?
Kitty is nothing but a star-struck fanboy who seems to desperately want Cohen's attention and admiration.
I think you're right. But he's a very rich fanboy, and I suppose that gets him some attention. But I really don't see why he bought $165 million worth of Chewy. Even with inflation, that's a lotta money.
Biden -- 81 million votes -- more than any other president ever -- Trump 67 million votes -- more than any other president ever -- wonder where those votes came from -- mail-in pallets w/o creases -- wonder how the PO delivered them -- be nice to know
You really are an idiot, Hap. You realize, do you not, that our population is GROWING? That every four years there are MORE PEOPLE than there were four years earlier???
Christ on a crutch.
No, Ordie. Jill Biden was not a babysitter for the Biden family.
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/feb/22/viral-image/no-jill-biden-wasnt-teenage-babysitter-joe-bidens-/
Learn to do fact checking.
I've always had issues with RFK Jr. Most people have issues with him. Anti-vaxxers are a public health and safety threat.
And he got total immunity for official acts carried out in accordance with his duties under the constitution -- big cheer for our nation and the supremes
Bullshit. For nearly 250 years, no president ever needed that immunity. It was obvious that every president was not liable for any official acts performed. It wasn't till Donald Trump took office and began committing actual crimes that a president thought he needed it. And Trump got it, with the help of two of the three judges he appointed.
Shameful.
Absolutely right.
Is "record acquisition problems" what you call taking a large number of classified documents with you when you leave the White House, refusing to return them, and storing some of them in a shower?
Trumpty was impeached TWICE. Presidents are harder to get rid of than one might think.
All hell would break out, but it'd certainly serve Trumpty and "his" Supreme Court justices right.
Actually, Gorsuch is Episcopalian, but he started out as a Catholic.
Maybe we will get a real court case (FBI et al) to determine if it was wrong to believe the 2020 election was rigged -- or not
Something like 69 REAL court cases have proved the 2020 election was not "rigged" or "stollen".
You might enjoy this as well:
Conservative group finds ‘absolutely no evidence of widespread fraud’ in 2020 election
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/3559758-conservative-group-finds-absolutely-no-evidence-of-widespread-fraud-in-2020-election/
But the shares were directly purchased from chewy
Why do you think that? Has Chewy done an offering recently?
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1766502/000110465924076457/tm2418581d1_sc13g.htm
I don't think Cohen--who presumably doesn't want to be charged with insider violations--is collaborating with Kitty, but Kitty may have wanted that. And presumably he became interested in Chewy because of Cohen.
It's odd, isn't it? Cohen is no longer a Chewy beneficial owner.
https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1766502/000114036124027439/ny20018065x2_def14a.htm
Far as I know, no one has ever discussed Thoreau here. Did you mistake his reference to Trudeau as a reference to Thoreau?
No. Unfortunately, there has never been a constitutional amendment protecting women's privacy and reproductive rights. Roe was merely the decision reached by the Supreme Court in 1973.
THIS court reversed it in 2022.
Yes, he does. And he should have more.
I believe jackson voted with the majority?
No, she did not. You realize, do you not, that it takes about 30 seconds to look this stuff up?
ROBERTS, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which THOMAS,
ALITO, GORSUCH, and KAVANAUGH, JJ., joined in full, and in which BAR-
RETT, J., joined except as to Part III–C. THOMAS, J., filed a concurring
opinion. BARRETT, J., filed an opinion concurring in part. SOTOMAYOR,
J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KAGAN and JACKSON, JJ., joined.
JACKSON, J., filed a dissenting opinion.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf
Oh? So you're voting for the former heroin addict? The anti-vaxxer? And don't forget that RFK actually has been a very effective environmentalist.
Libertarians don't like environmentalists.
No. Nobody can "add" anything to the constitution without getting an amendment through both houses of congress. And then it would have to be ratified by three-quarters of the states.
Here's the process:
https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/constitution
I always thought it was called "Lake Superior" because it was the biggest of the Great Lakes.