Is there anyone naive enough to believe that our gypsies were just being good little do-bees and decided to file early? Is there anyone naive enough to believe that being on the cusp of the judge's decision, pro or con, didn't weigh heavily in their rush to file? Without looking, I would be willing to bet they NEVER filed early before this august occasion. Insofar as the highly contentious 'mitigating circumstances', hell, that could be referencing their bout with the loan shark and ensuing forced interface with the SEC. It could be a reference to the government shutdown which extended closure. It could be a reference to the not inconsiderable legal costs just to stay in business. It might even mean they ran out of toilet paper and had to go to Costco for a case and their CC bounced. Just seems as if there's always something -- always something -- that keeps them from achieving the lofty goals set way back in the "17th century".

All IMO, of course.

Hurt what, when, who?

But ... but ... No update necessary as resolution is in the company's favor is "guaranteed".

Just illustrating absurdity with absurdity. Rock on.

Do you?

The judge's mere presence kept them semi-honest. Mitigating circumstances? LOL. Back to the 'Calamity Jane' defense .... or was it the 'Titanic' defense? The long and short of everything is that they produced their own 'mitigating circumstances'. We didn't do it -- the SEC didn't do it -- the judge didn't do it -- their '16 employees' didn't do it -- THEY, King Reggie and Lady Linda, did it.

I wonder how vigilant they would have been without the judge looking over their collective shoulders.

Right on! But for different reasons. Just sayin'.

Now THAT is hilarious. Is it too much to ask for an investment to show, at the very least, some semblance of progress -- after a decade of stagnation? If there was ever a filing that would be filed on a timely basis, this is the one. Too bad they weren't more diligent in the "13th century". But, we've discussed that "7000 times". Filing yet another NT would have raised their last red flag. lmao.

Good what?

No shit? They managed to file on time? Big increase in revenue and profits? Can’t wait to read the latest chapter.

Prolly not.

Hilarious

Any word or guess as to exactly how many of their "employees" are full time?

Anything possible at this point, I suppose.

A 70% (give or take) "correction" on the heels of a '2 million per week' missive??? Perhaps another walk around the premises with a more jaundiced eye might shed some light.

It's entirely possible they could get torched and won't even have to bother with the NT. Kinda like the good ol' days.

I do believe you missed the author's point. He was not saying they don't have to file. Sometimes I wonder if the company is aware that they have to file. If enough people bitch about the situation and this catches the SEC's notice, it really does get testy. Am embroiled in another one that got caught and had to produce 2-years + worth of reports. They managed to pull that all together but are still relegated to the grays -- deservedly so, IMO.

Their NT should be coming out in a week or so.

Of course there was an assist by those who make good money by taking advantage of an already bad circumstance. But placing the blame strictly in their wheelhouse is folly, IMO. ARYC made this bed and we, unfortunately, are lying in it.

Seriously? That negativity wasn't spawned by yet another busted fins promise, was it? And what about the $2 mil per week report that, in hindsight, appears to have been a pro-active attempt at preventing the precipitous pps decline due to the fin report they KNEW would not be on time -- if ever. Anyone who has ever seen the show "American Greed" knows that there are hucksters in about any industry one can think of who look legit as hell, who talk the talk and walk the walk -- until they can't any more.

Ridiculous is as ridiculous does. Welcome to dbmm. Home of the "disruptor".

With all the "100% Guaranteed" around here, who needs an update?

I've got 364 shares that used to be worth thousands that I'll let you have for the nickel that was stated this dbmm would realize.

Not for nothing but this "company" has been nothing BUT bleak for over a decade. Different shades of bleak is all.

IMO? Shocking!

To say nothing of the company's equally blatant ineptitude.

Coulda said that the first time. Say what?

PROVE!

Inconsequential, unbridled PAP!

Lol. So what? Is that statement meant to instill confidence? Over a decade of loss after loss despite her robust college creds? BFD!

IMO, of course.

Waaay too much common sense. Wouldn't surprise me in the least if, after hearing what the gypsies have to say, that it's taken 'under advisement' and put off for another month -- maybe two.

Would that be your answer?

And you would know this how?

Quite possibly the judge, perhaps?

Say what?

Also 'here' is the very apparent financial straits in which they reside. I mean, how to pay those '16 full-time employees' (not counting IR, I see) is a real problem. A talented employee should fetch $100k in salary and benefits, yes? That, times 16 is ...... well, the point is made, N'est-ce pas?

Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.