Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Also, some are expecting an announcement maybe in a different area, like golf clubs. But according to the CEO they don't expect revenue until 4Q or 1Q. It could be definite business but not enough to sustain the company near term which is why they have to get additional financing. Their last financing scheme cause the stock to drop a lot after they sucked in investors. You cam benefit if you can figure out who to believe, but it probably won't sound credible because there are no professional analysts on this stock. Most investors here don't care because they either got caught in a losing investment years ago and hang on any good news, or they are just in love with cool technology, or they have inside information.
It doesn't but it gives some an excuse to pump so it might go up anyway. People are looking for "endorsement" even if it doesn't result in revenue for LQMT. LM was endorsed by the wireless industry along time ago. LQMT used to derive derive revenue from it. They have been phasing out the CE side of their business to give AAPL exclusive rights where they derive no further revenue benefit according to the CEO.
If there is "potential" management doesn't want anyone knowing it otherwise they would issue press releases.
No problem.
It probably frustrates (more), any one wanting to take over the company that isn't already involved some how (e.g. dilution). Maybe lqmt is willing to keep it going just to keep it others out due to control and secrecy requirements if the Govt is involved somehow. Maybe it's not even that complex or maybe someone doesn't want the "potential" to fall into the wrong hands, even if things are still a ways off.
If toxic financing is as explained by some on this board and through links to articles, then anyone that benefits from it would rather have more of it (vs. advancing things, right?) AAPL's not in any hurry and neither is aerospace industry, right? To them, it's more about getting it right. So why not just keep riding the dilution train, esp. if it's the only option, right? And as one pointed out, it might even secure a position.
It seems more to me that despite the appearance of dilution, etc., maybe this is just a commitment to a bigger agenda. Do or die, right. All for one, one for all; in the grand scheme of things.
I'm floored. It's the same guy. I'll check it out. Thank you!
That is very cool. I want you know that I studied with Wolf. A MIT on cellular automaton in the 80's. I was at a different university across the river. Is this the same guy? (Suppose not if you are in E. Europe?) Can you explain the what each color represents?
The big dilution over the last year was a big turn off to me. I had never seen that in a stock before. Now that. Understand it better, the need for the company to raise more money and a plan to approve more shares, and given the timeframe of 2H2014 experimental licenses (for mfg), and maybe some license fees, and maybe some small revenue....it's more activity, but not all positive, so.... May e this next round of financing will get them over the hump, but, waiting for more potential dilution just puts a sour taste in our mouth.
I agree even though I'm not trading it.
It seems to me that they need to demonstrate that they can execute with some consistency and on an increasing scale.
When they can demonstrate that, they'll look a lot better to me at least.
They don't say it, but it still sounds challenging to produce something with LM.
Did TSLA use toxic financing (vs. LQMT). Also, TSLA had govt financing that they paid back early. Does LQMT (even though it effectively started there?). Not yet.
MTRN also seems to want to take it slow (aerospace/defense market is like that right).
No rush here. They could turn around and may still do it. But it may not be without another round of toxic financing.
We don't feel nervous about it even though we might miss out because we decided to go for a more probable return someplace else.
If LQMT only goes up from here, we'll miss it near term. If they correct after AAPL announces, we'll reconsider then.
If they really get going, but slowly, there will be other opportunities. They still don't seem to be at critical mass if their next planned move is for "experimental" licenses for potential second sourcing and not until 2H2014. Maybe they'll get some license revenue before then but it still sounds "experimental" based on their words.
Elon is totally different breed of leader. He doesn't hide.
With the long wait anticipated by the longs, will wait until there is better news. I'm committed someplace else right now.
I took Micky's input and pulled up GDX and overlaid NUGT and it does move with it. You can see for yourself.
I'd like to see sustainable "financial stability and growth" to feel better about the stock. How will the company be able to address all the "opportunity" with low/no cash or without diluting.
If anything, if this is a classic toxic financing situation (implied by several on this board), the company may not have an incentive to speed things up.
It's hard for us to get excited about a slow situation as good as a story might sound.
Wow, it's hard to imagine the scope of all of that; but sometimes I get a creepy feeling on some of the penny sock boards.
You have a nice evening and thanks for keeping the watch on this board. You opened my eyes quickly. i appreciate it.
They were even almost getting a divorce over it ....sad....they thought they were smarter than the crooks based on the premise that you can trust a ceo, lol
They believed the ceo, lol.
HBB, you wanna get paid ? .... Think about the "coming soon" gold correction with non-penny stocks. Meet me over at gld and I'll explain it.
The interest in a vote to increase shares by almost 50% is scary. What happened to the shares approved last February. Did they somehow get used without telling anyone ???
Who thinks the stock price can rise for an exit by Chung with a profit within less than 6 months and the stock diluting thereafter?
Is that the scenario or is more about having enough shares to swap with an acquisition?
You can't name a single qualified catalyst.
I don't see orders on this stock being processed that fast. I'm just looking for explanations not based on "fluff"
How do you know it's a fake order?
I have a hard time believing that GS would waste time on a stock like this. Who puts out the fake orders besides them and benefits from it?
What's your catalyst this time?
This is not December.
The clock stopped with a big sell order pending.
Look out for Kaiser and Livi. They haven't showed up yet.
It's too bad there aren't any qualified analysts on this stock that could give some merit to opinion, etc. Otherwise it's just a guessing game.
If you really dig, you'll see where some associated entities are foreign companies.
I'd like to see a long life battery for a smart watch that can be used in a smart phone also. If lqmt can support and create a product line or themselves around battery technology, we're ll for it.
AAPL stock price dropped due to margin contraction.......so.....here it comes back on a buy back program...if they have great new product line coming out in 2014....ok....they are as slow as lqmt if not slower.
They could pass up their competition at some point, but....there is no way that I could agree that they have been leaders in elegance in mobile devices in particular. Maybe they are getting closer to making a quantum jump. They feel the sting of competition no doubt. There is no doubt that they have brand leadership; but that's not the same as "elegance" in my books.
I hear you but I do not agree that an mac or iphone to date has been "elegant"... And among their Asian peers with reference to mobile devices. They're still catching up. If they come out with true designer style jewelry, I would be surprised. It doesn't mean that they won't, I would just be surprised. Used to do strategic planning for a leading .... And I can tell you that US suppliers are still not there when it comes to some specific features, etc. Just look at how AAPl had to lock up lqmt just to try to get a long term strategic edge. I like AAPL, but would not agree that they have been leaders in mobile space in particular in terms of innovation to date. They may get market share through their brand, etc.
That says it. If you can get rid of your opposition, you secure your spot.
That was a beautiful design.
I can't imagine aapl being that elegant in their design (techy group).
Ok, but where is the business going to come from and when?