Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
If it were HUGE dilution going on, do you think the stock would have gone up 23% yesterday?
Well I removed the word "Republican" from the signature and it appears as though they are going to let me keep it as is.
I feel that the new signature would have already been disabled as admin appears to be looking at every post of mine soon after it is posted.
Awesome!
Seriously?
I recently had one of my signatures disabled by admin, and I just tried adding another one but it went right to archive scrap.
My question is why is it some people can have profanities in their signature, but I can't have a real factual quote that doesn't include any profanity in it at all?
What happened to free speech?
Not a problem. Court documents are always good to have.
I think that's a good guess. I think that if they don't get a deal done before the 20th and the judge gives the ok to investigate, then all negotiations are off and it's GAME ON and WMI will go for the throat.
I could be wrong and have been wrong before, but I think the time for playing games is almost over.
"US Bank wanted WAMU, however, the offer they presented was not even considered. "
WOW!
Thanks for sharing!
I expect them to be assumed and back divis paid.
True and true.
Also, I love how when C was at the $1 -1.50 range, the media was telling everybody to stay away from all fins. Hahaha, I wonder why. Soon they will say it is safe to buy them, and then they will tank again. Gotta love it.
Can I start a Basher Board that includes such information as the info you referenced?
Thank you kindly.
What goes around comes around, and bad things happen to bad people.
I'd still like to get an answer from admin on the topic.
Haha.
I interpreted it as , the Federal Reserve System has important work to do to continue to screw the American people over and is doing everything in their power to make sure people don't understand how the system actually works.
Well the rules certainly aren't applied fairly or evenly, that's for sure.
I have a lot of the founding members marked because their posts are insightful and supported, but that guy has been around for a while and has relatively no marks, and there is a reason for that.
I am curious if ihub pays, or gets paid, for bashing activities on certain stocks.
Thanks again. I love the way that you can explain and support your statements with logic and reason. That is very rare here and ihub, and you should be commended for that.
: ^ )
That is awesome.
You always find the good ones.
Keep it up.
Whatever you say.
Thanks.
I just wanted to bring it up because the R/S didn't really seemed to be a focus, and usually what happens after R/Ss isn't too good.
Have a great day, and keep up the great work here!
No offense, but if anybody bought FAS this afternoon is going to lose their @$$ .
I could be wrong, but today was the wrong time to hop on the FAS train.
I say it gaps up to open on Monday.
What do you think?
Can Quinn-Emanuel be linked to Obama?
Government spending is what propelled us out of the GD. You can say it was the war, but if it wasn't for BIGTIME spending by the Government on the war and jobs related to the war, the GD would have went on and on.
Double click on Faith Elizabeth Gay. Then double click on Sidley Austin LLP.
http://www.muckety.com/Quinn-Emanuel-Urquhart-Oliver-Hedges-LLP/5043174.muckety
A couple names that jump out at me are Barack and Michelle Obama.
Stay away from OPMR. R/S more than probable in the near future. Upcoming vote in a couple weeks.
Nothing really, but you can follow this one.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=37673373
You got me, but if there is a delay, my guess would be because an agreement is almost/has been reached.
If there isn't a delay, then the investigation will move on full-steam ahead, and anyone who thinks that discovery hasn't already started is crazy.
WMI has records and they have proof of wrongdoing.
Just because other people break the rules does not make it ok for you to do so.
FDIC responds to JPM Motion to Intervene in the FDIC Lawsuit
http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/10/20/2151829/FDIC_Response_to_JPM_Motion_to_Intervene.pdf
Figured I'd post these again so there is atleast some documents floating around.
Well if there is a deal being worked out, I don't feel it would be worth it to authorize an investigation that would not be continued.
If there is a deal going to be struck, and the court feels that both parties will make it happen by a certain date, I could see it getting delayed, but I don't really have direct experience in such situations.
You suprise me though. You should be used to delays by now anyways. You've made it 7 months, and I have confidence you can last another few weeks.
Goldman Sachs: the Gangster Bankster with the Fed's Blessings
http://www.goldmansachs666.com/2009/05/goldman-sachs-links-for-may-6-2009-from.html
The footnote on page 7 of the document is great.
"Because the FDIC effectively liquidated much of WMB through the P&A Agreement, it
is unclear whether the Receivership estate has any significant assets beyond JPMC’s purchase
price paid in connection with the P&A Agreement."
They just want to hear the FDIC say that they gave everything away for peanuts.
Also, #4 on page 7 of the document is great.
"4. An order directing FDIC-Receiver to provide Plaintiffs with an accounting
of all property transferred from Plaintiffs in connection with the
Receivership;"
We want you to prove it.
hahaha
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request the Court to grant the following
relief:
1. An order declaring Plaintiffs’ Claims to be valid and proven against the
Receivership;
2. An order directing FDIC-Receiver to pay the Claims from the assets of the
Receivership in accordance with 12 U.S.C. § 1821(d)(11);
3. An order directing FDIC-Receiver to provide Plaintiffs with an accounting
of the disposition of the assets of the Receivership if any Claim is not
satisfied in full;
4. An order directing FDIC-Receiver to provide Plaintiffs with an accounting
of all property transferred from Plaintiffs in connection with the
Receivership;
5. Enter a judgment against FDIC-Corporate and FDIC-Receiver for
damages, in an amount to be determined, equal to the amount of money
Plaintiffs would have received in a straight liquidation of WMB’s assets
and liabilities less any amounts actually received from the Receivership;
6. Enter a judgment against FDIC-Corporate and FDIC-Receiver for
damages, in an amount to be determined, equal to the value of Plaintiffs’
property converted by the FDIC;
7. An order declaring the FDIC’s January 23, 2009 disallowance to be void,
and that the parties should proceed as if such disallowance never occurred;
8. Award Plaintiffs’ costs and attorneys’ fees as may be permitted by law;
and
9. Award Plaintiffs such other relief as may be just.
Compl. 27-28 (underlining added).6 In short, WMI is not seeking any assets from JPMC in this
case. Rather, WMI is pursuing claims for monetary relief from the FDIC, and a ruling in its
favor would therefore not be dispositive on the ownership of any disputed assets as to which
JPMC might assert a claim.
6 Note that the reference to payment from the “the Receivership in accordance with 12 U.S.C.
§ 1821(d)(11)” denotes payment from the Receivership estate after liquidation of the estate’s
assets. Because the FDIC effectively liquidated much of WMB through the P&A Agreement, it
is unclear whether the Receivership estate has any significant assets beyond JPMC’s purchase
price paid in connection with the P&A Agreement.
You gotta love it!
Nothing too new, but still a great read.
http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/10/20/2151829/WMI_Response_to_JPM_Motion_to_Intervene.pdf
Is it possible that the ruling/hearing will be delayed?
I can't take credit for finding the document. I just found it over at yahoo. Yet another suit against the FDIC regarding the negligent seizure and sale.
govinsider does some good digging and shares some good docs.
Courtesy of govinsider at yahoo.
http://www.courthousenews.com/2009/04/30/FDICWaMu.pdf
You better look again.
Do you think that would have happened if they weren't Chinese?
BTW, thanks for the post.
It is very interesting.