Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Thank you Art, every comment you've posted on this board was truly accurate.
My small 5+ million shares of SPCL/Pixelmags was only $100 per million though I purchased many more after that and sold at a higher price. Still holding my original millions, but am still upset about the private company management failing to notify its traders of its stock.
I also appreciate the Monday estimate of a FINS filing, though we have received many of other days that said it will happen, yet nothing has taken place in regards to the FINS being filed.
Is your Monday , before 10 AM date, offered by the private company management that we could rely on?
LOL, where are the valid complaints unconnected to personal opinions?
I laugh again with nothing but personal complaints behind MRIB company press releases being read.
LOL, I'm sure that's what a court judge would like to know.
Exactly! Thanks for sharing that info:
My guess is that the trades going on today are all market makers selling their stocks they are holding on to in their accounts.
The MM trades at the Ask price are shown on my "Time & Sales" list as 'Blue' when all of the other trades at the Ask show up 'Green'.
After the Blue trades, the Ask price goes back up like just now:
Two 10,000 @ .0066 in Blue followed by 145,000 at .0068 in Green.
Also it's easy to see the trade amounts at the Ask price are never reduced from the Ask size.
Well that still gets back to why we didn't know that in "August of 2016" [71 days later] and had to wait until the Dec 8k instead after a new Pixelmags manager was incorporated.
It seems to me that Pixelamgs was being operated by "private company" leaders who didn't know how to operate a "public company".
That's all I'm saying which seems to be a bad move.
The contents of the 8K sets a lot of people back for a while which brings the estimates of future events.
Here's one from the May 8K:
I assume everyone has read the May 8K and the Dec 8K which tells us the SEC filings are late as if we didn't already know that. And yes, we all knew that the SEC filings were for both SPCL and the private company that doesn't have one yet. SPCL filed a NT-10-K in the months they completed a contract (Mar 2016) but did nothing. They had a 15 Day EXTENSION to file it. I believe that filing need was also stated in the May 8K.
I really liked the Dec 8K telling us that the Pixelmags "merger" happened in May when we are all told that the merger was still in the progress of being completed and how high the pps was going to go when it actually happens.
I understand many of the problems with a "private company", but spending 9 months trying to get it right by hiring a third party auditor and still don't have anything done to pass to the traders is misleading.
No, I didn't know that, but I do know other companies file documents to the SEC that are available for the public to review.
It would be nice to see the SEC, FINRA or Nasdaq step in and suspend the trading of SPCL/Pixelmags stock.
It's getting very boring to see small size and low priced trades with the pps going up and down all day long.
When will the Pixelmags "private company" management ever learn how to manage a "public company" when they move out of being "private" and learn they are now a subsidiary of SPCL?
Pixelmags carries a "private company" history, but based on the last SPCL 8K, Pixelmags merged with a "Public company" (SPCL) and became a "subsidiary" of them so they have to be controlling themselves as a "public company" now.
They can use all of their private company excuses internally or through their supporters, but they are still required to maintain the new public company shareholders/traders by filing the required operational data forms.
If the Ask holder with 13,448,066 doesn't sell at .0075 or lower, will end up losing the "066" shares to Zero shares when the reverse split moves out.
Really?
A "911 Trade to end the day" was just as entertaining as the $16.80 trade for 2000 shares at the high price of .0084 for the day.
Or maybe a "Golden Cross" announced as expected will get everyone else excited?
Probably news of the SPCL/Pixelmags private company management leaving the company will do the same since they have not posted any SPCL/Pixelmags company news yet.
I doubt they will do a R/S anytime soon if they won't be able to add a new pps to SPCL/Pixelmags with a 100 times price multiplier.
Where would the Nasdaq future plan go with the pps selling for 100 times the current pps of .009? [$.90]
Or even with the latest .008, .0081, .0082 .0083, .0084 or .0085?
Not likely, in my opinion.
Finally, a big money SPCL/Pixelmags buyer has moved in.
SPCL @ .0093 for 1.3 million = $12,090
SPCL/Pixelmags share trading is certainly not created by concerns of a R/S coming.
Any selling has not viewed the market run lately:
I thought the TXTM O/S was around close to 2 billion shares.
How did the O/S get lower than that?
It's become obvious to me that the pps will go much higher than the .04 pre R/S posted here after the financial filing is released.
As a minimum, .04 X 100 puts SPCL pps at $4.00, good for the new NASDAQ entry.
LOL, is that another UK calculator result?
Apparently, my reading of filings that are not up to date which is used to assist other investors on a lack of details presented by a public company would not be considered a "keeping up with the joneses" as indicated on the daily attorney comment, certainly not by me.
Simple answer was I was checking on the stock I left behind. As far as "news" already released,
I don't recall anyone discussing the little loss of TXTM to the publicly traded South African company.
It was pretty obvious to me when reading the two news statements, so I felt a need to be informed.
Likely, most TXTM shareholders would appreciate the same thing.
The SEC doesn't restrict companies to
My examples in the past were inexperienced private management simply because they are allowing all current share holders to get pushed back in life to wondering why they are not being updated with public press releases describing their SPCL/Pixelmags lack of everything including known dates of FIN filings or Reverse split dates.
Should we assume they don't have a clue or are not paying their "LIAISON" enough for their completion?
Every thought I run through creates an inexperienced management in a private company that can't get their 8K projects completed for a public company like SPCL.
It may be difficult for the inexperienced Pixelmags managers to file a R/S request into FINRA since FINRA's website is faulty today
I'm confused! Is this the "news" we're expecting in the future?