Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
again, trademark permissions are almost always part of a distributing contractual arrangement ...it's only obvious nothing can be done regarding these three time wasters until contract is resolved ...judge has no choice but to say you can't put the cart before the horse
you keep confusing an intellectual property infringement strategy by playboy, one of many to come, with the meat of the litigation ...the contract ...although these small court filings might have short term effect on pps, they are not as significant as you might think nor do they deal with the crux of the main argument; they are not a good indicator to rely on ...nor of possible direction
then again anything can happen ...it's litigation LOL
GLTY
knowing court docs, they're all just one side or anothers opinion until rendered dif in a court room ...wouldn't surprise me that CIRC recv their $$ back they claim was put in and a life time subscription to Playboy Magazine
Anything is possible ...lol
you would like it to end there ...but it doesn't
insignificant in that the intellectual property right use / parameters are part of the contract, not the other way around; put in place as protection for both parties ...standard to try to separate granted rights before continuing on to the meat of a merchandise dispute
one thing to speculate to help your sharevalue; its another to deal with reality and having a HAND IN over 30 Intellectual Property disputes of which I had 90% SUCCESS RATE ...
lets see if you're capable of understanding ...litigation to get out of contract = 10yr unwarranted extension as the evidence presented in argument was that goals were not met ... no evidence there are negotiations for settlement and finally the assumption of a huge payout is just that
this is where your assumptions fail ...could be just the $$ CIRC claim they put in ...ya never know
but not at a convenience or super mkt level ....novelty at best
and to be sure, those who contracted with CIRC for 10yrs got their booty kicked
IMO
agree ...thus the first phase of the game ...Intellectual Property
I am amazed that a co like Playboy would have signed a 10yr agreement in the first place with what some might call a develop co / lacking a larger proven track record ...rather than push for a co with an established global network and have immediate dist on a larger scale ...their mistake; the 10yr extension is the crux of this entire dispute
IMO
Playboy clearly wants out of a ten year extension ...win,lose or draw ...wouldn't you? IMO
clearly it's who can survive the waiting game and clearly playboy thinks they can do better than CIRC...there are plenty of private label producers & dist out there ...and who says there are serious negotiations going on that would give CIRC the edge? right now the game is just developing
This talk of a contract extension is fantasy .. 1st of all playboy wants their intellectual property / branding back [X2 X3 attempts]...2nd off the likelihood of a cash settlement including an extension would never pass muster of what is called a friendly arrangement; "A friendship founded on business is a good deal better than a business founded on friendship." of which neither describes the CIRC Playboy arrangement...if settlement happens, cash only and ties severed ... goodbye
IMO of course
I;ve got faster facts ...stock is down again
What future $$ is this Fairy Tale worth ; what will you pay
I like this fairy tale going on here
NASCOW, please go to MDI$ and tell them it's a "fairy tale".
IT'S HAPPENING OVER THERE with a heck of a lot less going for them than we potentially have here. GLTY
just don't cut it ... GLTY
Lets suppose all these if's "happen" you think that's gonna cut it and help this co meet req for new exchange without R/S? ...
http://www.amex.com/equities/howToLst/Eq_HTL_ListStandards.html
I suggest reading this again
Sorry, I’ve been busy adding to my estate…would have got back to you sooner …but it appears you need a new line of work ...to meet NYSE Alternext requirement of a certain maintained share price … what do you think they will do to get it to $2 - $3 requirement
...you think their business model will suffice without accounting gimmicks
…what does debt free have to do with up listing?
http://www.amex.com/equities/howToLst/Eq_HTL_ListStandards.html
r/s when there is no dilution??? what part of debt free dont u understand ? cdft long & strong
consider the fact there will be a R/S? now consider the question "how long will they stay within / survive the requirements of up listing and remain there?
4 plus yrs gone ...a few more to go
and your point is? you think I missed something?
Yes they do ...individually or class action . ..a judge might say preponderance of the evidence has been met ...odds are good based on the record IMO
BuyIns.net manufactures their data. It is bogus. They basically take the short volume reports presented by the regulators and throw some smooth math at it. The problem is, the short volume reports consist of both short sales and long sales routed thru a market maker. The routed trade is market short because the market maker is technically not in possession of the long shares sold at the time of execution. This is what is considered a riskless principle trade.
Buyins.net has never validated their numbers. They can’t.
IMO
NanoTech has previously worked with BuyIns.NET to help prevent this type of transaction and will continue to make every effort to ensure that sellers of NTEK stock conform to all securities regulations and that buyers receive the stock that they
purchased at the price they purchased it for.
CUSIP changes reconcile nothing. Many have tried the CUSIP change route and were disappointed.
CUSIP changes are done at the book entry level and shares are converted at the DTCC level, but nowhere is book entry and DTCC reconciled against each other. When a CUSIP change takes place every broker-dealer simply renames the shares in your account at the same time; electronically and instantaneously. None go thru the TA. Those held at Cede and Co. are converted between old CUSIP and new and done naming Cede and Co. as the holder.
CUSIP changes to reconcile NSS have proven costly and disappointing.
Admit it, MHYS just one of those public co's lacking market experience and just don't have a clue how to manage the timing of a R/S vs raising money to execute its business plan ...shareholder conference slip up deja vu IMO
glad I can help
not MM's ...prop traders [instructing multiple MM] setting bid and ask ...
don't exert yourself "huge" will always be subjective and the pennies are nothing but construed of the subjective
huge is a subjective term
IF you're in disagreement with 2cent bid, why don't you put in a bid to buy at least at .2798?
ANY SETTLEMENT YET? March 7 closer& closer
2cent bid ...just about right?
Where's the bid support?
To the point ...Absolutely best post
what makes you think he's taken any of my money?
I know there's plenty of $$ available for the right projects
D comes off 20 business days from time of placement, but I've seen certs not land in the hands of Brokers for 90 days...all depends what MHYS has planned and when they want to initiate their plans
maybe maybe not...less has been paid out in punitive in higher profile cases
either way...still has to be paid..the pressure's on
If that were the case...I'm sure they would have APPEALED by now;
How many more Infringement Filings can Playboy file to wear thin CIRC finances before litigation proceeds? ... &how many shares can CIRC sell to continue paying for representation?
what news? Playboy lost, and Cirtran either gets to roll the ball or get compensated! either way, shareholders make dollar! can't believe why this is still at present pps. jig is up! we roll!