Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Sara Fuks Sara Fuks has spent the bulk of her 17-year legal career in the plaintiffs’ securities class action bar. After graduating law school, Sara joined the litigation department at a top national law firm, Dewey Ballantine, LLP, where she focused on general commercial litigation. Sara went on to prosecute numerous ERISA and securities class actions as an associate at Milberg LLP, learning that her passion lies in recovering losses for aggrieved investors. Sara joined the Rosen Law Firm in 2012 and became the first female partner at the firm in 2022. She has secured hundreds of millions of dollars for investors as lead or co-lead counsel.
Among the significant recoveries Sara has been instrumental in obtaining are a $110 million settlement in the Fiat Chrysler Automobiles securities class action (S.D.N.Y. 2019) in which the Rosen Law Firm served as co-lead counsel, and a $28.75 million settlement in the Och-Ziff Capital Management Group securities class action (S.D.N.Y. 2019) in which the Rosen Law Firm served as co-lead counsel.
Sara was selected to SuperLawyers in 2021-2023 and SuperLawyers Rising Stars in 2017-2019.
https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/sara-fuks/
Here is fraudulent Beplate from 2013, bullshitting everyone, how wonderful the elusive fictional magic bandage was back then. And now, over a decade later, we still, starting with the FDA, cannot ever see this fantastical magic bandage. You calling this a startup after well over a decade of complete failure and fraud is entirely misleading and indicative of how Ponzi Scheme operators manipulate the gullible. Beplate must be laughing and smiling at the thought of how naive his marks for the con are.
Douglas Beplate from 2013 linked here
"F. UHP Acknowledges Its Financial Statements Were False"
"InterContinental Miami’s spacious suites and oversized standard rooms provide premium space to host your critical business meetings in comfort and style" https://global.natpe.com/
"Beplate Profited by Selling Millions...During the Fraud Period and Failed to Report His Stock Sales"
https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2022/comp25413.pdf
ueec_con_men now claiming the sec is fraudulent?...https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2022/comp25413.pdf
The SEC found no shortage of fraud. Where is it coming from? Here is the SEC's answer:
FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Exchange Act Section IO(b) and Rule 10b-5 Thereunder
(UHP and Beplate)
SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Exchange Act Section I0(b) and Rules IOb-S(a) and (c) Thereunder
(Schiliro)
THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Aiding and Abetting Violations of Exchange Act Section lO(b) and Rule 10b-5(b)
(Schiliro)
FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Securities Act Section 17(a)
(All Defendants)
FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Exchange Act Section 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B)
of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 Thereunder
(UHP)
SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Aiding and Abetting Violations of Exchange Act Section 13(a),
13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)2)B), and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13
(Beplate and Schiliro)
SEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violation of Section 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rule 13b2-1
(Beplate and Schiliro)
EIGHTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Exchange Act Section 13(a) and Rule 13a-14 Thereunder
(Beplate)
NINTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Rule 13b2-2 of the Exchange Act
(Beplate and Schiliro)
TENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 304(a)
(Bcplatc)
ELEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Exchange Act Section 16(a) and Rule 16a-3 Thereunder
(Beplate)
"Absolutely incorrect. The company is under no obligation to release facts. uhp has only published boasts and promises, which are never facts.
You nor anyone else knows a thing about this company because they've never released info that can be verified.
Don't even come here and state you have facts. There are no facts about uhp except the court documents and filings of law enforcement.
Those are the only facts that are here. None of your pumpery is facts...."
Zorax
Re: GetRch$lwly post# 12852
Thursday, January 11, 2024 11:04:09 PM
Post# 12862 of 12873
Someone read this very slowly to Rodman...https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2022/comp25413.pdf
1.This is an accounting fraud case arising from schemes by UHP's then-Chief
Executive Officer, Beplate, and then-Chief Operating Officer, Schiliro, to fraudulently report
inflated revenues and receivables in the Forms 10-Q and 10-K for 2017 and 2018 UHP filed with
the Commission.
2. UHP is a manufacturer of hemostatic gauze for the healthcare and wound care
sectors. During 2017, UHP recorded two fraudulent sales that materially overstated its reported
revenue and accounts receivable balances in its publicly-filed financial statements. The first
fraudulent transaction involved a purported March 31, 2017 sale of product to a customer based
on Beplate's and Schiliro's procurement in early May 2017 of a sham, back-dated purchase
order. The customer formally cancelled the order the following day, UHP never shipped the
product to the customer, and no payment was sought or received from the customer.
Nevertheless, UHP reported the transaction as first quarter 2017 revenue from the "sale" and the
full amount in its accounts receivable balance in its Forms I0-Q for the first three quarters of
2017.
3. The second fraudulent transaction involved Beplate and Schiliro orchestrating the
recognition of a purported December 20, 2017 sale of product to UHP's largest customer that
was delivered in February 2018. However, the customer never agreed to purchase the product.
Despite the fact that there was no legitimate sale, UHP reported it as revenue and included the
full amount in its accounts receivable balance in its 2017 Form 10-K annual financial statements,
and continued to report it as part of its total accounts receivable balances in its 2018 Forms I0-Q.
4. To conceal their fraud and justify the revenues and receivables being recognized,
Beplate and Schiliro repeatedly gave UHP's auditors false explanations about the purported sales
2
Case 1:22-cv-03612 Document 1 Filed 06/08/22 Page 2 of 44 PageID: 2
and concealed the true facts and circumstances surrounding them. They also directly or
indirectly provided the auditors with false documents, including bogus sales invoices and
incorrect shipping documentation and falsified accounting records, and Beplate lied to UHP's
auditors in quarterly and annual management representation letters.
5. As a result of Beplate's and Schiliro's fraud, UHP reported materially overstated
total revenues and accounts receivable balances in its Forms 10-Q and 10-K for 2017 and 2018,
each of which Beplate signed and falsely certified.
VIOLATIONS
6. By virtue of the foregoing conduct and the conduct alleged further herein,
Defendant UHP violated Section l 7(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act) [ 15
U.S.C. $ 77q(a)]; Sections 10(b), 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") [ 15 U.S.C. $$ 78j(b), 78m(a), 78m(b)2)A) and 78m(b)(2)(B)]
and Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13 [17 CF.R. $$ 240.10b-5, 240.12b-20, 240.13a-1 and
240. 13a-13] thereunder;
7. Defendant Beplate violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C.$
77q(a)]; Sections l0(b), 13(b)(5) and 16(a) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78m(b)(5)
and 78p(a)] and Rules 10b-5, 13a-14, 13b2-1, 13b2-2 and 16a-3 [17 C.F.R. $$ 240.10b-5,
240.13a-14, 240.13b2-1, 240.13b2-2 and 240.16a-3] thereunder; Section 304(a) of the SarbanesOxley Act of2002 [15 U.S.C. § 7243(a)]; and aided and abetted UHP's violations of Sections
13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. $$ 78m(a), 78m(b)(2)(A) and
78m(b)(2)(B)] and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13 [17 CF.R. $$ 240.12b-20, 240.13a-1 and
240. 13a-13] thereunder; and
8. Defendant Schiliro violated Section l 7(a) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. §
3 Case 1:22-cv-03612 Document 1 Filed 06/08/22 Page 3 of 44 PageID: 3
77q(a)]; Sections 10(b) and 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. $$ 78jb) and 78m(b)(5)]
and Rules 10b-5(a), 10b-5(c), 13b2-1 and 13b2-2 [17 CF.R. $$ 240.10b-5(a), 240.10b-5(c),
240. 13b2-1 and 240. 13b2-2] thereunder; and aided and abetted UHP's violations of Sections
10(b), 13(a), 13(b)2)A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. $$ 78jb), 78m(a),
78m(b)(2)(A) and 78m(b)(2)(B)] and Rules 10b-5(b), 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 [17 C.F.R. $$
240.10b-5(b), 240.12b-20, 240.13a-1 and 240.13a-13] thereunder.
9. Unless Defendants are restrained and enjoined, they will continue to engage in the
acts, practices, transactions, and courses of business set forth in this Complaint or in acts,
practices, transactions, and courses of business of similar type and object.
NATURE OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND RELIEF SOUGHT
10. The Commission brings this action pursuant to the authority conferred upon it by
Exchange Act Section 2l(d) [15 U.S.C. $ 78ud)] and Sections 20(b), 20(d) and 20(e) of the
Securities Act [15 U.S.C. §§ 77t(b), 77t(d) and 77t(e)].
11. The Commission seeks a final judgment: (a) restraining and permanently
enjoining Defendants from violating the federal securities laws and rules this Complaint alleges
they have violated; (b) ordering Defendants to pay civil money penalties pursuant to Section
20(d) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(d)] and Section 2l(d)(3) of the Exchange Act [15
U.S.C. $ 78u(d)(3)]; (c) permanently prohibiting Beplate and Schiliro from serving as an officer
or director of any company that has a class of securities registered under Exchange Act Section
12 [ 15 U.S.C. § 781], or that is required to file reports under Exchange Act Section 15(d)
[15 U.S.C. § 78o(d)], pursuant to Exchange Act Section 21(d)2) [15 U.S.C. $ 78u(@)2)] and
Securities Act Section 20(e) [15 U.S.C. U.S.C. $ 77t(e)]; (d) ordering that Beplate reimburse
UHP for all bonuses, incentive-based and equity-based compensation, and/or profits realized
4 Case 1:22-cv-03612 Document 1 Filed 06/08/22 Page 4 of 44 PageID: 4
from his sale of UHP stock pursuant to Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 [15
U.S.C. $ 7243(a)]; and (c) ordering any other and further relief the Court may deem just and
proper.
A Ponzi scheme is an investment fraud that pays existing investors with funds collected from new investors. Ponzi scheme organizers often promise to invest your money and generate high returns with little or no risk. But in many Ponzi schemes, the fraudsters do not invest the money.
keywords below include nonexistent enterprise:
1.This is an accounting fraud case arising from schemes by UHP's then-Chief
Executive Officer, Beplate, and then-Chief Operating Officer, Schiliro, to fraudulently report
inflated revenues and receivables in the Forms 10-Q and 10-K for 2017 and 2018 UHP filed with
the Commission.
2. UHP is a manufacturer of hemostatic gauze for the healthcare and wound care
sectors. During 2017, UHP recorded two fraudulent sales that materially overstated its reported
revenue and accounts receivable balances in its publicly-filed financial statements. The first
fraudulent transaction involved a purported March 31, 2017 sale of product to a customer based
on Beplate's and Schiliro's procurement in early May 2017 of a sham, back-dated purchase
order. The customer formally cancelled the order the following day, UHP never shipped the
product to the customer, and no payment was sought or received from the customer.
Nevertheless, UHP reported the transaction as first quarter 2017 revenue from the "sale" and the
full amount in its accounts receivable balance in its Forms I0-Q for the first three quarters of
2017.
3. The second fraudulent transaction involved Beplate and Schiliro orchestrating the
recognition of a purported December 20, 2017 sale of product to UHP's largest customer that
was delivered in February 2018. However, the customer never agreed to purchase the product.
Despite the fact that there was no legitimate sale, UHP reported it as revenue and included the
full amount in its accounts receivable balance in its 2017 Form 10-K annual financial statements,
and continued to report it as part of its total accounts receivable balances in its 2018 Forms I0-Q.
4. To conceal their fraud and justify the revenues and receivables being recognized,
Beplate and Schiliro repeatedly gave UHP's auditors false explanations about the purported sales
2
Case 1:22-cv-03612 Document 1 Filed 06/08/22 Page 2 of 44 PageID: 2
and concealed the true facts and circumstances surrounding them. They also directly or
indirectly provided the auditors with false documents, including bogus sales invoices and
incorrect shipping documentation and falsified accounting records, and Beplate lied to UHP's
auditors in quarterly and annual management representation letters.
5. As a result of Beplate's and Schiliro's fraud, UHP reported materially overstated
total revenues and accounts receivable balances in its Forms 10-Q and 10-K for 2017 and 2018,
each of which Beplate signed and falsely certified.
VIOLATIONS
6. By virtue of the foregoing conduct and the conduct alleged further herein,
Defendant UHP violated Section l 7(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act) [ 15
U.S.C. $ 77q(a)]; Sections 10(b), 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") [ 15 U.S.C. $$ 78j(b), 78m(a), 78m(b)2)A) and 78m(b)(2)(B)]
and Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13 [17 CF.R. $$ 240.10b-5, 240.12b-20, 240.13a-1 and
240. 13a-13] thereunder;
7. Defendant Beplate violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C.$
77q(a)]; Sections l0(b), 13(b)(5) and 16(a) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78m(b)(5)
and 78p(a)] and Rules 10b-5, 13a-14, 13b2-1, 13b2-2 and 16a-3 [17 C.F.R. $$ 240.10b-5,
240.13a-14, 240.13b2-1, 240.13b2-2 and 240.16a-3] thereunder; Section 304(a) of the SarbanesOxley Act of2002 [15 U.S.C. § 7243(a)]; and aided and abetted UHP's violations of Sections
13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. $$ 78m(a), 78m(b)(2)(A) and
78m(b)(2)(B)] and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13 [17 CF.R. $$ 240.12b-20, 240.13a-1 and
240. 13a-13] thereunder; and
8. Defendant Schiliro violated Section l 7(a) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. §
3
Case 1:22-cv-03612 Document 1 Filed 06/08/22 Page 3 of 44 PageID: 3
77q(a)]; Sections 10(b) and 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. $$ 78jb) and 78m(b)(5)]
and Rules 10b-5(a), 10b-5(c), 13b2-1 and 13b2-2 [17 CF.R. $$ 240.10b-5(a), 240.10b-5(c),
240. 13b2-1 and 240. 13b2-2] thereunder; and aided and abetted UHP's violations of Sections
10(b), 13(a), 13(b)2)A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. $$ 78jb), 78m(a),
78m(b)(2)(A) and 78m(b)(2)(B)] and Rules 10b-5(b), 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 [17 C.F.R. $$
240.10b-5(b), 240.12b-20, 240.13a-1 and 240.13a-13] thereunder.
9. Unless Defendants are restrained and enjoined, they will continue to engage in the
acts, practices, transactions, and courses of business set forth in this Complaint or in acts,
practices, transactions, and courses of business of similar type and object.
NATURE OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND RELIEF SOUGHT
10. The Commission brings this action pursuant to the authority conferred upon it by
Exchange Act Section 2l(d) [15 U.S.C. $ 78ud)] and Sections 20(b), 20(d) and 20(e) of the
Securities Act [15 U.S.C. §§ 77t(b), 77t(d) and 77t(e)].
11. The Commission seeks a final judgment: (a) restraining and permanently
enjoining Defendants from violating the federal securities laws and rules this Complaint alleges
they have violated; (b) ordering Defendants to pay civil money penalties pursuant to Section
20(d) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(d)] and Section 2l(d)(3) of the Exchange Act [15
U.S.C. $ 78u(d)(3)]; (c) permanently prohibiting Beplate and Schiliro from serving as an officer
or director of any company that has a class of securities registered under Exchange Act Section
12 [ 15 U.S.C. § 781], or that is required to file reports under Exchange Act Section 15(d)
[15 U.S.C. § 78o(d)], pursuant to Exchange Act Section 21(d)2) [15 U.S.C. $ 78u(@)2)] and
Securities Act Section 20(e) [15 U.S.C. U.S.C. $ 77t(e)]; (d) ordering that Beplate reimburse
UHP for all bonuses, incentive-based and equity-based compensation, and/or profits realized
4
Case 1:22-cv-03612 Document 1 Filed 06/08/22 Page 4 of 44 PageID: 4
from his sale of UHP stock pursuant to Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 [15
U.S.C. $ 7243(a)]; and (c) ordering any other and further relief the Court may deem just and
proper.
https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2022/comp25413.pdf
Who are the fraudulent, thieving parasites who have put out bogus PR's for over a decade?
I think he is referring to a stock ticker symbol.
Only jackasses with more money than brains buy.into.Ponzi.schemes. There is no product, no revenues, no company...only internet con artists.
FWIW, money and funding is not an issue. An offer of assistance in that regard was not needed.
No surf, my neighbor's parrot told me. Anything else?
" Anyone can pick up a phone and start calling the Bourbon Room, individuals involved, networks. agents, people in Hollywood, etc.. There are many people who are involved in different capacities." I copied and posted this from a previous post surf. Again, this is not a secret under wraps. When I speak to multiple people and hear similar things; I am clued I am getting it straight. I haven't even mentioned there is work being done to set up future shows. Are you interested? There are plenty of people with knowledge about this to contact who are involved in different capacities.
Thanks for the interest. I'll try to put up more info. I have limited time. And we should be getting information shortly straight from the sources.
If you scroll down about one third to one quarter of the page, there are a number of CONFIRMED BUYERS INCLUDE .... Mr..Blagman used to work for Disney as the national sales manager. He has extensive experience dealing with these individuals in this capacity. He has been attending natpe for decades and was a lot younger than he is now when he started at these events, Lauren, the executive producer for HAD, was worldwide director for advertising for Pepsi. There is substantial experience and knowledge of how to position HAD for unparalleled global success. He isn't "pitching" Hollywood After Dark" in a manner like some would have you believe. It is already a known quantity. There are several matters, while seeming like small details to us, are important matters for long term global success in every market (no market is being taken for granted). The most major of these matters is a significant offer from one network is in hand but it is not the network he wants in that particular market (one out of dozens of countries). And that other network is already far along in negotiations. Other than that, it is all about positioning the product for maximum success. A lot certainly will come out of this conference.
With all the negative hype, I actually started communicating about this to see what was going on. Don't believe the bullshit about HAD being dead from Angels, or the other bullshit about it being pitched. It has been out of post production for months and extensively reviewed and negotiated by the key people involved, for quite some time, with many terrific deals already in place and finalized. Looking at Mr. Blagman's past ventures and success (Poker After Dark being among them); he knows exactly what he is doing, what he wants, and the way he wants it to happen and unfold.
What kind of news is anyone expecting? Anything specific or just general?
10- ALL I KNOW IS - I have held this stock for the better of 5 years. I have sold shares when years were good. I have held these shares as times have sucked through 2023.
Thanks tahoe5star. Miami is absolutely correct. Mr. Blagman is a regular at natpe events. Examining the attendees, their are several key players Mr. Blagman needs to sit down with face to face and position HAD with for maximum success. He can do it most efficiently all in one place. Here's to wishing him and his investors the very best.
Food for thought:
spon·sor /spän(t)s?r/ noun
1. an individual or organization that pays some or all of the costs involved in staging a sporting or artistic event in return for advertising.
"the production cost $50,000, most coming from local sponsors"
Food for thought. We have been told that they have sponsors and per the website,
.
So why do they need to go to a convention to pitch the show? Just saying............................
Here are two versions of an entertaining saying that is usually credited to Abraham Lincoln or Mark Twain:
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt.
It’s better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than open it and remove all doubt.
Thank you SEC for exposing this fraudulent scam.
Over a decade of bullshit bait_&_switch PR's demonstrate only fools would fall for this Ponzi Scheme run by internet con artists pretending to be shareholders and investors.
Don't know what we're yessing about with this_POS_dead_company!!
Yes!!???? ueec down 90% over the past 5 years according to the 5 year price chart on ycharts.com
Yes!!???? ueec=strong sell candidate ueec strong sell candidate according to stockinvest.us
My focus is twofold...the show(s) and business. The share price will take care of itself given those two variables. Scammers worry about the stock price because there is no viable business behind the stock. I'm not worried in the least. Are you worried about my investment?
Surf, I gave an outline where to start making calls to gather information. This show is hardly a secret in Hollywood. Reread my post. There is no shortage of people with direct involvement and indirect involvement. I doubt you have genuine interest. If you do, work the phones. If one person does not talk to you; call another. If anyone is striking out everywhere they turn, I'd suggest changing one's attitude may help. I know a lot more than I am saying. And there are other details I have not uncovered. You can spout all the bullshit you want. But it is fact this show is very professionally done, well know by key individuals in the entertainment industry, and definitely is going to debut. I'm very happy holding this long term. People don't realize how big this is going to be and the scope and reach of the project. More importantly from my point of view and interests, it is being done the right way both from a business and entertainment standpoint. In both those respects, it has exceeded my expectations I had when I invested. I'm not a TV watcher. But I'm very anxious to see this one and watch it grow.
He did not inform you how many shares he would sell nor how many he would hold at various stages. Neither did he say at what price. I think everyone can see through the bullshit you are trying to pass.
Everyone is calling it Hollywood After Dark. So to my knowledge it is its own entity. I am not privy to any details however. So anything is possible. From everything I gather, it will debut under the name Hollywood After Dark as it appears in Brian Gartland Entertainment in all markets. It will be its own show in every market from the way people are talking..
Crock of insipid bullshit rodman. You can't be serious?
Well II spoke to Les Paul and others have voiced our displeasure with the job Stephen Squires performed.
His lack of attentiveness to timely SEC filing did result in the QTMM delisting no doubt! That being said the company was well on its way to reporting but the SEC standard 180 filing demand letter was not sufficient for the company to comply with.
I believe the technology will be purchased or we will eventually see a merger but I believe we as investors will see our investments recovered. Read into the posts here as you will but don't take one persons opinion!
The company will once again be up listing IMO!
Stay tuned!
If he is dumping shares, he will regret it. BTW, I'm laughing at all your bullshit. You picked the wrong stock to bash. I remember how shocked you were at the filming. The day will come when you are completely mortified. I'm very comfortable and relaxed after a few phone calls. I'm not getting played. And this has blockbuster potential.
A certain poster here with a hundred million shares according to him is the one who really played you guys. Dumped dem all at 3.
I've begun doing my first DD since early summer. Here's what I'm starting to find. I take my credibility very seriously. Anyone can pick up a phone and start calling the Bourbon Room, individuals involved, networks. agents, people in Hollywood, etc.. There are many people who are involved in different capacities. I don't suggest what anyone else should do. But I am not lightening up a very heavy position. There is nothing funny going on. No fraud. All the filings are honest and transparent. There is cooperation and integrity between mwwc and Mr. Blagman. The financing all went smoothly. Financing and sponsors are not an issue hindering anything. My 90% figure was a little high. But the vast majority of worldwide syndication is locked up nevertheless. The only thing that needs to be finalized are deals with a major network in the US and several important networks in foreign countries. The deals are in place and only minor issues remain to be worked out (I'm hoping for a great timeslot...that's my personal big deal). But everyone in LA I am talking to speaks very highly of Mr. Blagman and Hollywood After Dark. My only criticism is I think this needs more publicity to the general public. Evidently it is getting plenty of attention in Hollywood and the entertainment industry. But after talking to a number of people I have no doubt this is going through. This is hardly a typical OTC stock. Take a good look at the people involved. Oh, and by the way, Afrobeats will be coming to Hollywood After Dark sooner rather than later. I think everyone is going to be very surprised. It was very quiet just before the original filming too. But again, this a well known quantity in Hollywood.👌👍️
He would be hyping it if he needed sponsors or finances. I remember Lauren talking about France with certainty months ago. You can't convince me this is dead in dozens of countries. Brian Garland has shows that have been airing for years seeking sponsors like HAD. Something is causing silence though. Actually forcing it.
Only Ponzi scheme operators encourage ignoring common sense.
He already has filmed with the sponsors he has in August. I don't see that delaying anything at the point they have reached.
Here's the thing. Mr. Blagman has been ready to announce since as far back as September by all accounts and especially towards the end of the year. I'm sure he can do 90% of what he intended. The expensive things are already accomplished and it is out of post production. I do not think it is finances holding it up at this point. It makes no sense not to follow through from here. It's too silent. A major component does not want an announcement and wants the debut in my opinion.
"Sad ending here?"